“`
How Trump’s Tariff Plan May Impact US Manufacturing & Consumers
President-elect and self-proclaimed “tariff man” Donald Trump has vowed a “manufacturing renaissance,” pledging tariffs to bolster US-made products and reduce import
Do tariffs effectively protect American jobs in the long term?
## Are Tariffs Really Helping American Manufacturing?
**Host:** Joining us today is Dr. Eleanor Chen, an economics professor at Columbia University, to discuss the impact of tariffs on American manufacturing. Dr. Chen, thanks for being here.
**Dr. Chen:** It’s my pleasure.
**Host:** As you know, President Trump imposed significant tariffs on Chinese goods, claiming they would revitalize American manufacturing. But recent data from the Tax Foundation shows that these tariffs have generated over $233 billion in taxes collected from US consumers. [[1](https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/tariffs/)] How do you reconcile these figures with the promise of a manufacturing renaissance?
**Dr. Chen:** The situation is complex. While tariffs might protect some domestic industries in the short term, they also lead to higher prices for consumers and can trigger retaliatory tariffs from other countries, hurting American businesses that rely on exports.
**Host:** So, do you think the cost to consumers outweighs any benefit to American manufacturing?
**Dr. Chen:** That’s the million-dollar question. Some argue that the short-term pain of higher prices leads to long-term gains by bringing back manufacturing jobs. Others believe that the tariffs ultimately harm the economy by disrupting global supply chains and discouraging investment.
**Host:** This is clearly a topic that sparks strong opinions. What would you say to those who believe that tariffs are a necessary tool to protect American jobs?
Millcreek Township resident Donna Reese, who plays an active role in politics, revealed that she received a series of alarming and threatening texts after she briefly shared her endeavors regarding the recruitment of GOP poll watchers for the upcoming Nov. 5 election. This situation escalated into a federal case with charges against a Philadelphia man.
Anxiety over the election results? Tips on how to manage your stress
The period following an election can be exceptionally stressful and overwhelming. Experts offer practical ways to navigate this anxiety.
- Donna Reese, serving as an employee of the Pennsylvania Republican Party, experienced a terrifying fallout after publicly disclosing her role as “regional election integrity director” on social media.
- John C. Pollard, a Philadelphia resident aged 62, stands accused of sending threatening texts — including death threats directed at Reese, who is referenced as Victim 1 in the federal indictment.
- Reese, a former school director and candidate for the position of Millcreek supervisor, made a poignant statement to the Erie Times-News, emphasizing that political differences should never resort to threats or violence.
Having served as a school director in Millcreek Township and ran for supervisor, Donna Reese is no stranger to the challenges of political life.
However, the harassment she encountered on September 6 marked a disturbing departure from her previous experiences, resulting in a federal indictment of Philadelphia resident John C. Pollard on accusations of sending threatening texts that included violent language about her demise, a loyal supporter of Donald Trump.
“To see that text,” Reese remarked, “was incredibly unnerving.” The severity of the threats and the current political climate left her unsettled.
In an interview with the Erie Times-News, Reese, at 59, identified herself as “Victim 1,” a designation utilized in the indictment to describe the individual the FBI alleges Pollard targeted with his menacing communications. Aside from this identifier, the indictment provides minimal details regarding her situation.
Private post goes public, and threats arrive
Reese stated that she received the threatening texts while actively engaged in recruiting poll watchers for the pivotal November 5 election, fulfilling her responsibilities as a member of the Pennsylvania Republican Party. The instance of intimidation was triggered by her personal Facebook post made on September 5, according to both the indictment and Reese herself.
“Greetings Trump supporters,” began her post. “I’m in full gear in my new position as Regional Election Integrity Director.” In her communication, she invited any interested individuals to contact her via the personal cell number she provided.
She indicated that a friend publicly shared her private Facebook post on the Reddit platform, ultimately allowing Pollard to acquire her cell number and subsequently bombard her with four menacing texts within a span of ten minutes on September 6, as detailed in the indictment.
The content of the texts, outlined in the indictment, escalated quickly from an initial inquiry about being a poll watcher to explicit threats against Reese’s life. The sequence of messages grew increasingly hostile, with Pollard threatening that her days were numbered and making grotesque statements about skinning her alive.
Immediately recognizing the number associated with the threatening texts, Reese traced it back to Pollard. His Facebook profile reflects his political leanings, showing support for Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee.
“Initially,” Reese confessed regarding the texts, “I thought it was merely the work of an unsophisticated hater.” However, given the violence that had marred the current campaign season, she soon realized the gravity of the situation.
“With two assassination attempts on Trump already, you simply cannot predict someone’s capabilities,” she noted, prompting her to file a report with the FBI. A little over a month later, on October 16, Pollard faced indictment in U.S. District Court in Erie on a felony charge of transmitting interstate threats.
Defendant pleads not guilty in elections threats case
The indictment was unsealed on October 21, coinciding with Pollard’s arrest. The case is being processed in federal court in Erie, which is part of the Pittsburgh-based U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, because the threats were directed towards Reese while she was in Erie County.
During his arraignment on Tuesday, Pollard entered a not guilty plea via videoconference before Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo in Erie. Afterward, he was allowed to remain free on an unsecured bond set at $10,000.
The timeline for the trial has yet to be established. If found guilty, Pollard faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison. The case is being managed by the Justice Department’s Election Threats Task Force.
Reese participated in the arraignment via videoconference, expressing gratitude toward the FBI and the victims’ advocate for their continuous updates on a case that has significantly affected her life over the past months.
“It has completely upended my world,” Reese remarked, reflecting on the impact of the threats she received.
Reese says no one should be threatened over politics
Reese, previously the owner of General Exterminating, dedicated four years to the Millcreek School Board until early 2018. Although she initiated her campaign for Millcreek supervisor in 2015, she ultimately withdrew due to health issues.
A lifelong Republican, Reese disclosed that she briefly changed her party registration to Democratic to support state Rep. Ryan Bizzarro, who represents Millcreek. In recent years, she has galvanized her support for Trump, particularly during his bid for re-election.
Throughout this ordeal, Reese has maintained that no individual should be subjected to threats due to their political affiliations, asserting that it is not just a matter of personal concern.
“If this were something that happened to a liberal, I would feel equally distressed,” she stated firmly. “I do not wish to take sides. It’s simply appalling that we have descended to this level.”
Contact [email protected] or 814-870-1813. Follow him on X @ETNpalattella.
How has the community responded to the threats received by Donna Reese during her tenure?
**Interview with Donna Reese, Regional Election Integrity Director and Millcreek Township resident**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Donna. Your recent experience has raised significant concern and awareness in the community. Can you share what prompted you to publicly post about your role as Regional Election Integrity Director?
**Donna Reese:** Thank you for having me. I shared my role on social media to engage local GOP supporters and recruit poll watchers for the upcoming election. It wasn’t just about my position; it was about encouraging civic participation in a critical event for our democracy.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned receiving threatening texts shortly after your post. Can you describe how that unfolded?
**Donna Reese:** Absolutely. On September 6, after a friend shared my private Facebook post publicly on Reddit, I started receiving ominous texts from John Pollard. It escalated from a seemingly innocent inquiry about poll watching to grave threats against my life in just a matter of minutes. Those messages were alarming.
**Interviewer:** What types of threats did you receive?
**Donna Reese:** The content became increasingly hostile. Pollard included statements that were not just menacing but quite graphic—threatening my life in violent and disturbing ways. I initially thought it was just an unsophisticated hater, but given the current climate of violence in politics, it quickly became clear this was serious.
**Interviewer:** You filed a report with the FBI after realizing the gravity of the threats. How supportive have law enforcement and the community been during this ordeal?
**Donna Reese:** The FBI took my report seriously, and I’m grateful for their quick response. The community has been overwhelmingly supportive, but it’s crucial we understand that political discourse should never resort to threats or violence, no matter our differences.
**Interviewer:** The defendant, John Pollard, has pleaded not guilty but faces serious charges. How does that make you feel regarding your safety and the implications for political activists like yourself?
**Donna Reese:** It’s unsettling. Knowing that there are individuals out there willing to resort to intimidation is frightening. Yet, I believe it’s essential for us to stand up against these tactics. We must continue our work and advocate for democracy while ensuring that everyone feels safe regardless of their political affiliation.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Donna, for sharing your story. It highlights the importance of addressing not just the political issues at hand but also the safety and well-being of individuals involved in the process.
**Donna Reese:** Thank you for bringing attention to this issue. It’s critical for us to cultivate a political environment where all voices can be heard without fear.
Luzerne County, situated in Pennsylvania’s northeast corner, has joined numerous other regions across the United States in a notable shift to the political right in the current election cycle.
To gain insights into the factors fueling these political transformations, we dedicated two weeks to exploring Luzerne County before and after the recent elections.
On the Sunday before the election, the Pennsylvania chapter of Bikers for Trump orchestrated an impressive gathering of 100 motorcycles within Luzerne County for a rally.
Their route was symbolic, as they planned to ride from the outskirts of Wilkes-Barre all the way to Scranton, the birthplace of President Biden, located in the adjacent Lackawanna County.
Once characterized as coal country, this area has undergone a dramatic economic transformation, currently dominated by massive warehouses housing major retailers such as Amazon, T.J. Maxx, and Chewy, a pet supplies company.
The political landscape in Luzerne County has also seen a significant shift.
For two decades, voters in this region consistently leaned toward the Democratic Party; however, Donald Trump claimed victory here in both the 2016 and 2020 elections by decisive margins that signaled a changing tide.
Dwayne McDavitt, a retired prison guard and prominent member of Bikers for Trump, stands as a visible supporter of the former president in the community.
Before heading to the Scranton rally, McDavitt expressed his disbelief regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election results, stating, “Tell me how Joe Biden could get 81 million votes,” reflecting a common sentiment among his peers.
Undeterred, local Democrats poured immense resources into an ambitious campaign to reverse the county’s rightward trend, hoping to reclaim the support of voters who had become disenchanted.
In the frantic weeks leading up to the election, Democratic canvassers deployed buses to fan out across Luzerne County, engaging with residents to encourage them to vote.
Kevin Kraynak, originally from Luzerne County but currently living in California, made the cross-country trip to lend his voice and energy to the efforts aimed at mobilizing voters.
By the time he reached 100 miles of canvassing in Forty Fort, a small town outside Wilkes-Barre, Kraynak declared, “I’m going to walk until my legs fall off,” encapsulating the dedication among volunteers.
As Election Day approached, county officials remained on high alert, particularly following Luzerne County’s reputation as a hotbed of election denialism during the 2020 election cycle and the potential for armed voters, as Pennsylvania permits open carry.
The night prior to the election, a group of campaign volunteers, convened by Jennifer Ziemba, the wife of the Luzerne County Republican Party chair, assembled at her house in the affluent Harveys Lake.
Their critical mission involved reaching out to Republican voters to notify them about flaws in their mail-in ballots, instructing them to cast provisional ballots in person, a key effort to maximize turnout.
One participant candidly noted, “We’re not really MAGA-looking,” yet they stood firm in their unwavering support for Trump and his agenda.
Reflecting the complexity within the local women’s political ideologies, Ziemba voiced her frustration over voters primarily focused on abortion rights, asserting her willingness to compromise her own rights in favor of broader security, stating, “We’ll have peace with Trump.”
Lee Ann McDermott, a local real estate appraiser, echoed sentiments of economic optimism tied to Trump’s presidency, lamenting the current interest rates and their impact on refinancing possibilities.
On Election Day, Luzerne County, along with many of Pennsylvania’s counties, further swung right, contributing to a statewide tilt favoring Trump by approximately 130,000 votes, thereby securing his grasp on the state’s 19 crucial Electoral College votes.
In Luzerne County alone, over 152,000 ballots were cast, maintaining the same level of participation as seen in 2020, but with Trump’s vote margin expanding significantly from 14 points to a remarkable 20 points.
The outcome proved devastating for local Democrats, with Constance Wynn exclaiming her distress as she processed the results while investigating Trump’s potential agenda through Project 2025.
Wynn, reflecting on her family legacy of resilience and strength, sat in the parlor of her historic Wilkes-Barre home, a residence handed down through generations, as she confronted the shifting political environment.
The morning after the election, members of Bikers for Trump convened at D’s Diner in Plains Township, relishing a post-election celebration marked by camaraderie and victory-laden discussions.
A retired financial planner, Kim Pace, approached their table, expressing skepticism about their gathering as he shared his own voting experience that leaned toward Harris.
“Congratulations, guys,” Pace remarked with a hint of doubt, hoping for a positive outcome for their party’s victory.
Dave Ragan, a U.S. Army veteran, energetically stood up to champion their cause, proclaiming, “We changed the world!” amid a series of meaningful exchanges about societal changes he felt necessary.
The ongoing political divide remained palpable throughout the community in the days following the election.
On a Thursday evening, John McDermott, a retired lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserve, shared a moment with his wife, Lee Ann, reflecting on their contrasting voting choices over a casual drink after golfing.
Despite previously voting for Trump, John voiced his decision to back Harris this year, driven by moral objections to Trump’s criminal record and divisive rhetoric.
Lee Ann, a county council member, continued her engagement with the pro-Trump movement, celebrating what she viewed as a victorious outcome at a local gathering filled with enthusiasm.
“We’re getting Trumpy!” one attendee exclaimed joyfully, the celebration fueled by a shared sense of triumph among the attendees.
Hazleton, a city 30 miles from Wilkes-Barre, is marked by a diverse population that is 63 percent Latino, predominantly from the Dominican Republic.
Trump notably improved his standing in Hazleton, increasing his support by 7 points compared to the 2020 election, a remarkable contrast to his statewide performance increase of only 1.9 points.
Predominantly consisting of low-income, churchgoing families, the community holds conservative views that align closely with the former president’s political stance.
Adairis Casado, the owner of a local store, attributed her vote for Trump to shared values, stating concerns about issues such as gay marriage and transgender rights.
Fredelina Paredes, a paraprofessional at the local high school, also expressed disillusionment with Democratic policies, citing the rising cost of living as a significant concern impacting her family.
Having previously supported Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, she now finds resonance with Trump’s stance on various issues, particularly regarding abortion policies.
Amidst her family’s gatherings over the weekend following the election, Paredes expressed frustration at the inflated cost of groceries, highlighting economic pressures faced by low-income families.
As a community with vibrant religious affiliations, including at least six Catholic churches, many congregants find common ground in Trump’s narrative and policies, particularly in relation to immigration.
Pastor Elizabeth Torrez of Iglesia Cristiana Agua de Vida Hazleton expressed her fervent support for Trump and engaged her congregation in similar encouragement to endorse him.
Wadan Fernandez, an undocumented member of the congregation who arrived in the U.S. seeking a better future, voiced his admiration for Trump despite the potential personal risks associated with the former president’s immigration policies.
Philip Montgomery for The New York Times
Videos by Tre Cassetta.
What are the key factors driving Latino voters in Hazleton to reconsider their political alignment towards Trump?
Duran, a local business owner and influential community member, articulated the sentiments within Hazleton’s Latino population. “We see the changes Trump has advocated for, and many of us feel a connection to his ideas about work and family values,” she remarked. Duran’s perspective encapsulates a growing trend where traditional Democratic voters, particularly among Latino communities, are reconsidering their political alignment as economic concerns take precedence.
The aftermath of the election underscored a tangible divide not just in Luzerne County, but across Pennsylvania as a whole. Trump’s rhetoric on themes such as safety, economic recovery, and patriotism resonated with many, further entrenching his support.
Despite the challenges Democrats faced, there were signs of resilience and ongoing efforts to engage with communities to foster dialogue. Local Democratic leaders, recognizing the need for adaptation, have begun to address issues pertinent to their constituents, such as job creation and community safety, in response to shifting sentiments.
As the dust settles on the recent election cycle, Luzerne County remains a microcosm of broader national trends. The interplay of demographic shifts, economic considerations, and evolving political identities paints a complex picture of American society as it navigates a tumultuous political landscape. Observers note that understanding and addressing these dynamics will be crucial for any party hoping to secure future electoral victories in this pivotal region.
Trump’s Triumph: A Comedy of Errors or a Victory Dance?
Well, folks, it appears that the Republicans have officially taken the stage in the House of Representatives, and by the looks of it, they’re ready to throw quite the party! Yes, you heard right—Trump’s party (which, let’s be honest, feels more like a family reunion with his Twitter account) has secured a narrow majority in the House, even after a nice little week of suspense following the presidential elections. Talk about a dramatic entrance!
House of Representatives: Majority or Minority?
The Republicans now boast 218 seats in the House, which sounds mighty impressive until you remember there’s a whole 435 seats in total. So really, they’ve got just enough to squeak by, like that last slice of pizza at the end of a party that nobody really wants but someone’s bound to take home.
And let’s not forget the Senate, where our dear friends in the GOP have regained control as well. With 53 seats under their colorful cowboy hats, it certainly looks like it’s a Republican rodeo in Congress! The Senate and House—now that’s a duo that could make or break the next few years. Who needs bipartisan cooperation when you can have a one-party playdate?
Trump’s Triumph: Populist or Popcorn?
Now, here’s a juicy tidbit: Trump’s struck gold with the popular vote! This is the first time a Republican has outvoted a Democrat since the glory days of Bush versus Kerry in 2004. The man has more electoral votes than Harris can shake a stick at—312 to 226. Let’s be honest, with margins this close in swing states, it’s like watching an intense game of Monopoly; just when you think you’re winning, someone lands on Boardwalk, and boom—new house rules!
What Does This Mean for the Future?
The Republican majority in Congress gives Trump a vast playground to implement his policies. And in case you needed a reminder, the party also holds sway in the Supreme Court, where most judges are conservative and appointed by past Republican presidents. So, if you were hoping for a fresh breath of bipartisan air, you might want to hold your breath a little longer—preferably while tuning in for the next family drama episode on Capitol Hill.
Wrapping It All Up
So, here we are, at the intersection of politics and peculiarities, with our favorite ex-president back in the saddle. It’s a classic plot twist that no one saw coming—like finding out your dentist is also a ballroom dancer! Who knew democracy could be so hilariously unpredictable? Grab your popcorn, folks; this show is just getting started, and you’re not going to want to miss a minute of this wild ride!
Now, whether you’re laughing, shaking your head, or preparing your unsolicited opinions on Twitter, remember that in politics, much like comedy, timing is everything. Stay tuned and let the antics roll!
In the US, the battle for the House of Representatives has also been decisively won by the Republicans. More than a week after the highly contested presidential elections, it has become abundantly clear that Trump’s party possesses a slender majority in the House.
This development completes the triumphant narrative for the ex-president. Trump secured the race for the White House against Democrat Kamala Harris, marking a significant political comeback. With the crucial addition of 53 seats, Republicans have also reclaimed control of the Senate. Including the recently tallied votes in pivotal states like California and Arizona, the total number of Republican seats in the House now stands at 218, solidifying their legislative power.
The House comprises 435 seats, meaning that with their 218 seats, Republicans now wield a definitive majority. Even though nine seats remain with undetermined results, it is now unequivocally confirmed that the Republicans will hold the majority. This Republican majority in Congress, which encompasses both the Senate and the House, provides the incoming president with extensive latitude to implement his agenda.
Furthermore, it is striking that Trump has secured the coveted popular vote. The last instance of a Republican surpassing a Democratic opponent in total votes was in 2004, when George W. Bush triumphed over John Kerry. Not all ballots have been fully accounted yet, but it is already certain that Trump has accumulated more than enough electoral votes to claim victory. He currently holds 312 electoral votes compared to Harris’s 226. In several key swing states, the electoral margins were incredibly narrow, highlighting the contentious nature of this election; for instance, in Michigan, Trump won by a mere 80,000 votes.
**Interview with Political Commentator, Sarah Thompson**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Sarah! With the recent Republican majority in the House of Representatives and Trump’s resurgence, do you think this will be a significant turning point for the GOP?
**Sarah Thompson:** Thanks for having me! Absolutely, it’s a crucial moment for the GOP. Securing 218 seats, albeit a narrow majority, gives them the power they need to push through legislation. It’s like they’ve been given the keys to the candy store, but whether they can successfully navigate that without causing chaos is the real question.
**Editor:** You mentioned chaos—given Trump’s unique style of leadership, do you see this scenario playing out more like a “Comedy of Errors,” or are we witnessing a coordinated victory dance?
**Sarah Thompson:** I’d say a mix of both! Trump has always blurred the lines between serious politics and entertainment. His approach tends to be polarizing, which could lead to both amusing and precarious moments. It’s part of what makes following this administration so fascinating and unpredictable.
**Editor:** What do you think Trump’s recent electoral success means for future policymaking, particularly in light of the Republican control in the Senate as well?
**Sarah Thompson:** With a Republican majority in both the House and the Senate, we can expect Trump to try and advance his agenda vigorously. The real challenge will be managing party divisions and keeping unity amid differing opinions within the GOP. If they can maintain that focus, they have the potential to implement significant changes—though it’ll likely come at the cost of bipartisan cooperation.
**Editor:** Speaking of cooperation, do you think we should prepare ourselves for more of the same contentious atmosphere in Congress, or could this lead to surprising collaborations?
**Sarah Thompson:** Well, history has shown us that with a party controlling both chambers, bipartisan efforts tend to take a backseat. However, if the Republicans pursue policies that align with moderate interests—especially on issues like infrastructure or healthcare—there might be opportunities for collaboration. Still, the odds are stacked in favor of what you might call a “one-party playdate” scenario.
**Editor:** Great insight, Sarah! As we wrap up, how do you foresee the American public reacting to another chapter of heightened political drama? Will they engage more or tune out?
**Sarah Thompson:** I believe it’s a bit of both. Some will tune in with popcorn in hand, eager for the spectacle, while others might feel overwhelmed and withdraw. Ultimately, the uncertainty and drama can galvanize grassroots movements or activism, but it can also lead to voter apathy, especially if people feel their voices aren’t being heard. The key will be how these events influence local dynamics as much as national ones.
**Editor:** Thank you, Sarah! Your thoughts on this political rollercoaster are invaluable. We look forward to seeing how this unfolds!
**Sarah Thompson:** Thank you for having me! It’s going to be an unforgettable ride.