Home » Spain » Page 24
Tag:

Spain

Technology

Workouts change forever with this little camera gadget that uses AI

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

AI-Powered Personal Trainer BodyPark ATOM Launches on Kickstarter – Revolutionizing Home Fitness

Madrid, Spain – Forget expensive gym memberships and the struggle to stay motivated. A new era of personalized fitness is dawning with the upcoming Kickstarter launch of BodyPark ATOM, an AI-powered personal trainer designed to bring expert guidance directly into your home. Priced at just $119, this compact device promises to transform how we approach strength training and overall wellness, and it’s already generating buzz within the fitness community. This is a breaking news development for the tech and fitness industries, poised to disrupt the traditional personal training model.

From Bodybuilding to Broad Appeal: The Rise of Strength Training in Spain

For years, strength training in Spain – and globally – was often associated with elite athletes or those seeking extreme muscle definition. But a growing awareness of its holistic health benefits is driving a surge in popularity. More and more people are discovering that lifting weights and using resistance machines isn’t just about aesthetics; it’s about improving overall health, boosting metabolism, and enhancing quality of life, even as we age. This shift in perception has created a demand for accessible and affordable fitness solutions.

Meet BodyPark ATOM: Your AI Fitness Companion

BodyPark ATOM isn’t just another fitness tracker. It’s a sophisticated system built around precision, personalization, and motivation. The core of its functionality lies in advanced motion capture technology. Unlike wearables that simply count steps, ATOM meticulously records every exercise, including repetitions, sets, and training time, eliminating the need for manual logging. Think of it as having a watchful eye – and a knowledgeable coach – guiding you through each movement.

Real-Time Feedback and Injury Prevention

One of the most compelling features of BodyPark ATOM is its ability to analyze your form while you exercise. Boasting a database of over 1,000 exercises, the device provides instant audio feedback if your posture is incorrect. This real-time correction is crucial, not only for maximizing the effectiveness of each repetition but also for preventing long-term injuries. Experts consistently emphasize the importance of proper form, and ATOM effectively bridges the gap between intention and execution. It’s like having a personal trainer constantly monitoring and correcting your technique.

Beyond Rep Counting: Gamification and Personalized Plans

Let’s face it: counting reps can be monotonous. BodyPark ATOM tackles this challenge with a fully automated rep-counting system, freeing you to focus entirely on your workout. But it doesn’t stop there. The device incorporates elements of gamification, turning exercise into a more engaging and addictive experience. You can even compete against yourself or friends, adding a social dimension to your fitness journey. Furthermore, the AI learns from your performance, suggesting adjustments to your training plan to help you achieve your specific goals – whether it’s building strength, losing weight, or improving endurance.

Seamless Integration and Data Synchronization

BodyPark ATOM isn’t an isolated gadget; it’s designed to integrate seamlessly into your existing fitness ecosystem. It’s compatible with a wide range of applications and platforms, including Apple Watch, allowing for real-time synchronization of health data like heart rate, activity levels, stress levels, and respiratory rate. This comprehensive data integration provides personalized training reports and allows you to monitor your progress across multiple devices. You can even share your data with a human trainer if you choose, creating a hybrid approach to fitness coaching.

BodyPark ATOM App Interface

A Portable and Versatile Solution

The thoughtfully designed BodyPark ATOM is small, discreet, and easily portable. Its minimalist aesthetic blends seamlessly into any home environment, and it requires no complicated setup. A magnetic mount allows you to attach it to gym machines for optimal scanning, and it’s also compatible with standard tripods. Whether you’re working out at home, in the gym, or even traveling, ATOM is ready to go.

The launch of BodyPark ATOM on Kickstarter marks a significant step forward in democratizing access to personalized fitness guidance. By leveraging the power of artificial intelligence, this innovative device empowers individuals to take control of their health and achieve their fitness goals more effectively and safely. Keep an eye on the Kickstarter campaign for updates and be among the first to experience the future of home fitness. This is a story to watch as it unfolds, potentially reshaping the landscape of personal training and wellness for years to come.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

U.S. Threatens Tariffs Unless Defense Spending Increases, POLITICO Reports

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Trump Demands Higher Defence Spending From <a href="https://www.zhihu.com/question/303774277" title="哪些好玩的app只有美区app store有？中国区下架了哪些有意思的app!!!？ - 知乎">NATO</a> Allies,Focusing Criticism On <a href="https://www.archyde.com/tricks-to-create-a-bomb-proof-password/" title="Tricks to create a bomb-proof password">Spain</a>

Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt – Former President Donald Trump has once again intensified his calls for NATO members to boost their military expenditures, singling out Spain for what he perceives as insufficient contributions to the alliance’s collective defense. The renewed pressure comes as geopolitical tensions escalate globally, with ongoing conflicts demanding increased security measures.

Trump’s Renewed Focus On NATO Spending

Table of Contents

During a recent event in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, Trump directly questioned whether NATO leaders were actively addressing Spain’s commitment to defense spending, specifically referencing its GDP contribution. This intervention underscores a consistent theme throughout Trump’s political career: the belief that several NATO members have unduly relied on the United States for their security, without adequately sharing the financial burden.

His criticism of Spain centers on its historically low level of military investment. According to data released in 2024, Madrid allocated just 1.3 percent of its Gross Domestic Product to defense. This figure places Spain at the bottom among NATO nations in terms of military spending as a percentage of GDP. Trump has repeatedly demanded that allies meet a target of 2 percent of GDP, and more recently, hinted at a 5 percent expectation.

Spain’s Position And Pledges

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has defended his nation’s approach, suggesting that Spain’s security needs and geopolitical position differ from those of other member states, and thus require a different level of investment. He initially requested an exemption from stricter spending requirements, arguing that Madrid doesn’t require the same level of financial outlay to fulfill its NATO obligations.

In April, Sánchez pledged to raise Spain’s defense spending to 2 percent of its GDP by the close of 2025, reacting to mounting pressure from both Washington and Brussels. However, this commitment falls considerably short of Trump’s latest demand for a 5 percent contribution. The former President has, in the past, threatened to impose tariffs on nations he believes are not meeting their financial obligations to the alliance.

A Comparative Look At NATO Defense Spending (2024 estimates)

country GDP % for Defense
United States 3.7%
Greece 3.8%
Poland 4.0%
United Kingdom 2.2%
Spain 1.3%
Germany 1.5%

Did You Know? The North Atlantic Treaty Association (NATO) was founded in 1949 with the primary purpose of collective defense against the Soviet Union. Today, it continues to serve as a vital alliance for security cooperation among North American and European nations.

Pro Tip: understanding the historical context of NATO’s formation and its evolving role in global security provides valuable insight into current debates surrounding defense spending and burden-sharing.

Broader Implications For The Alliance

Trump’s continued focus on defense spending highlights a fundamental tension within NATO.While most members acknowledge the need to strengthen collective defense,disagreements persist over how to achieve this goal and how the financial burden should be distributed. The alliance has set a target for members to spend 2 percent of their GDP on defense by 2024,with a longer-term goal of reaching 5 percent,but progress has been uneven.

The situation is intricate by differing threat perceptions among member states. Sánchez recently stated that Moscow does not represent an immediate security threat to Spain, a position which has drawn criticism from other EU nations. this divergence in views underscores the challenges of forging a unified security policy within the alliance. What impact will these tensions have on the cohesiveness of NATO?

Will European nations respond to Trump’s demands and increase their defense spending to appease the United States, or will they continue to prioritize domestic concerns and pursue autonomous security strategies? The answers to these questions will shape the future of the transatlantic alliance.

Understanding NATO’s Spending Targets

The 2% GDP target for defense spending was initially agreed upon by NATO members in 2014, in response to Russia’s annexation of Crimea. It was intended to signal a renewed commitment to collective defense and to ensure that allies were adequately investing in their military capabilities.however, achieving this target has proven to be challenging for many nations, due to competing budgetary priorities and economic constraints. The goal of 5% has been recently suggested by Trump as a way to ensure NATO´s effective capacity to respond to current global issues.

Furthermore,it’s important to note that defense spending is not solely about the amount of money allocated,but also about how that money is spent.Investing in modern equipment, advanced technologies, and well-trained personnel is crucial for maintaining a credible defense capability.

Frequently Asked Questions About NATO Defense Spending

  • What is the current NATO defense spending target? the current target is for members to spend 2% of their GDP on defense, with a longer-term goal of 5%.
  • Why is Donald Trump critical of NATO allies’ defense spending? Trump believes that many NATO members are not contributing their fair share to the alliance’s collective defense.
  • what percentage of its GDP does Spain currently spend on defense? Spain currently allocates approximately 1.3% of its GDP to defense.
  • What are the potential consequences of insufficient defense spending? Insufficient spending can lead to a weakening of collective defense capabilities and a reduced ability to respond to security threats.
  • Is there a consensus among NATO members on defense spending priorities? There is a lack of consensus, with differing views among member states on how to prioritize defense investments.
  • What is the historical context of NATO’s spending goals? The 2% target was established in 2014 following Russia’s annexation of Crimea as a response to perceived increases in regional threats.
  • Has Spain committed to increasing its defense budget? yes, Spain has pledged to increase its defense spending to 2% of GDP by the end of 2025.

What role do you beleive economic factors play in a nation’s ability to meet NATO’s defense spending goals? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Do you think a standardized defense spending target is the most effective way to ensure NATO’s collective security?


What are the potential economic consequences of the U.S. imposing tariffs on NATO allies?

U.S. Threatens Tariffs Unless Defense Spending Increases, POLITICO Reports

The Escalating Pressure on NATO Allies

According to a recent report by POLITICO, the United States is actively threatening to impose new tariffs on goods from NATO allies who fail to meet the agreed-upon target of spending 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defense. This aggressive stance represents a significant escalation in pressure on European nations, notably as the war in Ukraine continues and concerns about transatlantic security deepen. The move, reportedly championed by former President Trump and now gaining traction within the biden governance, aims to enforce long-standing commitments and bolster collective defense capabilities.

This isn’t simply about hitting a number; it’s about burden-sharing and demonstrating a unified commitment to deterring potential adversaries like Russia. The core issue revolves around perceived imbalances in defense spending, with the U.S. shouldering a disproportionate share of the financial burden for NATO’s collective security.

Which Countries Are Facing Potential Tariffs?

Several NATO members are currently falling short of the 2% GDP defense spending target. POLITICO’s reporting identifies key countries perhaps facing tariffs, including:

* Germany: Historically hesitant to considerably increase defense spending, Germany is a major focus of the U.S. pressure.

* Canada: Despite being a close ally, Canada consistently lags behind in meeting the 2% target.

* Spain: Facing economic challenges, Spain’s defense budget remains below the agreed-upon threshold.

* Italy: While increasing spending, Italy still needs to make significant progress to reach the 2% goal.

* Netherlands: Similar to other European nations, the Netherlands is under scrutiny for it’s defense expenditure levels.

The specific tariffs being considered haven’t been publicly detailed, but sources suggest they could target key exports from these countries, potentially impacting trade relations and economic growth. The threat of economic repercussions is intended to incentivize these nations to prioritize increased defense investment.

The Rationale Behind the Tariff threat: A Deep Dive

The Biden administration, while initially more cautious than its predecessor, appears to be increasingly receptive to the argument that stronger enforcement of the 2% target is crucial for several reasons:

* Deterrence: Increased defense spending by european allies strengthens NATO’s overall deterrent capability, sending a clear message to potential aggressors.

* Burden Sharing: the U.S. argues that it has long carried too much of the financial burden for collective defense, and that allies need to step up.

* Ukraine Conflict: The war in Ukraine has highlighted the importance of robust defense capabilities and the need for allies to be prepared to respond to security threats.

* Domestic Political Pressure: There’s growing bipartisan support in the U.S. for demanding greater burden-sharing from NATO allies.

* Industrial Base Support: Increased defense spending translates to contracts for U.S. defense contractors, bolstering the domestic industrial base.

Ancient Context: Trump’s Previous Attempts

This isn’t the first time the U.S. has pressured NATO allies on defense spending. During the Trump administration, similar threats were made, though never fully implemented. Trump repeatedly criticized European nations for “free-riding” on U.S. security guarantees and demanded they meet their financial obligations.

While the Biden administration initially adopted a more diplomatic approach, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the perceived lack of progress on defense spending have led to a reassessment of this strategy. The current situation represents a more formalized and potentially impactful effort to enforce the 2% target.

Potential Economic Consequences of Tariffs

The imposition of tariffs could have significant economic consequences for both the U.S. and the affected NATO allies:

* Trade Disruptions: Tariffs would disrupt established trade flows, potentially leading to higher prices for consumers and businesses.

* Economic Slowdown: Reduced trade could contribute to an economic slowdown in both the U.S. and Europe.

* Retaliatory Measures: Affected countries could retaliate with their own tariffs on U.S. goods, escalating the trade conflict.

* Strain on Transatlantic Relations: The tariff threat could further strain already tense transatlantic relations, potentially undermining NATO’s unity.

* supply Chain Issues: Tariffs could exacerbate existing supply chain disruptions, impacting various industries.

The 2% Target: Origins and Evolution

The 2% GDP defense spending target was initially established at the 2006 Bucharest Summit. While it was intended as a guideline, it gained prominence under the Trump administration. The original intent was to ensure that all NATO members invested sufficiently in their defense capabilities to contribute meaningfully to collective security.

However, the interpretation of “defense spending” has been a point of contention. Some countries argue that certain expenditures, such as military pensions and veterans’ benefits, should be included in the calculation, while others disagree. This ambiguity has further complex efforts to accurately assess compliance with the 2% target.

Option Solutions

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

Zidane: Only Real Madrid Would Bring Me Back to Coaching

by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor
written by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor

Zidane’s France Dream: How National Team Appointments are Redefining Football Management

The allure of a national team job is shifting. For decades, club football – with its daily challenges and immediate rewards – represented the pinnacle for most managers. But as Zinedine Zidane publicly reaffirms his desire to lead France, a pattern emerges: elite coaches increasingly prioritizing national team roles, even after achieving monumental success at the club level. This isn’t simply about prestige; it’s a strategic recalibration driven by evolving pressures within the modern game, and it signals a potentially seismic shift in the future of football leadership.

The Allure of the International Stage: Beyond Club Glory

Zidane’s situation is emblematic of this trend. After an unprecedented three consecutive Champions League titles with Real Madrid, he’s held out for one opportunity: managing Les Bleus. This patience, unusual in a profession known for its volatility, highlights the unique appeal of international management. While club roles demand constant fire-fighting – navigating transfer windows, appeasing owners, and managing player egos – national team positions offer a different kind of control. There’s a longer-term focus, a chance to build a legacy beyond immediate results, and a reduced daily grind.

“Did you know?” box: Zinedine Zidane’s Champions League hat-trick with Real Madrid in the 1998 final remains the only time a player has scored twice in a Champions League final with a header.

The Deschamps Factor: A Changing of the Guard

The impending departure of Didier Deschamps after the 2026 World Cup is the catalyst for Zidane’s ambition. Deschamps’ tenure, while successful, demonstrates the cyclical nature of international management. Even winning a World Cup doesn’t guarantee indefinite employment. This contrasts sharply with the club game, where sustained success often leads to long-term contracts and unwavering support. The national team landscape is becoming increasingly competitive, with a new generation of tacticians vying for top positions.

The Rise of the Specialist: Tactical Flexibility and Player Management

Modern national team managers aren’t just tacticians; they’re specialists in player management and psychological preparation. They must quickly forge a cohesive unit from players drawn from diverse club environments, each with their own playing styles and personalities. This requires exceptional communication skills, emotional intelligence, and the ability to adapt tactics based on opponent analysis and player form. The emphasis is shifting from imposing a rigid system to maximizing the individual talents within the squad.

“Expert Insight:” According to a recent report by the Global Football Observatory, national teams with managers who prioritize player well-being and open communication consistently outperform those with more authoritarian approaches.

Beyond France: A Global Trend

Zidane’s case isn’t isolated. Consider the interest in Pep Guardiola for national team roles, or the fact that Carlo Ancelotti has repeatedly been linked with positions beyond club management. The increasing financial disparity between top clubs and the rest of the footballing world is also a factor. National teams offer a level playing field, where tactical acumen and player motivation can often outweigh financial advantages.

The trend extends beyond Europe. South American nations are also increasingly targeting experienced European coaches, recognizing the value of their tactical expertise and ability to implement modern training methods. This globalization of coaching talent is raising the overall standard of international football.

“Pro Tip:” For aspiring football managers, developing strong interpersonal skills and a deep understanding of sports psychology is now as crucial as tactical knowledge.

Implications for Club Football: A Talent Drain?

The growing appeal of national team jobs could lead to a “talent drain” from club football. Top clubs may find it increasingly difficult to attract and retain elite managers, as more coaches prioritize the prestige and unique challenges of international management. This could exacerbate the existing power imbalance in club football, further concentrating success among a handful of wealthy teams.

However, it could also create opportunities for emerging managers to step up and prove themselves at the club level. The constant churn in national team management could also lead to more innovative tactical approaches and a greater emphasis on player development.

“

The Future of National Team Management: Data, Innovation, and Player Empowerment

Looking ahead, national team management will become even more data-driven and technologically advanced. Advanced analytics will play a crucial role in player selection, tactical planning, and injury prevention. Virtual reality and augmented reality will be used to simulate game scenarios and enhance player training.

Crucially, the role of the player will continue to evolve. National team managers will need to empower players, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility. The days of the autocratic coach are numbered. The most successful national teams will be those that can harness the collective intelligence and creativity of their players.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Will Zinedine Zidane definitely become the next France manager?

A: While Zidane has publicly expressed his desire to manage France, the appointment isn’t guaranteed. The French Football Federation will likely consider other candidates and assess the overall situation after the 2026 World Cup.

Q: How is national team management different from club management?

A: National team managers have less time with players, must integrate individuals from diverse club environments, and focus on long-term development rather than immediate results. The political landscape and media scrutiny are also often more intense.

Q: What skills are most important for a modern national team manager?

A: Strong communication, emotional intelligence, tactical flexibility, data analysis skills, and the ability to build a cohesive team culture are all essential.

Q: Could this trend impact smaller national teams?

A: Yes, smaller nations may struggle to compete for top coaching talent, potentially widening the gap between established footballing powers and emerging nations. Investment in local coaching development will be crucial.

What are your predictions for the future of international football management? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Trump, el-Sisi to Lead Gaza Peace Summit | POLITICO

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

The Fragile Promise of Peace: How the Gaza Ceasefire Signals a New Era of Middle East Diplomacy – and the Risks Ahead

The specter of escalating conflict in the Middle East has long been a defining feature of the 21st century. But the recent ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, coupled with a flurry of diplomatic activity, presents a potentially pivotal moment. While a formal signing ceremony is anticipated, the notable absence of both Israel and Hamas from the summit itself raises a critical question: is this a genuine step towards lasting peace, or merely a temporary reprieve masking deeper, more complex challenges? The coming weeks will be a crucial test, not just for the region, but for the evolving dynamics of international power and the future of conflict resolution.

A Hostage Exchange and a Presidential Visit: The Immediate Landscape

The immediate priority is the release of hostages held by Hamas in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, scheduled to begin Monday. This exchange, a direct result of the Thursday ceasefire deal, is a tangible sign of progress, offering a glimmer of hope to families on both sides. Simultaneously, former U.S. President Donald Trump’s planned visit to Israel and subsequent attendance at the Sharm El-Sheikh summit adds another layer of complexity. His presence, delivering a speech at the Knesset, is a calculated move, signaling continued U.S. involvement – and potentially, a shift in approach – to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Humanitarian Aid and the EU’s Commitment: Building Blocks for Stability?

The resumption of humanitarian aid flowing into the Gaza Strip, facilitated by Israel following a U.N. request, is a vital component of the ceasefire’s sustainability. However, aid alone is insufficient. European Council President António Costa’s participation in the Egypt summit, representing the European Union, underscores the international community’s commitment to supporting a “just and sustainable peace.” The EU’s pledge to contribute to the implementation of the “Middle East peace plan” is significant, but the plan’s details remain largely undisclosed, fueling speculation and uncertainty.

Key Takeaway: The immediate focus on hostage releases and humanitarian aid is essential, but these are merely first steps. The long-term success hinges on the specifics of the peace plan and the willingness of all parties to engage in genuine dialogue.

The Absent Players: Why Israel and Hamas Aren’t at the Table

The conspicuous absence of both Israel and Hamas from the summit is perhaps the most telling aspect of this situation. Israel’s reluctance likely stems from a desire to maintain control over the negotiation process and avoid appearing to legitimize Hamas. Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization by many countries, may be wary of international pressure and preconditions. This dynamic highlights a fundamental challenge: any lasting peace requires direct engagement with all key stakeholders, even those with whom negotiations are difficult or politically sensitive.

“The lack of direct participation from Israel and Hamas underscores the deep-seated mistrust and the complex political calculations at play. A sustainable peace cannot be brokered solely through intermediaries; it requires direct dialogue, however challenging.” – Council on Foreign Relations analysis.

Future Trends: The Shifting Sands of Middle East Diplomacy

Several key trends are likely to shape the future of the Middle East peace process:

1. The Rise of Regional Mediators: Beyond Traditional Diplomacy

Historically, the U.S. has played the dominant role in Middle East peace negotiations. However, the increasing influence of regional actors – such as Qatar, Egypt, and the UAE – suggests a shift towards a more multi-polar diplomatic landscape. These countries often have closer ties to the various parties involved and can offer alternative channels for communication and mediation.

2. The Impact of Domestic Politics: A Fragile Consensus

Political instability within both Israel and the Palestinian territories poses a significant threat to the ceasefire’s longevity. Internal divisions and shifting political priorities can undermine any progress made at the negotiating table. The upcoming Israeli elections, for example, could lead to a change in government and a reassessment of the peace process.

3. The Role of Economic Incentives: Investing in a Future of Peace

Sustainable peace requires more than just political agreements. Economic development and investment in the Palestinian territories are crucial for creating a viable future and addressing the root causes of conflict. The international community must prioritize economic assistance and support initiatives that promote economic opportunity and stability.

Did you know? The Gaza Strip has one of the highest unemployment rates in the world, exceeding 40% according to recent World Bank data.

4. The Evolving Security Landscape: Counterterrorism and Regional Alliances

The threat of terrorism remains a major concern in the region. The rise of extremist groups and the proliferation of weapons pose a constant challenge to stability. Strengthening regional security cooperation and addressing the underlying factors that contribute to radicalization are essential for preventing future conflicts.

Navigating the Uncertainties: Actionable Insights for Stakeholders

For policymakers, the key is to prioritize inclusive dialogue, support regional mediation efforts, and invest in economic development. For businesses, understanding the evolving political and security landscape is crucial for managing risk and identifying opportunities. And for individuals, staying informed and engaging in constructive dialogue are essential for fostering a more peaceful and just future.

**Pro Tip:** Monitor regional news sources and analysis from reputable think tanks (like the Middle East Institute) to stay abreast of developments and gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of the situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the “Middle East peace plan” being discussed?

A: Details of the plan remain largely undisclosed, but it is understood to be a comprehensive framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, potentially addressing issues such as borders, settlements, and the status of Jerusalem.

Q: What role is Donald Trump playing in the current situation?

A: Trump’s visit to Israel and attendance at the Sharm El-Sheikh summit are seen as a signal of continued U.S. engagement in the region, though his specific role and influence remain to be seen.

Q: Is this ceasefire likely to hold?

A: The ceasefire’s sustainability is uncertain. It depends on the commitment of all parties to uphold the agreement, the successful implementation of the peace plan, and the resolution of underlying political and economic issues.

Q: What are the biggest obstacles to a lasting peace?

A: Deep-seated mistrust, political divisions, economic hardship, and the threat of terrorism are among the biggest obstacles to achieving a lasting peace in the Middle East.

What are your predictions for the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.