Alpine F1’s New Era: Why Long-Term Plans Are Out and ‘Grinding’ Is In

Just 22 points. That’s all Alpine F1 managed to salvage from the 2025 season, a dismal finish that landed them at the very bottom of the constructors’ championship. But new Managing Director Steve Nielsen isn’t talking about five-year plans or ambitious race targets. He’s talking about a fundamental shift in approach – a return to the relentless, iterative process that built championship-winning teams at Enstone decades ago. This isn’t just a change in leadership; it’s a rejection of the modern Formula 1 obsession with pre-defined timelines, and a potentially crucial move for a team desperately seeking a path back to competitiveness.

The Demise of the 100-Race Plan

In 2021, when Renault rebranded as Alpine, a clear vision was laid out: podiums by 2024, victories by 2025. This ambitious roadmap, often referred to as the “100-race plan,” aimed to rapidly elevate the team back to the front of the grid. However, the reality starkly contrasted with these expectations. Development on the A525 was halted mid-2025, resources redirected towards the significant regulation changes coming in 2026. The result? A season of struggle and a sobering last-place finish.

Nielsen’s arrival in September signaled a clear break from this previous strategy. He dismisses the notion of fixed timelines, arguing that they can stifle innovation and create undue pressure. “I’m not a person who believes in a 100-race plan or a three-year plan or a five-year plan,” he stated in Abu Dhabi. “I believe you put the best people you can get in the right positions, you give a clear mission, get the army marching all in the same direction, and you work as hard as you can and do the best job you can.”

The ‘Grinding Process’ and Building a Foundation

Nielsen’s philosophy centers around a more organic, incremental approach – a “slow grinding process” focused on continuous improvement. This isn’t about overnight miracles; it’s about systematically addressing weaknesses, strengthening the team’s structure, and relentlessly pursuing performance gains. He acknowledges the uncertainty inherent in this method. “I can tell you we’re building a better car next year than we have this year. I can’t tell you whether that will line up first, 10th or 20th on the grid.”

This approach echoes the team’s history. Nielsen, a veteran of the Benetton and Renault eras, recalls the time it took to build previous championship-winning teams at Enstone. “It took three years to win a race and five years to win the championship,” he notes, adding a crucial caveat: “That metric doesn’t necessarily apply today.” The modern F1 landscape is far more complex and competitive, but the underlying principle of sustained, focused effort remains vital.

Recruitment and Structural Improvements: The Core of the Rebuild

The immediate focus isn’t solely on aerodynamic development. Nielsen emphasizes the importance of strengthening the team’s internal structure and attracting top talent. Motorsport.com reports that key areas of recruitment are underway, targeting specific weaknesses within the organization. This suggests a deliberate effort to build a more robust and capable team, capable of consistently delivering performance improvements.

This focus on internal improvements is a smart move. While a revolutionary car design can provide a short-term boost, sustained success requires a strong foundation – a cohesive team, efficient processes, and a culture of continuous learning. Alpine’s previous struggles suggest these elements were lacking, and Nielsen’s emphasis on rebuilding them is a positive sign.

The 2026 Regulations: A Clean Slate, But No Guarantees

The upcoming 2026 regulations, with their significant changes to power units and aerodynamics, present both an opportunity and a challenge. Alpine has strategically shifted its focus to these regulations, halting development on the A525 to concentrate resources on the future. This is a calculated risk, but one that could pay off if the team successfully navigates the new technical landscape.

However, Nielsen is realistic about the challenges ahead. He doesn’t expect an immediate return to the front of the grid. The priority for 2026 is to achieve consistent competitiveness and regularly score points. “I want to be racing every week, ideally for points,” he says. “We’ve managed that on the odd weekend this year, but too often we’ve been a long way off at the back.”

This pragmatic approach is refreshing. In a sport often driven by hype and unrealistic expectations, Nielsen’s focus on incremental progress and consistent performance is a welcome change. It acknowledges the immense competition in Formula 1 and the difficulty of achieving rapid gains.

Ultimately, Alpine’s success will depend on its ability to execute this “grinding process” effectively. There are no shortcuts in Formula 1, and Nielsen’s philosophy recognizes that. The team’s future isn’t about a fixed timeline; it’s about building a strong foundation, attracting the right people, and relentlessly pursuing improvement. Whether that will translate into championship contention remains to be seen, but it’s a far more realistic and sustainable approach than the ambitious, ultimately failed, 100-race plan.

What are your predictions for Alpine’s performance in the 2026 season? Share your thoughts in the comments below!