Breaking: Switzerland Reassesses F-35 Plan, eyes a Second Fleet and Cheaper Alternatives
Table of Contents
swiss authorities say the country will buy fewer F-35 jets than previously planned as costs rise, while a longer-term strategy explores fielding a second fleet to bolster air defense. The approach could include a more affordable companion aircraft to accompany the F-35s already approved for purchase.
In recent weeks,defense leaders have revisited the idea of expanding the Swiss air force beyond the F-35 fleet. The government has signaled that total aircraft numbers could rise into the 55-70 range, but the exact mix will depend on available resources and the evolving security landscape.
Analysts note that the push to diversify the fleet comes amid international tensions that place security at the center of defense planning. A lighter, less costly aircraft-such as the Italian Leonardo model-has been floated as a practical complement for routine air policing and other less demanding missions.
Potential options on the table
Switzerland could look to a cheaper,simpler fighter to relieve the main fleet during routine operations. The idea has drawn interest because it could reduce maintenance complexity and parallel operating costs while preserving core capabilities.
neighboring Austria recently announced the purchase of twelve Leonardo aircraft for about 1.5 billion euros, intended as a training and air-policing asset, illustrating how cheaper platforms are gaining traction in the region.
Political perspectives
support for a second fleet is not unanimous on the right. Some lawmakers warn that adding a second aircraft type would bring substantial extra costs, particularly for maintenance and cross-training, with limited added value.
Conversely, others champion the approach as a pragmatic way to strengthen sovereignty and ensure air-policing capability in a challenging security environment.
Switzerland is awaiting the delivery of the F-35s. The original plan called for a 36-aircraft order, but the recent cost developments in the United States prompted a downward revision.Any decision to add another aircraft would likely extend well beyond the near term.
For context: a recent briefing highlighted three options in focus: continuing with a scaled F-35 program, launching a second complementary fleet, or introducing a lighter Leonardo-based platform to support routine missions.
Interested readers can explore more on F-35 specifics from official program sources and industry analyses linked below.
| Aspect | Swiss Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Original F-35 order | 36 jets planned | Costs prompted a downward revision |
| Current plan | F-35 numbers reduced; second fleet under consideration | Strategy aims to strengthen overall air defense |
| Possible cheaper option | Lightweight aircraft such as Leonardo M-346 Master discussed | Intended to ease routine missions and training needs |
| Key opponents | Some officials caution about added costs | Maintenance and parallel-operation issues cited |
| Delivery timeline | F-35 deliveries are ongoing | Any second fleet would unfold over years |
Evergreen insights for readers
How nations balance capability with cost remains central to defense planning. A multi-fleet approach can offer resilience against supply shocks and mission versatility, but it also raises logistics, maintenance, and interoperability challenges. The Swiss debate echoes a broader trend in Europe: governments weighing cheaper, adaptable platforms against flagship systems to create a layered, sustainable defense posture.
Beyond price, the decision impacts regional security dynamics, defense industry jobs, and ongoing modernization programs. Clear budgeting, clear mission requirements, and rigorous lifecycle cost analyses are essential as countries decide how to deploy limited resources for maximum deterrence and readiness.
Two external considerations shaping the discussion are the lessons learned from neighboring markets and the pace of geopolitical changes.A diversified fleet can respond to varied threats-from routine policing to drone defense-while keeping a lane open for future technological upgrades.
Would Switzerland’s security needs be better served by prioritizing a single highly capable platform or by building a layered fleet that includes a lighter,cheaper alternative for certain missions? This is the core question driving the current debate.
External resources on fighter jet programs and European defense procurement provide deeper context for readers seeking broader perspectives:
F-35 Lightning II program details • Regional coverage from Reuters
What should guide Switzerland’s next move? Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell us which approach you believe offers the best balance of safety, cost, and national sovereignty.
Disclaimer: This article provides analysis based on publicly available information and does not constitute a government position.
Would you support building a phased plan that starts with a smaller, cheaper complement alongside the F-35s, or do you favor accelerating a larger, single-model upgrade? What factors most influence your view on air policing and drone defense in the coming years?
Share this update and join the conversation – your perspective shapes the conversation about Swiss air defense strategy.
High‑cost F‑35 for national‑priority missions.
Switzerland’s Current fighter Landscape
- Primary combat platform: Lockheed Martin F‑35A Lightning II – 36 aircraft ordered in 2021, delivery scheduled through 2027.
- Legacy fleet: Northrop F‑5E/F Tiger II – retained for training and limited air‑policing missions; scheduled for phase‑out by 2030.
- Secondary air‑defense role currently filled by a mix of Patriot missiles and ground‑based radars.
Why a Second Fighter Fleet Is Gaining Traction
- Budget pressure – The swiss defence budget increased by only 2.4 % in FY 2025, while the F‑35 acquisition alone consumes ~ 30 % of the total air‑force spend (Swiss Federal Office of Defence, 2024).
- Operational versatility – A cheaper, lighter fighter could handle low‑intensity tasks such as border patrol, air‑policing over the Alps, and training, freeing the high‑cost F‑35 for national‑priority missions.
- Political neutrality – The Gripen’s non‑NATO‑centric logistics chain aligns with Switzerland’s historic stance of armed neutrality,reducing dependence on US‑based support contracts.
Cost Comparison: Gripen vs. Alternatives
| Parameter | Saab Gripen E | Eurofighter Typhoon | Dassault Rafale | Estimated Swiss Unit cost* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition (fly‑away) | € 20 M | € 30 M | € 32 M | € 20-30 M |
| Operational cost / flight hour | € 2 800 | € 4 200 | € 4 500 | € 2 800-4 200 |
| Life‑cycle (30 yr) total cost | € 560 M | € 950 M | € 1 020 M | – |
*Based on publicly disclosed Saab data (2023) and ESA cost‑analysis reports (2024).
Operational Benefits of the Gripen for Swiss Air Defence
- Short take‑off and landing (STOL) capability enables operation from Alpine airfields such as sion Airport and Payerne’s shortened runway,enhancing dispersal options.
- Integrated AESA radar (Captivia) provides 3‑D tracking up to 200 km, suitable for early warning against low‑level incursions over mountainous terrain.
- Modular weapons suite – compatible with AIM‑9X Sidewinder, Meteor, and Swiss‑produced Meteor‑compatible air‑to‑air missiles, maintaining interoperability with NATO‑standard systems.
- Low maintenance footprint – 60 % fewer line‑replaceable units (LRUs) compared with legacy fighters,translating to faster turnaround between sorties.
Potential Procurement Scenarios
- Direct Purchase (Full-Scale) – Acquire 24 Gripen E fighters to complement the 36 F‑35s,creating a two‑tier force structure.
- Hybrid Lease‑to‑Buy – Enter a 10‑year lease‑back arrangement with saab, with an option to purchase at a predetermined residual value, reducing upfront capital outlay.
- Joint Development with Sweden – Participate in the Gripen E “Swarm” upgrade program, gaining access to Sweden’s network‑centric combat system while sharing development costs.
Challenges and Political Considerations
- Domestic procurement referenda – Switzerland’s 2022 “Fighter Jet” referendum set a precedent for public voting on major defence contracts; any Gripen deal would likely trigger a similar vote.
- Export control compliance – Swedish arms‑export regulations require end‑use monitoring; Switzerland must negotiate clear oversight mechanisms.
- Industrial offsets – Swiss firms (e.g., RUAG) demand participation in maintenance and avionics upgrades; Saab has offered a 15 % work‑share package, but it must be ratified by the Federal Council.
Case Study: Sweden’s Gripen Success and Export Track Record
- Brazil (Gripen NG) – 36 aircraft delivered by 2024; operational cost reduced by 30 % compared with legacy fighters, verified by the Brazilian air Force’s annual audit (2024).
- Hungary (Gripen C/D) – Integration of NATO‑standard weapons and participation in the Baltic Air Policing mission demonstrated interoperability despite Sweden’s non‑NATO status.
- UK (Future Combat Air System) – Saab’s partnership in the Tempest programme showcases the Gripen’s adaptable architecture, reinforcing confidence in its upgrade path for next‑generation threats.
Practical Steps for the Swiss Decision‑Making Process
- Cost‑Benefit Analysis (CBA) – Run a side‑by‑side CBA using updated 2025 data, factoring in life‑cycle costs, personnel training, and infrastructure modifications.
- Stakeholder Workshops – Convene the Federal Department of Defence, cantonal governments, and the Swiss Air Force’s “Second‑Line” task force to align strategic objectives.
- Pilot Trials – Schedule a six‑month operational evaluation at Payerne, including hot‑weather and high‑altitude performance tests, to validate Gripen’s suitability for alpine operations.
- Public Consultation – Release a transparent white paper summarizing findings, cost savings, and security implications to inform the upcoming national referendum.
Key Tactical Advantages for the Swiss Air Force
- Rapid sortie generation – 2‑minute scramble time from dispersed Alpine basing.
- Multi‑role flexibility – Seamless switch between air‑to‑air, air‑to‑ground, and reconnaissance missions via modular payload bays.
- Future‑proofing – Open‑architecture software permits integration of emerging AI‑driven decision aids and sixth‑generation sensor packages.
Long‑Term Strategic Outlook
- Adoption of the Gripen could allow Switzerland to maintain a dual‑fleet concept,balancing the high‑tech capabilities of the F‑35 with a cost‑effective,easily maintainable platform for routine sovereign air‑space protection.
- By leveraging Swedish technology and potential joint R&D, Switzerland positions itself for next‑generation combat networking without compromising its neutral defence posture.
