Here are the text details found in the provided HTML content:
Main subscription offers:
Paywall Journey (Monthly):
All articles & content on noz.de
News app including push function
For 1. Month free of charge, then € 14.95 per month
Trial month for € 0
Cancelable monthly
* Annual subscription (saving 30 %!)
At the start of 2022, a disagreement arose regarding the assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic risk level in Germany. While the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Germany’s public health agency, sought to adjust the risk level from “very high” to “high,” Health Minister Karl Lauterbach intervened, effectively preventing the downgrade and igniting a debate over the role of politics in pandemic response.
Reports revealed that the RKI’s desire to downgrade the risk assessment was based on their scientific interpretation of the pandemic situation at the time. However, Lauterbach informed the RKI that
“a downgrade of the risk assessment was “politically not desired”
despite their recommendation.
This decision raised concerns about whether political expediency was influencing public health decisions.
Lauterbach defended his decision, stating that he believed the RKI and the Ministry of Health (BMG)
“rightly postponed the downgrade”
at the time.
His stance suggests a belief that maintaining the “very high risk” level was necessary to ensure continued vigilance and adherence to public health measures.
This incident underscores the complex relationship between scientific data, political considerations, and public perception during a pandemic. The debate surrounding the risk assessment downgrade highlights the ongoing challenges of balancing public safety with individual freedoms and economic concerns.
