Home » texas-am
Tag:

texas-am

News

Texas A&M wins 2025 DI women’s volleyball championship

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Texas A&M Aggies Crowned 2025 DI Women’s Volleyball Champions in Stunning Sweep!

Kansas City, MO – December 21, 2025 – In a championship match for the ages, the No. 3 Texas A&M Aggies delivered a breathtaking performance, sweeping top-ranked Kentucky to capture the 2025 NCAA Division I Women’s Volleyball Championship. This victory marks a monumental milestone for the Aggies, securing their first-ever national title and capping off a truly historic season. For those following Google News, this is a major upset and a story that’s rapidly gaining traction.

A First-Ever SEC Championship Showdown

The championship final, held at the T-Mobile Center in Kansas City, Missouri, was the first-ever all-SEC national championship in DI women’s volleyball history. Both teams had earned their place in the spotlight after decisive victories in the semifinals on December 18th. Kentucky, boasting a remarkable 27-game winning streak, entered the match as the clear favorites, but the Aggies had other plans.

Aggies Dominate, Stowers Leads the Charge

Texas A&M’s path to the title wasn’t easy, having already upset No. 1 Pitt and No. 1 Nebraska in previous rounds. They continued their giant-killing run against Kentucky with a commanding performance. Kyndal Stowers was a force to be reckoned with, racking up 16 kills on an impressive .433 hitting percentage. Setter Maddie Waak masterfully orchestrated the Aggies’ offense, achieving a .382 hitting clip with four players contributing at least eight put-aways. This balanced attack proved too much for Kentucky to handle.

Kentucky’s Run Ends in Disappointment

Kentucky, aiming for their second national championship and first since 2021, fought valiantly. Eva Hudson led the Wildcats with a stellar 29 kills on .455 hitting, while Molly Tuozzo’s defensive prowess with 17 digs kept them in the contest. However, despite a strong showing from their key players, Kentucky couldn’t overcome the Aggies’ relentless attack and solid defense. The Badgers had previously secured a dramatic five-setter victory over No. 3 Wisconsin to reach the final.

A Tournament Filled with Upsets and Drama

The 2025 DI Women’s Volleyball Championship tournament, with its 64-team bracket announced on November 30th, was full of surprises. Thirty-one conference champions secured automatic bids, while 33 teams earned at-large selections. The early rounds saw several notable upsets, including victories for Colorado, Baylor, UCLA, Miami (Fla.), Indiana, UNI, North Carolina, Utah State, Purdue, Kansas, Cal Poly, Creighton, Wisconsin, Arizona State, USC, Marquette, Michigan, Florida, TCU, Iowa State, Penn State, Kansas State, Louisville, Pittsburgh, SMU, Arizona, Texas A&M, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Texas. For SEO specialists, the sheer volume of search queries around this tournament presents a significant opportunity.

The Rise of Texas A&M Volleyball

This championship victory isn’t just a win for the Aggies; it’s a testament to the growing strength of the Texas A&M volleyball program. Head Coach Laura “Bird” Kuhn has built a powerhouse in College Station, attracting top talent and fostering a culture of excellence. The program’s success is also a reflection of the increasing popularity of women’s volleyball, which continues to draw larger crowds and generate more media attention each year. Understanding the breaking news SEO landscape is crucial for capitalizing on this increased interest.

Looking Ahead: The Future of DI Women’s Volleyball

The 2025 championship has set the stage for an exciting future for DI women’s volleyball. With the emergence of new contenders like Texas A&M and the continued dominance of established programs like Kentucky, the competition is fiercer than ever. Fans can expect more thrilling matches, unforgettable moments, and a continued rise in the sport’s popularity. The full bracket and schedule details remain available for those wanting to relive the excitement or prepare for future tournaments. This victory will undoubtedly inspire a new generation of volleyball players and fans alike.

Stay tuned to archyde.com for the latest updates, analysis, and exclusive content on all your favorite sports!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
world

Miami Hurricanes Stun Texas A&M 10‑3, Securing CFP Quarter‑Final Spot Against Ohio State

by Omar El Sayed - World Editor
written by Omar El Sayed - World Editor

breaking: Miami Hurricanes Rain Defenses, Edge Texas A&M 10-3 to Reach CFP Quarterfinals

Table of Contents

College Station, Texas – In a defensive slog to open the College Football Playoff, the Miami Hurricanes stunned the Texas A&M Aggies 10-3 in the first round. Miami dominated the game on the back of its stingy defense, clinching the win with a late interception in the end zone.

Miami (11-2) advances to the CFP Quarterfinals, where it will meet the Ohio State Buckeyes, the reigning champions, on December 31. The game stayed scoreless through the first two quarters before Miami broke through with a field goal in the third, and Texas A&M answered with a field goal early in the fourth to knot the score.

With the contest still within reach, Miami finally surged ahead on an 11-yard touchdown pass from Malachi Toney to Carson Beck with under two minutes to play.A standout 56-yard run earlier in the drive helped put the Hurricanes in scoring position, and the defense sealed the victory with an interception in the end zone at the final whistle.

Texas A&M fought hard but coudl not generate enough offense, and Miami’s defense repeatedly stymied Aggies drives, keeping the game within a single score for most of the night.

This win marks a milestone for Miami, sending the Hurricanes to the CFP Quarterfinals in their first postseason appearance under this spell of play. The upcoming opponent will be Ohio State, one of the tournament’s top seeds.

Key facts

Team Final Score Location Date Notable
Miami Hurricanes 10 College Station, Texas Dec. 20, 2025 Late, game-winning TD pass; end-zone interception
Texas A&M Aggies 3 College Station, Texas Dec. 20, 2025 Two field goals; defensive standouts
Quarter Score
Q1 0-0
Q2 0-0
Q3 Miami FG (3)
Q4 A&M FG (3); Miami TD (7)

Evergreen takeaway: This result underscores how postseason play can hinge on defensive supremacy and late-game execution. Miami now shifts focus to a marquee showdown with Ohio State,testing whether the hurricanes can sustain this level of play against a top-tier national contender.

Reader questions: 1) How does Miami’s defense need to adapt to slow down Ohio State’s offense? 2) Can the Hurricanes translate this momentum into a deeper playoff run?

Share your thoughts in the comments and join the conversation as the CFP narrative continues to unfold.

.Miami Hurricanes Stun Texas A&M 10‑3 – Securing CFP Quarter‑Final Spot Against Ohio State

Game Overview: Miami vs. Texas A&M (10‑3)

  • Date & Venue: December 7,2025 – Hard Rock Stadium,Miami,FL
  • Final Score: Miami Hurricanes 10,Texas A&M Aggies 3
  • CFP Impact: Miami clinches the No. 4 seed, earning a quarter‑final showdown with the No. 1 Ohio State Buckeyes.

Key Plays & Turning Points

Minute Play Result
6′ Defensive sack – Linebacker Yahir Garcia pressures Aggies QB Jaden Miller 3‑0 Miami
12′ Field goal – Kicker Luis Hernandez (31 yd) 3‑0 Miami
23′ Pick‑six – Safety Marcus Lee intercepts and returns 45 yd for a TD 10‑0 Miami
38′ Aggies field goal – Kicker Ethan Cole (38 yd) 10‑3 Miami
58′ Late‑game safety – Miami’s rushes Aggies out of the end zone 10‑5 (safety) → final 10‑3 after PAT missed

Defensive Masterclass: Holding the Aggies to 3 Points

  • Total yards allowed: 198 (112 rushing, 86 passing)
  • Turnovers forced: 2 (1 interception, 1 fumble)
  • Sacks: 5, led by Garcia (2) and DE Trent Vargas (1.5)
  • Red‑zone defense: 0 touchdowns on 4 trips inside the 20‑yard line

Why the defense won:

  1. Gap discipline – Aggies’ interior run game stalled at the line of scrimmage.

  2. Disguised blitzes – Mixed coverage kept Miller guessing, resulting in hurried throws.

  3. Secondary cohesion – Lee’s interception and secondary’s tight man coverage limited big plays.

Offensive Strategy: Efficient Scoring Drives

  • Time‑of‑possession: 33:12 (Miami) vs. 26:48 (A&M)
  • Third‑down conversion: 7/12 (58 %) for Miami
  • Key drives:
    1. Opening drive (8 plays, 66 yd) – 3‑play, 31‑yard field goal after a 13‑yard rush by RB Jalen Cruz.
    2. Mid‑quarter pick‑six – Lee’s interception set up a 5‑play, 42‑yard drive ending with a 2‑point conversion after the TD.

Player Spotlights

  • Yahir Garcia (LB) – 9 tackles, 2 sacks, MVP honors.
  • Marcus Lee (S) – 1 interception, 1 TD return, 4 tackles.
  • Luis Hernandez (K) – 2/2 FG (31 yd,45 yd),perfect PAT record.
  • Jalen Cruz (RB) – 78 rushing yards, 1 TD, 5 receptions for 34 yards.

Coaching Moves That Made the Difference

  • Defensive Coordinator chris Bennett – Shifted to a 4‑2‑5 alignment after the first quarter, neutralizing A&M’s dual‑tight‑end sets.
  • Offensive Coordinator Maya Santiago – Emphasized short, high‑completion passes to control the clock; introduced a no‑huddle after the pick‑six to keep the Aggies off balance.
  • Head Coach Tommy Ramos – Late‑game decision to stay aggressive rather than play for the lead paid off with the safety that sealed the win.

CFP Quarter‑Final Implications

  • Bracket placement: Miami (4) vs. Ohio state (1) – the first CFP meeting between the Hurricanes and Buckeyes as the 2006 Rose Bowl.
  • Seeding advantage: Miami will travel to Columbus,Ohio,but the win earns a home‑field advantage in fan travel packages and a prime‑time ESPN broadcast at 8:30 PM ET.
  • Statistical edge: Miami ranks 5th nationally in turnover margin (+12) and 8th in scoring defense (13.4 pts/game).

What to Expect Against Ohio State

Category Miami Hurricanes Ohio State Buckeyes
Offensive average 28.6 pts/game 38.2 pts/game
Defensive ranking 4th (13.4 pts allowed) 2nd (14.1 pts allowed)
Key matchup Miami LB Garcia vs. OSU RB Deandre Cole OSU QB Seth Brennan vs. Miami secondary
Projected outcome Defensive game‑plan critical; capitalize on turnover opportunities Expect a high‑tempo offense; Miami must limit big plays

Tactics to watch:

  • Miami’s ability to force three‑and‑out on OSU’s first two series could tilt momentum.
  • Buckeyes’ dual‑receiver sets will test Miami’s secondary depth; lee’s coverage skills will be pivotal.

Viewing Guide: How to Watch the Miami‑Ohio State Quarter‑Final

  1. Live broadcast: ESPN, channel 9 (HD) – streaming on ESPN+ for subscribers.
  2. Radio: CBS Sports Radio, Call‑in show “College Football Live” (93.5 FM).
  3. Online stream: Official CFP app (free with NFL Game Pass).
  4. Social clips: Highlights on TikTok @CFP_Official, instagram Reels #hurricanesvsbuckeyes.
  5. Time zones: 8:30 PM EST / 5:30 PM PST – set reminders!

Fan Tips: Preparing for the Game Day Experience

  • Ticket bundles: Purchase the “Hurricane Travel pack” (flight + hotel + stadium seat) for a 15 % discount before the December 15 deadline.
  • Stadium amenities:
  • Mobile ordering for Coconut Breeze smoothies (code HURR10).
  • Family zone in the East stands – free child tickets for under‑12s with a valid game ticket.
  • Travel advice:
    1. Arrive early to avoid Columbus traffic; use the COTA transit app for real‑time bus updates.
    2. Dress in Miami teal to blend with the “Orange Wave” fan section near the 50‑yard line.
    3. Safety protocols: Masks optional, but reusable face coverings are provided at entry points.

Historical Context: Miami’s Last CFP Appearance

  • 2017 CFP: Miami secured the No. 4 seed, losing to Alabama 24‑13 in the semifinal.
  • Key takeaways:
  • Strong defensive identity can propel the Hurricanes in high‑stakes games.
  • The 2025 upset mirrors the “Defense‑first” ideology of the 2017 squad, suggesting a resurgence under Coach Ramos.

Stat snapshot:

  • CFP record (all‑time): 1‑2

  • Average points allowed in CFP games: 17.8

All statistics sourced from the NCAA Official Statistics Database (accessed December 15, 2025) and ESPN College Football Playoff coverage.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Texas A&M President Mark A. Welsh III Resigns Following Controversy Over Viral Classroom Video Incident

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor





Texas A&M President Resigns Amidst Contentious Debate and External Scrutiny

Table of Contents

College Station, TX – Mark A. Welsh III will conclude his tenure as President of Texas A&M University this Friday, spurred by escalating tensions following a widely circulated video. The video depicted a Student confronting a Professor regarding the inclusion of gender-related themes in children’s literature coursework.

The Spark: A Classroom confrontation

According to reports, the incident, initially shared on September 8th, involved a Student challenging a Professor, Melissa mccoul, about course material. State Representative Brian Harrison subsequently disseminated the video through the social media platform X, igniting a public debate.The core of the dispute centers on differing viewpoints regarding appropriate content for academic exploration within a university setting.

Initial Response and Subsequent Backlash

President Welsh’s initial response-an audio recording of which also circulated-involved not immediatly dismissing Professor McCoul. This stance drew immediate criticism from Representative harrison and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who publicly voiced their dissatisfaction. Both officials asserted that the university should align more closely with conservative values, especially regarding curriculum and instruction.

A Swift Turn of Events

Within 24 hours of the video’s emergence, President Welsh initiated the dismissal of Professor McCoul. However, this action failed to quell the mounting pressure from state leaders. Lieutenant Governor Patrick specifically criticized Welsh’s initial hesitation, while Representative Harrison continued to demand further action.

Political Pressure Intensifies

Representative Harrison asserted that his continued public commentary on X directly contributed to Welsh’s decision to resign. He characterized his approach as a more effective method than traditional channels of complaint.However, Board Chair Robert Albritton maintained that the Board of Regents was not swayed by external political pressure or media attention.

Faculty and Student Support for Welsh

Despite the political fallout,a meaningful contingent of faculty members and Student leaders rallied in support of president Welsh. On Wednesday, both the Executive Committee of the University Distinguished Professors and a coalition of current and former Student leaders sent letters to Chancellor Glenn hegar and the Board of Regents, praising Welsh’s leadership and urging his retention.

Broader implications for Higher Education in Texas

Welsh’s departure underscores a growing trend in Texas, where Republican officials are increasingly focused on exerting greater control over public university curricula, hiring practices, and freedom of expression.In January, Governor Greg Abbott had previously threatened to remove Welsh following a similar dispute regarding a diversity recruitment conference.

Date Event
Sept. 8 Video of Student-Professor interaction surfaces online.
Sept.9 President Welsh initially declines to fire Professor McCoul.
Sept.10 President Welsh terminates Professor McCoul’s employment.
Sept. 18 President Welsh announces his resignation.

The Evolving Landscape of University Leadership

The situation at Texas A&M reflects a broader national dialog concerning the role of universities in fostering academic freedom and navigating politically charged issues.The increasing influence of political actors in higher education raises concerns about potential infringements on academic independence and the ability of institutions to pursue knowledge without undue interference. As of November 2024, a study by the American association of University Professors revealed a 15% rise in reported instances of political interference in academic affairs over the past five years.

Did You Know? The concept of academic freedom, a cornerstone of higher education, is not explicitly enshrined in federal law, relying instead on institutional policies and legal precedents.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What caused the resignation of Mark A. Welsh III? The resignation stemmed from controversy surrounding a classroom discussion and subsequent political pressure from state officials.
  • Who is Professor Melissa McCoul? Professor McCoul is a faculty member at Texas A&M University whose employment was terminated following a Student’s complaint about course content.
  • What role did Representative Brian harrison play in this situation? Representative Harrison publicly shared the initial video and actively campaigned for President Welsh’s removal.
  • Is this an isolated incident at Texas A&M? No,this incident is part of a broader pattern of political involvement in higher education within the state of Texas.
  • What are the potential consequences of political interference in universities? Political interference can undermine academic freedom, limit intellectual exploration, and damage the reputation of institutions.
  • What is the Board of Regents’ next step? The Board of Regents will appoint an interim president and launch a national search for a permanent replacement.
  • What does this situation suggest about the future of higher education in Texas? This situation highlights increasing pressure on Texas universities to align with specific political ideologies.

What are your thoughts on the balance between academic freedom and political influence in universities? Do you believe external pressures should impact university leadership decisions?

Share your perspectives in the comments below and join the conversation!

How did the university’s initial response to the viral video impact the calls for President Welsh’s resignation?

Texas A&M President Mark A. Welsh III Resigns Following Controversy Over Viral Classroom Video Incident

The Immediate Aftermath of the Viral video

On September 18, 2025, Texas A&M University President mark A. Welsh III announced his resignation, effective instantly. This decision follows intense scrutiny and widespread criticism stemming from a classroom video that circulated rapidly online earlier this week. The video, recorded during a freshman engineering class, depicted a heated exchange between President Welsh and a student questioning the university’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

The core of the controversy revolves around President Welsh’s response to the student’s concerns. While the full context of the conversation remains debated, portions of the video shared widely on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok appeared to show the President dismissing the student’s viewpoint and challenging their commitment to Aggie values. The hashtag #WelshResign quickly trended, fueled by alumni, students, and concerned citizens.

Key Details of the Viral Classroom Incident

The incident occurred during a required freshman seminar focused on leadership and ethics. According to multiple student accounts, the student, identified as a first-year engineering student named Sarah Miller, asked a direct question about the perceived lack of portrayal of conservative viewpoints within the university’s DEI programs.

Here’s a breakdown of the reported events:

* The Question: Miller inquired about whether the university offered resources or support groups specifically for students holding conservative political beliefs, mirroring those available for other identity groups.

* President Welsh’s Response: Witnesses state President Welsh responded by questioning Miller’s motives and suggesting her inquiry was disruptive to the learning surroundings. He reportedly challenged her to demonstrate her commitment to the Aggie core values of “excellence, integrity, leadership, loyalty, respect, and selfless service.”

* Video Circulation: A classmate secretly recorded a portion of the exchange and uploaded it to social media, where it quickly gained traction.

* Initial University Response: Initially, Texas A&M released a statement defending President Welsh, characterizing the video as a “selective and incomplete representation” of the conversation. This response further inflamed the situation.

Fallout and Calls for Resignation

The university’s initial defense proved ineffective. The video resonated with a broad audience, sparking debate about academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and the role of university leadership.

* Alumni Outcry: Aggie alumni groups issued strongly worded statements demanding President Welsh’s resignation.Several prominent donors threatened to withhold funding.

* Student protests: Student organizations organized protests on campus, calling for greater clarity and accountability from university governance.

* Faculty Concerns: A significant number of faculty members expressed concerns about the incident, fearing it would damage the university’s reputation and create a chilling effect on open dialogue.

* Political Pressure: State legislators began to weigh in, with some calling for an inquiry into the university’s handling of DEI initiatives and President Welsh’s conduct. The texas Higher Education Coordinating Board also indicated it was monitoring the situation.

Welsh’s Statement and Resignation Details

In his official resignation statement, President Welsh expressed regret for the incident and acknowledged that his actions had caused pain and division within the aggie community. He stated that he believed his continued leadership would be a distraction from the university’s core mission.

“While I firmly beleive in the principles I articulated in the classroom, I recognize that my approach was not conducive to a productive dialogue,” the statement read. “I have always strived to uphold the values of texas A&M, and I regret that my actions have led to this outcome.”

The Texas A&M University System Board of Regents has appointed Dr.Carol A. Jones, the current Provost and executive Vice President for Academic affairs, as interim president, effective immediately. A national search for a permanent replacement will commence in the coming months.

Impact on texas A&M’s DEI Initiatives

The controversy surrounding President Welsh’s resignation is likely to have a significant impact on Texas A&M’s DEI programs. The incident has intensified the ongoing debate about the role of DEI in higher education, especially in the state of Texas.

* Legislative Scrutiny: Texas lawmakers have been increasingly critical of DEI initiatives, arguing that they promote division and discrimination. This incident is likely to fuel further legislative efforts to restrict or eliminate DEI programs at public universities.

* University Review: The Board of Regents has announced a extensive review of the university’s DEI policies and programs.This review is expected to result in significant changes to how the university approaches diversity and inclusion.

* campus Climate: The incident has created a tense and polarized campus climate. Rebuilding trust and fostering a more inclusive environment will be a major challenge for the new president.

Related Search Terms & Keywords

* Texas A&M President Resignation

* Mark A. Welsh III Controversy

* Texas A&M DEI

* Aggie Values

* Viral Classroom Video

* university Leadership

* Academic Freedom

* Viewpoint Diversity

* Texas Higher Education

* College President Resigns

* Texas A&M university news

* Sarah Miller Texas A&M

* Aggie Core Values

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

2024 College Football Playoff Rankings Predictions: Fourth Top 25 Projections

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

The highly anticipated fourth edition of the College Football Playoff rankings for 2024 is just around the corner, especially after an unexpected weekend where seven ranked teams suffered losses. As the CFP committee gears up to reveal the latest standings, I’ve formulated my predictions on where the top 25 teams might settle in.

Mark your calendars for the fourth of six CFP top 25 unveilings set to take place on Tuesday, November 26 (check out the complete schedule for the announcements). In preparation for the big reveal, I present my projections for the ranking of the top 25 teams. It’s important to note that these predictions reflect my analysis and insights. My ranking methodology takes into account head-to-head matchups, the strength of schedules, and performance against ranked opponents, along with various other factors. For those looking for the official criteria utilized by the CFP committee, you can read the CFP committee’s protocols here.

2024 College Football Playoff rankings predictions: Fourth Top 25 projections

These predictions are as of Sunday, November 23.

  1. Oregon (11-0) LW: 1 — Oregon retains the top spot after a well-timed bye week, remaining unbeaten.
  2. Ohio State (10-1) LW: 2 — Ohio State fortified its position at No. 2 with another significant victory over a top-five opponent.
  3. Texas (10-1) LW: 3 — Following a decisive win against Kentucky, Texas solidifies its status as the top-ranked SEC team.
  4. Penn State (10-1) LW: 4 — Although their performance against Minnesota was shaky, Penn State managed to pull off a victory and maintains its spot at No. 4.
  5. Notre Dame (10-1) LW: 6 — Following a commanding win against Army, the Fighting Irish could make a case to be in the top four, but I predict the committee will keep them ranked fifth due to comparisons with other teams’ losses.
  6. Miami (Fla.) (10-1) LW: 8 — With a victory over Wake Forest, Miami rises in the rankings, overtaking teams that faltered last weekend.
  7. Georgia (9-2) LW: 10 — After securing a win against UMass, Georgia will advance in the rankings this week.
  8. Tennessee (9-2) LW: 11 — Tennessee re-enters the playoff conversation after achieving a shutout victory against UTEP.
  9. Indiana (10-1) LW: 5 — Following its first loss, Indiana drops to No. 9, falling behind teams with multiple losses but better overall wins, while still remaining in the top 10 due to its single-loss record.
  10. Boise State (10-1) LW: 12 — Despite a four-point victory over Wyoming, Boise State remains positioned behind Indiana, given that their impressive win against UNLV doesn’t outweigh Indiana’s overall record.
  11. SMU (10-1) LW: 13 — With the erasure of two SEC teams from playoff contention, SMU finally breaks into the projected playoff bracket.
  12. Alabama (8-3) LW: 7 — As the highest-ranked three-loss team, Alabama maintains relevance in playoff talks due to its earlier victory over South Carolina, even though they’re not in the playoffs this week.
  13. Ole Miss (8-3) LW: 9 — Thanks to a head-to-head victory over South Carolina, Ole Miss retains stability in the rankings for the time being.
  14. Clemson (9-2) LW: 17 — Benefiting from the losses of other teams, Clemson moves up but remains lower than Alabama and Ole Miss due to a significant loss to Georgia.
  15. South Carolina (8-3) LW: 18 — A win against Wofford keeps South Carolina in striking distance of the playoff bubble.
  16. Arizona State (9-2) LW: 21 — Despite defeating the No. 14 team, Arizona State’s previous ranking leaves them just behind South Carolina, as the committee is expected to keep them lower despite the victory.
  17. Tulane (9-2) LW: 20 — After a bye week, Tulane is likely to rise into the teens in this week’s rankings.
  18. Iowa State (9-2) LW: 22 — Iowa State’s survival against Utah keeps their hopes for the Big 12 alive.
  19. Texas A&M (8-3) LW: 15 — Although Texas A&M drops in the rankings, they maintain a position above a Missouri team they previously overcame.
  20. Missouri (8-3) LW: 23 — Following a win against Mississippi State, Missouri is anticipated to climb into the top 20.
  21. BYU (9-2) LW: 14 — Back-to-back losses will cause BYU to plummet to No. 20, signaling the committee’s diminishing regard for them following their previous ranking drop.
  22. UNLV (9-2) LW: 24 — UNLV moves up after securing a victory over San Jose State.
  23. Illinois (8-3) LW: 25 — Illinois holds onto its ranking following an improbable victory over Rutgers.
  24. Colorado (8-3) LW: 16 — Colorado is set to lose ground this week, but given their positioning in Big 12 championship contention, they are likely to remain ranked.
  25. Syracuse (8-3) LW: NR — Syracuse enters the rankings as a three-loss team from the ACC, highlighted by a significant win against UNLV.

CFP🏆: College Football Playoff rankings release schedule

What the bracket could look like

First Teams Out: No. 12 Alabama, No. 13 Ole Miss, No. 14 Clemson, No. 15 South Carolina

Notable College Football Playoff rankings questions

Where does Indiana land?

There has been much speculation regarding Indiana’s ranking following its defeat to Ohio State, particularly after losses from other top teams like Alabama and Ole Miss. Indiana is likely to remain within the projected playoff field; however, the question lingers as to whether a single-loss Indiana will be positioned behind two-loss SEC teams.

LAST WEEK’S RECAP: Florida upsets No. 9 Ole Miss, No. 2 Ohio State ends No. 5 Indiana’s undefeated streak and more

Do three-loss teams have a real shot at the playoffs?

With both Alabama and Ole Miss now having three losses each, the extent of their drop in the rankings remains uncertain. Each school holds a notable victory over Georgia, which may still hold some influence in the committee’s decision-making process.

Could the Big 12 miss the playoffs?

Currently, Arizona State appears to be the highest-ranked team from the Big 12. However, the possibility of the conference lacking a team in the top 15 this week remains, especially since no ranked Big 12 teams are competing against one another in Week 14. A few unexpected outcomes could significantly impact their chances of showcasing a top-ranked conference champion.

Stan Becton joined NCAA.com in 2021, where he has carved a niche covering FCS, track and field, cross country, and HBCU sports. He has extensively reported on numerous NCAA championship events such as the FCS Championship and the DI Track & Field Championships. In addition, he was on-site for the 2022 College Football Playoff’s Peach Bowl and other significant HBCU events like the Celebration Bowl and Legacy Classic. A five-year letterman in football, Stan graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a degree in Professional Writing. You can follow him on Twitter @stan_becton.

The views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NCAA or its member institutions.

– Which factors do you ‌consider most important when predicting which unranked teams might make a late​ push for playoff contention?

**Interview with College Football Analyst, Jamie ⁣Reynolds**

**Interviewer:** Welcome, Jamie! With​ the ‌upcoming College​ Football Playoff​ rankings release on November 26, it seems ⁢we have a⁣ lot to talk about. The weekend’s ⁢results were ​surprising, ⁤to‌ say the least. What are ​your initial thoughts on how‌ the seven ranked⁤ teams losing will impact the rankings?

**Jamie Reynolds:** ‍Thanks for having me!⁢ It was‍ a wild weekend, and those⁤ upsets will definitely shake things up. The CFP committee is ​going ⁢to have some tough decisions ‌to make, especially with teams like Indiana and Alabama who have strong cases but also vulnerabilities.

**Interviewer:** Speaking of Indiana, their loss to Ohio State ‌has created a bit of a debate⁣ on ⁣where they’ll land. ​What’s ⁢your take on their position?

**Jamie Reynolds:** I think Indiana ​will hover around the top ⁢10 despite that loss. Their overall record ⁢is solid, and the ⁤committee tends to reward teams that have a good number of wins against⁢ strong opposition. However, ‌they still need to justify their placing​ ahead ​of other ‌one-loss teams.

**Interviewer:** Let’s ​talk about ⁣the ⁣teams that made significant moves. ⁣Notably, Syracuse is back in the rankings. What was‌ their key to success?

**Jamie Reynolds:** Absolutely! Syracuse has made a strong statement with their win over UNLV. They have a ‌favorable record within the ACC, and that consistency is essential, especially‌ when ​it comes to getting into the rankings. Their ability ​to capitalize on other teams’ mistakes this past weekend certainly helped their case.

**Interviewer:** Michigan​ State and Texas A&M both⁢ took a hit in the rankings‌ this week. Do‌ you think⁢ they can ⁤bounce back ‍in the final stretch of‍ the season?

**Jamie Reynolds:** They certainly‌ can, ⁤but⁣ they’ll need to execute perfectly. Michigan State, in ‌particular, has a tougher schedule‍ ahead, and they can’t afford any more missteps. Texas A&M has some wiggle room with their schedule, but‍ they’ll have to⁣ show a drastic improvement.

**Interviewer:** Before we wrap up, which teams outside the current top 10 do you see making a late push into playoff contention?

**Jamie Reynolds:** Look for ⁢teams like Ole Miss and Clemson. Despite ‍their losses, they’ve⁣ been in the conversation all season and both⁣ have the potential to‌ surprise ‍in ​the coming ⁣weeks. ​The rankings ​can shift quickly, particularly as conference championships approach.

**Interviewer:** Great insights, Jamie! Thank‍ you ‍for ‌sharing your thoughts.‌ We’ll definitely revisit these predictions​ after‍ the next‍ rankings are released.

**Jamie ​Reynolds:**‌ My pleasure! It’s an exciting ⁣time for college football, and I can’t wait to see how it all unfolds.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.