Taiwan Declines U.S. Proposal for Equal Semiconductors Production Share: Why the Rejection?

and book.

What economic factors primarily drove Taiwan‘s decision to reject the 50/50 production split proposal?

The Core of the Proposal & Initial Reactions

The United States recently put forth a proposal to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and the Taiwanese government suggesting a 50/50 split in semiconductor production capacity. This aimed to bolster U.S. chip manufacturing, reduce reliance on East Asian supply chains, and address national security concerns surrounding semiconductor independence. The proposal, though, was met with a firm, though diplomatically delivered, rejection from Taiwan. This wasn’t a simple “no,” but a carefully considered response rooted in economic realities, existing commitments, and strategic foresight.The news, surfacing in late September 2025, sent ripples through the global semiconductor industry and prompted intense analysis.

Economic Considerations: the TSMC Advantage

Taiwan’s dominance in the semiconductor market isn’t accidental. It’s built on decades of investment, a highly skilled workforce, and a robust ecosystem of supporting industries. TSMC, in particular, holds over 50% of the global foundry market and a vast majority of the leading-edge chip production.

Here’s a breakdown of the economic factors influencing Taiwan’s decision:

* Existing Investment: TSMC is already heavily invested in expanding production within Taiwan.Diverting resources to a 50/50 split would necessitate slowing down these existing projects, potentially impacting their competitive edge.

* Cost Disparities: Building and operating advanced foundries in the U.S. is significantly more expensive than in Taiwan. Labour costs, land prices, and regulatory hurdles all contribute to higher expenses. This impacts pricing and profitability.

* Ecosystem Strength: The Taiwanese semiconductor ecosystem – including suppliers of materials, equipment, and design services – is unparalleled. Replicating this in the U.S. would take years and substantial investment.

* Geopolitical Risk: While the U.S. aims to reduce reliance on Taiwan, a forced production split could be perceived as a destabilizing factor in the region, potentially increasing geopolitical risk.

Strategic Concerns & Taiwan’s Long-Term Vision

Beyond pure economics, Taiwan has a clear strategic vision for its semiconductor industry. It’s not simply about being a manufacturing hub; it’s about maintaining technological leadership and driving innovation.

* Technological Leadership: taiwan aims to remain at the forefront of advanced chip manufacturing, notably in 3nm, 2nm, and beyond. A forced split could dilute focus and hinder research and development efforts.

* Diversification, Not Displacement: Taiwan isn’t opposed to some diversification of production to the U.S. However, it prefers a model of complementary manufacturing, where the U.S. focuses on specific niches or mature nodes, rather than attempting to achieve parity in leading-edge production.

* National security (Taiwan’s Viewpoint): While the U.S. frames the issue as a national security concern, Taiwan also has its own security considerations. Over-reliance on any single market,even the U.S., is seen as a potential vulnerability.

* Maintaining Global Market Share: A 50/50 split would inevitably impact Taiwan’s global market share, potentially benefiting competitors like Samsung and SK Hynix.

The U.S. CHIPS act & Its impact

The U.S. CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, designed to incentivize domestic semiconductor production, played a role in the proposal. The act offers substantial subsidies to companies building foundries in the U.S.Though, TSMC’s Arizona fab, while a significant investment, is not intended to replicate its full Taiwanese capacity. The U.S. government anticipated a larger commitment from TSMC, leading to the more aggressive 50/50 proposal. The Act’s stipulations regarding supply chain security and domestic manufacturing were key drivers behind the U.S.request.

TSMC’s Current U.S. Investments: A Closer Look

TSMC is already investing billions in the U.S., including:

* Arizona Fab: A $12 billion facility producing 5nm and potentially 3nm chips, expected to begin production in 2024.

* Potential Second Arizona Fab: Discussions are underway for a second fab, potentially focusing on more advanced nodes.

* Japanese Fab: A joint venture with Sony and Denso in Japan, further diversifying production.

* European Expansion: Exploring potential sites for a fab in Europe, responding to similar calls for regional semiconductor independence.

These investments demonstrate TSMC’s willingness to diversify,but on its own terms and aligned with its long-term strategic goals.

What Happens Next? The Future of U.S.-Taiwan Semiconductor Relations

The rejection of the 50/50 proposal doesn’t signal a breakdown in U.S.-Taiwan relations. Both sides recognize the importance of cooperation in the semiconductor space. Though, it does necessitate a recalibration of expectations.

* continued Dialog: Expect ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and Taiwan to find a mutually acceptable path forward.

* Focus on Complementary Manufacturing: The U.S. is likely to shift its focus to incentivizing TSMC and other companies to build specialized foundries in the U.S., rather than attempting to replicate Taiwan’s entire ecosystem.

* **Increased Investment in