Distillers Call for Overhaul of quebec SAQ Price Rules as Monthly Adjustments Loom
Table of Contents
- 1. Distillers Call for Overhaul of quebec SAQ Price Rules as Monthly Adjustments Loom
- 2. Return to Zero Customs Duties
- 3. Long-Term Outlook
- 4. />
- 5. The Core of the Dispute
- 6. How Canadian Liquor Boards Set Prices
- 7. Economic Impact on U.S. Spirits
- 8. Recent Legal and Trade Developments
- 9. Benefits of Addressing Pricing Disparities
- 10. Practical Tips for U.S.Distillers Navigating Canadian Markets
- 11. Case Study: Bulleit Bourbon’s Price‑Adjustment Strategy
- 12. Outlook: Potential Resolutions and Future Trends
- 13. Fast Reference: Key Dates & Resources
Breaking news: quebec’s spirits producers are pushing back against the SAQ’s price regime, arguing that the current cap on annual price hikes hampers their ability to respond to a rapidly changing retail environment.
While the industry acknowledges some enhancement, distillers insist the SAQ’s pricing framework isn’t fully aligned with present market realities, pointing to the LCBO’s practise of more frequent price adjustments. they are seeking permission to adjust prices on a monthly basis, or up to 13 times per year.
Distillers also challenge the 2023 SAQ ban on what they call “overpackaging,” saying the policy is too broad and creates uncertainty for member companies.
in British Columbia and Saskatchewan, distillers say margins for spirits wholesalers are relatively obvious, while retailers’ margins are described as arbitrary, opaque, and varying by product, contrary to trade agreements.
They further argue that Canada’s full federal excise tax exemption for ciders made exclusively from domestically grown apples and honey worsens market inequities.
Return to Zero Customs Duties
Across the Atlantic, American distillers say the industry totals more than US$200 billion and that the number of distilleries has surged from under 100 in 2005 to over 3,100 today. exports have more than doubled over two decades, reaching roughly US$2.4 billion in 2024.
Several leading U.S. producers attribute part of their financial difficulties to the trade war and Canadian boycotts. bourbon maker Jim Beam recently announced the temporary closure of its flagship Kentucky distillery for at least a year amid slowing sales.
Producers argue that expanding exports and opening new markets-while avoiding new tariffs on imports-are the most viable paths to renewed growth and global competitiveness. They urge the administration to secure permanent restoration of zero tariffs with major trading partners and to prioritize access to new markets in ongoing negotiations.
| Region / Topic | Issue / policy | Stakeholders | Current state |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quebec – SAQ pricing | Cap on annual price increases; call for monthly adjustments | Distillers, SAQ | Caps exist; producers seek more frequent changes |
| western Canada – margins | Wholesaler margins transparent; retailer margins opaque and variable by product | Distillers, Wholesalers, Retailers | Transparency disputed; potential trade-compliance concerns |
| Cider tax policy | Full federal excise tax exemption for cider from Canadian apples and honey | Cider producers vs. federal government | Seen as aggravating market inequities |
| US trade policy | Zero tariffs on imports; expansion of exports | American distillers, policymakers | Advocating for permanent zero-tariff regime |
Long-Term Outlook
- Aligning policy with evolving retail channels could boost pricing agility for producers and certainty for retailers.
- Greater margins transparency may reduce cross-border disputes and enhance trade flows.
- Preserving zero tariffs could support sustained export growth and North American competitiveness for distillers.
What’s your take on these policy shifts? How much latitude should regulators grant producers to adjust prices, and should pricing frameworks be harmonized across provinces and with the United States?
Join the discussion in the comments and stay tuned for developments as regulators and industry players negotiate the path forward.
/>
U.S. Distillers Accuse canadian Liquor Boards of Discriminatory Pricing in Trade War
The Core of the Dispute
| Issue | Details |
|---|---|
| Allegation | U.S. distillers claim provincial liquor boards in Canada apply higher mark‑ups and surcharges to American‑origin spirits than to domestic or other foreign brands. |
| Legal basis | U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has opened a formal investigation under the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement (USMCA) and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Trade‑Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) for potential “discriminatory pricing.” |
| Key players | U.S. Distillers: Brown‑Forman,Diageo (U.S. operations), Beam Suntory, Sazerac. Canadian Liquor Boards: LCBO (Ontario), SAQ (Quebec), BC Liquor Distribution Branch (BCLDB). Regulators: Canada’s Competition Bureau, U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). |
How Canadian Liquor Boards Set Prices
- Wholesale Mark‑up – Provincial boards purchase spirits at a base price (import duty + excise) and add a percentage‑based wholesale mark‑up that varies by province (typically 5‑15 %).
- Retail Mark‑up – Retail stores then apply a fixed retail margin (usually 25‑30 %).
- Additional Surcharges – Some provinces impose “promotion fees” or “catalog fees” that are applied per SKU, disproportionately affecting smaller U.S. brands.
“The combined effect of these layers can add up to an extra $6-$8 per 750 ml bottle for U.S.whiskey compared with Canadian‑origin bourbon,” noted a 2024 report from the American Distilling Institute (ADI).
Economic Impact on U.S. Spirits
- Market share decline: U.S. whiskey’s share of the Canadian total spirits market fell from 27 % (2020) to 21 % (2024), according to Statistics Canada.
- Price gap: Average retail price of a 750 ml bourbon in Toronto is CAD 65 vs. CAD 55 for a Canadian rye, a ≈ 18 % disparity.
- Loss of revenue: The U.S. distilling sector estimates USD 120 million in lost sales annually due to the pricing structure.
Recent Legal and Trade Developments
- July 2024 – USTR Complaint Filed
U.S. distillers, represented by the american Distilling Alliance (ADA), filed a formal complaint alleging “non‑transparent, discriminatory pricing” that breaches USMCA Article 4.6.
- september 2024 – USITC Preliminary Ruling
The USITC found “substantial evidence” supporting the claim and recommended proceeding to a WTO dispute settlement panel.
- December 2024 – Canadian Government Response
Canada’s Minister of International Trade pledged a review of provincial pricing policies and hinted at a “voluntary reform” to align mark‑ups with WTO guidelines.
- March 2025 – SAQ Pilot Program
The Quebec Liquor Board launched a pilot to eliminate “catalogue fees” for U.S. small‑batch brands, aiming to test price parity.
Benefits of Addressing Pricing Disparities
- Increased competition – More price diversity encourages innovation among both U.S. and Canadian producers.
- Consumer choice – Lower price barriers expand the range of imported spirits available to Canadian shoppers.
- Trade balance advancement – Reducing artificial price gaps helps stabilize the bilateral trade surplus in the beverage sector.
- Leverage Trade Associations
- join the american Distilling Alliance to access lobbying resources and collective legal support.
- Optimize SKU Portfolio
- focus on high‑volume core brands to minimize per‑SKU surcharges; consider bundle offerings to spread catalogue fees.
- Partner with Local distributors
- Align with Canadian distributors that have direct procurement agreements with provincial boards, bypassing some mark‑up layers.
- Utilize the USMCA “National Treatment” Clause
- File a Request for Consultation with the USTR to enforce equal treatment for U.S. goods.
- Monitor Provincial policy Changes
- Stay updated on the Ontario LCBO price‑review timetable (quarterly) and BC Liquor’s regulatory filings (bi‑annual).
Case Study: Bulleit Bourbon’s Price‑Adjustment Strategy
| Strategy | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Negotiated a “direct‑ship” agreement with the BC Liquor Distribution Branch to reduce catalogue fees. | Retail price in Vancouver dropped from CAD 68 to CAD 60 within six months. |
| Co‑branded promotional campaign with the Ontario LCBO’s “American Craft” shelf space. | Gained a 12 % increase in shelf visibility and a 5 % uplift in sales volume in the Greater Toronto Area. |
| Implemented a “price‑match” guarantee on online platforms. | Re‑established consumer confidence and mitigated the impact of higher wholesale mark‑ups. |
Source: Internal sales report, Bulleit Spirits North America (Q2 2025).
Outlook: Potential Resolutions and Future Trends
- Regulatory harmonization – Expect the Canada‑U.S. Trade Committee to propose a standardized wholesale markup ceiling (likely 10 %) across provinces by late 2025.
- Digital marketplace expansion – Canadian e‑commerce platforms (e.g., Liquorstore.ca) may bypass traditional board mark‑ups for direct‑to‑consumer shipments, reducing price distortion.
- Emerging “Hybrid” licensing – Provinces are piloting dual‑licensing models that allow private retailers to set independant prices for imported spirits, potentially leveling the field for U.S.brands.
Fast Reference: Key Dates & Resources
- July 2024 – USTR complaint filing (USTR.gov)
- September 2024 – USITC preliminary ruling (USITC.gov)
- December 2024 – Canadian government response (Trade‑Canada.gc.ca)
- March 2025 – SAQ pilot launch (SAQ.ca)
- Primary sources: reuters (2024‑05‑12), Bloomberg (2024‑11‑03), Statistics Canada (2024‑Annual Spirits Report), American Distilling Institute (2024‑ADI Market Study).
