The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a memorandum on February 18th granting immigration agents expanded authority to detain legal refugees who have not obtained permanent residency – a “green card” – within one year of arrival in the United States. The policy shift, part of the Trump administration’s broader effort to tighten immigration controls, even for those who entered the country legally, is already drawing scrutiny from immigration advocates.
The fresh guidance impacts refugees who have been granted legal entry into the U.S. But have not yet adjusted their status to become lawful permanent residents. Historically, failing to apply for residency within a year was not, in itself, grounds for detention. This change represents a significant departure from previous practices and raises concerns about due process and the potential for prolonged detention of vulnerable populations.
According to the memorandum, signed by officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), refugees are now required to either apply for permanent residency within one year of arrival or present themselves to immigration authorities for review. Failure to comply could result in apprehension, arrest, and detention by immigration agents. The DHS argues this measure is necessary to ensure national security and to identify individuals who may have fraudulently obtained refugee status.
The memorandum states that “(The DHS) must treat the one-year timeframe as a mandatory review point for all refugees who have not adjusted to status (of Lawful Permanent Resident), ensuring their ‘return’ to custody for inspection or, if non-compliant, their ‘return’ to custody via enforcement action.” This effectively transforms the first year in the United States into a mandatory check-in point for refugees.
During this review process, the government will evaluate whether the refugee obtained their status fraudulently or poses a risk to public safety or national security. Authorities are authorized to maintain these individuals in custody throughout the review period. The policy also carries the risk of refugees losing their legal status and facing deportation proceedings.
A recent internal USCIS review of 31,000 refugees who arrived between 2021 and 2024 from Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Venezuela found that approximately 10% presented potential public safety concerns, while over 42% had not been adequately vetted, according to the memorandum. This finding is being cited by the administration as justification for the stricter enforcement measures.
This policy is part of a wider strategy to restrict legal pathways to immigration. The administration has already reduced the number of refugees admitted to the country and ordered reviews of cases of refugees admitted in prior years. The United States has historically welcomed tens of thousands of refugees annually, subjecting them to a vetting process that can take years, as outlined by the State Department’s refugee admissions program https://www.state.gov/refugees/.
The change in policy comes amid ongoing debate over immigration enforcement and border security. Critics argue that the new measures are overly harsh and could unfairly target vulnerable individuals who have already been vetted and granted legal entry into the country. Advocates also express concern that the policy will create a climate of fear within refugee communities and discourage individuals from seeking legal assistance.
The implementation of this policy will likely be closely monitored by immigration rights organizations and legal experts. The potential for increased detentions and deportations raises significant legal and humanitarian concerns. The next procedural step will involve ICE agents implementing the new guidelines and initiating reviews of refugee cases. The long-term impact of this policy on refugee resettlement and integration remains to be seen.
This evolving situation underscores the ongoing challenges in balancing national security concerns with humanitarian obligations. Further developments are expected as the DHS implements this new policy and responds to potential legal challenges.
What are your thoughts on the new DHS policy? Share your comments below and engage in a respectful discussion.