Terence Crawford Stripped of WBC Super Middleweight Title Over Unpaid Fees, Sparks Outrage

Las Vegas, NV – In a stunning turn of events, the World Boxing Council (WBC) has declared the super middleweight title vacant, stripping it from Terence Crawford just months after his historic victory over Saúl “Canelo” Álvarez. The decision, announced by WBC President Mauricio Sulaimán, stems from crawford’s alleged failure to pay sanctioning fees totaling $300,000 – 0.6% of his $50 million purse – for his last two fights.

The WBC claims repeated attempts to secure payment and acknowledgment went unanswered. Sulaimán stated the board of governors voted unanimously to vacate the title after issuing multiple warnings. This includes a previously undisclosed payment owed from his August 2024 win against Israil Madrimov.

“The WBC has no choice,” Sulaimán explained. “Mr. Crawford, his representative and his legal counsel received extensive communications to address the situation.”

Crawford Fires Back: “The Belt Doesn’t Mean Anything”

Crawford responded swiftly and vehemently via a video posted on Instagram, refusing to pay what he deems an unjust demand. he dismissed the WBC belt as a “trophy” with no real value, arguing that he risks his life in the ring and should not be penalized for wearing their title.

“Who do you think I am? I’m not going to pay you anything,” Crawford declared. “What makes you better than any other organism? You should pay me.”

The American boxer further accused the WBC of bias, alleging the stripping is retaliation for his upset victory over Canelo Álvarez. “Everyone knows that you wanted Canelo to win. You were angry as I beat him. You never saw the WBC take the belt from Canelo because of Benavídez,” he stated.

Despite losing the title, Crawford remains defiant. “I am still the champion. They can’t take that away from me. History has already been made. I am a legend.”

Implications and Future Outlook

The controversy raises questions about the power and practices of boxing sanctioning bodies and the financial burdens placed on fighters. The vacant title will likely trigger a scramble among top contenders for the chance to claim the championship. This situation also adds fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding fighter compensation and the role of sanctioning fees in professional boxing.

Could the WBC’s decision to strip Terence crawford of his title set a new precedent for resolving financial disputes in professional boxing?

Council Routs Terence Crawford to Claim World Title Over Financial Dispute

The unprecedented Title Stripping

In a stunning turn of events on December 4th, 2025, the World Boxing Council (WBC) has officially stripped Terence Crawford of his welterweight title. This decision wasn’t based on performance in the ring, but a protracted and increasingly public financial dispute. The core of the issue revolves around mandatory challenger obligations and purse bids, specifically concerning a scheduled bout with rising contender, Janibek Alimkhanuly.

The WBC cited Crawford’s team’s repeated attempts to circumvent the standard purse bid process, demanding significantly higher guarantees than stipulated by council regulations. This sparked accusations of unfair negotiation tactics and a disregard for the established rules governing championship fights. The situation escalated when Crawford’s representatives allegedly threatened to pursue fights outside of the WBC sanction, effectively holding the title hostage.

Breakdown of the Financial Dispute

The dispute centers on several key financial points:

* Purse Bid Minimums: The WBC sets minimum purse bids for mandatory title defenses. Crawford’s team reportedly sought a minimum bid of $20 million, far exceeding the council’s established figure of $10 million.

* Step-Up Clauses: Alimkhanuly’s camp argued that Crawford’s team was attempting to insert unfavorable “step-up” clauses, potentially reducing Alimkhanuly’s share of the purse if Crawford faced a different opponent.

* Broadcast Rights: Control over broadcast rights played a significant role. Crawford, with his lucrative deal with ESPN, reportedly wanted to maintain exclusive control, limiting the potential revenue for Alimkhanuly and the WBC.

* Negotiation Deadlines: The WBC repeatedly extended negotiation deadlines, hoping to facilitate a resolution. However,talks ultimately broke down,leading to the unprecedented title stripping.

Implications for Terence Crawford’s Career

This decision marks a significant low point in terence Crawford’s or else stellar career. While he remains a highly respected and skilled boxer, the loss of the WBC title impacts his marketability and future earning potential.

* Reduced Bargaining Power: without a major title, Crawford’s leverage in future negotiations diminishes.

* Potential for Rematch difficulties: Securing a rematch for the stripped title will be significantly more challenging.

* Impact on Legacy: The circumstances surrounding the title loss will undoubtedly be a talking point throughout his career,potentially tarnishing his legacy.

* Future Opponents: Crawford will likely face pressure to prove himself against top contenders to regain championship status. Potential opponents include Errol Spence jr. (should he return to form) and other leading welterweights.

Janibek Alimkhanuly: The New Champion & Rising Star

With Crawford’s title vacated,Janibek Alimkhanuly has been officially crowned the new WBC welterweight champion. This represents a major breakthrough for the Kazakhstani fighter, who has been steadily climbing the rankings.

* Alimkhanuly’s Record: Boasting a professional record of 15-0 with 12 knockouts, Alimkhanuly is known for his aggressive style and powerful punching.

* The Road to the Title: Alimkhanuly earned his shot at the title through a series of impressive victories, showcasing his skills and determination.

* Future Defense Plans: The WBC has indicated that Alimkhanuly’s first title defense will likely be against a top-five ranked contender, potentially setting up a lucrative unification bout.

* Increased Visibility: Becoming a world champion significantly elevates Alimkhanuly’s profile, opening doors to bigger fights and endorsement opportunities.

Precedent and Future of Title Governance

This situation sets a dangerous precedent for future title governance. While the WBC maintains it acted to uphold its regulations and protect the rights of mandatory challengers, critics argue the decision was overly harsh.

* Past Title Disputes: Historically, title disputes have often been resolved through negotiation or arbitration. A direct title stripping based solely on financial disagreements is rare.

* Potential for Similar conflicts: This case could embolden other fighters to challenge the established purse bid process, potentially leading to more frequent title disputes.

* Need for Clearer Regulations: The WBC may need to revisit its regulations regarding mandatory title defenses and purse bids to provide greater clarity and prevent similar conflicts in the future.

* Impact on Fighter-Promoter Relationships: The dispute highlights the complex relationship between fighters, promoters, and sanctioning bodies, and the potential for conflicts of interest.

Key Search Terms & Related Queries

* Terence Crawford news

* WBC title stripping

* Janibek Alimkhanuly champion

* Boxing financial disputes

* Welterweight boxing rankings

* Boxing purse bids

* Terence Crawford next fight

* Janibek Alimkhanuly