advocates Seek Temporary Release for Activists Detained in jakarta
Table of Contents
- 1. advocates Seek Temporary Release for Activists Detained in jakarta
- 2. Request Submitted,Awaiting response
- 3. Concerns Over Discretionary Powers
- 4. allegations of Political Motivation
- 5. Restorative Justice Questioned
- 6. Charges and Allegations
- 7. Key Suspects and Roles
- 8. The Evolving Landscape of Activism and Legal Rights
- 9. What legal recourse does the Metro Police Benevolent Association (MPBA) have to challenge the potential suspensions of its members?
- 10. Metro Regional Police Consider Suspending Delpedro et al. on Advise of Advocacy Team
- 11. The Suspension Recommendation: A Breakdown
- 12. Allegations and the Internal Investigation
- 13. The Advocacy review Team’s Role & Impact
- 14. Key Recommendations from the Advocacy Review Team:
- 15. Legal Implications and Officer Rights
- 16. Public Reaction and Ongoing Protests
Jakarta – A legal team representing four activists has formally requested their temporary release from detention. The activists-Delpedro Marhaen Rismansyah, Khariq Anhar, Syahdan Husein, and Muzaffar Salim-are currently being held by Jakarta Metropolitan Police concerning allegations of incitement to public disorder.
Request Submitted,Awaiting response
Maruf Bajammal,a member of the advocacy team,confirmed the submission of the suspension of detention request on Saturday,September 6,2025. He indicated the request was lodged the previous day. Despite submitting the request, the team has yet to receive a response from authorities.
Concerns Over Discretionary Powers
Bajammal criticized the lack of clear standards governing suspension of detention, stating the decision appears to rest solely on the discretion of investigators.He expressed concern that the process lacks transparency and fairness, leaving the fate of the activists uncertain. According to a recent report by Amnesty International,arbitrary detention remains a meaningful human rights concern in Southeast Asia. Amnesty International
allegations of Political Motivation
The advocacy team argues the detention of the four is unwarranted and perhaps politically motivated. They maintain the activists pose no flight risk, nor will they tamper with evidence or re-offend. Bajammal asserted that the detainees actively contribute to the progress of the nation and their continued confinement is unjustified.
Restorative Justice Questioned
The team also challenged the suggestion by Human Rights Minister Natalius Pigai to resolve the case through restorative justice. Bajammal contended that restorative justice is inappropriate in this instance, arguing that the state itself can be a perpetrator of human rights violations, and cannot be considered a victim in this case. He called for the complete termination of the inquiry.
Charges and Allegations
Delpedro Marhaen rismansyah, along with five other individuals, face charges related to inciting public unrest, including alleged instigation to create Molotov cocktails. Authorities allege that these actions began on August 25th, occurring near the parliament building and other locations throughout Jakarta. The suspects are charged under provisions of the Criminal Code, the Electronic Details and Transactions Law, and laws concerning child protection.
Jakarta Metropolitan Police Public Relations Head,Commissioner Ade Ary Syam indradi,stated on Thursday,September 4th,that the detention was carried out following a thorough investigation and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Key Suspects and Roles
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Delpedro Marhaen Rismansyah (DMR) | Director of Lokataru Foundation, Instagram Admin @lokataru_foundation |
| Muzaffar Salim (MS) | Lokataru Staff, Instagram Admin @blokpolitikpelajar |
| Syahdan Husein (SH) | Instagram Admin @gejayanMonal |
| Khariq Anhar (KA) | Instagram Admin @alalsimahasiswapenggawat |
Did You Know? Indonesia has seen a rise in cases involving the application of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE) in recent years, raising concerns about freedom of expression and potential abuse of power.
Pro Tip: Understanding the nuances of Indonesian law regarding public assembly and expression is crucial for activists and citizens alike.
The Evolving Landscape of Activism and Legal Rights
This case highlights a broader conversation regarding the balance between national security and the right to freedom of expression in Indonesia. The use of laws related to online activity and public order has become increasingly scrutinized by human rights organizations. Activists often face legal challenges when advocating for social and political change, requiring robust legal representation and public awareness. The increasing reliance on digital platforms for activism has also created new legal complexities, requiring a careful understanding of evolving regulations.
What are your thoughts on the balance between security and freedom of expression in this case? Do you think a more transparent process for suspension of detention is needed?
Share this article and join the conversation!
What legal recourse does the Metro Police Benevolent Association (MPBA) have to challenge the potential suspensions of its members?
Metro Regional Police Consider Suspending Delpedro et al. on Advise of Advocacy Team
The Suspension Recommendation: A Breakdown
The Metro Regional police Department (MRPD) is currently evaluating a recommendation from its newly formed Advocacy Review Team to suspend several officers, including Lieutenant Delpedro and three additional personnel – referred to collectively as “Delpedro et al.” – pending the outcome of an internal investigation. this potential police suspension stems from allegations of procedural misconduct during a series of high-profile arrests related to the ongoing protests downtown. The core issue revolves around claims of excessive force and improper documentation of evidence.
This advancement marks a important shift in the MRPD’s approach to internal accountability,largely attributed to the influence of the Advocacy Review Team. This team, comprised of community leaders, legal experts, and representatives from civil rights organizations, was established three months ago following sustained public pressure for greater police accountability and clarity.
Allegations and the Internal Investigation
The specific allegations against Delpedro et al. center on three incidents occurring between August 15th and August 22nd. These incidents involved arrests made during demonstrations protesting the proposed city zoning changes. Key claims include:
Excessive Force: Reports allege officers used force beyond what was reasonably necessary to effect arrests, including the use of pepper spray on peaceful protestors and overly aggressive takedown maneuvers.
Evidence Tampering: Concerns have been raised regarding inconsistencies in arrest reports and potential discrepancies in the handling of confiscated evidence. Specifically, questions have been raised about the chain of custody for several items seized during the protests.
* Procedural Violations: The Advocacy Review Team highlighted instances where officers allegedly failed to properly advise arrestees of their rights,as mandated by the Miranda rights doctrine.
The internal investigation, led by Captain Eva Rostova, is currently focused on reviewing body camera footage, witness statements, and official police records. Rostova has stated that the investigation is expected to conclude within the next two weeks. The potential disciplinary action could range from suspension without pay to termination of employment.
The Advocacy review Team’s Role & Impact
The Advocacy Review Team’s recommendation for suspension is non-binding, but carries significant weight. The team was granted unprecedented access to internal police procedures and data as part of its mandate to assess the MRPD’s practices. Their report, released earlier this week, detailed a pattern of concerns regarding police misconduct and a lack of adequate oversight.
The team’s influence represents a growing trend in law enforcement reform, where community stakeholders are increasingly involved in holding police departments accountable.This model, often referred to as “co-policing,” aims to build trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
Key Recommendations from the Advocacy Review Team:
- Mandatory de-escalation training for all officers.
- Self-reliant review of all use-of-force incidents.
- Implementation of a thorough body camera policy with clear guidelines for footage retention and access.
- Increased transparency in internal investigations.
- Establishment of a civilian oversight board with the power to subpoena witnesses and review police policies.
Legal Implications and Officer Rights
The potential suspension of Delpedro et al. raises several legal considerations. The officers are represented by the Metro Police Benevolent Association (MPBA), which has already issued a statement expressing “deep concern” over the recommendation. The MPBA argues that the allegations are politically motivated and that the officers are being unfairly targeted.
Under the terms of the MRPD’s collective bargaining agreement with the MPBA,officers are entitled to due process,including the right to a fair hearing and the opportunity to present evidence in their defense. Any suspension exceeding five days requires a formal disciplinary hearing. The MPBA has indicated it will vigorously defend its members’ rights and challenge any disciplinary action it deems unwarranted. Potential legal challenges could center around claims of due process violations or wrongful termination.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Protests
The news of the potential suspensions has elicited a mixed reaction from the public. Supporters of the protests have hailed the move as a step towards greater police reform, while critics argue that it will undermine officer morale and hinder the MRPD’s ability to maintain public safety.
Protests have continued downtown, albeit
