The Smithsonian’s New Battle: Museums as Marketing, and the Fight for Historical Narrative
A single museum visit can spark a lifelong passion. For content creator Alissa Jones, filming exhibits at the Smithsonian wasn’t just a “grown-up gap year” after marketing burnout; it was a revelation. Her videos, aiming to provide a “marketing sizzle reel” for the exhibits, tap into a growing need: making museums accessible, engaging, and relevant. But as Jones found her footing, the Smithsonian itself found itself increasingly under fire, caught in a political crosscurrent threatening its core mission. This isn’t simply about exhibits; it’s about who controls the story of America, and how that story is told.
The Shifting Role of Museums in the Digital Age
Jones’s approach – leveraging short-form video to demystify museums – highlights a crucial shift. For decades, museums operated as authoritative, often passive, repositories of history. Today, they’re competing for attention in a saturated digital landscape. The challenge isn’t just preserving the past, but actively presenting it in a way that resonates with a modern audience. This requires a marketing mindset, a willingness to experiment with new formats, and a recognition that learning can – and should – be fun. The success of channels like Jones’s demonstrates a hunger for accessible historical content, proving that museums aren’t obsolete, but need to evolve.
Breaking Down Barriers to Entry
The “stuffy and exclusive” perception of museums is a significant hurdle. Cost, location, and even a sense of intimidation can prevent people from visiting. Virtual tours, online exhibits, and engaging social media content are vital tools for breaking down these barriers. But the current political climate adds another layer of complexity. If museums are perceived as pushing a particular agenda, they risk alienating potential visitors and fueling accusations of bias. This is where the Smithsonian finds itself in a precarious position.
The Political Assault on Historical Narratives
The Trump administration’s scrutiny of the Smithsonian, culminating in a systematic review to remove “divisive or partisan narratives,” represents an unprecedented direct assault on curatorial independence. The stated goal – to emphasize “success, brightness, and the future” – masks a deeper concern: controlling the historical narrative. The focus on perceived “overemphasis on slavery” and a desire to highlight “how far we’ve come” isn’t about historical accuracy; it’s about shaping a national identity that aligns with a specific political ideology. This echoes past controversies, like the debates over the Enola Gay exhibit, but the current situation is far more direct and politically charged.
As Dr. Sam Redman, director of the public history program at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, points out, this level of executive interference is “truly unprecedented.” The cancellation of exhibits featuring LGBTQ artists and the removal of artifacts from the National Museum of African American History and Culture demonstrate a chilling effect on curatorial freedom. Amy Sherald’s decision to cancel her show at the National Portrait Gallery underscores the point: museums must be “civic laboratories,” free to wrestle with complex issues, not “stages for loyalty.”
The Future of Museums: Navigating Politics and Public Trust
The Smithsonian’s current crisis isn’t an isolated incident. It’s part of a broader trend of politicization of cultural institutions. Museums are increasingly caught between competing demands: preserving historical truth, serving the public, and navigating political pressures. The key to survival lies in transparency, robust public engagement, and a commitment to intellectual honesty. Museums must actively demonstrate their value as unbiased sources of information and platforms for critical thinking.
One potential path forward is increased collaboration with communities directly impacted by the historical narratives being presented. Co-curation, community advisory boards, and participatory exhibits can foster a sense of ownership and build trust. Furthermore, museums need to invest in digital literacy initiatives, equipping visitors with the skills to critically evaluate information and discern fact from fiction. This is particularly crucial in an era of misinformation and polarized discourse.
The Smithsonian’s struggle is a microcosm of a larger battle for the soul of American history. The outcome will determine not only the future of museums but also the nation’s ability to confront its past and build a more inclusive future. The challenge isn’t simply about presenting a palatable narrative; it’s about fostering a national conversation based on truth, empathy, and a commitment to learning from the complexities of the past. What role will you play in shaping that conversation?
Explore more insights on Smithsonian Magazine for the latest updates and perspectives.
