Victoria’s Treaty: A Blueprint for Indigenous Agreements Across Australia?

Imagine a future where Indigenous voices aren’t just heard in Australian policy-making, but fundamentally shape it. That future took a significant step closer on November 30th, 2023, with the signing of Victoria’s first statewide treaty with its First Peoples. But this isn’t simply a symbolic gesture; it’s a complex legal and political shift with ripple effects extending far beyond the state’s borders. The question now isn’t whether other states will follow suit, but how, and what challenges – and opportunities – lie ahead.

The Historic Agreement: What Does it Mean?

The Treaty, finalized after a year of negotiations following Victoria’s truth-telling inquiry into the mistreatment of Aboriginal people, establishes a formal partnership between the Victorian government and the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria. Crucially, the Assembly – independently elected by Aboriginal Victorians – now possesses expanded powers, acting as a voice to parliament that the government is legally obligated to consult on laws and policies impacting the state’s Indigenous population. This isn’t merely consultation; it’s a mandated partnership, enshrined in legislation. The treaty also allows for local groups to negotiate their own, more specific agreements, acknowledging the diversity of Victorian Aboriginal communities.

As Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan stated, the agreement represents “two worlds meeting in respect and in partnership.” It’s a recognition that Western legal frameworks can coexist with, and learn from, the world’s oldest continuing cultures. But the signing isn’t the finish line; it’s the starting gun for a new phase of implementation and negotiation.

Beyond Victoria: A National Conversation

Victoria’s move places pressure on other Australian states and territories to address the long-standing issue of Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination. While the federal government has expressed support for reconciliation, a national treaty remains a distant prospect. The Victorian model, however, provides a tangible framework for other jurisdictions to consider.

Expert Insight: “The Victorian Treaty demonstrates that a pathway to meaningful self-determination is possible within the existing Australian constitutional framework,” says Professor Marcia Langton, a leading Indigenous academic. “It’s a pragmatic approach that acknowledges the need for both legal recognition and genuine partnership.”

Potential Future Trends & Implications

Several key trends are likely to emerge in the wake of Victoria’s treaty:

• Increased Momentum for State-Level Treaties: Queensland and Western Australia are already exploring treaty processes, and Victoria’s success will likely accelerate these efforts. Expect increased public debate and political maneuvering in these states.
• Focus on Localized Agreements: The Victorian model’s allowance for local treaties is significant. These agreements will likely address specific land rights, cultural heritage protection, and economic development opportunities tailored to individual communities.
• Challenges to Implementation: The true test will be in the implementation of the treaty. Ensuring adequate resources, addressing historical grievances, and navigating potential conflicts between different Indigenous groups will be crucial.
• Economic Empowerment: Treaties have the potential to unlock significant economic opportunities for Indigenous communities. This could include access to land for economic development, revenue-sharing agreements, and increased Indigenous participation in the workforce.
• Constitutional Debate: While Victoria’s treaty operates within the existing constitutional framework, it will inevitably fuel the debate about constitutional recognition of Indigenous sovereignty.

Did you know? Prior to European colonization, over 250 Indigenous language groups existed across Australia, each with its own unique legal and cultural systems. The treaty process represents a partial restoration of this diversity and self-governance.

The Opposition & Potential Roadblocks

The path forward isn’t without obstacles. Victoria’s coalition opposition, led by Melina Bath, has vowed to repeal the treaty if elected in 2026, favoring instead a standalone body overseen by a minister. This highlights the deep political divisions surrounding the issue and the fragility of the agreement. The opposition’s focus on “closing the gap” – while laudable – risks framing Indigenous self-determination solely as a matter of social welfare, rather than a fundamental right.

Pro Tip: For businesses operating in Victoria, understanding the implications of the treaty is crucial. Engaging with the First Peoples’ Assembly and demonstrating a commitment to Indigenous reconciliation will be increasingly important for maintaining a social license to operate.

Navigating the Legal Landscape

The legal implications of the treaty are complex. It’s likely to be tested in the courts, particularly regarding the scope of the Assembly’s powers and the interpretation of treaty provisions. The principle of “co-operative federalism” – where state and federal governments collaborate – will be key to resolving any jurisdictional disputes.

Furthermore, the treaty’s impact on existing native title claims remains to be seen. While the treaty doesn’t extinguish native title, it may provide a more streamlined process for resolving land disputes and securing Indigenous land rights.

“

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria?

The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria is an independent, representative body elected by Aboriginal Victorians. It acts as a voice to parliament and has the power to negotiate treaties with the Victorian government.

Will other states follow Victoria’s lead?

Queensland and Western Australia are already exploring treaty processes. Victoria’s success will likely accelerate these efforts, but the timeline and specific approach will vary in each state.

What are the potential economic benefits of the treaty?

The treaty could unlock significant economic opportunities for Indigenous communities, including access to land for economic development, revenue-sharing agreements, and increased Indigenous participation in the workforce.

What does this mean for non-Indigenous Victorians?

The treaty represents a step towards a more just and equitable society for all Victorians. It acknowledges the historical injustices faced by Aboriginal people and seeks to build a future based on respect and partnership.

The signing of Victoria’s treaty is a watershed moment in Australian history. It’s a testament to the resilience and determination of Aboriginal Victorians and a beacon of hope for Indigenous communities across the country. The hard work has only just begun, but the foundation for a more equitable and reconciled future has been laid. What will it take for other states to build on this momentum?

Explore more insights on Indigenous rights and reconciliation in our dedicated section.