**Ukraine Considers Use of Long-Range Weapons from the United States Under Zelensky’s Conditions**

1:

Chinese Drone Experts aid Russian Arms Maker

Chinese experts are collaborating with a Russian weapons manufacturer, IEMZ Koupol, on the growth of military drones, according to European security officials and related documents. These collaborations began in the second quarter of 2024 and have involved multiple visits by Chinese experts to Russia, along with deliveries of Chinese-made attack and surveillance drones facilitated by a Russian intermediary, TSK Vektor.

Reuters previously revealed that Koupol had developed a new drone, the Garpiya-3, with assistance from Chinese specialists. This recent report expands on that details,detailing the extensive involvement of Chinese experts in testing and technological work related to these drones.

european officials suggest this partnership signifies a strengthening relationship between russian and Chinese companies in the drone sector, potentially influencing the conflict in Ukraine.

China’s Foreign Ministry stated it is unaware of the situation and reaffirmed its position of not providing lethal weapons to either side of the conflict, while maintaining strict control over exports, including drones.

Kremlin, the Russian Ministry of Defense, and IEMZ Koupol have not responded to requests for comment. Documents show financial transactions, with over a dozen attack drones from Sichuan AEE being delivered to Koupol last year through TSK Vektor, both of which are subject to U.S.and EU sanctions.

Western governments have voiced concerns regarding Chinese companies supplying components to the Russian military.

How might Zelenskyy‘s conditions for using long-range weapons impact the overall strategic calculus of the conflict?

The Shifting Landscape of US Military Aid to Ukraine

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has reached a critical juncture, with Kyiv increasingly vocal about its need for advanced weaponry to effectively counter Russian aggression. Specifically, Ukraine is actively considering the deployment of long-range weapons systems provided by the United States, but under stringent conditions laid out by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. This development marks a potential escalation in the type of military assistance provided, and a meaningful shift in Ukraine’s defensive strategy. The discussion centers around weapons like the ATACMS missile system,capable of striking targets deep within Russian-controlled territory.

Zelenskyy’s Key Conditions for Long-Range Weapon Deployment

President Zelenskyy has consistently emphasized that the use of US-supplied long-range weapons will be governed by several crucial conditions, primarily focused on preventing escalation and ensuring responsible request. These conditions include:

* strict Target Limitations: Weapons will only be used to target military objectives within Ukrainian territory currently occupied by Russia. This explicitly excludes strikes on Russian soil, aiming to avoid a direct escalation of the conflict.

* US Oversight & Approval: Ukraine seeks a degree of consultation and, perhaps, approval from the US regarding specific target selection, notably for high-value or strategically sensitive locations. This is intended to reassure Washington and maintain alignment on strategic goals.

* Preventing Civilian Casualties: A paramount concern is minimizing civilian harm. Ukraine has pledged to adhere to international humanitarian law and prioritize targets that pose the least risk to non-combatants.

* Reciprocal Action Consideration: Zelenskyy has hinted at a willingness to adjust deployment strategies based on Russia’s actions.If Russia alters its tactics,Ukraine reserves the right to reassess its approach to weapon usage.

* Maintaining Coalition Unity: Ukraine understands the importance of maintaining a united front with its allies. Deployment decisions will be made with consideration for the broader international context and the sensitivities of partner nations.

The ATACMS Missile System: A Game Changer?

The ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) is a key focus of these discussions. This surface-to-surface missile, with a range of up to 300 kilometers (186 miles), would considerably enhance Ukraine’s ability to strike critical Russian logistical hubs, command centers, and ammunition depots.

* Impact on Russian Logistics: ATACMS could disrupt Russia’s supply lines, making it more difficult to sustain its offensive operations.

* Degrading Command & Control: Targeting command centers could hamper Russia’s ability to coordinate its forces effectively.

* Reduced Artillery Effectiveness: Striking ammunition depots would limit Russia’s artillery firepower, a key component of its military strategy.

* Strategic Implications: The deployment of ATACMS would signal a clear message of resolve from both Ukraine and the US, demonstrating a willingness to escalate support in response to continued Russian aggression.

US Hesitation and the Debate Over Escalation

The US has been hesitant to provide Ukraine with long-range weapons due to concerns about escalating the conflict and provoking a wider war.Key arguments against providing ATACMS include:

* Risk of Russian Retaliation: The US fears that strikes on Russian territory, even if unintentional, could trigger a retaliatory response, potentially drawing NATO into the conflict.

* Escalation Spiral: There’s concern that providing more powerful weapons could lead to a dangerous escalation spiral, with each side responding to the other’s actions with increasingly potent weaponry.

* Political considerations: Domestic political considerations within the US also play a role,with some lawmakers expressing reservations about further escalating US involvement in the conflict.

However, proponents of providing long-range weapons argue that:

* Ukraine’s Right to Self-Defense: Ukraine has a legitimate right to defend its territory, and long-range weapons are essential for achieving this goal.

* Limited Scope of Use: Zelenskyy’s conditions demonstrate a commitment to responsible weapon usage and a desire to avoid escalation.

* Strategic Advantage: Providing Ukraine with the means to strike deeper into Russian-controlled territory could shorten the conflict and ultimately reduce the risk of a wider war.

Previous Instances of US Weaponry Impacting the Conflict

The provision of other US weaponry, such as the HIMARS (high mobility Artillery Rocket System), has already demonstrated a significant impact on the battlefield. HIMARS, while shorter-ranged than ATACMS, has allowed Ukraine to precisely target Russian ammunition depots and command posts, disrupting their operations and slowing their advance.

* HIMARS Successes: The successful use of HIMARS in the summer and fall of 2022 significantly hampered Russia’s offensive in the Donbas region.

* Changing battlefield dynamics: The introduction of HIMARS forced Russia to adapt its tactics, relocating ammunition depots and command centers further from the front lines.

* Demonstrated Precision: The precision of HIMARS strikes has minimized collateral damage and demonstrated Ukraine’s commitment to responsible weapon usage.

The Role of International Pressure and Diplomatic Efforts

Alongside military aid, international pressure and diplomatic efforts remain crucial to resolving the conflict. The United Nations, the European Union, and individual nations continue to impose sanctions on Russia and call for a peaceful resolution.

* Sanctions Effectiveness: The effectiveness of sanctions in crippling the Russian economy is a subject of ongoing debate, but thay undoubtedly exert pressure on the Kremlin.

* Diplomatic Initiatives: