Home » Rosario Murillo
Tag:

Rosario Murillo

News

Trump sends direct message to the dictatorship of Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Trump Fuels Honduras Election Controversy, Accuses Nicaragua & Venezuela of ‘Narco-Terrorism’ – Breaking News

Washington D.C. – In a dramatic intervention that’s sending ripples through Central America, former US President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed National Party candidate Tito Asfura in Honduras’ upcoming presidential election. The endorsement, delivered via his Truth Social platform, is coupled with scathing accusations against Nicaragua and Venezuela, which Trump labels as breeding grounds for “narco-terrorism” and communist influence. This is a breaking news development with significant implications for regional stability and US foreign policy, and is optimized for Google News indexing.

Trump’s Direct Endorsement & Allegations

Trump didn’t simply offer support; he actively urged Hondurans to vote for Asfura, framing the election as a battle against a rising tide of regional instability. “The only true friend of freedom in Honduras is Tito Asfura,” Trump posted. He further warned against supporting other candidates, Rixi Moncada and Salvador Nasralla, dismissing them as unreliable and potentially aligned with communist ideologies. The former president explicitly linked the perceived threat to the situations in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, alleging that the Maduro regime is attempting to extend its influence through “narco-terrorists.”

“Will Maduro and his narcoterrorists take control of another country as they have done with Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela?” Trump questioned, before directly answering with a call for Asfura’s victory. This level of direct involvement from a former US president in a foreign election is highly unusual and has sparked immediate criticism from opposing candidates in Honduras, who accuse Trump of meddling in their internal affairs.

The US Accusation of ‘Narco-Terrorism’ – A History

The accusations leveled against Venezuela, and now extended to Nicaragua, aren’t new. Since his first term, Trump’s administration has consistently accused Venezuelan officials, including President Nicolás Maduro, of being deeply involved in international drug trafficking. This escalated in recent years with the designation of the Tren de Aragua criminal gang – originating in a Venezuelan prison – as a terrorist organization. The US also significantly increased the reward for Maduro’s capture, raising it to $50 million. This aggressive stance reflects a broader US strategy to counter what it perceives as a growing threat from illicit activities and authoritarian regimes in Latin America.

Rubio’s Strong Stance & Regional Concerns

Adding further weight to the US government’s concerns, Senator Marco Rubio recently described the regimes in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela as “enemies of humanity” during a visit to Costa Rica. Rubio specifically highlighted the migration crisis, attributing it directly to the policies of these three governments. He also voiced concerns about Nicaragua’s alleged willingness to host a Russian military presence, framing it as a direct threat to US national security. This echoes long-standing anxieties about Russia’s increasing influence in the Western Hemisphere.

Evergreen Context: The historical relationship between the US and Latin America has been marked by periods of intervention and influence. The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, laid the groundwork for US dominance in the region, and subsequent decades saw numerous instances of US involvement in Latin American politics, often driven by economic and strategic interests. Understanding this historical context is crucial for interpreting current events and anticipating future developments.

Implications for Honduras & Beyond

Trump’s endorsement of Asfura has injected a new level of volatility into the Honduran election. While Asfura has welcomed the support, his opponents have condemned it as a blatant attempt to influence the outcome. The election, already fraught with tensions, is now taking place under the shadow of US political interference. The outcome will likely have significant consequences for Honduras’s relationship with the US, as well as its approach to regional issues such as drug trafficking and migration.

The broader implications for Latin America are equally significant. The US’s increasingly assertive stance towards Nicaragua and Venezuela, coupled with its willingness to directly intervene in elections, signals a potential shift in US foreign policy. This could lead to increased regional instability and further polarization, or it could serve as a catalyst for positive change, depending on how these dynamics unfold. Staying informed about these developments is vital for anyone interested in international affairs and the future of the Americas. For more in-depth analysis and SEO-optimized coverage, continue to visit Archyde.com.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Unprecedented Sanctions Imposed: U.S. Studies Ending Trade Agreement and 100% Tariffs on Ortega and Murillo Regime This title succinctly captures the key aspects of the article-the end of a trade agreement and the imposition of 100% tariffs as part of th

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor



U.S.weighs Significant Economic Penalties Against Nicaragua

Table of Contents

Washington D.C. – The United States government is poised to implement considerable economic measures against nicaragua, citing persistent concerns regarding labor standards, human rights, and perceived obstructions to fair trade. The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) officially resolute Monday that the Nicaraguan government’s actions constitute unreasonable burdens on American commerce.

Section 301 Examination Findings

The USTR’s determination, made under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, underscores a deteriorating relationship between the two nations. This action enables the potential imposition of widespread economic sanctions, including a possible suspension of Nicaragua’s benefits under the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR)-a cornerstone of the Nicaraguan economy. Furthermore, the U.S. is contemplating the application of tariffs reaching up to 100% on Nicaraguan exports.

According to the USTR’s findings, Nicaragua’s policies represent a clear impediment to U.S. trade, stemming from documented abuses of labor rights, widespread human rights violations, and a systematic dismantling of the rule of law. These practices are deemed “actionable,” justifying unilateral responses from the United States.

Potential Repercussions and Options on the Table

The USTR is currently evaluating four primary courses of action. These include a complete suspension of Nicaragua’s CAFTA-DR benefits, partial limitations on those advantages, the imposition of tariffs on all imports, or the selective application of tariffs across specific sectors. A public consultation period is underway, scheduled to close on November 19, 2025, before a final decision is made by President Donald Trump.

Sources within Washington suggest that preliminary discussions regarding potential tariffs have already taken place with other Central American countries within the CAFTA-DR framework, excluding Nicaragua. This move could foreshadow a growing isolation of Nicaragua within the regional trade bloc.

Investigation Origins and Previous Warnings

This determination follows an in-depth investigation initiated in December 2024, during the latter part of the biden administration. The investigation encompassed over 160 testimonies and public comments, with evidence of serious human rights abuses being forwarded to the State Department. Earlier this year, Secretary of State Marco Rubio signaled the possibility of removing Nicaragua from CAFTA-DR, asserting the agreement was “designed to reward democracy.” Rubio characterized the leadership in Nicaragua alongside those in Venezuela and Cuba as “enemies of humanity.”

Economic impact on Nicaragua

The United States represents Nicaragua’s primary trading partner, accounting for approximately 55% of its exports. Key exports include textiles, coffee, sugar, meat, and tobacco. The benefits derived from CAFTA-DR have played a vital role in sustaining Nicaragua’s economy since the agreement’s implementation in 2006.

Export Category percentage of total Exports to U.S. (approx.)
textiles 30%
Coffee 20%
Sugar 15%
Meat 10%
Tobacco 5%

Analysts predict that the implementation of these measures will lead to a contraction in nicaragua’s trade balance and a significant disruption to formal employment opportunities.

Did You Know? Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 has been increasingly utilized in recent years to address perceived unfair trade practices by various countries.

Pro Tip: Businesses with existing trade relationships with Nicaragua should proactively assess potential risks and develop contingency plans to mitigate the impact of potential sanctions.

Shifting U.S. Approach

The USTR’s resolution marks a notable escalation in Washington’s approach towards Managua, transitioning pressure from diplomatic and human rights arenas onto the realm of international trade. The report explicitly states that the Nicaraguan government’s actions “not only violate fundamental rights,but also undermine fair competition and destabilize the Central American region.”

Understanding CAFTA-DR

The Central America Free Trade Agreement – Dominican Republic (CAFTA-DR) is a free trade agreement among the United States and five Central American countries: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.It aims to eliminate trade barriers and promote economic growth within the region. While offering significant economic benefits, CAFTA-DR also includes provisions related to labor rights and environmental protection, which are central to the current dispute with nicaragua. The agreement was initially signed in 2004 and entered into force in phases beginning in 2006. Maintaining democratic principles and adherence to the rule of law are considered vital to the long-term success of such trade agreements.

Frequently asked Questions About U.S.-Nicaragua Trade

  • What is Section 301 and why is it vital? Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the U.S. to take action against countries perceived to be engaging in unfair trade practices.
  • What is CAFTA-DR and how does it affect Nicaragua? CAFTA-DR is a free trade agreement giving Nicaragua preferential access to the U.S. market, which it relies on heavily.
  • What are the potential consequences of U.S. sanctions on Nicaragua? Sanctions could lead to economic contraction, job losses, and increased political instability in Nicaragua.
  • What is the current status of the USTR’s investigation? The USTR is currently seeking public comment on proposed actions, with a decision expected before the end of November 2025.
  • could tariffs be imposed on specific Nicaraguan products? Yes, the USTR is considering both broad tariffs on all imports and sector-specific tariffs.

What impact do you believe these potential sanctions will have on the nicaraguan people? Do you think a trade dispute is the most effective way to address human rights concerns?

Share your thoughts in the comments below!


What are the potential long-term effects of ending CAFTA-DR on Nicaragua’s key export industries?

Unprecedented Sanctions Imposed: U.S.Studies Ending trade Agreement and 100% Tariffs on ortega and Murillo Regime

The Escalation of U.S. Sanctions Against Nicaragua

The United States is considering a dramatic escalation of its economic pressure on the Nicaraguan government led by President Daniel Ortega and Vice President Rosario Murillo. This includes a potential termination of the existing trade agreement and the imposition of a sweeping 100% tariff on all imports from Nicaragua. These measures represent a critically important shift in U.S.policy,moving beyond targeted sanctions to a broader economic strategy aimed at compelling political reforms. The core driver behind these actions is the ongoing human rights crisis and the erosion of democratic institutions within Nicaragua.

Understanding the Current Trade Relationship

Currently, nicaragua benefits from preferential trade access to the U.S. market under the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR). This agreement has been instrumental in Nicaragua’s economic growth, especially in sectors like textiles, coffee, and beef.

* Key Exports to the U.S.: Textiles & Apparel (largest share), Coffee, Beef, Sugar, Seafood.

* CAFTA-DR Benefits: Duty-free access for many Nicaraguan products,fostering investment and job creation.

* Economic Impact: The U.S. is Nicaragua’s largest trading partner, accounting for a substantial portion of its exports.

Ending CAFTA-DR would eliminate these benefits, considerably impacting Nicaragua’s economy and potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic activity.

The Proposed 100% tariffs: A Detailed Breakdown

The proposed 100% tariffs are intended to cripple Nicaragua’s export revenue and further isolate the Ortega-Murillo regime. This isn’t simply a tariff on specific goods; it’s a blanket imposition across all product categories.

* Scope of the Tariffs: All goods originating from Nicaragua would be subject to the 100% duty.

* Impact on Nicaraguan Businesses: Businesses reliant on U.S. exports would face insurmountable challenges, potentially leading to closures.

* Consumer Impact (U.S.): While the primary aim is to pressure the Nicaraguan government, U.S. consumers could see increased prices on imported Nicaraguan goods, particularly coffee and certain apparel items.

* Legal Basis: The U.S. management is likely to invoke national security or foreign policy concerns as justification for the tariffs,citing the Nicaraguan government’s actions as detrimental to U.S. interests.

The Political Context: Why Now?

The escalation in sanctions follows years of increasing concerns over Nicaragua’s political situation. Key events driving the U.S. response include:

  1. 2018 Protests: Widespread protests against the Ortega government were met with violent repression, resulting in hundreds of deaths and thousands of arrests.
  2. 2021 Elections: The elections were widely condemned as fraudulent, with opposition leaders imprisoned or exiled.
  3. Crackdown on Civil Society: The Nicaraguan government has systematically dismantled civil society organizations, including NGOs and independent media outlets.
  4. Human Rights Violations: Ongoing reports of arbitrary arrests, torture, and political persecution continue to fuel international condemnation.

These actions have led the U.S. to conclude that a more forceful approach is necessary to address the crisis.

Past Precedents: U.S. Sanctions and Regime Change

While a 100% tariff is unprecedented in its breadth, the U.S. has a history of using economic sanctions as a tool of foreign policy.

* Cuba Embargo: The decades-long U.S. embargo against Cuba is a prime example of a complete economic sanction.

* Iran Sanctions: The U.S. has imposed numerous sanctions on Iran, targeting its oil industry and financial sector.

* Venezuela Sanctions: Similar sanctions have been applied to venezuela, aiming to pressure the Maduro regime.

The effectiveness of these sanctions has been debated, with some arguing they exacerbate humanitarian crises while others maintain they are essential for promoting political change.

Potential Consequences for Nicaragua’s Economy

The combined impact of ending CAFTA-DR and imposing 100% tariffs could be devastating for Nicaragua’s economy.

* GDP contraction: Economists predict a significant contraction in Nicaragua’s GDP.

* Increased Poverty: Job losses and reduced economic activity are likely to led to increased poverty rates.

* Migration: Economic hardship could trigger a surge in emigration from Nicaragua.

* Supply Chain Disruptions: U.S. businesses reliant on nicaraguan suppliers may face disruptions to their supply chains.

* **Black Market Activity

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Terror climate in the General Staff: General under threat in the midst of the consolidation of the power of Rosario Murillo

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Breaking News: Uncertainty and Fear in Nicaraguan Military as Three Generals Fall Victim to Ortega-Murillo Regime’s ‘Revenge’

Managua, Nicaragua — The corridors of the General Staff of the Army of Nicaragua have become a scene of uncertainty and fear as at least three high-ranking generals have been targeted in what military sources describe as “humiliating and mortal revenge” by the Ortega-Murillo regime. This development comes on the heels of Rosario Murillo’s official recognition as “Supreme Chief of the Army,” solidifying the regime’s grip on power following recent constitutional reforms.

New Era Under Murillo

The recent constitutional reforms of February 2025 have transformed the power structure in Nicaragua, with Ortega systematically subordinating the army to his wife, Rosario Murillo. Murillo has now officially become “co-president” and the Supreme Chief of the Army alongside Ortega. This transition has been anything but peaceful, with reports of internal purges aimed at maintaining absolute control.

The Nicaragua Army: History and Current Transformation

The Nicaraguan Army, formally constituted 45 years ago, has traditionally maintained operational autonomy. However, under the current regime, it has been progressively politicized and subjected to direct control by the Ortega-Murillo family. The army currently has 20 generals appointed directly by Ortega since 2007, with recent strategic promotions and alleged internal purges affecting several high-ranking officers.

Budget Strengthening Amid Crisis

Despite the internal crisis, the Nicaraguan army and police have received significant budgetary increases. In 2025, these institutions received a joint increase of 22 million dollars, following a trend of annual increases that reached an additional 20 million in 2024. This economic strengthening contrasts with the climate of internal purges, suggesting a dual strategy of financially strengthening institutions while ensuring absolute loyalty through fear and co-optation.

Fear as an Instrument of Power

According to Confidential, “fear is real, and every time repression occurs or internal purges in Nicaragua, people ask ‘how long they will stop!'” This reality has now extended to the highest echelons of military power. The current situation in the General Staff reflects the broader transformation of the Nicaraguan State, where the Ortega-Murillo regime has eliminated the balance of powers and established absolute control over all institutions, including the Armed Forces.

As the regime consolidates its power, the question on everyone’s mind is: “Who will be next?” The military, once a bastion of autonomy, now finds itself under the iron grip of a regime determined to maintain its hold on Nicaragua at any cost.

Stay tuned to archyde.com for the latest updates on this developing story. For more on the Nicaraguan military and the Ortega-Murillo regime, visit our dedicated section.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.