Trump Advisor Claims ICE Agents Will Monitor Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Performance

Super Bowl Security Concerns Surface as Former Trump Aide Warns of ICE Presence

Las Vegas, NV – Former campaign manager for Donald Trump, Corey Lewandowski, has ignited controversy by suggesting that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents might potentially be deployed at the upcoming Super Bowl. The remarks surfaced during an interview on “The Benny Show” on October 1st, 2025, raising questions about security measures surrounding the event and specifically, the performance of headline act Bad Bunny.

Lewandowski’s Stance on Enforcement

During the interview,Lewandowski asserted that there would be “no safe haven” for individuals residing in the United States without legal authorization,even at high-profile events such as the Super Bowl. He stated that ICE would “find you, apprehend you, put you in a detention facility, and deport you,” characterizing this commitment to enforcement as a key directive of the current management.

The former campaign manager further criticized the selection of Bad Bunny as the halftime performer, labeling the decision as “shameful” and questioning the artist’s patriotism. He suggested that other domestic entertainers would have been more appropriate choices for the prestigious performance slot.

Bad Bunny’s Historic Performance and Previous Concerns

Bad Bunny is set to make history as the first artist to perform a Super Bowl halftime show entirely in Spanish. The Grammy-winning artist has achieved unprecedented streaming success, with his album I had to throw more photos surpassing 7 billion streams on Spotify as of Sunday, solidifying his global appeal.

However, the artist previously voiced concerns about potential ICE activity near his concert venues. In 2024, Bad Bunny opted to exclude the continental United States from his world tour, citing fears of increased deportations targeting Latinos under the previous administration. He expressed worry that ICE presence could create a climate of fear for attendees.

Political Fallout and Public Reaction

Lewandowski’s comments have drawn strong reactions, especially from those who view his statements as a veiled threat and an attempt to politicize a major cultural event. The controversy highlights the ongoing debate surrounding immigration enforcement and the impact of political rhetoric on public perception.

Figure	Position	Key Statement
corey lewandowski	Former Trump Campaign Manager	“there is nowhere you can provide safe haven to people who are in this country illegally. Not the Super Bowl and nowhere else.”
Bad Bunny	Super Bowl Halftime Performer	Expressed concern about potential ICE presence near concert venues due to fears of deportations.

Did You Know? ICE’s presence at large public events is not unprecedented, though typically minimized to avoid disrupting the event or causing widespread panic.

pro Tip: Staying informed about your rights and legal options is crucial, especially if you or someone you know is subject to immigration enforcement.

The situation raises essential questions about the balance between national security, immigration enforcement, and the enjoyment of cultural events. Will ICE actively enforce immigration laws at the Super Bowl,and what impact will that have on attendees and the overall atmosphere of the event? Do you think political statements shoudl be kept separate from major entertainment events like the Super Bowl?

The Evolving Landscape of Super Bowl Halftime Shows

The Super Bowl halftime show has become a cultural phenomenon,consistently attracting massive viewership and generating significant media attention. The selection of Bad bunny marks a significant shift, showcasing the growing influence of Latin music on the global stage. Over the years, the performances have evolved from elaborate stage productions featuring established artists to more diverse and inclusive lineups.The event continues to serve as a platform for artists to reach a massive audience and make a cultural statement.

Share your thoughts on this developing story in the comments below!

How dose Roger Stone’s claim regarding ICE monitoring Bad Bunny’s performance align with ancient instances of political statements or controversies surrounding Super Bowl performances?

the Controversy Explained: Political scrutiny at the Super Bowl

Recent claims by a former advisor to Donald Trump have ignited a firestorm of controversy, alleging that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents will be tasked with monitoring Bad Bunny’s performance at the upcoming Super Bowl. The statement,made on a conservative talk radio program,has sparked outrage and debate regarding immigration policy,artistic freedom,and political overreach.This article delves into the details of the claim, the reactions it has provoked, and the potential implications for future super Bowl performances and artist expression. we’ll explore the context of heightened border security, the history of political statements at the Super Bowl, and the legal boundaries of ICE’s authority.

Who Made the Claim and what Was Said?

The assertion originated with roger Stone, a long-time political operative and advisor to former President Trump. During an appearance on The War Room podcast, Stone stated, without providing specific evidence, that ICE agents would be present at the Super Bowl to “monitor” Bad Bunny, citing concerns about potential undocumented individuals within the artist’s entourage. He framed this as a necessary measure to enforce immigration laws and secure the border.

Key points from Stone’s statement included:

* A direct accusation that Bad Bunny’s team may include individuals with questionable immigration status.

* The implication that ICE’s presence is a proactive measure to prevent any potential violations of immigration law.

* A broader narrative linking the Super Bowl performance to the ongoing debate over border security and immigration reform.

* The claim was made without any official confirmation from ICE or the Super Bowl organizers.

ICE’s Response and Legal Authority

As of today, October 2nd, 2025, ICE has not officially confirmed or denied the claim. However, agency spokespersons have reiterated their commitment to enforcing immigration laws within the United States, stating that they routinely conduct targeted enforcement operations based on credible intelligence.

It’s crucial to understand the scope of ICE’s authority:

1. Jurisdiction: ICE operates within the borders of the United States and has the authority to investigate and apprehend individuals suspected of violating immigration laws.
2. Probable Cause: ICE agents require probable cause – a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed – to conduct searches, make arrests, or detain individuals. Simply attending a concert, even as part of an artist’s entourage, does not constitute probable cause.
3. Warrant Requirements: In many cases, ICE agents are required to obtain a warrant before entering private property or conducting searches.
4. Fourth Amendment protections: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Legal experts have pointed out that targeting an artist’s performance based on speculation about the immigration status of their team members raises significant constitutional concerns.

Bad Bunny and Political Statements at the Super Bowl

Bad Bunny is known for using his platform to advocate for social and political causes, including Puerto Rican statehood and LGBTQ+ rights. His selection as the Super Bowl halftime performer was already met with mixed reactions, with some praising the choice as a celebration of Latin American culture and others criticizing his outspoken political views.

Historically, the Super Bowl has become a venue for subtle – and sometimes not-so-subtle – political statements:

* Colin Kaepernick (2016-2019): His kneeling protest during the national anthem sparked a national debate about racial injustice and police brutality.

* Lady Gaga (2017): Her performance was widely interpreted as a message of inclusivity and tolerance.

* The Weeknd (2021): His performance, while visually stunning, was criticized by some for its lack of overt political messaging.

Bad Bunny’s performance is expected to be highly anticipated, and the added layer of political scrutiny only amplifies the event’s significance.

Public Reaction and Calls for Boycott

The claim regarding ICE monitoring has been met with widespread condemnation from artists, activists, and fans. Social media platforms have been flooded with messages of support for Bad Bunny and calls for a boycott of the Super Bowl.

Key reactions include:

* Artist Solidarity: Numerous artists have publicly expressed their support for Bad Bunny, condemning the claim as a form of intimidation and harassment.

* Activist Outcry: Immigration rights organizations have denounced the potential ICE presence as a violation of civil liberties and a form of racial profiling.

* Fan Backlash: Many fans have vowed to boycott the Super Bowl, arguing that the event has been politicized and that supporting it would be tantamount to endorsing discriminatory practices.

* #StandWithBadBunny: This hashtag has become a rallying cry for supporters, trending globally on platforms like Twitter and Instagram.

Implications for Future super Bowl Performances

This incident raises serious questions about the future of Super Bowl performances and the extent to which artists will be subjected to political scrutiny.

Potential implications include:

* Increased Security measures: Future Super Bowl performances may be subject to heightened security measures, including