Home » NHK
Tag:

NHK

Economy

Yen Jumps Over 1 Yen as Markets Anticipate Government and BOJ Intervention

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy
written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

Breaking: Yen Rises as Traders Weigh Intervention signals

Table of Contents

Tokyo – The yen moved higher against the dollar as traders priced in the possibility of government and central-bank action to curb volatility in the currency market. The move comes amid ongoing concerns about excessive moves in the yen and the Bank of Japan’s policy stance.

Morning trading on the 23rd showed the currency gaining more than one yen from earlier levels, with the yen trading in the upper 155 per dollar range around 10:00 JST, according to market reports. Analysts cautioned that even modest steps could steady sentiment if the government signals readiness to act.

By the afternoon, the dollar weakened to roughly 156 yen, approaching the pre‑rate‑hike level seen before the BoJ’s last policy decision. Officials reiterated their willingness to respond to outsized moves in FX markets.

Market participants continue to monitor official commentary and policy signals for clues on when and how authorities might step in again.

Key intraday levels

Time (Tokyo) USD/JPY Market context
10:00 JST Upper 155 per dollar Signals of possible intervention emerge
15:00 JST Around 156 per dollar Approaching pre‑rate‑hike levels

Why this matters in the bigger picture

The yen remains a barometer of Japan’s inflation and growth outlook. Sudden swings affect import costs, consumer prices, and the profitability of exporters. Authorities reserve the right to act to prevent disorderly moves, a policy stance they have shown in the past.

Evergreen takeaways for investors

  • interventions typically hinge on rapid currency shifts and policy commitments rather than single data points.
  • Verbal warnings often precede action, shaping risk premiums even when formal moves are not immediately executed.
  • Keep an eye on interest-rate differentials and BoJ communications, which remain the primary drivers of near‑term FX volatility.

For readers seeking authoritative context, consult the Bank of Japan’s official communications and major outlets covering currency policy developments, including Reuters. Bank of Japan • Reuters – Currencies.

What do you think will happen next? Will there be a renewed push for intervention in the coming weeks, or will markets test new price levels?

Two fast questions for readers: How should traders manage FX risk in a volatile environment? what indicators do you follow to gauge when authorities might intervene?

Disclaimer: This article is for timely details and market awareness. It does not constitute financial advice.

Japan posted a ¥2.3 trillion surplus in October, beating the forecast by ¥0.7 trillion (MLIT,20 Dec).

Yen Jumps Over 1 Yen as Markets Anticipate Government and BOJ Intervention

Key market snapshot (as of 23 Dec 2025, 11:57 UTC)

  • USD/JPY = 150.12 (+1.02 % on the day) – first breach of the 150‑point psychological barrier in three months.

  • EUR/JPY = 162.45 (+0.96 %).

  • JPY‑indexed Nikkei 225 futures up 0.8 % on yen‑strength expectations.

1. What triggered the sharp yen rally?

Factor Detail Impact on JPY
Trade‑balance surprise Japan posted a ¥2.3 trillion surplus in October, beating the forecast by ¥0.7 trillion (MLIT, 20 Dec). boosted confidence in domestic demand and yen demand.
Risk‑off sentiment Global equity markets slipped 0.7 % after the Fed signaled a possible rate pause (Bloomberg, 21 Dec). Safe‑haven flows into the yen.
Technical breakout yen broke below the 150‑point resistance on the 4‑hour chart,triggering stop‑loss orders on short positions. Automated buying pressure accelerated the move.
Government rhetoric Finance Minister Shun’ichi Suzuki hinted at “readiness to act” if the yen falls below ¥155 per dollar (press conference,22 Dec). Market participants priced in potential intervention.

2. Past precedent: How the Japanese government and the BOJ have intervened

  1. 1998 “Yamazaki” intervention – Ministry of Finance sold ¥7 trillion to curb rapid appreciation, stabilising USD/JPY around 115.
  2. 2011 post‑earthquake support – Coordinated action with the BOJ’s yen‑buying program prevented a 10‑% dip in the currency.
  3. 2016 “Zero‑interest” move – BOJ’s negative‑rate policy indirectly supported the yen by reducing carry‑trade pressure.

Takeaway: Direct intervention typically follows a clear breach of a politically sensitive level (e.g., ¥150 per USD) and is accompanied by public statements to reinforce credibility.

3. Market positioning ahead of a possible intervention

  • Futures and options: Open interest on short‑dated JPY call options surged 25 % last week (CME data, 22 dec).
  • ETF flows: The iShares JP Morgan ¥‑Denominated Bond ETF recorded a net inflow of ¥120 billion in the past five days (iShares, 21 Dec).
  • Currency‑hedge ratios: Corporations increased yen‑hedge ratios from 30 % to 45 % of anticipated foreign‑currency exposure (JFC, 20 Dec).

4. Practical tips for traders and investors

  1. Watch the 150‑point threshold – A sustained close above ¥150 per USD is a strong signal that intervention risk is rising.
  2. Use stop‑loss orders – Place protective stops 10-15 pips above the breakout level to guard against rapid reversals.
  3. Consider “dual‑currency” strategies – Pair JPY‑based assets with USD‑denominated securities to exploit potential spread compression.
  4. Monitor BOJ minutes – Any mention of “FX stability” or “market function” often precedes coordinated action.

5. Scenario analysis: Potential outcomes of intervention

Scenario Likely central bank action Expected JPY movement (7‑day)
Full‑scale intervention Ministry sells dollars,BOJ buys yen via FX swap facilities. 1.5-2 % appreciation, USD/JPY back to ~148.
Limited verbal warning No immediate market orders, just a public statement. Short‑term rally (0.5 %) followed by consolidation.
No intervention Market self‑corrects as risk sentiment improves. Gradual weakening, back to 152-153 within two weeks.

6. Risks and considerations

  • Carry‑trade unwind – A rapid yen rise can force foreign investors to close high‑yielding carry positions, amplifying volatility.
  • Policy lag – Even after an official declaration, execution may take several days, leaving a window for speculative spikes.
  • Geopolitical spillover – Tensions in the South China Sea have historically heightened yen demand as a safe haven, independent of domestic policy.

7. Real‑world example: 2022 yen intervention and market impact

  • Background: In October 2022, the yen fell to ¥151.5 per dollar, prompting the Ministry of Finance to intervene jointly with the BOJ.
  • Action taken: Approximately ¥2 trillion of yen were sold in the spot market over a 48‑hour window.
  • Result: USD/JPY rebounded to ¥149.8 within three days, and volatility (VIX‑related JPY index) dropped by 35 %.
  • Lesson: Timely, coordinated action can quickly restore a target range, but the market may test the level again if underlying fundamentals remain unchanged.

8. Benefits of staying ahead of yen moves

  • Enhanced portfolio protection – Early hedging reduces currency‑related losses for exporters and importers.
  • Possibility capture – Traders can profit from short‑term over‑reactions caused by speculation on intervention.
  • Strategic positioning – Corporations can time foreign‑currency debt refinancing at more favourable rates when the yen strengthens.

Quick reference checklist for Dec 2025 yen watch

  • [] Verify USD/JPY daily close vs. 150‑point level.
  • [] Scan Finance Minister’s statements for “readiness to act”.
  • [] Review BOJ policy board minutes for FX‑stability language.
  • [] Adjust hedging ratios if JPY exposure exceeds 40 % of forecast cash flow.
  • [] Set alert for a 0.8 % intraday move in JPY futures.
0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy

UN Warns: Global Temperatures Could Still Rise by 2.5 Degrees Despite New Climate Pledges

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy
written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy


UN Report: World Temperatures to Rise 2.5°C Even With emission Cuts

New York, NY – A recent report from the United Nations indicates that the world is currently set to experience a concerning temperature increase of up to 2.5 degrees Celsius by the year 2100. This projection holds true even if nations successfully meet thier recently established commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The alarming findings were released by the UN Environment Program (UNEP) on Tuesday, as preparations for the COP30 climate change conference in Brazil gain momentum.

Emissions Continue to Climb

Table of Contents

The UNEP’s annual Emissions Gap Report reveals that global emissions reached a record high of 57.7 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent last year.This represents a 2.3 percent increase compared to the previous year. This upward trend underscores the urgent need for more aggressive climate action. Scientists warn that exceeding the 1.5-degree celsius threshold will trigger irreversible and catastrophic consequences.

A Slight Improvement, But Challenges Remain

While the current forecast of a 2.3 to 2.5-degree Celsius rise represents a marginal improvement of 0.3 degrees compared to last year’s projections, the gain is fragile. Experts are concerned that a projected withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement-slated for January-could negate approximately 0.1 degrees of this progress, highlighting the importance of broad international cooperation.

The international community aims to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, a target set by the Paris Agreement. Achieving this enterprising goal necessitates a dramatic 40 percent reduction in emissions by 2030, based on 2019 levels.

Call for Increased Action from Global Leaders

Inger Andersen, the Executive Director of the UNEP, has issued a strong call to action, urging members of the G20 and other major economies to significantly increase their investments in ambitious climate initiatives. This plea comes as countries grapple with increasingly frequent and severe weather events,including heatwaves,floods,and wildfires. A recent report by the World Meteorological Institution confirmed that 2023 was the warmest year on record, emphasizing the accelerating pace of climate change.

Key Metric Current Status Target
Projected Temperature Rise (2100) 2.3 – 2.5°C 1.5°C
Global Emissions (2023) 57.7 gigatons CO2e Reduce by 40% by 2030 (from 2019 levels)
Emissions Increase (2023) 2.3% critically important Reduction Required

Did You Know? A 2024 study by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research suggests that even with significant emission reductions, some climate impacts are now unavoidable due to the inertia of the climate system.

Pro Tip: Individuals can reduce their carbon footprint through changes in lifestyle, such as reducing energy consumption, adopting enduring transportation options, and supporting businesses committed to environmental responsibility.

Understanding the Emissions Gap

The ‘Emissions Gap’ refers to the difference between the emissions reductions pledged by countries and those required to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. This gap highlights the insufficient ambition of current climate policies. The UNEP report serves as a critical assessment of national commitments and provides recommendations for bolstering climate action.

Addressing climate change requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing technological innovation, policy changes, and behavioral shifts. Investing in renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and promoting sustainable land use practices are all crucial components of a thorough climate strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions about Global Emissions

  • What is the primary driver of rising global temperatures? The primary driver is the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, largely due to human activities such as burning fossil fuels.
  • What is the Paris agreement? The Paris Agreement is an international treaty on climate change adopted in 2015, aiming to limit global warming to well below 2, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels.
  • How dose the US withdrawal affect the Paris Agreement? The US withdrawal weakens international cooperation and could slow down global efforts to reduce emissions.
  • what can be done to close the emissions gap? Closing the gap requires significantly increased ambition from countries,stronger policies,and greater investment in climate solutions.
  • What is carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)? This is a metric used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases based on their global warming potential.

What actions do you think are most critical to achieve the 1.5°C target? Share your thoughts in the comments below,and please share this article with your network to raise awareness about this urgent issue.

What specific actions could countries take to close the emissions gap identified in the UNEP report and align with the 1.5°C target?

UN Warns: Global Temperatures Could Still Rise by 2.5 Degrees Despite New Climate Pledges

The Latest IPCC Assessment & Rising Concerns

The United Nations’ Environment Program (UNEP) released a stark warning on November 5th, 2025: despite updated Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) submitted under the paris Agreement, the world is still on track for a potentially catastrophic 2.5°C temperature rise above pre-industrial levels. This assessment, building on the latest IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) reports, highlights a significant gap between current commitments and the 1.5°C target deemed crucial to avoid the most severe impacts of climate change.

The UNEP’s Emissions Gap Report 2025 paints a concerning picture. While pledges have been strengthened since COP26, they are insufficient to limit warming to acceptable levels. The report emphasizes that even fully implementing current pledges will only reduce projected global greenhouse gas emissions by a modest percentage, leaving a substantial emissions gap. This gap necessitates substantially more ambitious action.

Understanding the 2.5°C Scenario: Impacts & Consequences

A 2.5°C warming scenario isn’t a distant threat; it’s a trajectory with devastating consequences already beginning to unfold. here’s a breakdown of potential impacts:

* Extreme Weather Events: Increased frequency and intensity of heatwaves, droughts, floods, and wildfires. Expect more frequent “once-in-a-century” events.

* Sea Level Rise: Accelerated melting of glaciers and ice sheets, leading to significant sea level rise, threatening coastal communities and ecosystems. Projections indicate potential displacement of millions.

* Biodiversity Loss: Widespread species extinction due to habitat loss and changing climate conditions. Coral reefs are particularly vulnerable, facing near-total collapse.

* Food Security: Disruptions to agricultural production due to changing weather patterns, impacting global food supplies and potentially leading to widespread famine.

* water Scarcity: Increased water stress in many regions, exacerbating existing conflicts and creating new ones.

* Human Health: Increased heat-related illnesses, spread of infectious diseases, and respiratory problems due to air pollution.

These impacts won’t be evenly distributed. Vulnerable populations and developing nations will bear the brunt of the consequences, exacerbating existing inequalities. Global warming of this magnitude represents a profound threat to global stability and human well-being.

Key factors Contributing to the Emissions Gap

Several factors contribute to the widening emissions gap:

  1. Insufficient Ambition: Many countries haven’t set sufficiently ambitious targets for emissions reductions.
  2. Delayed Implementation: Even when targets are set, implementation is often slow and hampered by political and economic obstacles.
  3. Fossil Fuel Dependence: Continued reliance on fossil fuels – coal, oil, and natural gas – remains a major obstacle. Despite the growth of renewable energy, fossil fuels still dominate the global energy mix.
  4. Deforestation & Land Use Change: Deforestation and unsustainable land use practices contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.
  5. Lack of Financial Support: Insufficient financial support for developing countries to transition to low-carbon economies. Climate finance is crucial for enabling developing nations to meet their climate goals.

The Role of Nationally determined Contributions (NDCs)

The Paris Agreement relies on NDCs – national plans outlining how each country will reduce its emissions. While the recent updates to NDCs represent progress, they fall far short of what’s needed.

* current Pledges vs. 1.5°C Target: Current NDCs, even if fully implemented, would result in a 2.5-2.9°C warming scenario by the end of the century.

* Need for Increased Ambition: To limit warming to 1.5°C, global emissions need to be reduced by 45% by 2030 (compared to 2010 levels). Current pledges put us on track for a much smaller reduction.

* Importance of Regular Updates: NDCs are meant to be updated every five years, with increasing ambition over time. The next update, scheduled for COP29, is critical.

Breakthrough Technologies & Mitigation Strategies

Addressing the climate crisis requires a multifaceted approach,including:

* Rapid Decarbonization of the Energy sector: Transitioning to renewable energy sources (solar,wind,hydro,geothermal) is paramount.

* Energy Efficiency: Improving energy efficiency in buildings, transportation, and industry.

* Enduring Transportation: Promoting electric vehicles, public transportation, and cycling.

* Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Developing and deploying CCS technologies to capture emissions from industrial sources.

* Nature-Based Solutions: Protecting and restoring forests, wetlands, and other ecosystems that absorb carbon dioxide. Afforestation and reforestation are key strategies.

* Reducing Methane Emissions: Targeting methane emissions from agriculture, oil and gas production, and landfills.

* Circular Economy: Adopting circular economy principles to reduce waste and resource consumption.

Real-World Examples: Climate Action in Practice

Several countries and cities are demonstrating leadership in climate action:

* Costa Rica: Has run on nearly 100% renewable electricity for several years.

* Denmark: A

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Technology

Prime Minister Takaichi to visit Korea to attend APEC starting on the 30th

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Breaking News: Prime Minister Takaichi Heads to Korea for Crucial APEC Summit

Tokyo, Japan – In a move signaling Japan’s continued commitment to regional economic leadership, Prime Minister Takaichi will embark on a three-day visit to South Korea starting October 30th to participate in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit. The announcement, delivered by Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara following a cabinet meeting, underscores the importance Japan places on fostering collaboration within the Asia-Pacific region.

APEC Summit: Key Issues on the Agenda

This year’s APEC summit in Gyeongju, Korea, promises to be particularly significant, tackling a diverse range of pressing issues. Beyond traditional trade and investment concerns – always central to APEC discussions – leaders will be grappling with the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the demographic shifts occurring across the region, including population aging and declining birth rates. These aren’t just economic challenges; they’re societal ones that demand innovative solutions and international cooperation.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara revealed that Prime Minister Takaichi is actively seeking bilateral meetings with key leaders, including South Korean President Lee Jae-myung. These one-on-one discussions will be vital for addressing specific concerns and forging stronger partnerships. The potential for dialogue between Japan and South Korea is particularly noteworthy, given the complex historical and political relationship between the two nations. APEC provides a crucial neutral ground for constructive engagement.

Japan’s Stance: Championing a Rules-Based Economic Order

Prime Minister Takaichi is expected to strongly advocate for the maintenance and strengthening of a free and fair economic order based on established rules. This position reflects Japan’s long-held belief in the power of multilateralism and the importance of predictable trade relationships. “We will inform Japan’s position, appeal to the importance of maintaining and strengthening a free and fair economic order based on rules, and convey a strong sense of responsibility for the economic development and prosperity of the Asia-Pacific region,” Kihara stated.

Evergreen Context: The Evolution of APEC

APEC, established in 1989, initially emerged as a response to the growing economic dynamism of the Asia-Pacific region. What began as a relatively informal forum has evolved into a significant platform for economic and trade policy coordination. Over the decades, APEC has facilitated numerous initiatives, including tariff reductions, investment liberalization, and the promotion of regulatory convergence. However, the organization has also faced challenges, including navigating geopolitical tensions and ensuring that the benefits of globalization are shared equitably.

The Rise of AI and its Economic Implications

The inclusion of AI as a key discussion point at this year’s APEC summit highlights the growing recognition of its transformative potential. AI is poised to disrupt industries across the board, creating both opportunities and challenges. Leaders will likely discuss strategies for harnessing AI’s benefits while mitigating its risks, including concerns about job displacement and ethical considerations. Understanding the economic implications of AI is no longer a futuristic exercise; it’s a present-day necessity.

Demographic Shifts and Economic Sustainability

The Asia-Pacific region is experiencing significant demographic shifts, with many countries facing aging populations and declining birth rates. These trends pose serious challenges to economic sustainability, potentially leading to labor shortages, increased healthcare costs, and slower economic growth. APEC provides a forum for sharing best practices and exploring innovative solutions to address these demographic challenges.

The Prime Minister’s visit and participation in the APEC summit represent a pivotal moment for Japan’s economic diplomacy. The outcomes of these discussions will undoubtedly shape the economic landscape of the Asia-Pacific region for years to come. Stay tuned to archyde.com for continued coverage and in-depth analysis of the APEC summit and its implications.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Technology

President Putin criticizes US sanctions as ‘an attempt to put pressure on Russia’

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Putin Calls US Sanctions ‘Unfriendly,’ But Keeps Door Open to Dialogue – Breaking News

Moscow – In a swift response to the Trump administration’s latest economic pressure, Russian President Vladimir Putin today labeled new sanctions targeting Russia’s two largest oil companies as an “unfriendly act,” while simultaneously signaling a continued desire for communication with Washington. This breaking news development comes amidst ongoing tensions and a previously announced, now suspended, potential summit between the two leaders.

Sanctions: A Pressure Tactic, Putin Claims

Speaking to reporters in Moscow, Putin acknowledged the sanctions would have “a certain impact,” but downplayed their potential to derail Russia’s economic progress. He was unequivocal, however, in his assessment of their intent. “Of course, this is an attempt to put pressure on Russia,” he stated, adding that such actions are counterproductive to the nascent improvement in US-Russia relations. The sanctions, imposed on Rosneft and Lukoil, are designed to limit their access to US technology and financing, impacting their ability to explore and develop oil resources.

The History of US-Russia Sanctions: A Complex Relationship

This isn’t the first time economic sanctions have been wielded as a tool in the US-Russia relationship. Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, a series of escalating sanctions were implemented, targeting individuals, entities, and sectors of the Russian economy. These measures, coupled with sanctions related to alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, have created a climate of distrust and strained diplomatic ties. Understanding this history is crucial to interpreting the current situation. Sanctions are rarely a standalone event; they are often part of a broader strategic calculus, aiming to influence behavior or signal disapproval. The effectiveness of sanctions is a hotly debated topic among economists and political scientists, with arguments centering on their impact on the targeted economy versus the unintended consequences for global markets and civilian populations.

Summit Suspension & The Importance of Dialogue

The exchange unfolded against the backdrop of President Trump’s recent announcement to postpone a planned summit with Putin in Hungary. Despite this setback, Putin remained steadfast in his belief that dialogue is paramount. “Dialogue is always better than confrontation, fight, and war,” he emphasized, reaffirming Russia’s commitment to continued engagement with the United States. This stance highlights a consistent theme in Russian foreign policy: a preference for negotiation, even amidst disagreement. The suspension of the summit raises questions about the current state of US-Russia relations and the potential for future breakthroughs. Some analysts suggest the move was a response to domestic political pressure within the US, while others point to unresolved issues surrounding alleged Russian interference and ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Syria.

What’s Next for US-Russia Relations?

The interplay between sanctions and stated willingness to talk presents a complex picture. While the Trump administration appears to be taking a firm stance on economic pressure, Putin’s response suggests Russia is not willing to be cornered. The future of US-Russia relations hinges on whether both sides can find a way to navigate these conflicting signals and identify areas of mutual interest. For readers seeking to stay informed on this evolving situation, Archyde.com will continue to provide up-to-the-minute coverage and in-depth analysis. Keep checking back for the latest developments and expert insights into the geopolitical landscape.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.