Home » Muslims
Tag:

Muslims

News

European Bishops’ ‘Eucharistic Chain’ Prays for Peace This Lent | 2026

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

Across Europe, Catholic leaders are joining together this Lenten season in a powerful display of solidarity with those impacted by conflict, launching the annual “Eucharistic Chain” initiative. The effort, organized by the Council of European Bishops’ Conferences (CCEE), will see churches throughout the continent hold Masses dedicated to praying for peace and remembering victims of war, particularly in Ukraine and the Holy Land.

The “Eucharistic Chain,” a longstanding Lenten tradition for European Bishops’ Conferences, aims to foster a sense of communion and hope amidst ongoing global crises. This year’s focus reflects the continued suffering in regions gripped by violence, with specific prayers intended for an “unarmed and disarming peace,” according to a statement released by the CCEE. The initiative underscores the Church’s commitment to invoking peace “from the Lord” through collective prayer and reflection.

Pope Leo XIV will mark the beginning of Lent with a Mass on Ash Wednesday at the Basilica of Saint Sabina on Rome’s Aventine Hill. The service will be preceded by a traditional Statio and penitential procession from the nearby church of Saint Anselmo, as reported by Vatican News. The Pope will also participate in the annual Lenten Spiritual Exercises with the Roman Curia, taking place at the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace from February 22-27.

A Continent-Wide Call for Peace

From Ash Wednesday through the end of Lent, each national Bishops’ Conference affiliated with the CCEE will host at least one Mass specifically dedicated to those affected by war. This coordinated effort is intended to create a continuous “chain” of prayer throughout Europe, uniting communities in a shared desire for peace. The initiative builds on Pope Leo XIV’s recent message for the 59th World Day of Peace, where he urged the faithful to embrace peace as a “presence and a journey,” rather than an unattainable goal. “Let us open ourselves to peace!” the Holy Father said, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and welcoming peace rather than dismissing it as impossible.

The CCEE’s initiative comes at a time of heightened global tensions, with ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Holy Land causing immense suffering. Catholic News World reports that the focus on these regions reflects the urgent need for prayer and advocacy for those caught in the crossfire. The Bishops hope the “Eucharistic Chain” will not only offer spiritual comfort to victims of war but also inspire a renewed commitment to peacebuilding efforts across the continent.

Building on a Tradition of Prayer

The “Eucharistic Chain” has turn into a regular Lenten observance for Europe’s Bishops’ Conferences, demonstrating a consistent commitment to praying for peace and justice. The CCEE website details how the initiative aims to provide a space for communal prayer and reflection, fostering a sense of hope and solidarity in the face of adversity. This year’s effort builds on previous initiatives, continuing the Church’s long-standing tradition of advocating for peace and reconciliation.

The initiative also aligns with broader efforts to promote peace and dialogue in conflict-affected regions. By focusing on the need for an “unarmed and disarming peace,” the Bishops are calling for a shift away from violence and towards peaceful resolutions. This message resonates with Pope Leo XIV’s emphasis on the importance of opening oneself to peace and recognizing its potential for transformation.

As Lent progresses, the “Eucharistic Chain” will serve as a visible reminder of the ongoing need for prayer and action in support of peace. The CCEE’s initiative offers a powerful example of how faith communities can come together to address global challenges and advocate for a more just and peaceful world.

The coming weeks will see churches across Europe actively participating in this continent-wide prayer effort. The impact of this collective spiritual focus remains to be seen, but the initiative underscores the unwavering commitment of the Church to seeking peace and offering solace to those affected by conflict.

What are your thoughts on the role of faith-based organizations in promoting peace? Share your comments below and consider sharing this article with your network.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment

Muslim Mayor Bid: US Islam & Politics in 2024

by Marina Collins - Entertainment Editor
written by Marina Collins - Entertainment Editor

The Echo of Suspicion: How Anti-Muslim Sentiment is Reshaping American Politics

Nearly two decades after the height of post-9/11 scrutiny, and seventeen years after Colin Powell directly challenged the prejudice surrounding Barack Obama’s faith, a familiar pattern is emerging in New York City’s mayoral race. The contest isn’t simply about policy differences; it’s a stark reminder that the question of whether a Muslim can fully participate in American public life – and be trusted to lead – remains a potent and dangerous undercurrent. This isn’t a relic of the past; it’s a warning sign about the fragility of inclusivity and the ease with which fear can be weaponized in the political arena.

From Obama to Mamdani: A Recurring Narrative

In 2008, the whispers about Obama’s religious affiliation, fueled by misinformation and outright falsehoods, forced Colin Powell to address the issue head-on. His simple question – “Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country?” – resonated deeply, but the underlying bias didn’t disappear. Now, Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic socialist and practicing Muslim, is facing a similar barrage of thinly veiled attacks. While critiques of his experience are legitimate fodder for debate, the increasingly frequent association with terrorism, exemplified by the New York Post’s inflammatory headlines like “WEAPONS OF HAMAS DESTRUCTION,” and the deeply troubling imagery invoked by Ellie Cohanim, reveal a more insidious motive.

The parallel to Donald Trump’s 2015 claim of witnessing “thousands” of Muslims celebrating the 9/11 attacks is chilling. Trump’s lie, demonstrably false, tapped into pre-existing anxieties and paved the way for his proposed Muslim ban. The current attacks on Mamdani, and the echoes of Cuomo’s insinuations about his reaction to a hypothetical future terrorist attack, demonstrate that this rhetoric hasn’t vanished – it’s been refined and is being deployed once more.

The Long Shadow of 9/11 and the Erosion of Trust

The events of September 11th, 2001, understandably led to heightened security measures and a focus on preventing future attacks. However, this period also saw a significant erosion of civil liberties for Muslim Americans. The widespread surveillance conducted by the NYPD’s Demographics Unit, as documented by organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union, created a climate of fear and distrust within Muslim communities. This history is crucial to understanding the present moment. The feeling of being perpetually under suspicion hasn’t faded, and it’s easily exploited by those seeking to divide and conquer.

The Politics of “Dual Loyalty”

The accusations leveled against Mamdani, and the historical context of post-9/11 discrimination, tap into the dangerous trope of “dual loyalty” – the idea that Muslim Americans cannot be fully committed to the United States. This accusation, often unspoken, implies that religious faith inherently compromises patriotism. It’s a narrative that has been repeatedly debunked, yet continues to resurface in times of political tension. The fact that even a politician like Andrew Cuomo would entertain such a suggestion, even with a chuckle, is deeply concerning.

Beyond New York: A National Trend?

The situation in New York City isn’t an isolated incident. Across the country, we’re seeing a rise in anti-Muslim rhetoric and discrimination, often fueled by online disinformation and extremist groups. The Southern Poverty Law Center has documented a significant increase in anti-Muslim hate groups in recent years, and the proliferation of Islamophobic content on social media platforms continues to be a major challenge. This trend is particularly worrying given the increasing political polarization and the upcoming 2024 elections. The weaponization of religious identity for political gain is a dangerous game, and one that threatens the very foundations of American democracy.

Furthermore, the increasing visibility of Muslim Americans in politics – from Mamdani’s mayoral run to the election of Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib to Congress – is likely to exacerbate these tensions. As more Muslims seek to participate in the political process, they will inevitably face increased scrutiny and prejudice. The challenge will be to counter this prejudice with education, dialogue, and a renewed commitment to inclusivity.

The question Colin Powell posed in 2008 remains unanswered for many. The current mayoral race in New York City serves as a stark reminder that the fight against religious bigotry is far from over. The future of American politics hinges on our ability to confront these biases and build a society where all citizens, regardless of their faith, are treated with dignity and respect. What steps can communities and leaders take to proactively address and dismantle these harmful narratives before they further erode trust and inclusivity?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Muslims Unite: Turkish and Israeli Efforts to Counter Israeli Regime

by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health
written by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health

“`html


Iran and Turkey Discuss Escalating Gaza Crisis and Regional Stability

Table of Contents

Monday’s phone call between the foreign ministers of Iran and Turkey highlighted growing concerns over the conflict in Gaza and its wider regional implications.

Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Abbas Araghchi, engaged in a phone conversation with his Turkish counterpart, Hakan Fidan, on Monday. Turkey currently holds the rotating presidency of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

The discussion centered on bilateral relations between the two nations. More significantly, it delved into recent regional and international developments that are of mutual interest.

Both ministers expressed their views on the escalating situation in the region. Particular attention was given to the intensification of attacks against Gaza’s civilian population. They also discussed military assaults in Syria.

Minister Araghchi strongly condemned the actions in Gaza. He described them as grave crimes and an escalation of alleged genocide. This included the purposeful denial of essential resources like water and food to the Palestinian people,according to the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs website.

Iran’s top diplomat called upon Islamic countries to act decisively. He urged them to organize an emergency meeting, particularly within the OIC framework. The goal is to activate regional advisory mechanisms to halt the ongoing violence in Gaza and counter what Iran views as regional aggression.

On his part, the Turkish Foreign Minister echoed these sentiments.He condemned the reported crimes and attacks by Israel in Gaza and Syria. Minister Fidan underscored the urgent need for a unified and firm response from Islamic nations to end such actions.

Understanding Diplomatic Engagement

Diplomatic phone calls between foreign ministers are crucial for maintaining international relations. They allow for direct communication on pressing global issues, fostering understanding and potential collaboration.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (O

How might this alliance between Turkey and Israeli opposition figures impact the long-term prospects for a two-state solution?

Muslims Unite: Turkish and Israeli Efforts to Counter Israeli Regime

The Shifting sands of Middle Eastern Alliances

Recent geopolitical developments have witnessed an unprecedented, albeit complex, alignment between Turkey and elements within Israel, driven by a shared objective: countering the increasingly hardline policies of the current israeli regime led by Benjamin Netanyahu. This isn’t a traditional peace initiative, but a pragmatic convergence of interests fueled by concerns over regional stability, the Palestinian issue, and the erosion of moderate voices within Israel itself. The term “Israeli regime” is increasingly used to distinguish the current government from the state of Israel, reflecting a growing discontent among certain Israeli factions. This evolving dynamic represents a notable shift in Middle Eastern politics, impacting Israeli-Turkish relations, Palestinian solidarity, and the broader regional security landscape.

Identifying Shared Concerns: Why This Alliance?

Several key factors underpin this surprising collaboration. Both Turkey and a growing segment of Israeli society share anxieties regarding:

Netanyahu’s Policies: The current Israeli government’s expansion of settlements in the West Bank, its judicial overhaul attempts, and its increasingly aggressive stance towards Palestinians are viewed as destabilizing by both Ankara and many Israelis.

Regional Instability: A prolonged conflict between Israel and Palestine, exacerbated by the current regime’s actions, threatens to ignite wider regional unrest. Turkey, with its strategic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean, has a vested interest in maintaining stability.

Erosion of the Two-State Solution: The diminishing prospects for a viable two-state solution, a long-held position of Turkey, are directly linked to the current Israeli government’s policies.

Internal Israeli Dissent: A significant portion of the Israeli population actively opposes the current government’s agenda, seeking a more moderate and inclusive path forward. This internal opposition is finding resonance with external actors like Turkey.

Gaza Humanitarian Crisis: The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and perceived insufficient action by the current Israeli regime, has prompted turkey to take a more assertive role in providing aid and advocating for a ceasefire.

Turkish Diplomacy and Backchannel Negotiations

Turkey, under President Erdoğan, has been actively engaging in diplomatic efforts to mediate between Israel and Palestine, and more subtly, to foster dialog with dissenting voices within Israel. This includes:

Maintaining Interaction Channels: Despite strained relations in the past, Turkey has maintained open lines of communication with various Israeli officials, including those critical of the current government.

Supporting Palestinian Rights: Turkey continues to be a staunch advocate for Palestinian rights and a two-state solution, providing political and humanitarian support to the Palestinian Authority. This support is framed as a counterbalance to the current Israeli regime’s policies.

Economic Leverage: turkey’s growing economic influence in the region provides it with leverage to encourage moderation and dialogue.

Intelligence Sharing: Reports suggest increased intelligence sharing between Turkish and Israeli security agencies, focused on countering extremist groups and maintaining regional security – a collaboration driven by mutual threat perception, not alignment with the current Israeli government’s policies.

Israeli Opposition and Civil Society Engagement

Within Israel, a growing movement of opposition groups and civil society organizations are actively seeking to challenge the current regime. These groups are:

Anti-Government Protests: Mass protests against the judicial overhaul and the government’s policies have become a regular occurrence in Israel, demonstrating widespread discontent.

Reservist Refusals: A growing number of Israeli military reservists are refusing to serve, citing moral objections to the government’s actions in the West Bank and Gaza. This is a significant challenge to the regime’s authority.

Seeking International Support: Israeli opposition groups are actively seeking international support, including from Turkey, to pressure the government to change course.

Dialogue with Turkish counterparts: Unofficial channels of communication have been established between Israeli opposition figures and Turkish diplomats and civil society representatives. This facilitates the exchange of ideas and strategies.

Focus on Human Rights: Many Israeli NGOs are documenting and publicizing human rights abuses committed by the Israeli military and settlers in the west Bank, raising awareness internationally and putting pressure on the government. Human rights in Palestine are a central focus.

The Role of Hamas and Regional Actors

The dynamic is further complex by the role of Hamas and other regional actors. While Turkey maintains contact with hamas, it dose not equate to endorsement of thier actions. Turkey’s primary goal is to de-escalate tensions and prevent a wider conflict. Other regional players, such as Egypt and Qatar, are also involved in mediation efforts, adding layers of complexity to the situation. The Hamas-israel conflict remains a critical factor influencing regional stability.

Implications for the Future: A New Middle East Order?

This emerging alliance between turkey and elements within Israel, driven by opposition to the current Israeli regime, has significant implications for the future of the Middle East.

Weakening of the Netanyahu Government: Increased international pressure and internal dissent could weaken the current Israeli government,possibly leading to a change in leadership.

Revitalization of the Peace Process: A more moderate Israeli government could be more open to negotiations with the

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Vatican Urges Ratification of UN Landmine Ban

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief


Holy See Calls For Universal Ratification Of Anti-Personnel Landmine treaty

Geneva – In A Pressing Appeal Delivered Friday, The Holy See Has Urged All Nations To Ratify The Anti-Personnel Landmines convention. Archbishop Ettore Balestrero, The Holy See’s Permanent Observer To The United Nations In Geneva, Emphasized The Critical Link between Disarmament And Development During The 2025 Intersessional Meeting Of The Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention.

Marshall Islands Praised For Ratification

Archbishop Balestrero Offered Congratulations To The Marshall Islands For Their Recent Ratification Of The Ottawa Convention. this landmark Treaty, Initially Proposed In Oslo In 1997 And Enacted In 1999, Aims To Eradicate Anti-Personnel Landmines Globally. The Archbishop Reaffirmed The Goal Of Universal Ratification, Highlighting The Convention’s Potential To Alleviate The Suffering Of landmine Victims And Prevent Future Casualties.

Concerns Over Potential Treaty Withdrawals

A Note Of Concern Was Raised Regarding Some States Considering Withdrawing From The Convention. “The Holy See Is Deeply Concerned About The Intention Of Certain States Parties To Withdraw From The Convention,” He Stated. He Urged All Nations Not Yet Participating To Join promptly And To Implement The Treaty Fully.

The Devastating Impact Of Landmines

The united Nations Office For Disarmament Affairs (Unoda) Reports That Anti-Personnel And Anti-Vehicle Landmines Have Inflicted Immense suffering For Decades. These devices Continue To Kill And Injure Civilians Long After Conflicts Cease. The Ottawa Convention Has Already Led To The Destruction Of Over 40 Million Stockpiled Landmines, Significantly Reducing Casualties.

Did You Know? The HALO Trust, one of the world’s largest mine clearance organizations, reported clearing over 77,000 landmines and other explosive remnants of war in 2024 alone.

Disarmament As A Moral Imperative

Archbishop Balestrero Stressed That The Ottawa Convention Prioritizes Human Dignity. He Established “A Clear Link Between Disarmament And Development.” He Expressed Sorrow Over the Numerous Deaths Caused Annually By Explosive Remnants Of War, With Children Disproportionately Affected.He Affirmed That Existing Disarmament Treaties Are Not Just Legal Obligations But Also “Moral Commitments To Present And Future Generations.”

According To The Archbishop, Compliance With International Law And Disarmament Treaties Strengthens Nations By Showing “An Enduring Source Of Strength And Duty towards All Of Humanity.”

Military Spending Under Scrutiny

The Holy See’s Representative Sharply Criticized The Excessively High Global Military Spending. The Sum, Which exceeded $2.7 Trillion In 2024, Was Described As “A Grave Imbalance and Even Scandal.” He Contrasted This Enormous Expenditure With The Insufficient Resources Allocated To Essential Services Such As Social Assistance,Food Security,And Human Development.

The Archbishop Emphasized That “No Peace Is possible Without True Disarmament.” He Warned That National Defense should Not Transform Into A “Race To Rearmament.”

A Call for Dialogue And Reason

Archbishop Balestrero concluded By Urging All Nations To “Return To Reason And Dialogue,” Advocating For Diplomatic Solutions To Prevent Escalation. The Holy See Reaffirmed Its Commitment To Promoting Peace. It Also Stated The Importance Of Preserving The Convention, “Remaining Fully Confident That The Sanctity Of Human Life…Will Continue To Inspire Its Implementation.”

Pro Tip: Support organizations like the HALO Trust or Mines Advisory Group (MAG) to contribute to global mine clearance efforts.

Aspect Description
Objective To Eliminate Anti-Personnel Landmines Worldwide
Core Obligations Prohibits Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer Of Anti-Personnel Mines
Impact Over 40 Million Landmines Destroyed; Reduced Casualties
Holy See’s Role Advocates For Universal Ratification And Implementation
Challenges States Parties Considering Withdrawal; Continued Casualties From Existing Mines

Do you believe that increased diplomatic efforts can lead to wider adoption of the Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention? What role can individual citizens play in supporting demining efforts worldwide?

The Enduring importance Of Landmine Clearance

Landmine Clearance Remains A Critical Humanitarian Effort Years After Conflicts End. Explosive Remnants Of War Continue To Pose A Meaningful Threat To Civilians, Impeding Development And Causing Lasting Trauma.Organizations Dedicated to Demining Play A Vital Role In Reclaiming Land and Protecting communities.

The Ongoing Support For And Expansion Of International treaties Like The Ottawa convention Are Essential For Creating A Safer And More Secure World. Continued Advocacy And Resource Allocation Are Needed To Achieve A Landmine-Free Future.

Frequently Asked Questions About Anti-Personnel Landmines

  • What Is The Goal Of The Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention?

    The primary goal is to eliminate anti-personnel landmines worldwide, preventing further casualties and suffering.

  • Why Is The Holy See Involved In This Issue?

    The Holy See views the convention as a moral imperative, linking disarmament with human development and the sanctity of life.

  • What progress Has Been Made In Landmine Destruction?

    Over 40 Million Landmines Have Been Destroyed Under The Ottawa Convention, Significantly Reducing Casualties.

  • What Are The Main Challenges To Eliminating Landmines?

    Challenges Include States Considering Withdrawal From The Convention And The Presence Of Existing Mines In Conflict Zones.

  • How Does Military Spending Relate To This Issue?

    The Holy See Criticizes Excessive Military spending, Arguing That Resources Should Be Redirected To Social Assistance And Peace-Building Efforts.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation below. How can we further promote the goals of the Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.