Home » u.s. news » Page 5

<a href="https://www.archyde.com/tricks-to-create-a-bomb-proof-password/" title="Tricks to create a bomb-proof password">Birth</a> Proclamation: Daughter Born in <a href="https://www.archyde.com/mexican-activist-to-lead-the-new-york-immigration-office-telemundo-new-york-47/" title="Mexican activist to lead the New York ... office - Telemundo New York (47)">New York City</a> in 1925

Daughter Born in New York City in 1925

New york City welcomed a newborn daughter on June 25, 1925. This event, while seemingly a personal milestone, reflects broader demographic trends of the era and the vibrant growth of one of the world’s leading cities.

The arrival of this child coincided with a period of notable social and cultural change in the united States, frequently enough referred to as the Roaring Twenties. New York City, a magnet for immigrants and a hub of innovation, was experiencing rapid expansion and transformation.

The context of 1925 New York City

In 1925, New York City was a bustling metropolis. Immigration had brought diverse cultures and perspectives, contributing to the city’s unique character. The economy was booming, fueling construction, artistic expression, and a sense of optimism.

The birth of a daughter in this environment meant entering a world on the cusp of modernity.Women were beginning to assert their rights, and societal norms were being challenged. This child would grow up in a rapidly changing landscape, witnessing pivotal moments in American history.

Historical Birth Rates in the United States

Birth rates in the United States during the 1920s were generally declining compared to earlier decades. Though, New York City continued to experience considerable population growth due to immigration. according to data from the National Center for Health Statistics, the birth rate in 1925 was approximately 21.3 births per 1,000 population.

Year Birth Rate (per 1,000 population)
1920 23.7
1925 21.3
1930 18.8

Source: National Center for Health Statistics

Did You Know? The 1920s saw a rise in access to prenatal care, although it remained unevenly distributed across socioeconomic groups.

The Significance of Family History

The birth of a daughter is a foundational event in any family’s history. This particular birth, occurring in a significant city like New York in 1925, adds a layer of historical context. Tracing family lineages and understanding the circumstances surrounding one’s birth can provide valuable insights into identity and heritage.

Understanding Demographic Shifts

Analyzing birth records from specific years and locations can definitely help historians and demographers understand broader population trends. Factors such as immigration, economic conditions, and public health initiatives all influence birth rates and demographic patterns. As of 2024, the United States continues to experience evolving demographic shifts, with changing birth rates and increasing diversity. Understanding these trends is crucial for policy-making and resource allocation.

Pro Tip: Utilize online genealogy resources and historical archives to research birth records and family histories.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What was New York City like in 1925? New York City in 1925 was a booming metropolis, a center of immigration, culture, and economic growth during the Roaring Twenties.
  • What were the typical birth rates in the US during the 1920s? Birth rates in the US during the 1920s were decreasing but remained around 21 to 23 births per 1,000 population.
  • Why is a birth in 1925 historically significant? A birth in 1925, like any birth, represents a continuation of family history and reflects the social and economic conditions of the time.
  • How can I research my family’s birth records? Genealogy websites and historical archives provide resources for researching birth records and family histories.
  • Were there significant advancements in prenatal care in 1925? While access was limited, there was a growing awareness and some advancements in prenatal care during the 1920s.

What are your thoughts on the importance of preserving family history? Share your comments below!


What impact did June lockhart’s portrayal of strong, capable mothers have on societal perceptions of women in the 1960s?

June Lockhart, Iconic TV Matron from ‘Lassie’ and ‘Lost in Space,’ Passes away at 100

June Lockhart, a beloved actress best known for her roles as the compassionate mother figures in the classic television series Lassie and Lost in Space, has died at the age of 100. Her passing, reported on October 26, 2025, marks the end of an era for television fans who grew up wiht these iconic shows. Lockhart’s career spanned decades, encompassing stage, film, and television, but it was her portrayal of maternal warmth and strength that cemented her place in television history.

Early Life and Career Beginnings

Born June Evelyn Lockhart on June 25, 1925, in New York City, she was the daughter of actors Gene Lockhart and Miriam Adler. This theatrical lineage naturally led her to the stage. Lockhart began her career on Broadway in the 1940s, appearing in productions like Wish Me Luck and The Lady Has a Telephone.

Her early film roles included appearances in Hazel Florence (1949) and The Pied Piper (1949). However, it was television that would ultimately define her career. She transitioned seamlessly from stage and screen to become a familiar face in American households.

The Role of Ruth McBurney in Lassie (1958-1964)

Lockhart’s breakthrough role came in 1958 with Lassie. She played Ruth McBurney, the widowed mother raising her son, Timmy, with the help of the intelligent collie, Lassie. This role established her as the quintessential television mother – kind, resourceful, and deeply devoted to her family.

* Lassie resonated with audiences due to its wholesome family values and the strong bond between humans and animals.

* Lockhart’s performance was praised for its authenticity and emotional depth. She wasn’t simply playing a mother; she embodied motherhood.

* The show’s popularity made Lockhart a household name and a symbol of 1960s television.

Journey to the Future: Maureen Robinson in Lost in Space (1965-1968)

Following Lassie, Lockhart continued to embody the role of the strong matriarch in Lost in Space (1965-1968). As Dr. Maureen Robinson, a biochemist and the mother of the Robinson family, she navigated the dangers of space alongside her husband, John, and their children.

* Lost in Space was a groundbreaking science fiction series that captured the imagination of a generation.

* Dr. Robinson was a progressive character for her time – a highly intelligent and capable woman in a traditionally male-dominated field.

* Lockhart brought a sense of calm and authority to the role, even amidst the show’s often-campy and fantastical scenarios.

* The show’s enduring popularity has led to reboots and continued interest in the original series and its cast.

Later Career and Recognition

Even after Lost in space concluded, lockhart remained active in television, making guest appearances on shows like all My Children, Magnum, P.I., and General Hospital. She continued to work well into her 90s, demonstrating a lifelong passion for her craft.

* She received a star on the Hollywood Walk of fame in 1960.

* Lockhart was a frequent guest at science fiction and television conventions, where she warmly interacted with fans.

* Her dedication to her fans and her willingness to share her experiences made her a beloved figure in the entertainment community.

Personal Life

June Lockhart was married three times. Her first marriage was to John Dempsey in 1944, with whom she had two children, Anne and Junie. She later married Bernard Lederman in 1959, and Kirk Scott in 1986.She is survived by her daughter, Anne, and several grandchildren.Her daughter Junie passed away in 2018.

Legacy and Impact on Television

June Lockhart’s legacy extends far beyond her individual roles.She represented a specific ideal of motherhood on television – one of strength, compassion, and unwavering support. Her characters provided a sense of stability and comfort to viewers, particularly during times of social

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Rise of the ‘Hub Home’: How Neighborhood Resilience is Rewriting Disaster Preparedness

Imagine a world where, during the next major blackout, you didn’t have to rely solely on overwhelmed emergency services or crowded shelters. Instead, you could walk next door – or a few doors down – to a neighbor’s house equipped with solar power, batteries, and a welcoming space to recharge, connect, and find support. This isn’t a futuristic fantasy; it’s the rapidly evolving reality of “hub homes,” and they represent a potentially transformative shift in how communities prepare for – and survive – increasingly frequent climate-fueled disasters.

From Harvey to Uri: The Birth of a Grassroots Solution

The concept of hub homes emerged from the crucible of extreme weather events in Texas. Following Hurricane Harvey in 2017 and the devastating Winter Storm Uri in 2021, communities realized the limitations of traditional disaster response. As Sarah Kotwis, senior associate at the clean energy nonprofit RMI, points out, average annual power interruption hours across the U.S. have jumped in the last decade, largely due to extreme weather. West Street Recovery (WSR), a Northeast Houston nonprofit founded after Harvey, began distributing generators to residents willing to share, recognizing the immediate need for localized power solutions. This initial effort laid the groundwork for a more ambitious idea: equipping homes with renewable energy and turning them into neighborhood safe havens.

“We were like, ‘Shoot, power grid failure is a serious thing that we are not prepared for’,” recalls Becky Selle, co-director of disaster preparedness at WSR. The arrival of a private grant from the Hive Fund, channeled through Solar United Neighbors, allowed WSR to install solar panels and battery systems in select homes, transforming them into the first “hub homes.” These weren’t intended to replace emergency services, but to supplement them, providing a crucial lifeline in the critical hours and days following a disaster.

“It’s the missing link in the disaster resilience ecosystem,” says Renae Hanvin, CEO and founder of Resilient Ready, an expert on “social capital.” “At the end of the day, the first thing you need (in an emergency) to help you is a person.”

Beyond Power: Building Social Capital and Community Trust

The success of the hub home model hinges on more than just technology. It requires a deliberate investment in social capital – the connections, trust, and cooperation between people. David Espinoza, a hub home captain and WSR’s co-director of community organizing, emphasizes the importance of building relationships. “You have to build that trust,” he says. “I got to know my neighborhood a lot better” by going door-to-door, introducing himself to neighbors, and establishing a network of support.

This emphasis on community connection is particularly vital for vulnerable populations. Espinoza notes that hub homes offer a more accessible resource for mixed-status, Spanish-speaking, and medically vulnerable households, even when traditional shelters are available. The personal connection and language accessibility can be a significant barrier for those who might otherwise hesitate to seek help.

The Threat to a Promising Model: Funding Cuts and Legal Battles

Despite its early success, the future of the hub home program is now uncertain. The cancellation of the EPA’s $7 billion Solar for All program in August 2023 dealt a significant blow. This funding was earmarked to expand the program in Harris County, Texas, and across the nation, potentially reaching over 900,000 lower-income households. Both Solar United Neighbors and Harris County have filed lawsuits against the EPA, arguing that the cancellation undermines efforts to build resilience in communities most vulnerable to climate change.

The EPA’s decision highlights a critical tension: the need for long-term, sustained investment in community-based resilience initiatives versus short-sighted political considerations.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Decentralized Resilience

The setback with the Solar for All program doesn’t signal the end of the hub home concept, but it does underscore the need for diversified funding streams and innovative financing models. Several trends suggest that decentralized resilience solutions like hub homes will become increasingly important in the years to come:

  • Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events: Climate change is driving more frequent and intense heatwaves, hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, straining existing infrastructure and emergency response systems.
  • Grid Vulnerability: Aging infrastructure and increasing demand are making power grids more susceptible to outages, as demonstrated by events like Winter Storm Uri.
  • Rising Energy Costs: Fluctuating energy prices and the need for energy independence are driving interest in distributed renewable energy solutions like solar and battery storage.
  • Growing Demand for Community-Based Solutions: There’s a growing recognition that top-down approaches to disaster preparedness are often insufficient and that empowering communities to take ownership of their resilience is crucial.

We can expect to see a rise in microgrids, community solar projects, and other decentralized energy solutions that enhance local resilience. Furthermore, the integration of smart home technologies and energy management systems will allow hub homes to optimize energy usage and share resources more effectively. The concept could also expand beyond energy, incorporating water storage, food security initiatives, and communication networks.

The Role of Policy and Investment

To fully realize the potential of hub homes and similar initiatives, policymakers need to prioritize investments in community resilience. This includes:

  • Incentivizing Distributed Renewable Energy: Tax credits, rebates, and other incentives can encourage homeowners to invest in solar and battery storage.
  • Supporting Community Resilience Planning: Funding for local governments to develop and implement resilience plans that incorporate community-based solutions.
  • Promoting Social Capital Building: Investing in programs that foster community connections and trust.
  • Streamlining Permitting Processes: Reducing bureaucratic hurdles for installing renewable energy systems and implementing resilience projects.

A community solar installation with residents participating.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a hub home?

A hub home is a residence equipped with renewable energy sources (like solar panels and batteries) and emergency supplies, serving as a safe haven and resource center for neighbors during disasters.

How does the hub home model differ from traditional shelters?

Hub homes offer a more localized, personalized, and accessible form of support compared to traditional shelters, which can be overcrowded and difficult to reach. They leverage existing social networks and build community trust.

What are the biggest challenges to implementing the hub home model?

Challenges include securing funding, building community trust, managing energy resources effectively, and ensuring equitable access for all residents. The recent cancellation of the Solar for All program is a significant setback.

Can I turn my home into a hub home?

While it requires investment and community engagement, it’s possible! Start by connecting with local organizations like Solar United Neighbors and West Street Recovery to learn about available resources and programs. See our guide on preparing your home for emergencies for more information.

The story of Doris Brown and the hub homes in Northeast Houston is a powerful reminder that resilience isn’t just about infrastructure; it’s about people. As climate change continues to intensify, empowering communities to help themselves will be essential for navigating the challenges ahead. What steps will *you* take to build resilience in your neighborhood?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

NEW YORK (AP) — The head coach of the Portland Trail Blazers and a player for the Miami Heat were arrested Thursday along with more than 30 other people in a takedown of two sprawling gambling operations that authorities said leaked inside information about NBA athletes and rigged poker games backed by Mafia families.

Portland coach Chauncey Billups was charged with participating in a conspiracy to fix high-stakes card games tied to La Cosa Nostra organized crime families that cheated unsuspecting gamblers out of at least $7 million. Heat guard Terry Rozier was accused in a separate scheme of exploiting private information about players to win bets on NBA games.

The two indictments unsealed in New York create a massive cloud for the NBA — which opened its season this week — and show how certain types of wagers are vulnerable to massive fraud in the growing, multibillion-dollar legal sports-betting industry. Joseph Nocella, the top federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York, called it “one of the most brazen sports corruption schemes since online sports betting became widely legalized in the United States.”

“My message to the defendants who’ve been rounded up today is this: Your winning streak has ended,” Nocella said. “Your luck has run out.”

Both men face money laundering and wire fraud conspiracy charges. Also charged was former NBA assistant coach and player Damon Jones, who stands accused of participating in both schemes.

“The fraud is mind boggling,” FBI Director Kash Patel told reporters. “We’re talking about tens of millions of dollars in fraud and theft and robbery across a multiyear investigation.”

The alleged fraud, however, paled in comparison to the riches the athletes earned on the court. Billups, who was inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame last year, had about $106 million in earnings over his 17-year career. Rozier made about $160 million in his stops in Boston, Miami and Charlotte.

Billups and Rozier have been placed on leave from their teams, according to the NBA, which said it is cooperating with authorities.

“We take these allegations with the utmost seriousness, and the integrity of our game remains our top priority,” the NBA said in a statement.

Hours after his arrest, Rozier appeared in a federal court in Orlando, Florida, wearing a Charlotte Hornets sweatshirt, handcuffs and shackles. Billups appeared before a judge in Portland, Oregon. Both men were ordered released from custody on certain conditions.

Billups’ attorney, Chris Heywood, issued a statement Thursday evening denying the allegations, calling his client a “man of integrity.” “To believe that Chauncey Billups did what the federal government is accusing him of is to believe that he would risk his Hall-of-Fame legacy, his reputation and his freedom. He would not jeopardize those things for anything, let alone a card game,” Heywood said.

Rozier’s lawyer, Jim Trusty, said in a statement that his client is “not a gambler” and “looks forward to winning this fight.” Trusty criticized authorities for not allowing his client to surrender on his own and accused officials of wanting “the misplaced glory of embarrassing a professional athlete with a perp walk.”

Messages were left Thursday at a phone number and email address listed in public records for Jones.

Roughly 20 other defendants appeared in federal court in Brooklyn, where most of them pleaded not guilty. Many of those charged with violent crimes or with lengthy criminal records and ties to organized crime were detained.

Mafia families profited off gambling scheme, officials say

The poker scheme lured unwitting players into rigged games with the chance to compete against former professional basketball players like Billups and Jones. The games were fixed using sophisticated cheating technology, such as altered card-shuffling machines, hidden cameras in poker chip trays, special sunglasses and even X-ray equipment built into the table to read cards, authorities allege.

The scheme often made use of illegal poker games run by New York crime families that required them to share a portion of their proceeds with the Gambino, Genovese and Bonnano crime families, according to court papers. Members of those families, in turn, also helped commit violent acts, including assault, extortion and robbery, to ensure repayment of debts and the continued success of the operation, officials said in court documents.

Athletes accused of leaving games early

In the sports betting scheme, Rozier and other defendants are accused of accessing private information from NBA players or coaches that could affect a player’s performance and giving that information to others so they could place wagers. Players sometimes altered their performance or took themselves out of games early to rig prop bets — a type of wager that allows gamblers to bet on whether a player will exceed a certain statistic, such as a total number of points, rebounds or assists, according to the indictment.

In one instance, Rozier, while playing for the Charlotte Hornets in 2023, told people he was planning to leave the game early with a supposed injury, allowing gamblers to place wagers earning them tens of thousands of dollars, authorities said. That game against the New Orleans Pelicans raised eyebrows at the time. Rozier played the first 9 minutes and 36 seconds of the game before leaving, citing a foot issue. He did not play again that season.

Posts still online from March 23, 2023, show that some bettors were furious with sportsbooks that evening when it became evident that Rozier was not going to return to the game after the first quarter, with many turning to social media to say that something “shady” had happened regarding the prop bets involving his stats for that night.

The indictments contain the descriptions of several unnamed NBA players whose injury status and availability for certain games were the source of betting activity. Those players are not accused of any wrongdoing, and there is no indication that they would have even known what was being said about their status for those games.

Those players include LeBron James, Anthony Davis and Damian Lillard. Their identities are clear based on a review of corresponding injury reports surrounding games mentioned in the indictment. The indictments show that certain defendants shared information about the availability of those players in a game on March 24, 2023, involving the Portland Trail Blazers, and two games in 2023 and 2024 involving the Los Angeles Lakers.

The NBA had investigated Rozier previously. He was in uniform as the Heat played the Magic on Wednesday in Orlando, Florida, in the season opener for both teams, though he did not play in the game.

___

Durkin Richer reported from Washington, and Reynolds reported from Miami. Associated Press writers Claire Rush in Portland, Oregon; David Collins in Hartford, Connecticut; Sarah Brumfield in Cockeysville, Maryland; Larry Lage in Detroit; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; and Mike Schneider in Orlando, Florida, contributed to this report.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.