BREAKING: Amin Ayoub Accuses Coach of Extortion Ahead of Fight

[City, Date] – In a startling revelation that has sent ripples through the MMA community, French fighter Amin Ayoub, a former Brave CF champion and current Ares FC standout, has publicly accused his former coach, Woirin, of attempted extortion. Ayoub, known for his electrifying “Fierceness” moniker, took to X (formerly Twitter) to detail the alleged incident, claiming Woirin threatened to abandon his corner for an upcoming fight unless his pay was increased just one week prior to the bout.

Ayoub, who holds a professional record of 25 wins and 5 losses in the welterweight division, described the alleged behavior as “toxic” and called out his former trainer for not being truthful about the situation. “Toxic behavior from (an) ex,” ayoub posted.”But he doesn’t want to explain that just 1 week before his fight, he threatens his fighter to renegotiate a sum or not show up in his corner… No, life is harsh, tell the truth sometimes, don’t you think?”

This accusation highlights a recurring tension within the demanding world of professional combat sports: the intricate and often fraught relationship between athletes and their coaching staff. While coaches are integral to an athlete’s readiness and success, ensuring fair compensation and clear dialog is paramount to maintaining a healthy and productive partnership. Incidents like these underscore the importance of professional conduct and ethical boundaries, especially under the immense pressure of impending competition.

The aftermath of such allegations frequently enough extends beyond the individual parties involved, prompting broader discussions about professionalism, loyalty, and financial openness in sports. As the story unfolds,it serves as a stark reminder that behind the glitz and glamour of professional fighting,complex human dynamics and financial considerations play a significant role in an athlete’s journey.

How might the alleged text message dismissal of Li Jingliang impact public perception of the UFC‘s treatment of its fighters?

UFC Fighter Faces Harsh Criticism After Alleged Text-Based Dismissal

The Fallout from a Digital Pink Slip

The world of mixed martial arts (MMA) is frequently enough brutal inside the octagon, but recent events suggest it can be equally harsh outside of it.Reports have surfaced alleging that UFC fighter Li Jingliang received notification of his release from the organization via text message, sparking widespread criticism of the UFC’s fighter management practices. This incident has ignited a debate about UFC contracts,fighter welfare,and the evolving relationship between the promotion and its athletes. The news, initially circulating on social media, quickly gained traction, wiht many in the MMA community expressing outrage.

Details of the Alleged Dismissal

While the UFC hasn’t officially confirmed the specifics, the claim centers around a brief text message reportedly sent to Li Jingliang following his loss to Khamzat Chimaev at UFC 267 in October 2021. The message, as reported by various sources, simply informed him that his services were no longer required.

The timing of the dismissal,following a competitive fight against a rising star like Chimaev,has been a key point of contention.

Critics argue that a fighter with li Jingliang’s experiance and contributions to the UFC deserves more respect than a curt text message.

The incident highlights a perceived lack of clarity in the UFC’s decision-making process regarding fighter cuts.

Bout Agreements: Fighters typically sign bout agreements for a limited number of fights.

Release Clauses: UFC contracts often include clauses allowing the promotion to release fighters for various reasons, including performance, injury, or simply a lack of marketability.

Non-Exclusive Contracts: Many UFC contracts are non-exclusive, meaning fighters can pursue other opportunities outside the UFC, but the UFC retains significant control over their participation in MMA events.

Contract Negotiation: The power dynamic in contract negotiations often favors the UFC, leaving fighters with limited bargaining power.

Fighter Unions: The incident has fueled calls for a stronger MMA fighter union to advocate for better working conditions and fairer treatment.

Social Media Backlash: Social media platforms have been flooded with messages of support for Li Jingliang and condemnation of the UFC’s alleged actions.

Concerns about Fighter Welfare: Critics argue that the UFC has a responsibility to provide fighters with more dignified treatment, even when releasing them from their contracts.

Impact on Fighter Morale: The perceived lack of respect can negatively impact fighter morale and possibly affect performance.

Notable Wins: Li Jingliang has secured several impressive victories throughout his UFC career, including wins over Zak Ottow and Bobby nash.

Rising Star: He was considered a rising star in the welterweight division before facing tougher competition.

International appeal: Li Jingliang’s popularity in China has contributed to the UFC’s growing presence in the Asian market.

Professional Record: As of July 29, 2025, Li Jingliang’s professional MMA record stands at 18-7-1.

Public Relations Strategy: The UFC’s lack of response may be part of a purposeful public relations strategy to minimize the damage.

Legal Considerations: The UFC might potentially be hesitant to comment due to potential legal ramifications.

Internal Review: It’s possible the UFC is conducting an internal review of its fighter release procedures.

potential Implications for the Future of the UFC

This incident could have significant implications for the future of the UFC and its relationship with its fighters.

Increased Scrutiny: The UFC will likely face increased scrutiny from media, fans, and regulatory bodies.

Demand for Reform: There will be growing pressure for the UFC to reform its fighter management practices.