Home » israel » Page 41

Indonesia Demonstrates Strong Support for Palestine Amidst Gaza Ceasefire

Jakarta – Demonstrations of solidarity with Palestine continued across Indonesia on Sunday as a ceasefire began to hold in the Gaza Strip. Thousands of citizens took to the streets,expressing their unwavering support for Palestinian independence and a lasting resolution to the ongoing conflict.

Ceasefire Takes Effect; Troops begin Withdrawal

The displays of support followed reports that Israel had initiated a phased withdrawal of troops from Gaza on friday, October 10th, following a ceasefire agreement with Hamas. According to Gaza’s civil defense agency, Israeli forces had begun to pull back from several areas, including Gaza City and Khan Younis. Mohammed al-Mughayyir, a senior agency official, confirmed the withdrawals to AFP on Friday.

Peaceful Protest at Central Jakarta’s Horse Statue

Despite the cessation of hostilities,peaceful protests in support of Palestine persisted in Indonesia. A significant demonstration took place at the Horse Statue in Central Jakarta, resulting in temporary closures of Jalan Medan Merdeka Barat and Selatan. Authorities advised motorists to seek alternative routes.

According to a post on X (formerly Twitter) by @TMCPoldaMetro at 07:36 on Sunday, October 12th, 2025, the “Defend Palestine” Peace Action was underway. Approximately 1,722 security personnel were deployed to oversee the demonstration, under instructions to refrain from carrying firearms and to engage with participants respectfully.

“Heal the World” and Calls for Freedom

As of 09:15 WIB on Sunday, October 12th, 2025, a large crowd gathered near the Horse Statue, moving towards Gambir station. Participants united in song, singing michael Jackson’s “Heal The World” while raising flags and displaying posters advocating for Palestinian independence. Some posters featured images of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Cyclists joined the demonstration, carrying banners with the Arabic phrase “Falistin Hurrah,” meaning “Self-reliant Palestine,” and the slogan “Abolish the apartheid from the river to the sea.” Othre posters proclaimed Indonesia’s continued opposition to Israeli aggression until Palestinian independence is achieved.

March to the U.S. Embassy

The demonstration extended beyond the Horse Statue, with a portion of the crowd marching toward the United States Embassy, chanting “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” and waving both Palestinian and Indonesian flags. Road closures remained in effect around the protest areas.

Ahmad Pranoto, a 40-year-old demonstrator, proudly displayed a large Palestinian flag, measuring approximately 6×4 meters, which he had brought from his home in Gunung Sindur, Bogor, West Java. “I brought this from home, rode my motorbike here alone. Wherever there was action to defend Palestine, I was there,” he stated.

the Ongoing Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Brief Overview

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the world’s most enduring and complex disputes, with roots tracing back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Key issues include territorial claims, the status of Jerusalem, the right of return for Palestinian refugees, and security concerns. Multiple ceasefires and peace negotiations have been attempted over the decades, but a lasting resolution remains elusive.

Did You know? The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine (Resolution 181) in 1947 proposed dividing the region into separate Arab and Jewish states,but it was never fully implemented and led to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.

Conflict Phase Years Key Events
1948 Arab-Israeli War 1948-1949 Establishment of Israel,Palestinian displacement
Six-Day War 1967 Israeli occupation of west Bank,Gaza Strip,East Jerusalem
First Intifada 1987-1993 Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation
Second Intifada 2000-2005 Increased violence,breakdown of peace process

Pro Tip: To stay informed about the conflict,consult reputable news sources such as the Associated Press (https://apnews.com/), Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/), and BBC News (https://www.bbc.com/news).

Frequently Asked Questions About Palestine Support in Indonesia

  • What is the past relationship between Indonesia and Palestine? Indonesia has long been a staunch supporter of the palestinian cause, rooted in its post-colonial solidarity with other developing nations and its predominantly Muslim population.
  • Why is there so much support for Palestine in Indonesia? Strong religious and political ties, combined with a sense of shared struggle against colonialism and oppression, contribute to widespread support.
  • What is the meaning of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”? This phrase is a Palestinian nationalist slogan calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state encompassing all of historic Palestine, a position that is frequently enough debated and criticized.
  • Are these demonstrations peaceful? Authorities have reported that the demonstrations have been largely peaceful, with security personnel instructed to exercise restraint and respect freedom of expression.
  • What impact do these demonstrations have on Indonesian foreign policy? these demonstrations reflect and reinforce Indonesia’s consistent diplomatic support for a two-state solution and the palestinian people.

will this show of solidarity translate into further diplomatic action? What long-term impact will the ceasefire have on the region?

Share your thoughts in the comments below!


How does Indonesia’s ancient relationship with Palestine influence its current diplomatic stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

indonesia Stands in Solidarity with Palestine Amidst Gaza Ceasefire Efforts

Humanitarian Aid & Diplomatic Initiatives

Indonesia has consistently demonstrated unwavering support for Palestine,especially during the ongoing crisis in Gaza. This commitment extends beyond diplomatic statements,manifesting in ample humanitarian aid and active participation in international ceasefire efforts.As of October 12, 2025, Indonesia continues to be a vocal advocate for a lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Recent Aid Deliveries to gaza

Despite immense logistical challenges, Indonesia successfully airdropped 18 tonnes of vital aid into Gaza in August 2025, requiring special permission from Israel. This delivery, timed to coincide with Indonesia’s Independence Day, included essential necessities aimed at alleviating the severe starvation impacting the Gazan population.

* Key Aid Components: the airdrop focused on delivering food supplies,medical equipment,and hygiene products.

* Logistical Hurdles: Obtaining clearance for aid deliveries remains a important obstacle, highlighting the complexities of operating within the conflict zone.

* International cooperation: Indonesia’s aid efforts are often coordinated with other international organizations to maximize impact and ensure efficient distribution.

Indonesia’s Diplomatic Role in Ceasefire Negotiations

indonesia’s foreign policy prioritizes a two-state solution, advocating for an self-reliant Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. This position informs its diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a complete and just peace.

  1. engagement with International Forums: Indonesia actively utilizes platforms like the United Nations to raise awareness about the Palestinian cause and push for resolutions supporting a ceasefire.
  2. Bilateral Discussions: Indonesian officials maintain regular communication with key stakeholders, including representatives from Palestine, Israel, and regional powers, to facilitate dialog and explore potential pathways to peace.
  3. Support for UNRWA: Indonesia is a consistent donor to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), providing crucial funding for essential services like healthcare, education, and social welfare programs for Palestinian refugees.

Historical Context of indonesia-Palestine Relations

Indonesia’s solidarity with Palestine dates back to its independence in 1945. The nation’s founding fathers,including Sukarno,were strong supporters of the Palestinian struggle for self-determination. This historical connection continues to shape Indonesia’s foreign policy.

Early Support for Palestinian Independence

Indonesia was among the first nations to recognize the State of Palestine, solidifying its long-standing commitment to the palestinian cause. This early recognition signaled a clear stance on the international stage.

Ongoing Political and Economic Support

Beyond diplomatic recognition, Indonesia provides ongoing political and economic support to the Palestinian Authority. This includes:

* Capacity Building Programs: Indonesia offers training and educational opportunities for Palestinian officials and professionals to strengthen governance and institutions.

* Economic Assistance: Financial aid and investment projects aim to stimulate economic development and improve living conditions in Palestinian territories.

* Humanitarian Assistance: Consistent provision of humanitarian aid, particularly during times of crisis, demonstrates Indonesia’s unwavering commitment to the well-being of the Palestinian people.

the Indonesian Outlook on the Gaza Conflict

Indonesia views the ongoing conflict in Gaza as a humanitarian catastrophe and a violation of international law. The Indonesian goverment consistently condemns violence against civilians and calls for an immediate ceasefire.

Condemnation of Violence Against Civilians

Indonesia has repeatedly condemned the targeting of civilians by all parties involved in the conflict. The nation emphasizes the importance of protecting innocent lives and upholding humanitarian principles.

Calls for Accountability and Justice

Indonesia advocates for accountability for alleged war crimes and human rights violations committed during the conflict. The nation supports international efforts to investigate and prosecute those responsible for atrocities.

Emphasis on a Two-State Solution

Indonesia firmly believes that a two-state solution, based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital, is the only viable path to a lasting and just peace. This remains the cornerstone of Indonesia’s policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Impact of the Conflict on Indonesian Public opinion

The situation in Gaza resonates deeply with the Indonesian public, fostering widespread sympathy and support for the palestinian people.

Pro-Palestine Demonstrations and Activism

Numerous pro-Palestine demonstrations and rallies have taken place across Indonesia, reflecting the strong public sentiment in support of the Palestinian cause. These events often involve calls for an end to the occupation and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

Fundraising and charitable Initiatives

Indonesian citizens and organizations have launched numerous fundraising and charitable initiatives to provide aid to Palestinians affected by the conflict. These efforts demonstrate a strong sense of solidarity and a desire to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people.

Social Media Activism and Awareness Campaigns

Social media platforms have become a key tool for raising awareness about the situation in Gaza and mobilizing support for Palestine. Indonesian users actively share information, participate in online campaigns, and express their solidarity with the Palestinian people.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Fragile Foundation: Can Trump’s Gaza Plan Deliver Lasting Peace, or Just a Temporary Truce?

Over 53% of the Gaza Strip remains under Israeli control, including critical areas like the Philadelphi Corridor, even as a ceasefire takes hold. This isn’t a full withdrawal, but a strategic repositioning – a fact that underscores a critical reality: the current agreement, brokered with confidence by former President Donald Trump, may be less a definitive peace plan and more a carefully constructed pause. The question isn’t if the situation will unravel, but when, and whether the ambiguities within the agreement will allow for genuine, lasting stability.

The Trump Plan: A Framework Riddled with Uncertainty

Caroline Glick, a key advisor to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, has publicly expressed “deep faith” in Trump’s commitment to ensuring all parties adhere to the deal. The plan hinges on a phased approach: Hamas’ demobilization, deradicalization efforts, and ultimately, a transition of control to a reformed Palestinian Authority. However, as Ret. Maj. Gen. Yaakov Amidror points out, the devil is in the details – details conspicuously absent from the signed agreement. Who will disarm Hamas? Who will verify compliance? These fundamental questions remain unanswered, creating a significant vulnerability.

The establishment of an International Stabilization Force (ISF) operating under the supervision of a Board of Peace chaired by Trump is intended to provide oversight. But the ISF’s coordination with the IDF, rather than operating independently, raises concerns about its impartiality and effectiveness. The temporary technocratic administration, while a step towards civilian governance, relies heavily on the success of Palestinian Authority reforms – a process historically fraught with challenges.

The Philadelphi Corridor: A Critical Control Point

Maintaining control of the Philadelphi Corridor is arguably the most crucial element of the current arrangement. Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser emphasizes that this control is vital to curtailing Hamas’ ability to rearm via smuggling through the Egyptian border. However, even with stringent checks on humanitarian aid – a necessity Kuperwasser stresses – completely preventing the flow of weapons is a near-impossible task. The sheer volume of aid required to address Gaza’s dire humanitarian needs creates inherent risks.

This reliance on controlling the flow of aid highlights a fundamental tension: providing for the civilian population while simultaneously preventing the resupply of a terrorist organization. It’s a balancing act that demands constant vigilance and a level of international cooperation that has often proven elusive in the past. The success of this aspect of the plan is directly tied to the effectiveness of border security and the willingness of Egypt to actively collaborate in preventing smuggling.

The Hostage Release and the Price of Freedom

The immediate release of 48 hostages, living and deceased, in exchange for 250 Palestinian security prisoners and 1,722 Gazans is a significant, albeit painful, concession. Kuperwasser warns that many of those released are “arch-terrorists” who pose a continued threat. While avoiding the release of the most dangerous individuals, Israel is still accepting a substantial risk. The potential for these released prisoners to reignite violence is a looming shadow over the entire agreement.

The Risk of Recidivism: A Looming Threat

The release of convicted killers and individuals with a history of violence presents a clear and present danger. Even if these individuals publicly renounce violence, their past actions and deeply held beliefs make the possibility of recidivism highly probable. Israel’s security services will undoubtedly be monitoring these individuals closely, but preventing them from engaging in terrorist activities will require a sustained and comprehensive effort.

Beyond the Ceasefire: A Path Forward?

The current situation is, as Amidror aptly describes, “very complicated.” The agreement provides a framework, but lacks the specificity needed to ensure its long-term success. A major diplomatic push is required to clarify responsibilities, address the ambiguities, and establish a robust verification mechanism. Disarming Hamas and ending its control over civilian life in Gaza remain the paramount objectives, but achieving these goals will require a sustained commitment from all parties involved.

Ultimately, the fate of this agreement rests on more than just political will. It depends on the ability to address the underlying grievances that fuel the conflict, to foster economic opportunity in Gaza, and to create a genuine path towards a two-state solution. Without these fundamental changes, the current ceasefire is likely to be just that – a temporary reprieve before the cycle of violence resumes. The international community must recognize that a lasting peace requires a long-term investment in the region, not just a short-term fix.

What are your predictions for the future of the Gaza peace process? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Gaza Ceasefire: Beyond Hostage Release, a Fragile Path to Regional Realignment

Over 2,000 Palestinian prisoners are poised for release as the first phase of a ceasefire unfolds, but the true significance of this moment extends far beyond individual freedoms. The orchestrated exchange, heavily influenced by the United States and culminating in a summit led by Donald Trump, signals a potential – and profoundly unstable – realignment of power dynamics in the Middle East, one where traditional diplomatic channels are bypassed in favor of direct, high-stakes negotiations. This isn’t simply a pause in conflict; it’s a test case for a new era of crisis management, and its success hinges on navigating a complex web of competing interests and deeply entrenched grievances.

Trump’s Diplomatic Gambit: A New Model for Conflict Resolution?

The prominent role played by former President Trump in brokering this ceasefire is unprecedented. While past administrations have engaged in shuttle diplomacy, Trump’s approach – a direct, headline-grabbing intervention culminating in a regional summit – represents a departure from established norms. As Al Jazeera’s Nour Odeh noted, this is “Trump’s show,” a demonstration of his continued influence and a potential blueprint for future interventions. This raises critical questions: is this a sustainable model for conflict resolution, or a temporary fix reliant on personality and political expediency? The summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, co-chaired with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and attended by a diverse array of world leaders, will be a crucial indicator. The expectation of a “document ending the war in the Gaza Strip” is ambitious, to say the least, and its substance will be scrutinized globally.

The Humanitarian Crisis: A Race Against Time

While the release of hostages and prisoners offers a glimmer of hope, the immediate humanitarian situation in Gaza remains dire. The ceasefire has allowed for the entry of aid trucks, but as Al Jazeera’s Hind Khoudary reports, the distribution is slow and insufficient. The needs extend far beyond food; Gaza requires tents, medical equipment, and essential infrastructure – resources largely unavailable for the past two years. The scale of devastation is immense, with entire neighborhoods reduced to “wastelands.” Reconstruction will be a monumental task, requiring sustained international commitment and a coordinated effort to rebuild not just physical structures, but also the social and economic fabric of the region. The long-term stability of any ceasefire depends on addressing these fundamental needs.

Beyond Immediate Relief: The Challenge of Economic Reconstruction

The economic challenges facing Gaza are staggering. Months of conflict have decimated livelihoods, leaving the population reliant on humanitarian aid. Rebuilding a viable economy will require not only financial investment but also the removal of restrictions on movement and trade. The World Bank estimates the cost of reconstruction to be in the billions, a figure that doesn’t account for the ongoing psychological trauma and the long-term impact on human capital. Without a sustainable economic future, the cycle of conflict is likely to continue.

Phase Two: The Hard Work of Governance and Security

The current ceasefire represents only the first phase of a much larger, more complex undertaking. The negotiation of phase two – encompassing Israeli withdrawal, Hamas’s disarmament, and the establishment of new governance structures – will be fraught with difficulty. The fate of Hamas remains a central question. Can the group be integrated into a future Palestinian government, or will its disarmament be a prerequisite for any lasting peace? The absence of a functioning government in Gaza, as highlighted by Professor Adnan Hayajneh, presents a significant obstacle. Establishing legitimate and accountable governance structures will be essential to prevent a power vacuum and ensure the long-term security of the region.

The Role of Regional and International Actors

The success of phase two will depend on the active engagement of regional and international actors. Egypt’s role as a mediator is crucial, as is the involvement of the United Nations and other key stakeholders. However, the divergent interests of these actors could complicate the process. The United States, under Trump’s leadership, will likely continue to play a dominant role, but its approach may not be universally accepted. A truly sustainable solution requires a collaborative effort based on mutual respect and a shared commitment to peace.

The coming days and weeks will be critical. The release of hostages is a momentous step, but it’s merely the beginning of a long and arduous journey. The fragile ceasefire offers a window of opportunity to address the underlying causes of the conflict and build a more stable and just future for the region. Whether this opportunity is seized remains to be seen, but the stakes could not be higher. What are your predictions for the long-term impact of this ceasefire on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.