A recent financial report on county cricket in England and Wales has highlighted a stark divide among the 18 first-class counties. The findings, detailed in the Leonard Curtis Cricket Finance Report 2025, reveal that clubs with a franchise in the popular Hundred competition are significantly outperforming those without.
Surrey, Lancashire, and Warwickshire, all of which host teams in The Hundred, collectively generated a considerable 44% of the total revenue across all 18 counties in 2023. This underscores the financial boost provided by the shorter, franchise-based format.
conversely, the report indicates a concerning reliance on central funding from the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) for many clubs. For instance, Northamptonshire receives a ample 71% of its income from the ECB, followed by Leicestershire at 67%, and Derbyshire at 56%. This dependency raises questions about the long-term financial stability of clubs not directly benefiting from The Hundred.
Professor Rob Wilson, a co-author of the report, commented on the situation, stating that cricket in England and Wales remains “overly reliant on central distributions, TV rights, and international fixtures at a handful of Test grounds.” He noted that while some clubs have posted notable profits in recent years, these are exceptions rather than the norm.
“Without ECB support and income from The Hundred, it is indeed questionable whether some counties could survive even for a single season,” Professor Wilson added, emphasizing the critical role of the competition in the current landscape.
The report also introduced a new Financial Performance Index,evaluating clubs over a decade (2014-2023) based on their on-field and off-field results. Surrey topped this index, with Leicestershire at the other end of the spectrum. As the fifth edition of The Hundred competition prepares to launch on August 5th, these financial disparities are likely to remain a key talking point within the sport.
What are the primary financial concerns counties have regarding The Hundred?
Table of Contents
- 1. What are the primary financial concerns counties have regarding The Hundred?
- 2. The Hundred’s Divide: county Cricket Concerns Mount
- 3. The Financial Strain on County Cricket
- 4. Impact on Player Development Pathways
- 5. The Geographical Imbalance & County Portrayal
- 6. financial Disparities & County Funding
- 7. Potential Solutions & The Future of County Cricket
The Hundred’s Divide: county Cricket Concerns Mount
The Financial Strain on County Cricket
The Hundred, the England and wales Cricket Board’s (ECB) flagship short-form competition, continues to generate debate. While lauded for attracting new audiences, a growing chorus of concerns revolves around its impact on the financial health and structure of customary county cricket. The core issue? Resource allocation and the perceived prioritization of The Hundred over the County Championship and other domestic formats.
Reduced Revenue Streams: Counties report diminished revenue from ticket sales and sponsorships during The Hundred’s window, as fans and sponsors are diverted to the new competition. This impacts their ability to invest in grassroots cricket and player development.
Player Availability Conflicts: The Hundred’s scheduling frequently clashes with County Championship matches, leading to key players being unavailable for their counties. This weakens the quality of county cricket and disrupts team momentum.
Central Contract Complications: The increasing number of players holding both county contracts and The Hundred contracts creates administrative and logistical challenges. Disputes over player release and workload management are becoming more common.
Impact on Player Development Pathways
A significant worry centers on the effect The Hundred has on the development of young English cricketers. Traditionally, the County Championship served as the proving ground for aspiring professionals. Consistent first-class cricket was seen as crucial for honing skills and building the temperament required for international success.
- Reduced Opportunities for Young Players: With established players prioritizing The Hundred, opportunities for emerging talents in county teams are shrinking.
- Shift in Focus: The emphasis on power-hitting and aggressive batting in The Hundred may not adequately prepare players for the nuances of Test cricket, where patience and defensive technique are paramount.
- The Blast vs. Championship Debate: The Vitality T20 Blast already presented a challenge to the Championship’s dominance in attracting young players. The Hundred amplifies this issue, potentially creating a generation of cricketers skilled in short-form cricket but lacking the foundational skills for the longer format.
The Geographical Imbalance & County Portrayal
The structure of The Hundred, with its eight city-based franchises, has also raised concerns about its connection to traditional county loyalties. While aiming for broader appeal, it risks alienating existing cricket fans who identify strongly with their county.
Dilution of County Identity: Fans may feel less connected to a franchise representing a city rather than their historic county.
Uneven player distribution: Some counties are significantly underrepresented in the hundred squads, leading to a perception of unfairness.For example,counties like Lanarkshire (as highlighted in recent discussions regarding Glasgow’s county affiliation) and other smaller cricketing regions may struggle to get players into the competition.
The North-South Divide: Critics argue that The Hundred disproportionately benefits counties in the south of England, further exacerbating the existing north-south divide in English cricket.
financial Disparities & County Funding
The ECB distributes revenue from The hundred to the counties, but the allocation formula has been a source of contention. Many counties argue that the current system doesn’t adequately compensate them for the disruption caused by the competition.
Funding model Scrutiny: The clarity of the ECB’s financial distribution model is under scrutiny, with calls for a more equitable system.
Sustainability Concerns: Smaller counties,with limited financial resources,are notably vulnerable to the negative financial impacts of The Hundred. Their long-term sustainability is at risk.
Investment in Grassroots Cricket: There are concerns that the funds generated by The Hundred are not being reinvested sufficiently in grassroots cricket, hindering the development of future generations of players.
Potential Solutions & The Future of County Cricket
Addressing these concerns requires a collaborative effort between the ECB and the counties. Several potential solutions have been proposed:
Revised Scheduling: Adjusting The Hundred’s schedule to minimize clashes with County Championship matches.
Increased County Funding: Increasing the financial support provided to counties from the Hundred’s revenue.
strengthened player Release Agreements: establishing clear and enforceable player release agreements to ensure counties have access to their key players.
Enhanced County Representation: Ensuring fairer representation of all counties in The Hundred squads.
Prioritizing First-Class Cricket: Reaffirming the importance of the County Championship as the primary development pathway for English cricketers.
The future of English cricket hinges on finding a balance between innovation and tradition. While The Hundred has its merits, its long-term success depends on addressing the legitimate concerns of the counties and ensuring the continued health and vitality of the entire domestic game. the debate surrounding county cricket concerns is far from over, and a constructive dialog is essential to safeguard the future of the sport.