Matías Mariotto Critiques River Plate’s Withdrawal from AFA Meetings
The recent decision by River Plate to withdraw from the Asociación del Fútbol Argentino (AFA) Executive Committee meetings has sparked considerable debate within the Argentine football community. This move, taken by the club’s president, Stéfano Di Carlo, reflects a clear dissatisfaction with the voting procedures and overall management of the AFA. The stance has been well-received by River Plate’s supporters, who see it as a necessary measure to address ongoing issues within Argentine football governance.
Though, this decision has drawn criticism from several club leaders closely aligned with the AFA. Among them is Matías Mariotto, the young president of Banfield, who has publicly questioned River’s choice. “I don’t understand why River takes this stance. I am not a member of the committee, so I am not part of those conversations, but I believe dialogue is the best way forward,” Mariotto stated recently. His comments have sparked backlash from River Plate fans who perceive him as siding with the AFA.
Reactions from the Football Community
Mariotto, who previously criticized the AFA for its refereeing decisions and later had to retract statements made in early 2025, emphasized the importance of maintaining open channels of communication. “It’s not the time to lose touch. Discussions should happen behind closed doors,” he added. This sentiment echoes the concerns of many who feel that distancing from the AFA could hinder progress in addressing systemic issues within Argentine football.
Enzo Francescoli, River Plate’s manager, has also elaborated on the club’s rationale for stepping back from the AFA meetings. He indicated that remaining involved in a system that does not align with their values or objectives is not constructive. “When you are part of something and your ideas do not work or are contradicted, what’s the point of continuing? It’s better not to disturb and to leave before being caught in a photo, trying not to express opinions that might contradict your desires,” Francescoli remarked during a conversation with F12.
AFA’s Response to Criticism
Claudio Tapia, the president of the AFA, reacted to River’s withdrawal with a hint of humor, stating, “Oh, are there more? I didn’t know,” when asked about the possibility of other clubs following River’s lead. This comment highlights the ongoing tension between the AFA and clubs that are increasingly frustrated with the organization’s direction.
Francescoli did not hold back in his assessment of the AFA’s leadership, calling out key figures such as Tapia and Pablo Toviggino for their lack of transparency and decision-making criteria. “If no one listens, or the people who require to make decisions don’t listen, what’s the point of continuing to talk? Why keep coming to programs and saying ‘no, the 30-team football model is bad,’ if nothing changes?” he questioned, illustrating a growing frustration among club leaders.
Implications for Argentine Football
The decision by River Plate to withdraw from the AFA meetings may have significant implications for the future of Argentine football governance. As clubs like River express their dissatisfaction with the AFA’s operations, it raises questions about the effectiveness of the current leadership and the potential for reform. With prominent figures like Mariotto and Francescoli voicing their concerns, the AFA may need to reconsider its approach to fostering cooperation among member clubs.
The ongoing dialogue surrounding this situation underscores the importance of accountability and transparency in football governance. As fans and club presidents alike demand change, the AFA’s response to these challenges will likely shape the future landscape of Argentine football.
As this situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor how River Plate and other clubs navigate their relationships with the AFA. The need for reform within the organization has never been more pressing, and the actions taken in the coming weeks will determine whether meaningful changes can be achieved.
We invite readers to share their thoughts on this ongoing situation and the potential impact on the future of Argentine football.