The Kremlin Playbook in the West: How Trump’s Performance Signals a Dangerous New Normal
Three hours and seventeen minutes. That’s how long Donald Trump held the nation captive during a televised Cabinet meeting this week – longer than “The Godfather.” But the sheer length wasn’t the most alarming aspect. It was how the time was spent, and what it revealed about a potential shift in American political norms, that demands attention. This wasn’t simply a rambling press conference; it was a carefully orchestrated display of power, echoing tactics historically associated with authoritarian regimes, and signaling a potentially dangerous new normal for US politics.
The Echoes of Putin: Performance as Power
Observers were quick to draw parallels to Vladimir Putin’s famously lengthy and carefully controlled press conferences. Like Putin, Trump dominated the narrative, allowing minimal interruption and using the event to project an image of strength and control. The extended silence from Cabinet members – some waiting nearly 50 minutes for a chance to speak – wasn’t a sign of respect, but a demonstration of deference. This isn’t the behavior of a functioning Cabinet engaging in robust debate; it’s a performance of loyalty, designed for an audience of one.
This performative aspect is crucial. As the original reporting highlighted, Trump’s actions aren’t about policy discussion; they’re about maintaining a constant stream of attention and reinforcing his own narrative. He’s addicted to the show, and his advisors appear willing to play their parts, offering effusive praise and unwavering support. This dynamic, while not entirely new, is becoming increasingly normalized, blurring the lines between governance and spectacle.
Beyond the Spectacle: Erosion of Norms and Institutional Safeguards
The Cabinet meeting was merely the most visible symptom of a broader pattern of behavior. The past week saw attempts to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve, shake up the CDC with anti-vaccine proponents, and even consider deploying federal troops to Democratic-run cities. These actions, coupled with the purging of intelligence officials and threats to prosecute political opponents, represent a concerted effort to dismantle institutional safeguards and consolidate power.
The invitation extended to Iris Tao, a reporter from the far-right Epoch Times, further underscored this trend. By granting preferential access to a news organization with questionable journalistic standards and ties to an exiled Chinese opposition movement, the White House effectively bypassed the traditional press rotation and curated its own reality. This control over information flow is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes, and its adoption in the US is deeply concerning. You can find more information on the Epoch Times’ background here.
The Midterm Strategy: Weaponizing Fear and Division
Trump’s explicit acknowledgment that the “anti-crime” spree is intended to be a winning issue in the midterms reveals the cynical calculation behind these actions. By stoking fear and division, he aims to mobilize his base and deflect attention from more substantive issues. This strategy, while effective, further polarizes the electorate and undermines the foundations of democratic discourse. The focus on crime, regardless of statistical reality, is a clear attempt to tap into anxieties and exploit existing social tensions.
The “Butt-Snorkelers” and the Cult of Personality
The unflattering moniker “butt-snorkelers,” coined by General Ben Hodges, perfectly encapsulates the sycophantic behavior on display during the Cabinet meeting. The effusive praise from Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer and Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins wasn’t about policy; it was about personal validation. This cult of personality, where loyalty trumps competence and critical thinking, is a dangerous precedent. It creates an echo chamber where dissenting voices are silenced and bad ideas are amplified.
What’s Next: A Future Defined by Unchecked Power?
The events of the past week, and particularly the extended Cabinet meeting, aren’t isolated incidents. They represent a pattern of behavior that, if left unchecked, could fundamentally alter the nature of American democracy. The normalization of authoritarian tactics, the erosion of institutional safeguards, and the cultivation of a cult of personality pose a serious threat to the principles of accountability, transparency, and the rule of law. The question isn’t whether Trump is a dictator, as he disingenuously claims, but whether his actions are creating the conditions for one. The long-term implications of this shift are profound, and demand vigilant scrutiny and robust resistance.
What are your predictions for the future of American political norms in light of these developments? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
/medias/CuRqpISqIC/image/tps_12_1402261754644050595.jpg)
