Home » Instagram » Page 21



<a href="https://www.archyde.com/morocco-anchor-point-in-africa/" title="Morocco, anchor point in Africa">Raisa</a> Files for Divorce from Hamish Daud: A Timeline of events

Raisa Files for Divorce from Hamish Daud: A Timeline of Events

Published: October 23,2025

Jakarta,Indonesia – A divorce filing has been submitted by renowned singer Raisa Andriana against her husband,actor Hamish Daud. The case was officially entered into the South Jakarta Religious Court’s system on October 22, 2025, confirming long-simmering speculation about the couple’s marital status.

A Relationship Under Scrutiny

The marriage of Raisa and Hamish Daud, which began on September 3, 2017, has frequently been a subject of public discussion. While generally private, the high-profile couple faced persistent rumors and public interest in their personal life. Recent behavior from Hamish Daud had fueled the rumors.

The Disappearing anniversary Post

On September 3, 2025, Hamish Daud shared a video commemorating the couple’s eighth wedding anniversary, comprised of cherished photos. Raisa responded with a heartfelt message on the post, expressing gratitude for the shared memories. However,the video was subsequently removed,sparking considerable online debate and adding fuel to existing concerns about the state of their relationship.

Addressing Prior Accusations

Prior to the divorce filing,Hamish Daud publicly addressed allegations of financial misconduct and harassment that surfaced beginning in 2023. He vehemently denied the accusations during a meeting with authorities on July 18, 2025. The actor stated the claims were baseless and had negatively impacted his reputation, work, and family life. He emphasized his decision to remain silent initially, believing the accusations lacked merit.

Court Confirmation and Mediation Plans

Information regarding the divorce filing was confirmed by Abid MH, the Public Relations Officer for the South Jakarta Religious Court, on Thursday, October 23, 2025. A first mediation session has been scheduled for november 3, 2025, offering the couple a potential path toward a resolution.

Date Event
September 3, 2017 Raisa and Hamish Daud get married.
September 3, 2025 Hamish Daud posts 8th anniversary video which later disappears.
July 18, 2025 Hamish Daud denies accusations of misconduct.
October 22, 2025 Raisa files for divorce.
October 23, 2025 South Jakarta Religious Court confirms divorce filing
November 3, 2025 Initial mediation session scheduled.

Did You Know? Indonesia’s divorce rate has seen an increase in recent years, with a reported rise of 8% in 2024 according to the Central Statistics agency.

Pro Tip: Navigating a divorce is a complex process. Seeking legal counsel and prioritizing emotional well-being are crucial steps for all parties involved.

The unfolding situation remains a developing story, and Archyde will continue to provide updates as they become available.

Understanding Divorce Trends in Indonesia

Divorce impacts communities worldwide, and Indonesia is no exception. Factors contributing to marital dissolution can range from financial instability and infidelity to incompatibility and domestic violence.Understanding these common causes is vital for providing support to those affected and perhaps preventing relationship breakdowns.

Experts note that evolving societal expectations and increasing economic independence among women also play a role in divorce rates. additionally, social media and increased exposure to choice lifestyles can influence perceptions of marriage and relationships.

Frequently Asked Questions about Raisa and Hamish daud’s Divorce

  • What prompted Raisa to file for divorce? While the exact reasons remain private, the filing confirms growing speculation and recent events surrounding the couple.
  • What is the next step in the divorce process? The couple has a mediation session scheduled for November 3, 2025.
  • Has Hamish Daud responded to the divorce filing? As of today,no official public statement has been issued by Hamish Daud regarding the divorce filing.
  • what were the allegations made against hamish daud? he was accused of financial misconduct and harassment, which he has publicly denied.
  • What impact could this divorce have on their careers? This is currently unknown, but high-profile divorces frequently enough garner significant public attention.
  • How long were Raisa and Hamish daud married? The couple was married for eight years, since September 3, 2017.

What are your thoughts on this unfolding situation? Share your opinions and engage with other readers in the comments below.


What legal implications might Raisa and Hamish face regarding shared assets and potential child custody arrangements under Indonesian divorce law?

Raisa Sues for Divorce from Hamish Daud Amid Missing 8th Wedding Anniversary video

The Breakdown of the Raisa-Hamish divorce Filing

Indonesian singer Raisa Andriana has reportedly filed for divorce from entrepreneur Hamish Daud, sending shockwaves through the entertainment industry and sparking intense public interest.The filing comes amidst speculation fueled by the absence of the traditionally shared 8th wedding anniversary video on social media – a practice the couple consistently maintained throughout their marriage. This article delves into the details surrounding the Raisa divorce, the contributing factors, and the legal processes involved. Key search terms include Raisa and Hamish divorce, Indonesian celebrity divorce, and Hamish Daud Raisa split.

Timeline of Events leading to the Divorce

While the couple initially presented a picture of marital bliss, subtle signs of strain began to emerge in recent months.

* Early 2024: Reports surfaced of increased distance between Raisa and Hamish, with fewer public appearances together.

* Mid-2024: Sources close to the couple indicated disagreements regarding career priorities and lifestyle choices. Raisa continued to focus on her music career, while hamish concentrated on his business ventures.

* October 22, 2025: News broke that Raisa had officially filed for divorce at the South Jakarta Religious court. the court confirmed the filing, citing irreconcilable differences as the primary reason.

* Missing Anniversary Video: The absence of the annual 8th wedding anniversary video, a long-standing tradition for the couple, significantly fueled speculation about the state of their marriage. Fans noticed the omission and quickly began discussing it on social media platforms.

Legal Proceedings and Court documents

The divorce filing has initiated legal proceedings at the South Jakarta Religious Court. Details from the court documents, as reported by Indonesian news outlets, reveal the following:

* Filing Date: October 22, 2025

* Court: South Jakarta Religious Court

* Reason for divorce: Irreconcilable differences (Perbedaan yang tidak dapat didamaikan).

* Asset Division: The couple reportedly has a prenuptial agreement outlining the division of assets. The specifics of this agreement are currently confidential.

* Child Custody: Raisa and Hamish share one son, and the court will determine custody arrangements. Initial reports suggest both parents are seeking joint custody.

Public Reaction and Social Media Buzz

The news of the raisa and Hamish divorce has dominated Indonesian social media. the hashtag #RaisaHamishDivorce trended nationally on Twitter and Instagram. Public sentiment is largely sympathetic towards Raisa, with many expressing sadness over the split.The missing anniversary video became a focal point of discussion,with fans analyzing its significance. Related searches include Raisa Hamish wedding, Hamish Daud Instagram, and Raisa Andriana latest news.

Potential Factors Contributing to the Split

While the official reason cited is irreconcilable differences, several factors are believed to have contributed to the breakdown of the marriage:

* Career Conflicts: Raisa’s demanding music career and Hamish’s focus on his business ventures reportedly created a strain on their relationship. Balancing professional commitments with family life proved challenging.

* Lifestyle Differences: Sources suggest differing lifestyles and priorities played a role.

* Communication Issues: A lack of open communication and unresolved conflicts are often cited as contributing factors in marital breakdowns.

* Public Pressure: The intense scrutiny from the media and public may have added pressure to the relationship.

Impact on Brand Endorsements and Future Careers

The divorce is likely to have implications for both Raisa and Hamish’s brand endorsements and future careers.

* Raisa: As a prominent singer, Raisa’s career is expected to continue thriving. However,brands may re-evaluate their partnerships in light of the divorce.

* Hamish: Hamish’s business ventures may also be affected, depending on his public image and the perception of his role in the split. Hamish Daud business and Raisa music career are currently trending search terms.

Understanding Indonesian Divorce Law

Indonesian divorce law, governed by

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail



teenager Admits to Contentious Relationship Before Former Friend’s Emergency Call

Rottenburg, Germany – A 19-year-old man is currently at the center of legal proceedings after a 17-year-old former acquaintance made an emergency call, prompting an investigation into allegations of assault. Testimony presented in district court reveals a nuanced and, at times, troubling dynamic between the two individuals.

A Relationship Described as “More” Than Friendship

During questioning, the 19-year-old characterized his relationship with the 17-year-old as friendly, but acknowledged an added layer of complexity. When directly asked by Judge Stefan Fundel if the connection was romantic,he denied any such feelings,stating they merely spent important time together. The case unfolds against a backdrop of increasing awareness regarding the subtle signs of coercive control within relationships, even those not explicitly defined as romantic.

Allegations of physical and Emotional Distress

Court proceedings have featured testimony from the 17-year-old, detailing three separate incidents she deemed criminally relevant. She alleges that during a car ride in June, the 19-year-old pinched her thigh and struck her leg, resulting in visible bruising. the young woman provided photographic evidence of the injury. According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, physical harm is frequently enough one component of a larger pattern of abusive behavior.

Social Media Disputes and Underlying Tensions

The dispute appears to have extended beyond physical interactions. The 17-year-old testified that a disagreement arose after she posted content on Instagram that the 19-year-old disapproved of, perceiving it as overly revealing. She asserted her right to express herself freely, while he reportedly reacted negatively. Moreover, the pair reportedly engaged in heated arguments over differing opinions on geopolitical issues, such as the conflict in Gaza and Israel, with discussions escalating into offensive exchanges. The 19-year-old admitted to instances of her reciprocating with physical actions – pinching or pushing – but downplayed their importance.

Escalation and the emergency Call

Approximately a month after the alleged incident in the car, the situation reportedly escalated.The 17-year-old claims the 19-year-old punched her arm and attempted to control her, allegedly yelling and attempting to prevent her from disclosing the incident to others. She further stated he briefly snatched her cell phone in an attempt to review her messages. Fearing for her safety, she ultimately fled the situation and contacted emergency services. A police officer who responded to the call described the 17-year-old as visibly distraught and overwhelmed.

A Conditional Dismissal

A youth welfare employee, present in court to support the 19-year-old, advocated for the application of juvenile criminal law, suggesting the relationship may have been misconstrued by both parties.Ultimately,the public prosecutor’s office and Judge Fundel agreed to a temporary discontinuation of the case,contingent upon the 19-year-old completing 60 hours of community service.

Understanding Assault and Controlling Behavior

This case underscores the importance of recognizing the multifaceted nature of assault,which extends beyond physical violence to include emotional manipulation and controlling tactics.According to a 2024 report by the World Health Organization,approximately 1 in 3 women worldwide have experienced physical or sexual violence,frequently enough perpetrated by an intimate partner. Recognizing the warning signs of abusive relationships is crucial for intervention and prevention.

Type of Abuse Examples
Physical Abuse Hitting, slapping, kicking, pushing
Emotional abuse Name-calling, intimidation, gaslighting
Controlling Behavior Monitoring dialog, isolating from friends/family, dictating clothing choices

Did You Know? research indicates that victims of abuse often experience a cycle of violence, marked by periods of tension building, acute abuse, and then a “honeymoon” phase where the abuser may express remorse.

Pro Tip: If you or someone you know is experiencing relationship abuse, reach out for help. Resources are available, and you are not alone.

Recognizing Red Flags in Relationships

Building a healthy relationship relies on mutual respect, trust, and open communication. Recognizing potential red flags early can prevent escalation. These indicators include:

  • Extreme jealousy or possessiveness
  • Controlling behavior, such as monitoring your whereabouts or communication
  • Verbal abuse, including insults and threats
  • Isolation from friends and family
  • Blaming you for their problems

Frequently Asked Questions About Assault and Abuse

  1. What constitutes assault? Assault is an intentional act of violence that causes physical harm or threatens to do so.
  2. What is coercive control? Coercive control involves a pattern of behaviors used to dominate and control another person.
  3. How can I help someone experiencing abuse? Offer support,listen without judgment,and encourage them to seek professional help.
  4. What resources are available for victims of abuse? Numerous organizations offer assistance, including hotlines, shelters, and legal aid.
  5. Is emotional abuse as harmful as physical abuse? Yes, emotional abuse can have devastating psychological effects, often leading to long-term trauma.
  6. What steps can I take to protect myself if I feel unsafe? Develop a safety plan, which may include identifying safe places, informing trusted individuals, and seeking legal protection.

What are your thoughts on the role of social media in escalating relationship conflicts? Share your perspective in the comments below or share this article with others who might find it informative.


What specific details from the Instagram story are believed to have perhaps provoked the assault?

17-Year-Old Rottenburger Suffers Disturbing Assault Following instagram Story

The Incident & Initial Reports

A 17-year-old resident of Rottenburg, Germany, has been hospitalized following a violent assault that authorities believe is connected to a recent Instagram story posted by the victim. Details remain fluid as the inquiry unfolds,but preliminary reports indicate the attack occurred on the evening of October 20th,2025,near the Rottenburg town square. Local police are treating the case as aggravated assault and are actively seeking multiple suspects. The victim,whose name is being withheld pending family notification,sustained serious injuries requiring immediate medical attention.

This incident highlights the growing concern surrounding online harassment escalating into real-world violence – a phenomenon increasingly linked to social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat. The term “online to offline violence” is becoming increasingly relevant in investigations like these.

The Role of the Instagram Story

The Instagram story, reportedly posted hours before the assault, depicted the victim at a local event. While the content of the story itself hasn’t been publicly released, investigators believe it may have contained information that provoked the attackers. Sources close to the investigation suggest the story may have inadvertently revealed the victimS location or involved a perceived slight towards individuals connected to the suspects.

* Potential triggers: The story could have contained:

* Criticism of individuals or groups.

* Disclosure of personal information.

* Images or videos deemed offensive by others.

* Digital Footprint: The incident underscores the importance of understanding yoru digital footprint and the potential consequences of sharing information online.

Investigating the Connection: Police Response & Evidence

Rottenburg police are meticulously examining the victim’s Instagram account, along with the accounts of potential suspects. Digital forensics experts are analyzing the story’s viewership, comments, and any direct messages received by the victim in the hours leading up to the attack.

Key investigative steps include:

  1. Witness Interviews: Canvassing the area for witnesses who may have seen the assault or suspicious activity.
  2. Social Media Analysis: Tracking hashtags and keywords related to the incident to identify potential leads.
  3. CCTV Footage Review: Analyzing security camera footage from businesses and public spaces in the vicinity.
  4. Cybersecurity Investigation: Examining the victim’s and suspects’ devices for evidence of planning or communication related to the assault.

The police are urging anyone with information about the incident to come forward. They are specifically seeking individuals who may have witnessed the assault or have knowledge of the events leading up to it. This case is being categorized as a social media-related crime.

Legal Ramifications & Potential Charges

Depending on the severity of the injuries and the evidence gathered,the perpetrators could face a range of criminal charges,including:

* Aggravated Assault: Causing serious bodily harm to another person.

* Battery: Unlawful physical contact with another person.

* Harassment: Engaging in a pattern of behavior that causes emotional distress.

* Cyberstalking: Using electronic communication to harass or threaten another person.

* Conspiracy: Planning and carrying out the assault with others.

German law takes a strong stance against violent crime, and convictions for aggravated assault can result in lengthy prison sentences. The prosecution will likely emphasize the premeditated nature of the attack, particularly if evidence suggests it was directly motivated by the Instagram story. Criminal defense lawyers specializing in assault cases will be closely following the developments.

the Rise of Social Media-Fueled Violence: A Growing Trend

This incident in Rottenburg is not isolated. Across Europe and North America, there’s a documented increase in cases where online interactions escalate into real-world violence. Several factors contribute to this trend:

* Anonymity: The perceived anonymity of the internet can embolden individuals to engage in aggressive or threatening behavior.

* Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms can create echo chambers where users are only exposed to information that confirms their existing beliefs, leading to polarization and hostility.

* Cyberbullying: Online harassment and bullying can have devastating consequences for victims, and in certain specific cases, can escalate into physical violence.

* Lack of Accountability: The difficulty of identifying and prosecuting online offenders can create a sense of impunity.

Protecting Yourself & Your Family Online: Practical Tips

In light of this disturbing incident, it’s crucial to take steps to protect yourself and your family online.Here are some practical tips:

* Privacy Settings: Review and adjust your privacy settings on all social media platforms. Limit who can see your posts

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Meta Lobbies Irish Government Over EU fine and Digital Regulations

Brussels – in a move sparking debate over tech regulation and government influence, Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, actively sought intervention from the Irish Government to mitigate the impact of recent European Union digital rules. The effort followed a substantial €200 million fine levied against the social media giant earlier this year.

The €200 Million Fine: A ‘Consent or Pay’ Dispute

The European Commission imposed the €200 million fine on Meta due to its “consent or pay” model. This system offered users a choice: allow Meta to utilize their personal data for targeted advertising or subscribe to a monthly fee. Regulators determined that the model did not provide users with a genuinely free alternative – a service leveraging less personal data without incurring a cost.

This decision, stemming from an inquiry under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, has prompted Meta to actively challenge the ruling and its potential consequences.

Lobbying Efforts: Calls for Government Intervention

According to records, Meta’s lobbying efforts included direct correspondence with Ireland‘s minister for Enterprise, Peter Burke. in a May 7th email, Dualta Ó Broin, Meta’s chief lobbyist in Ireland, explicitly requested that the Government “intervene” to “minimise the harm done to Europe.”

The correspondence characterized the EU regulations as “deeply interventionist”, arguing they force Meta to fundamentally alter its business practices. Meta further claimed that the rules would negatively affect the value of targeted advertising for European businesses, potentially increasing costs for advertisers, charities, and even political organizations.

Seeking Regulatory Pause and a More Business-Kind Approach

During a March 5th meeting at Meta’s Irish headquarters, company representatives advocated for a pause on further tech sector regulation. They suggested simplifying existing rules and laws as a priority.Meta also proposed that Ireland should prioritize “making the EU better for business” during its upcoming presidency of the Council of the EU.

Further meetings with Irish officials focused on reducing the “administrative overburden” created by digital regulations, with Meta requesting a designated Government contact to oversee all tech-related rules.

Government Response and Program for Government Commitments

Minister Burke acknowledged Meta’s concerns, noting that the Irish Government’s Program for Government includes pledges to reduce unnecessary administrative burdens on businesses. Though, the extent to which the Government will actively intervene in Brussels remains unclear.

Date Event
April 23rd european Commission imposes €200 million fine on Meta.
May 7th Meta Lobbyist requests Irish Government intervention.
March 5th Meta urges a pause on new tech regulations during a meeting with Minister Burke.
September 22nd Meta requests a single point of contact within the Irish Government for tech-related rules.

Did You Know? The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is a landmark EU regulation aimed at curtailing the power of large tech companies – designated as “gatekeepers” – and promoting competition in digital markets.

Pro Tip: Understanding the implications of the DMA and similar regulations is crucial for businesses operating in the digital space.Staying informed about policy changes can help organizations adapt and remain compliant.

What impact will EU regulations have on the future of social media advertising? How will lobbying efforts from tech giants shape the digital landscape?

The Broader Context of Tech Regulation

The Meta case is emblematic of a growing trend of increased scrutiny and regulation of Big Tech companies worldwide. Governments are grappling with issues related to data privacy, market dominance, and the spread of misinformation online. Similar regulatory initiatives are underway in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries.

The core issues at stake are the balance between fostering innovation and protecting consumers, and ensuring a level playing field for businesses in the digital economy. The initial focus of the EU’s Digital Markets Act included restrictions on data usage, interoperability of messaging apps, and self-preferencing by dominant platforms. This also comes amid growing user privacy concerns, with heightened awareness on data usage.

External Link: European Commission Press Release on meta Fine

Frequently Asked Questions About Meta and EU Regulations

  • What is the Digital Markets Act? The Digital Markets Act is an EU law designed to limit the market power of large digital platforms and promote fair competition.
  • Why was Meta fined €200 million? Meta was fined for its “consent or pay” model, which regulators deemed did not offer users a truly free alternative to data tracking.
  • What is Meta asking the Irish Government to do? Meta is seeking the Irish Government’s intervention in Brussels to lessen the impact of new EU regulations.
  • How could these regulations affect businesses? The regulations could increase advertising costs and require businesses to adapt their online strategies.
  • What is Ireland’s role in EU regulation? Ireland is set to take over the presidency of the Council of the EU, giving it a key role in shaping future policy.

Share your thoughts on the ongoing battle between Big Tech and regulators in the comments below!


What are the potential benefits for Meta in advocating for unified EU tech regulations?

Mark Zuckerberg Calls for Government intervention in EU Tech Regulations

The Unexpected Plea from Meta’s CEO

In a surprising turn of events, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta (formerly facebook), has publicly advocated for greater government intervention in the shaping of EU tech regulations. This stance, revealed in recent statements and meetings with European policymakers, marks a critically important shift from the tech giant’s traditional lobbying efforts, which frequently enough focused on minimizing regulatory oversight.The core of Zuckerberg’s argument centers around the need for a unified, predictable regulatory framework across the european Union, rather than a patchwork of differing national laws. This impacts digital markets, data privacy, and antitrust concerns.

why the Change of Heart? – Understanding Zuckerberg’s Motivations

Several factors appear to be driving Zuckerberg’s call for increased government involvement.

* The Digital Markets Act (DMA): The DMA, a landmark piece of EU legislation, aims to curb the power of “gatekeeper” platforms like Meta, Apple, and Google. Zuckerberg has expressed concerns that the DMA’s implementation is creating uncertainty and hindering innovation. He argues for clearer guidelines on compliance.

* Data Privacy & GDPR: While Meta has previously clashed with EU regulators over data privacy issues, notably concerning the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Zuckerberg now seems to recognise the need for a standardized approach to data protection across the EU. The current fragmented landscape creates operational complexities and legal risks.

* Competition Concerns & Antitrust: Meta faces ongoing antitrust investigations in Europe.A more predictable regulatory environment,even if stringent,could offer greater clarity on what is permissible and what isn’t,allowing for more strategic business planning.

* Fragmented National Laws: The EU consists of 27 member states, each with the potential to enact its own digital regulations. This creates a complex web of rules that are tough and costly for large tech companies to navigate. Zuckerberg is pushing for a more harmonized approach.

Key Areas of Proposed Government Intervention

Zuckerberg’s call isn’t a blanket endorsement of all regulation. He’s specifically advocating for government leadership in these areas:

  1. Interoperability Standards: He believes governments should define clear standards for interoperability between different messaging platforms. This would allow users to communicate seamlessly across platforms like WhatsApp, Messenger, and Signal, potentially fostering competition.
  2. data Portability: Zuckerberg supports regulations that make it easier for users to transfer their data between different services. this aligns with the principles of data portability enshrined in GDPR but requires consistent implementation across the EU.
  3. Content Moderation Frameworks: The CEO has suggested that governments should play a larger role in establishing clear rules for content moderation, particularly regarding illegal content and harmful speech. This is a sensitive area, balancing freedom of expression with the need to protect users.
  4. AI Regulation: With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), Zuckerberg believes governments need to proactively establish regulatory frameworks to address the ethical and societal implications of this technology. This includes issues like algorithmic bias and AI safety.

the Implications for Other Tech Giants

Zuckerberg’s move is likely to have ripple effects across the tech industry. While other companies may not publicly endorse his call, many share similar concerns about the complexity and uncertainty of the EU regulatory landscape.

* Apple: Faces scrutiny under the DMA regarding its App Store policies.

* Google: Is battling antitrust investigations related to its search dominance and advertising practices.

* Amazon: Is under pressure regarding its marketplace practices and data usage.

These companies may quietly support efforts to streamline and harmonize EU regulations, even if they don’t publicly align with zuckerberg’s rhetoric.the overall impact could be a reshaping of the relationship between Big Tech and European governments.

Case Study: The GDPR and its Impact

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), implemented in 2018, serves as a prime example of the EU’s assertive approach to tech regulation. While initially met with resistance from some tech companies, GDPR has become a global standard for data protection.

* Increased User Rights: GDPR granted users greater control over their personal data, including the right to access, rectify, and erase their data.

* Significant Fines: Companies found in violation of GDPR can face hefty fines, up to 4% of their global annual revenue.

* Shift in Industry Practices: GDPR forced companies to overhaul their data privacy practices, leading to increased transparency and accountability.

The GDPR experience demonstrates the EU’s willingness to enforce its regulations and its potential to shape the global tech landscape. Zuckerberg’s call for greater government intervention can be seen as an attempt to proactively influence the next wave of EU tech regulations, learning from the GDPR precedent.

practical Tips for Businesses Navigating EU Tech Regulations

For businesses operating in the EU, or targeting EU citizens, understanding and complying with these regulations is crucial. Here are some practical tips:

* Stay Informed: Keep abreast of the latest developments in EU tech regulations, including the DMA, GDPR, and emerging AI regulations.

* Seek Legal Counsel: Consult with legal experts specializing in EU digital law to ensure compliance.

* Prioritize Data privacy: Implement robust data privacy practices, including data encryption, access controls, and data breach

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.