Tag:

Mexico

Measles Alert in Mexico: Cases Rise, Who Needs Vaccination?

by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health February 19, 2026

written by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health

Mexico is currently facing a growing measles outbreak, prompting health authorities to reinforce vaccination efforts and closely monitor the spread of the highly contagious virus. While concerns center on curbing transmission, recent clarifications have emerged regarding who needs vaccination, and surprisingly, older adults may not require a booster. This comes as officials report over 10,000 confirmed cases of measles and dozens of associated deaths between 2025-2026, with thousands more probable cases under analysis.

The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has issued an epidemiological alert for the region due to the increase in cases, highlighting Mexico as one of the countries with the highest incidence. Measles, spread through respiratory droplets, is a significant public health concern, and vaccination remains the most effective preventative measure. Although, understanding who is most at risk and who may already have immunity is crucial for a targeted response.

The question of who needs to be vaccinated has sparked debate, with health officials emphasizing that not the entire population requires immunization. A key factor in this determination is age and prior exposure to the virus. Experts suggest that individuals over the age of 50 may already possess sufficient immunity, potentially negating the need for vaccination.

Why Older Adults May Not Need Vaccination

According to epidemiologists at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), the triple viral vaccine (SRP/MMR) – protecting against measles, rubella, and mumps – is a standard part of the universal vaccination schedule. However, not all age groups require immunization at this time. Samuel Ponce de León Rosales, an epidemiologist, explains that individuals over 50 years traditional generally do not need to be vaccinated because measles was highly prevalent during their childhood, leading to widespread immunity through prior infection. The Ministry of Health has launched a platform, ¿Dónde me vacuno?, to help individuals locate over 21,000 vaccination points across Mexico.

Who Should Receive Vaccinated?

Health authorities recommend vaccination for the following groups:

Individuals under 50 years of age who do not have a complete vaccination schedule.
Those who do not recall having received the triple viral vaccine.
Individuals who have never had measles.
People belonging to groups with a higher health risk.

The current vaccination schedule recommends two doses of the triple viral vaccine: the first around 12 months of age and the second near 6 years old. Completing this schedule is vital to prevent severe complications and halt transmission. The ISSSTE provides information on measles prevention, emphasizing the importance of vaccination.

Understanding Measles and Vaccination

Measles is a highly contagious viral disease transmitted through respiratory droplets. Symptoms typically begin with a fever, cough, runny nose, and conjunctivitis (red eyes). The IMSS recommends the triple viral vaccine as the best protection for children, and the double viral vaccine for adolescents and adults. While there is no specific treatment for measles, supportive care can help manage symptoms, and severe cases may require hospitalization.

The decline in vaccination coverage below 95% has been identified as a key factor contributing to the resurgence of measles. Authorities are urging the public to reinforce epidemiological surveillance and complete immunization schedules, particularly among children and vulnerable populations.

Maintaining complete vaccination schedules, monitoring for symptoms, and seeking medical attention if measles is suspected are essential steps in containing the outbreak and protecting the population. The ongoing situation underscores the critical role of vaccination in preventing the spread of this highly contagious disease.

As Mexico continues to grapple with this measles outbreak, ongoing monitoring of case numbers and vaccination rates will be crucial. Public health officials will likely focus on targeted vaccination campaigns to reach vulnerable populations and improve overall immunization coverage. Continued vigilance and adherence to public health recommendations are essential to mitigate the impact of this resurgence.

Have you or your family members received the measles vaccine? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. Please also share this article to help spread awareness about measles prevention.

Disclaimer: This information is intended for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and does not constitute medical advice. It is essential to consult with a qualified healthcare professional for any health concerns or before making any decisions related to your health or treatment.

February 19, 2026 0 comments

Entertainment

Salma Hayek & Film Industry Support New Plan

by Marina Collins - Entertainment Editor February 16, 2026

written by Marina Collins - Entertainment Editor

Mexico’s film industry is poised for a significant boost following the announcement of a comprehensive support plan spearheaded by President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo. The initiative, unveiled on Sunday, February 15, 2026, includes a substantial tax incentive of up to 30% on income tax for film productions, aiming to revitalize the sector and strengthen Mexico’s cultural presence on the global stage. The plan received enthusiastic support from prominent figures within the industry, including Oscar-nominated actress Salma Hayek.

For years, Mexican cinema has faced challenges related to funding and institutional support. The new incentive is designed to address these issues, encouraging both domestic and international productions to film in Mexico. President Sheinbaum emphasized that culture is a right, not a privilege, and that this plan reflects a commitment to fostering artistic expression and economic growth within the film sector. This move comes as the Mexican government seeks to promote the country as a prime location for film and television production, capitalizing on its diverse landscapes and skilled workforce.

Boosting Production with Tax Credits

The core of the plan centers around a 30% tax credit on income tax for film productions. This incentive is intended to support both feature films and series, providing a significant financial advantage to producers choosing to film in Mexico. According to El Universal, the incentive will facilitate to attract investment and create jobs within the industry. The government has indicated that a commission will be established to determine the specific criteria for accessing these incentives, ensuring that they are distributed effectively and promote a diverse range of cinematic projects.

Salma Hayek, a vocal advocate for the Mexican film industry, publicly recognized President Sheinbaum’s support. Hayek recounted her own difficulties securing funding for her early projects when filming in Mexico lacked the financial incentives offered by other countries. “How do you make a love letter to Mexico and film it in Australia or the Dominican Republic?” she questioned, highlighting the importance of a competitive fiscal environment. Herald USA reported that Hayek believes this new initiative could be a turning point for Mexican cinema.

A Long-Awaited Shift for Mexican Cinema

The announcement follows a period of perceived neglect for the Mexican film industry. Hayek described the sector as having been “abandoned for a long time,” despite the consistent talent and creativity of Mexican filmmakers. El Sol de México noted that Hayek, visibly moved during the event at Palacio Nacional, emphasized Mexico’s technical expertise in filmmaking. Her recent production, filmed in Tulum and Veracruz, is described as “a love letter to Mexico,” underscoring her commitment to showcasing the country’s beauty, and talent.

The initiative builds on previous discussions between Sheinbaum and Hayek, who reportedly urged the President to implement these incentives during a meeting in Veracruz last November, as reported by Uno TV. The President acknowledged Hayek’s persistence and recognized her as a significant figure in promoting Mexican cinema internationally.

Looking Ahead

The implementation of this plan is expected to have a ripple effect throughout the Mexican film industry, attracting investment, creating jobs, and fostering a new wave of cinematic creativity. The establishment of the commission to oversee the distribution of incentives will be a crucial step in ensuring the plan’s success. The coming months will reveal the extent to which this initiative can transform the landscape of Mexican cinema and solidify its position on the world stage.

What are your thoughts on the new incentives? Share your opinions in the comments below and help us continue the conversation about the future of Mexican cinema.

February 16, 2026 0 comments

world

El Paso Airspace Shut Down After Laser Fired on Balloon Mistaken for Drone

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor February 13, 2026

written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

El Paso Airspace Shutdown: A party Balloon and a Laser – A Breakdown

Table of Contents

1. El Paso Airspace Shutdown: A party Balloon and a Laser – A Breakdown
2. What Happened in El Paso?
3. Unexpected Airspace Restrictions
4. Laser Deployment and Security Concerns
5. A Timeline of Events
6. Backlash and Calls for Accountability
7. The Broader Context of drone Security
8. What caused the El Paso airspace shutdown on February 12, 2026?
9. el Paso airspace Shut down After Laser Fired on Balloon Mistaken for Drone
10. The Initial Incident & Response
11. The Balloon revelation & Investigation
12. Why Balloons Are Frequently enough Mistaken for Drones
13. The growing Threat of Laser strikes
14. Preventing Future Incidents: A Multi-faceted Approach
15. Real-World Examples & Similar Cases
16. Benefits of Improved airspace Security Protocols

el Paso, Texas, experienced a dramatic and disruptive airspace closure this week, triggered by the misidentification of a party balloon as a potential aerial threat. The incident, stemming from border security operations, led to the temporary grounding of all flights at the city’s international airport and sparked criticism from local officials. The airspace, briefly restricted to levels not seen since the September 11th attacks, has since been reopened, but the event raises critical questions about protocol and coordination between federal agencies.

What Happened in El Paso?

on Tuesday, border patrol agents, equipped with a high-energy laser system, targeted an object believed to be an unauthorized drone operated by a Mexican cartel. Though, it quickly became clear that the object was not a drone but rather a harmless party balloon. Despite the innocuous nature of the target, the incident prompted a swift and extensive response.

Unexpected Airspace Restrictions

the Federal Aviation Governance (FAA) later imposed a ten-day closure of El Paso’s airspace, impacting commercial, cargo, and general aviation. This drastic measure, implemented without initial consultation with the white House or Defense officials, caused considerable disruption to travel plans and raised concerns among community leaders. The closure extended ten nautical miles from the airport and reached altitudes of up to 5,000 meters.

Laser Deployment and Security Concerns

The deployment of the laser technology was part of increased efforts by the Pentagon to enhance border security and develop capabilities to counter drone activity.According to sources, the system had been recently deployed and agents had received training from the Army in its operation. The FAA was reportedly informed about the laser’s deployment for a 10-day testing period, yet was not consulted before its use. An increase in drone activity along the U.S.-Mexico border has fueled these security measures, with the Trump administration previously voicing concerns about cartels utilizing drones for illicit activities.

A Timeline of Events

Date	Event
February 11	Border agents fire a laser at a suspected drone (later identified as a balloon).
February 11	The FAA announces a 10-day airspace closure over El Paso.
February 12	The FAA lifts the airspace closure, citing no ongoing threat.

Backlash and Calls for Accountability

The sudden airspace closure drew sharp criticism from El Paso Mayor Renard Johnson, who emphasized the lack of interaction and coordination with local authorities. Legislator Verónica Escobar echoed these sentiments, labeling the situation a “result of incompetence” at the federal level. The economic impact of the closure was also a concern, with Representative Gabe Vasquez highlighting the potential repercussions for businesses and travelers in both Texas and New Mexico. airlines such as United and southwest quickly responded, offering flexible change policies to affected passengers.

The Broader Context of drone Security

This incident underscores the growing challenges posed by unauthorized drone activity and the complexities of border security. The U.S. military has been actively testing high-energy laser weapons designed to neutralize airborne threats for years. In 2023,the Department of Defense reported a meaningful increase in unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs),some of which are suspected to be drones. The incident in El Paso highlights the need for clear protocols, improved communication, and careful target identification to prevent similar disruptions in the future.

What steps can be taken to improve communication and coordination between federal agencies regarding airspace security? Do you think the increased use of laser technology is a proportionate response to the threat of illicit drone activity?

Share your thoughts in the comments below and join the conversation.

What caused the El Paso airspace shutdown on February 12, 2026?

el Paso airspace Shut down After Laser Fired on Balloon Mistaken for Drone

On February 12th, 2026, the El Paso, Texas airspace experienced a significant, albeit temporary, shutdown following reports of a laser strike on what was initially believed to be a drone. The incident triggered a swift response from air traffic control adn local law enforcement, highlighting the growing concerns surrounding airspace security and the potential dangers of unauthorized laser illumination.

The Initial Incident & Response

At approximately 7:15 PM MST, air traffic controllers at El Paso International Airport (ELP) received multiple reports from pilots of a bright green laser beam directed towards the sky. Simultaneously, radar detected an unidentified object exhibiting unusual flight patterns. The combination of these factors led to the immediate assumption that a drone was operating illegally and perhaps posing a hazard to commercial air traffic.

* Airspace Restrictions: As a precautionary measure, a 30-mile radius around the suspected drone’s location was temporarily restricted. All civilian air traffic was grounded or rerouted, impacting several incoming and outgoing flights.

* Law Enforcement Involvement: The El Paso Police Department (EPPD) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) were immediately notified and launched a joint inquiry. Units were dispatched to pinpoint the source of the laser and identify the object in the airspace.

* Initial Search Efforts: Early search efforts focused on identifying potential drone operators in the vicinity. However, these proved unsuccessful.

The Balloon revelation & Investigation

After approximately 90 minutes, the “drone” was positively identified as a large, weather balloon released earlier that day by a local university’s atmospheric science department. the laser strike, it was steadfast, was directed at the balloon, not emanating from it.

* Source of the Laser: The EPPD quickly located the source of the laser – a teenager using a high-powered laser pointer from a residential area. The teenager claimed they were unaware of the airspace restrictions and were simply “playing” with the laser.

* FAA Regulations & laser Safety: Shining a laser at an aircraft is a federal crime,carrying potential penalties of up to $250,000 in fines and five years in prison. The FAA has seen a significant increase in laser incidents reported annually, posing a serious threat to pilot safety.

* Impact on Flights: The airspace was fully reopened at 9:00 PM MST, but the incident caused significant delays and disruptions for travelers. Over 20 flights were delayed, and three were diverted to choice airports.

Why Balloons Are Frequently enough Mistaken for Drones

The El Paso incident isn’t isolated. Several similar events have occurred in recent years where balloons – particularly large,reflective weather balloons – have been mistaken for unauthorized drones. Several factors contribute to this:

Radar Signatures: Large balloons can sometimes register on radar systems, albeit with a different signature than a typical drone.
Visual Appearance: From the ground, especially at night, a balloon can resemble a drone, particularly if illuminated.
Unpredictable Movement: Weather balloons drift with the wind, leading to erratic flight paths that can mimic the behavior of a poorly piloted drone.

The growing Threat of Laser strikes

The incident underscores the increasing danger posed by laser strikes to aircraft. Even brief exposure to a powerful laser beam can cause:

* Temporary Vision Impairment: Pilots can experience temporary flash blindness, glare, and afterimages, making it difficult to control the aircraft.

* Distraction & Disorientation: The sudden and unexpected illumination can distract pilots during critical phases of flight, such as takeoff and landing.

* Permanent Eye Damage: In rare cases, prolonged or intense laser exposure can cause permanent retinal damage.

Preventing Future Incidents: A Multi-faceted Approach

Addressing the issue requires a collaborative effort from law enforcement, the FAA, and the public.

* Increased Public Awareness: Educational campaigns are crucial to inform the public about the dangers and legal consequences of pointing lasers at aircraft.

* Enhanced Law Enforcement Training: Equipping law enforcement with the tools and training to quickly identify and respond to laser incidents is essential.

* Technological Solutions: The FAA is exploring technologies to help pilots detect and mitigate laser strikes,such as laser warning systems and specialized eyewear.

* Balloon Release Regulations: Stricter regulations regarding the release of large balloons, including mandatory notification to air traffic control, could help prevent future misidentification incidents.

Real-World Examples & Similar Cases

This isn’t the first time a balloon has caused airspace disruption. In 2023, a similar incident occurred near Denver international Airport, where a weather balloon triggered a temporary ground stop. Moreover, in 2015, a large party balloon drifting into restricted airspace over Washington D.C. caused a security scare and led to the temporary evacuation of the White House. These cases highlight the need for vigilance and improved communication regarding aerial objects.

Benefits of Improved airspace Security Protocols

Investing in robust airspace security protocols yields several benefits:

* Enhanced Pilot & Passenger Safety: Minimizing the risk of laser strikes and misidentified objects directly contributes to safer air travel.

* Reduced Flight Delays & Disruptions: Proactive measures can prevent needless airspace closures and minimize disruptions to air traffic.

* Increased public Confidence: Demonstrating a commitment to airspace security builds public trust in the aviation system.

* Protection of critical Infrastructure: Safeguarding airspace protects vital infrastructure, such as airports and air traffic control facilities.

February 13, 2026 0 comments

Economy

Trump Tariffs: Congress Limits Presidential Power on Duties

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy February 12, 2026

written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

The Fracturing GOP and the Future of Trump’s Trade Wars

Six Republican lawmakers just defied their party’s leader, voting to dismantle President Trump’s tariffs on Canada. This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s a crack in the foundation of what has, until recently, been remarkably unified Republican support for Trump’s policies. But is this a genuine shift in power, or merely a symbolic gesture? And what does it mean for the future of American trade policy, and the President’s ability to shape it?

A President Testing Congressional Limits

Donald Trump’s second term has been marked by a renewed push for protectionist trade policies, particularly the imposition of tariffs. He decreed import surcharges of 35% on many Canadian products last year, though exemptions were made for energy imports and goods covered by the CUSMA agreement. However, these actions have increasingly collided with a long-held Congressional prerogative: the power to regulate commerce. Whereas the President initiated these tariffs under a state of emergency, Congress is constitutionally responsible for setting trade policy.

The recent vote to repeal the Canadian tariffs, though unlikely to be overridden by a presidential veto given the current Republican majority, signals a growing discomfort within the GOP. Six Republicans joined Democrats in challenging the President, a move that prompted a direct threat from Trump, warning of primary challenges for those who opposed his policies. This highlights a key tension: loyalty to the President versus adherence to constitutional principles and perceived economic interests.

The Rise of Republican Mavericks

This isn’t simply about tariffs. A broader trend is emerging: a willingness among some Republicans to publicly question and even defy the President. As reported in January, Republicans in Congress are showing increasing frustration with party leadership on issues ranging from foreign policy to healthcare. This growing independence is particularly concerning for the White House, given the increasingly slim Republican margin in the House of Representatives.

“We cannot and we must not outsource our responsibilities,” declared Republican MP Don Bacon before voting to repeal the tariffs, succinctly capturing the sentiment of those asserting Congressional authority. This sentiment isn’t limited to a compact faction; it reflects a growing concern that the President is overstepping his constitutional bounds.

The Economic Argument Against Tariffs

Beyond constitutional concerns, a core argument against Trump’s tariffs centers on their economic impact. As Bacon pointed out, “as an old-fashioned conservative, I know that tariffs are a tax on American consumers.” This resonates with many Republicans who traditionally champion free market principles. While the President argues tariffs provide economic and national security, critics contend they raise costs for businesses and consumers, disrupt supply chains, and invite retaliatory measures from other countries.

Key Takeaway: The debate over tariffs isn’t just a political battle; it’s a fundamental disagreement over economic philosophy and the role of government in regulating trade.

What’s Driving the Defiance?

Several factors are contributing to this shift. Firstly, the upcoming midterm elections are looming large. A recent YouGov/Yahoo News poll showed Democrats with a five-point lead, raising concerns among Republicans about maintaining control of Congress. Secondly, the narrow margins in both chambers mean that even a small number of defections can derail the President’s agenda. Finally, the increasing economic costs of the trade wars are becoming harder to ignore, even for staunch Trump supporters.

Speaker Mike Johnson attempted to delay the vote on tariffs, but ultimately failed. While he downplayed the President’s reaction, stating Trump was “not upset,” the President’s subsequent post on Truth Social suggests otherwise. This disconnect between public statements and the President’s private sentiments underscores the delicate balancing act facing Republican leaders.

The Future of Trade Policy: A Looming Showdown

The vote on Canadian tariffs is likely just the first in a series of confrontations. Democrats have unlocked a procedural power to force more votes on the President’s tariffs, including those on Mexico and the so-called “liberation day” tariffs. This means that Republicans will face repeated opportunities to publicly align themselves with or against the President’s policies.

“Did you know?” Tariffs on goods imported from Canada, even with the exemptions under CUSMA, have added an estimated 0.3% to the cost of goods for American consumers, according to a recent analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

The President’s response to these challenges will be crucial. Will he continue to threaten primary challenges for dissenting Republicans, or will he seek to compromise and build broader support for his policies? The answer to this question will determine not only the fate of his trade agenda but as well the future of the Republican Party.

Expert Insight:

“The dynamic between President Trump and Congressional Republicans is evolving. While loyalty remains strong, the willingness to challenge the President on issues of constitutional authority and economic policy is a significant development. This could signal a broader reassertion of Congressional power and a more independent Republican Party.” – Dr. Eleanor Vance, Political Science Professor, Georgetown University.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Will Congress be able to override a presidential veto on these tariff resolutions?

A: Highly unlikely. Republicans currently hold a majority in both chambers, making a two-thirds vote to override a veto virtually impossible.

Q: What is CUSMA and how does it affect the tariffs?

A: CUSMA (Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement) is a free trade agreement that exempts a significant portion of trade between the three countries from tariffs. However, the President’s tariffs still apply to some products not covered by the agreement.

Q: What are the potential consequences for Republicans who defy the President?

A: President Trump has warned of primary challenges for Republicans who oppose his policies. This means that dissenting lawmakers could face opposition from Trump-backed candidates in future elections.

Q: Pro Tip: Stay informed about upcoming votes on trade policy and contact your representatives to voice your opinion. Your voice matters!

The fracturing within the Republican Party over trade policy represents a pivotal moment. While Trump still maintains considerable influence, the growing willingness of some Republicans to assert their constitutional authority and prioritize economic concerns suggests a potential shift in the balance of power. The coming months will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary blip or the beginning of a more fundamental realignment.

Explore more insights on US trade policy in our dedicated section.

February 12, 2026 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts