okay, I have extracted the text from the provided HTML. Here’s the content,cleaned up and formatted:
Article Text:
The magistrate,after eight months of proceedings in the Supreme Court,issued a few days ago the abbreviated procedure against Álvaro García Ortiz and the provincial prosecutor of Madrid,Pilar Rodríguez. A writing that leaves them on the edge of judgment under the accusation of having leaked the email to the press with the confession of Alberto González Amador On the night of March 13, 2024 but with a novelty in its first paragraph: that the Attorney General acted following “indications” of the government’s presidency.
The Supreme Lieutenant Remember in this resource that it is the first time that this possibility is on the table. Neither in the interrogations, nor in the reports of the Civil Guard nor in any diligence in charge of these eight months, the possibility that the objective of the Attorney General was not to collect the information of the case to deny false news, but to follow orders of the department that Oscar López directed at that time.
“The facts subject to imputation vary from one day to another in the resolutions of the instructor,” reproaches the Prosecutor’s Office after reaffirming in “the resounding absence of evidence about the referral of the mail from the State Attorney General’s Office.” at one point, he says, Judge Hurtado ensures that everything responded to the intention of the Prosecutor’s Office to go to the passage of something unimportant, but the lieutenant prosecutor replies that it was “a matter of unquestionable relevance, given information demonstrated as false that imputed to the institution an anomalous action for political reasons.”
The information that the Prosecutor’s Office intended to deny in those days of March, some of them disseminated by the chief of Cabinet of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, claimed that the Public Ministry had explored the possibility of reaching a silent pact with González Amador In his case of fiscal fraud but that at one point an order of the dome had frustrated that agreement, condemning the employer to a judicial ordeal of several years.The Prosecutor’s Office reiterates in this appeal that there is no evidence that allows the Attorney General of Madrid to trial and points to the key evidence of the Hurtado processing order: the Civil Guard Report About the messages intervened to Pilar Rodríguez and that illustrate the frenzy of messages and calls that night so that prosecutor Julián Salto sent them the confession that the businessman’s lawyer had sent him a month earlier.
According to the prosecutor’s Office, the two experts who appeared before the judge “acknowledged that they had not obtained any evidence that the filtration had been carried out by the Hon. Mr. State attorney General.” He denounces that “there is also no evidence of the concert” between the two accused to carry out the filtration, and highlights that in this case several people who “have declared to have been in possession of the mail, have examined it or know their content before the general prosecutor had obtained.”
Heading
The testimony of several journalists
Article Text (continued)
In this writing, the Prosecutor’s Office refers to the testimony of several journalists from the SER chain, eldiario.es, the country and the sixth who have claimed that they had access to the mail of the confession of the Ayuso couple before that information arrived in the mail of the attorney general sho
