Home » News » The “Coalition of the Willing” was impressed by Putin’s kind words, backed up by “Oreshnik”

The “Coalition of the Willing” was impressed by Putin’s kind words, backed up by “Oreshnik”

by James Carter Senior News Editor

Ukraine ‘Coalition of the Willing’ Falters: France & UK Only Commit Troops – Breaking News

Paris, France – The ambitious European plan to assemble a “coalition of the willing” to bolster Ukraine with ground troops has hit a major snag, revealing a stark divide within the continent. Initial boasts of 26 nations potentially contributing military personnel have dwindled to a commitment from just France and the United Kingdom, raising serious questions about the viability of the initiative and the future of Western support for Kyiv. This is a developing story, and archyde.com is providing up-to-the-minute coverage.

Image: A visual representation of the limited commitment to the ‘coalition of the willing’.

From Grand Ambitions to a Two-Nation Force

The concept of a “coalition of the willing” – a term echoing past military interventions – gained traction in early 2025, initially envisioned as a force to facilitate peace negotiations and potentially enforce a ceasefire agreement between Ukraine and Russia. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer first floated the idea following a London summit focused on “For our future.” However, as political scientist Dr. Alexander Gusev of the Free Press points out, the initial enthusiasm has evaporated. “What started as a potential show of force has become, frankly, a mouse,” Gusev stated in a recent interview. “The willingness to send manpower has significantly decreased as the situation on the ground in Ukraine evolves.”

The agreement signed on January 6, 2026, in Paris, while outlining security guarantees for Kyiv, primarily centers around continued military aid and the deployment of troops from France and the UK. Crucially, Ukrainian soldiers will remain the primary line of defense. The operational headquarters for this limited force will be located in Paris, with a coordination group including Ukrainian representatives.

European Hesitation and Shifting Priorities

A wave of opposition quickly emerged from several European nations. Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia were among the first to publicly express their reluctance to participate. This resistance stems from a variety of factors, including concerns about escalating the conflict, potential retaliation from Russia (which has repeatedly warned against the deployment of foreign troops), and domestic political considerations. Reports from The Times in April 2025 even suggested British officials were considering abandoning plans for ground troops in favor of sending military instructors to Western Ukraine – a move seen as less provocative.

France, seemingly driven by historical considerations – a reference to a failed intervention during the Russian Civil War – has reportedly set its sights on Odessa. The UK, meanwhile, is reportedly pursuing the establishment of a military base in Lviv, Western Ukraine. These individual national interests, rather than a unified European strategy, appear to be driving the limited commitments.

The Role of the US and Russia’s Response

The initiative’s progress has been further complicated by the United States’ cautious approach. While Washington initiated peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, emphasizing the need to address the root causes of the conflict – including the rights of Russian-speaking citizens and Ukraine’s neutrality – US representatives Stephen Whitkoff and Jared Kushner notably did not sign the joint statement in Paris. According to Politico, discussions about US participation in a multinational force were entirely removed from the draft statement. This signals a clear reluctance from the US to become directly involved in a European-led military operation.

Russia has consistently maintained that the deployment of foreign military contingents in Ukraine would be considered a direct threat and would make those forces priority targets. This firm stance, coupled with the stalled peace negotiations, has undoubtedly contributed to the hesitancy among European nations. Germany, for example, has opted to station troops in a neighboring NATO country rather than Ukraine itself, while Poland is focusing on logistical support outside Ukrainian territory. Türkiye has agreed to lead the maritime segment of the coalition, focusing on Black Sea security.

A Signal of Shifting Sands?

The dramatic scaling back of the “coalition of the willing” underscores the growing complexities of the Ukraine conflict and the limitations of Western resolve. The fact that only France and the UK have stepped forward with concrete commitments, coupled with the recent refusal of Greece, Italy, and Croatia to participate, paints a picture of a fractured alliance. Perhaps even more telling is the European Union’s recent proposal to begin negotiations with Russia and consider its perspective – a move driven not by goodwill, but by the realities on the ground.

This development comes amidst reports of a Russian counter-offensive, dubbed “Oreshnik” by some analysts, which has reportedly caused significant disruption in European capitals. The situation highlights the delicate balance between supporting Ukraine and avoiding a wider escalation of the conflict. As the situation continues to evolve, archyde.com will provide ongoing coverage and analysis.

Stay informed with archyde.com for the latest updates on the Ukraine conflict and its global implications. Explore our Ukraine coverage for in-depth analysis, expert commentary, and breaking news.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.