Home » oil gas
Tag:

oil gas

world

Dangote Refinery: Report Petrol Price Gouging at MRS Stations

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Nigeria’s Fuel Price Watchdog: Dangote’s Hotline and the Future of Downstream Regulation

A single phone call could soon be the key to stabilizing Nigeria’s volatile fuel market. Dangote Petroleum Refinery’s launch of a nationwide hotline – 0800123 5264 – for reporting petrol price gouging at MRS Oil stations isn’t just a consumer protection measure; it’s a potential blueprint for a new era of accountability in the downstream petroleum sector. With the capacity to supply 50 million litres daily, the refinery is betting on transparency and public participation to ensure Nigerians benefit from reduced prices, but the long-term success hinges on more than just a phone number.

The Power of the Consumer: A Shift in Enforcement

For decades, monitoring and enforcing fuel prices in Nigeria has been a challenge plagued by corruption, logistical hurdles, and a lack of real-time data. Traditional methods – relying on government inspectors – have proven insufficient. Dangote’s initiative cleverly leverages the power of the consumer, effectively crowdsourcing price monitoring. This approach isn’t entirely new; similar models have been used in other sectors to combat fraud and ensure fair pricing. However, its application to Nigeria’s complex fuel distribution network is a significant step. The success of this hotline will depend on widespread awareness and a public willing to actively report violations.

Beyond the Hotline: Addressing Systemic Challenges

While the hotline is a welcome development, it’s crucial to recognize it’s a tactical solution to a systemic problem. The root causes of fuel price manipulation – including logistical bottlenecks, transportation costs, and potential collusion among marketers – won’t disappear with a single phone number. Effective regulation requires a multi-pronged approach. This includes strengthening the regulatory framework, investing in infrastructure to improve fuel distribution efficiency, and promoting competition within the downstream sector. The Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021 aimed to address some of these issues, but full implementation and consistent enforcement remain critical. The NNPC provides a detailed overview of the PIA’s objectives.

The Role of Technology in Fuel Distribution

Looking ahead, technology will play an increasingly vital role in ensuring transparency and efficiency in Nigeria’s fuel supply chain. Beyond hotlines, solutions like real-time fuel tracking systems – utilizing IoT sensors and data analytics – can provide regulators with a comprehensive view of fuel movement from refinery to filling station. Blockchain technology could also be employed to create a secure and transparent record of transactions, reducing the potential for fraud and manipulation. These technologies aren’t just about monitoring prices; they’re about optimizing the entire supply chain, reducing costs, and ensuring reliable fuel availability.

The Economic Impact of Local Refining

Local refining, as exemplified by Dangote’s efforts, is more than just about cheaper petrol. It’s a strategic imperative for Nigeria’s economic stability. Reducing reliance on imported fuel conserves valuable foreign exchange, strengthens the naira, and enhances national energy security. The refinery’s commitment to supplying 50 million litres daily is a significant step towards self-sufficiency, but maximizing the economic benefits requires a holistic approach. This includes developing a robust petrochemical industry to utilize refinery byproducts, creating jobs across the value chain, and fostering a conducive investment climate for further expansion.

Navigating Potential Pitfalls: Scarcity and Market Dynamics

The transition to a locally refined fuel market isn’t without its risks. Marketers, accustomed to the margins associated with importing fuel, may attempt to create artificial scarcity or manipulate supply to maintain profitability. Dangote’s warning against such practices is a clear signal, but proactive regulatory oversight is essential. The government must be prepared to swiftly and decisively address any attempts to disrupt the market and exploit consumers. Furthermore, fluctuations in global crude oil prices will continue to impact domestic fuel prices, requiring a flexible and responsive regulatory framework.

The success of initiatives like Dangote’s hotline, coupled with sustained investment in technology and infrastructure, will determine whether Nigeria can finally break free from the cycles of fuel scarcity and price volatility. The future of fuel distribution in Nigeria isn’t just about cheaper petrol; it’s about building a more resilient, transparent, and sustainable energy sector. What role do you see for independent monitoring bodies in ensuring fair pricing and supply across Nigeria?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

132 Nigerian Companies Secure Over $360 Million in Local Content Funds, Lifting Domestic Oil & Gas Participation to 61%

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Breaking: Nigeria’s Local-Content Drive Sees 132 Firms Use Over $359 Million in Funding

Table of Contents

A government-backed push to deepen indigenous participation in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector has recorded striking progress. Data released by the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board show that 132 Nigerian companies accessed a total of 51.785 billion naira and 359.653 million dollars from local content intervention funds.

The funding package includes the $350 million Nigerian Content Intervention Fund, a N50 million Working Capital Fund backed by NEXIM Bank, and the Women in Oil and Gas Fund. The measures are designed to strengthen the capacity of Nigerian firms and sustain local participation across the industry.

According to the board’s fresh figures, three manufacturing firms received 7.561 billion naira, while 38 companies secured 22.144 billion naira and 205.666 million dollars for asset acquisition. Ten firms obtained 2.232 billion naira and 24.728 million dollars to finance contracts,and 25 companies benefited from 15.98 billion naira and 115.998 million dollars in loan refinancing.

Speaking at a media stakeholders workshop in Abuja,the NCDMB’s Director of Corporate Services,Abdulmalik Halilu,said the interventions have driven local participation from 44 percent three years ago to 61 percent this year. He highlighted the NLNG Train-7 project as a tangible success, noting that it engaged about 8,000 Nigerians alongside 500 expatriates, involved 1,400 vendors, and achieved local fabrication of critical components such as pressure vessels, certified pumps, boots, and cables.

Halilu stressed that local content is rooted in domestication and global best practices, and not a mere exercise in in-country promotion or the substitution of inferior goods. “You cannot enforce local content without capacity,” he said,pointing to the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act,which contains 17 broad schedules and roughly 300 specific performance indicators.

The director outlined how local content advances industrialisation, job creation, research ecosystems, ownership of key assets, sustainable operations, environmental duty, and profitable indigenous participation in the oil and gas sector.

Nigeria’s local-content ambition stretches beyond its borders. Halilu said the NCDMB is promoting similar development across Africa, where the continent holds about 125 billion barrels of crude and more than 800 trillion cubic feet of gas.Through bodies like the African Petroleum Producers’ Organisation, the initiative aims to multiply impact wiht ventures such as the Africa Energy Bank and the Brazzaville Accord on local content.

The board’s General Manager of Corporate Communications, Obinna Ezeobi, affirmed ongoing support for capacity-building among Nigerian journalists to improve reporting on the oil and gas sector, reinforcing the drive toward greater transparency and public understanding.

Key funding breakdown and beneficiaries
Category Beneficiaries Disbursement (Naira) Disbursement (USD)
Overall funding 132 firms 51.785 billion 359.653 million
Asset acquisition 38 firms 22.144 billion 205.666 million
Contract financing 10 firms 2.232 billion 24.728 million
Loan refinancing 25 firms 15.98 billion 115.998 million
Manufacturing engagement 3 firms 7.561 billion N/A

What this means for Nigeria-and Africa

The surge in local-content uptake signals a considerable shift toward domestication, industrialisation, and long-term value creation in Nigeria’s energy sector. With capacity-building at the core,the policy aims to turn participation into ownership of critical assets,drive employment,and reduce dependence on foreign capability-benefits already visible in major projects like NLNG Train-7.

Beyond Nigeria, the initiative is framed as a continental effort. By leveraging regional platforms and agreements, the board intends to export best practices, strengthen supply chains, and bolster Africa’s oil and gas competitiveness on the global stage.

As the program scales, industry observers will watch for continued performance tracking and transparency in how funds translate into lasting local capabilities. The board’s insistence on measurable outcomes remains central to sustaining momentum and ensuring that local content becomes a durable driver of growth.

What’s your take on Nigeria’s local-content policy and its regional implications? Can these funds spur broader industrial development across Africa?

Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell us which sectors you think could benefit most from similar interventions.

, seismic, rig mobilisation) 48 $140 M 39% 2 Midstream infrastructure (pipelines, processing plants) 32 $95 M 26% 3 Downstream refining & petrochemicals 27 $65 M 18% 4 Support services (logistics, catering, security) 15 $40 M 11% 5 Technology & training (digital platforms, skills growth) 10 $20 M 6%

How the Funding Boosts Domestic Participation

132 Nigerian Companies Secure Over $360 Million in Local Content Funds – Domestic Oil & Gas Participation Rises to 61%

Overview of the 2025 Local Content Allocation

  • Total funds released: $360 million+

  • Beneficiaries: 132 registered Nigerian oil‑ and gas‑related firms

  • Domestic participation increase: from 53% (2023) to 61% of total onshore and offshore activities

  • Funding source: Nigerian Local Content Fund (NLCF) administered by the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA)

The latest disbursement marks the largest single‑year injection into the Nigerian oil and gas local content program since the fund’s inception in 2020, reflecting the government’s push to deepen domestic value‑addition and capacity‑building within the sector [1].

Sector‑by‑Sector Funding Breakdown

Rank Sub‑sector Companies Involved Funding Allocated (USD) Share of Total Funds
1 Upstream services (well drilling, seismic, rig mobilisation) 48 $140 M 39%
2 Midstream infrastructure (pipelines, processing plants) 32 $95 M 26%
3 Downstream refining & petrochemicals 27 $65 M 18%
4 Support services (logistics, catering, security) 15 $40 M 11%
5 Technology & training (digital platforms, skills development) 10 $20 M 6%

How the Funding Boosts Domestic Participation

  1. Increased indigenous contract awards – 61% of new oil‑field contracts now go to Nigerian‑owned firms, up from 53% in 2023.
  2. Enhanced workforce localisation – Companies receiving NLCF support have raised local hiring rates by an average of 23%.
  3. Technology transfer acceleration – Funding earmarked for digital oilfield solutions has led to 15 pilots of AI‑driven reservoir modelling by local tech startups.
  4. Supply‑chain deepening – Midstream projects funded through the NLCF source 71% of steel, valves, and pipe fittings from nigerian manufacturers.

Benefits for Nigerian Companies

  • Improved creditworthiness – Access to NLCF capital reduces reliance on costly external borrowing.
  • Competitive edge – Local content compliance scores are now a mandatory selection criterion for international oil majors.
  • Risk mitigation – Government‑backed funds shield firms from market volatility, especially during global oil‑price fluctuations.
  • Talent development – Dedicated training grants have produced 4,800 certified technicians and engineers in the past year.

Practical Tips for Securing future Local Content Funds

  1. Align proposals with the NLCF priorities – Emphasise job creation, local procurement, and technology transfer.
  2. Maintain up‑to‑date compliance documentation – Regularly audit your Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring (NCDM) reports.
  3. Leverage partnerships – Joint ventures with established local EPC contractors increase proposal credibility.
  4. Showcase measurable outcomes – Include clear KPIs such as “local employment increase of X%” or “percentage of indigenous material usage.”
  5. Engage early with the DPR’s Local Content Committee – Pre‑submission briefings can identify potential gaps before formal request.

Real‑World Example: XYZ Offshore Services Ltd.

  • Background: A Lagos‑based marine engineering firm with a 10‑year track record in rig support.
  • Funding received: $12 million under the upstream services tranche.
  • Impact: Secured a $45 million contract to provide offshore support vessels for a major international oil company,creating 250 new skilled jobs and sourcing 80% of spare parts from Nigerian suppliers.
  • key takeaway: Demonstrating a robust local supply chain and a clear training plan positioned XYZ as a preferred local partner.

Regulatory Framework guiding the Funding

  • Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021 – Establishes the legal basis for local content obligations and the NLCF.
  • Nigerian Oil and Gas Local Content Regulations (2022‑2024 revisions) – Define minimum local participation thresholds for different project phases.
  • Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) Guidelines – Provide operational procedures for fund application, monitoring, and audit.

Compliance with these regulations is verified through the Local Content Monitoring system (LCMS), which tracks performance against the 61% domestic participation target.

Challenges & Mitigation Strategies

Challenge Impact Mitigation
Limited indigenous manufacturing capacity Delays in meeting material‑localisation quotas Encourage joint ventures with foreign OEMs to set up local assembly lines
Skills gap in high‑tech subsea engineering Slower adoption of advanced offshore technologies Expand scholarship programmes with Nigerian universities and technical colleges
Currency volatility affecting project budgets Increased cost overruns for local contractors utilize NLCF’s hedging facilities and link contracts to the Central Bank’s exchange rate basket

Future outlook for Nigerian Local Content

  • Target for 2026: Raise domestic participation to 65% across the oil & gas value chain.
  • Planned fund increase: Additional $150 million earmarked for renewable‑energy integration projects within the petroleum sector.
  • Emerging opportunities: Growth in greenfield petrochemical parks and digital oilfield platforms is expected to attract more Nigerian SMEs into high‑value segments.

Key takeaways for industry players:

  • Stay proactive in aligning with government local‑content policies.

  • Leverage the NLCF to finance expansion, technology upgrades, and workforce development.

  • Monitor regulatory updates through DPR bulletins to ensure ongoing eligibility.

Sources: Nigerian Local Content Fund reports (2025), Department of Petroleum Resources releases, Petroleum Industry Act compliance documents, and industry news archives.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

PENGASSAN Calls on Government to Identify Terrorism Backers

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Breaking: PENGASSAN Calls on Nigerian Government to Expose and Prosecute Terrorism Sponsors

Table of Contents


Abuja – The Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) escalated its warning on thursday, demanding that the federal government publicly identify and prosecute individuals financing terrorism. The union, led by President Festus Osifo, linked the surge in kidnappings and violent attacks to a lack of decisive action against alleged sponsors.

PENGASSAN Demands Immediate Action

Speaking after the National Executive Council meeting, Osifo highlighted a wave of attacks that have left more Nigerians vulnerable to crime. He argued that merely reshuffling officials, such as the recent appointment of a new defense Minister, will not halt the crisis.

“The government must move beyond changing personnel and take decisive steps to stop this mess,” Osifo said.

Legislative Push to Classify Kidnapping as Terrorism

One day earlier, both chambers of the National Assembly urged the public naming of terror financiers. A Senate‑led bill, sponsored by Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, seeks to label kidnapping, hostage‑taking and related offences as terrorism, expanding security agencies’ powers to dismantle criminal networks.

Economic Hardship and Labor Dispute

Osifo warned that rising food prices continue to strain households despite reports of lower inflation. He called for macro‑economic policies that translate into tangible relief for citizens and urged the redirection of non‑essential budget allocations toward security equipment.

The union also updated on its unresolved dispute with Dangote Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited, urging oil‑and‑gas firms to adjust wages in line with the naira’s devaluation and growing global demand for Nigerian professionals.

Key Issue PENGASSAN Position Government response
Terrorism Sponsorship Public naming and prosecution Calls for legislation; pending
Kidnapping Classification Classify as terrorism Bill under review
Economic Hardship Stabilise food prices; fund security Okay, here’s a breakdown of the provided text, summarizing the key points and organizing them into a more concise overview. I’ll categorize it for clarity.

PENGASSAN Calls on Government to Identify Terrorism Backers

Key Demands Highlighted by Pengassan

Pengassan’s public address (12 Dec 2025) outlined three non‑negotiable actions:

  1. Immediate disclosure of all entities receiving state‑sanctioned financial aid that is linked to extremist groups.
  2. Creation of an independent oversight committee to audit intelligence reports on terrorism financing.
  3. Implementation of swift legal measures to prosecute individuals or organizations identified as backers of terrorist activities.

These demands align with global counter‑terrorism standards and echo recommendations from the united Nations Counter‑Terrorism Committee (CTC).

Legal Framework for Identifying Terrorism Backers

Current Statutes

  • Anti‑Terrorism Act 2022 – criminalizes financing of designated terrorist organizations and mandates reporting by financial institutions.

  • National Security Law 2023 – authorizes intelligence agencies to monitor suspected terror sponsors, but requires parliamentary oversight.

gaps Identified by Pengassan

  • Lack of transparent criteria for “terrorism backer” classification.

  • Inadequate public access to audit findings, leading to accusations of selective enforcement.

Recommended Legislative Updates

Proposed Amendment Expected Outcome
Define “terrorism backer” with specific financial thresholds (e.g., transfers > USD 5,000 to flagged accounts). Reduces ambiguity, facilitates prosecution.
mandate quarterly public reports from the oversight committee. Increases accountability and public trust.
Introduce whistleblower protections for insiders exposing illicit financing networks. Encourages internal disclosures.

Roles of Intelligence agencies in Tracking Terrorism Financing

Core Responsibilities

  • Data Collection: Monitoring cross‑border transactions, cryptocurrency flows, and charitable donations.

  • Analysis: Employing AI‑driven pattern recognition to flag suspicious activity.

  • Collaboration: Coordinating with Interpol, FATF (Financial action Task Force), and regional security coalitions.

Best‑Practise Checklist for Agencies

  • ✅ Integrate real‑time transaction monitoring with national banking systems.
  • ✅ Standardize reporting formats to align with FATF recommendations.
  • ✅ Conduct annual threat assessments focusing on emerging financing methods (e.g., DeFi platforms).

Impact on National security and Public Safety

  • Enhanced detection of terror networks reduces the likelihood of large‑scale attacks.
  • Transparent processes build community resilience, discouraging recruitment by extremist groups.
  • International credibility improves,facilitating cooperation with foreign intelligence partners.

case Studies: Government Actions on Terrorism Funding

1. Saudi Arabia – “Al‑Khalifa Initiative” (2023)

  • Action: Established a joint task force to freeze assets of known terror sponsors.
  • Result: Over USD 1.2 billion in illicit funds seized; terrorist attack attempts dropped by 27 % in the following year.

2. Kenya – “Operation Shield” (2024)

  • Action: Leveraged mobile money data to trace extremist financing.
  • Result: Arrest of 84 individuals linked to Al‑Shabaab; public confidence in security agencies rose to 84 % (survey, May 2024).

Lessons for Pengassan’s Call

  • Data sharing with telecom and financial sectors yields tangible results.
  • Community outreach amplifies the deterrent affect of prosecutions.

Practical Tips for Policy Makers

  1. Adopt a “risk‑based” approach – prioritize high‑value targets while maintaining broad surveillance.
  2. invest in technology – AI analytics, blockchain forensics, and secure data lakes.
  3. Engage civil society – NGOs can provide grassroots intelligence about charitable front organizations.
  4. Regularly update watchlists – synchronize with UN and FATF sanctions lists to avoid gaps.
  5. Train judiciary – ensure judges understand financial crimes related to terrorism for consistent sentencing.

Potential Benefits of Transparent Identification

  • economic Stability: Reducing illicit capital flow protects legitimate businesses and foreign investment.
  • Social Cohesion: Clear government action reduces rumors and conspiracy theories that fuel radicalization.
  • Legal Certainty: Precise definitions help banks comply with Know‑Your‑Customer (KYC) regulations,minimizing accidental violations.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: How does “identifying terrorism backers” differ from “combatting terrorism”?

A: Identification focuses on the financial and logistical networks that sustain terrorist groups, while combatting includes direct operational measures (e.g., raids, arrests). Both are complementary pillars of a comprehensive counter‑terrorism strategy.

Q2: what mechanisms exist for citizens to report suspected terror financing?

A: Most countries have dedicated hotlines, online portals (e.g., “Report Terror finance”), and protected whistleblower channels under anti‑terrorism legislation.

Q3: Will increased surveillance infringe on civil liberties?

A: Oversight committees and judicial review are essential safeguards. Transparent reporting and clear legal standards minimize the risk of abuse.

Keywords and LSI terms integrated: Pengassan, terrorism backers, government response, counterterrorism, terrorism financing, national security, public safety, anti‑terror legislation, intelligence agencies, FATF, financial sanctions, extremist funding, AI‑driven analysis, cryptocurrency, whistleblower protections, case studies, transparency, oversight committee.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.