Garlasco Crime: Lawyer Reveals New Details on ‘Pizzino’ and Sempio’s Calls – Breaking News
Updated: October 18, 2025, 10:30 AM EST – The long-running Garlasco crime case continues to generate headlines as new details emerge from a recent appearance by Andrea Sempio’s lawyer, Angela Taccia, on the Italian talk show, Fourth Degree. The case, which has captivated Italy for years, centers around the 2006 murder of Chiara Poggi, and the ongoing questions surrounding the involvement of Sempio and others. This is a developing story, and we’re bringing you the latest as it unfolds. For readers seeking to understand the intricacies of Italian criminal justice and the challenges of cold case investigations, this story offers a compelling case study.
The Mysterious ‘Pizzino’ and a Potential Misunderstanding
A central point of discussion on Fourth Degree was the infamous “pizzino” – a small note discovered at Sempio’s parents’ home bearing the cryptic message: “Sell yourself, investigating judge, archive, 20, 30.” Taccia offered a surprising perspective on the note’s meaning, suggesting it may have referred to the cost of legal representation, specifically 20,000 or 30,000 euros, rather than anything more sinister.
“I had made a hypothesis, I have already reiterated a thousand times that I was not there at the time,” Taccia explained. “Drinking coffee with Andrea, I thought they were the stamps for the pages to copy, so 20 or 30 euros. I had never said it: it was my idea, my hypothesis.” She expressed frustration that private musings were made public, emphasizing her limited knowledge of the specifics. This highlights a common challenge in high-profile cases: the blurring of lines between legal strategy, speculation, and public perception.
Angela Taccia during her appearance on Fourth Degree. (Image Placeholder)
Suspicious Phone Calls and Marco Poggi’s Testimony
The program also revisited the series of brief, late-night phone calls made from Sempio’s phone to the Poggi family home in the week leading up to Chiara’s murder. These calls have long been considered suspicious. However, Taccia presented a previously reported explanation from Marco Poggi, Chiara’s brother, dating back to 2008.
According to Poggi’s earlier testimony, he had borrowed a phone from Sempio on several occasions, potentially accounting for the calls. “He himself had said that there could be calls from Sempio’s cell phone to Poggi’s home because, when they left the pub, he asked someone to lend him the telephone and sometimes Sempio lent it to him,” Taccia stated. This detail underscores the importance of revisiting older evidence and considering alternative explanations, a crucial aspect of any thorough investigation. It also demonstrates how seemingly damning evidence can be recontextualized with additional information.
Tensions Flare with Opposing Counsel
The discussion wasn’t without its friction. Taccia declined to comment directly on statements made by lawyer Federico Gallo, who represents Massimo Lovati, another figure connected to the case. Gallo had suggested Sempio would be in prison without his defense strategy and characterized a key receipt as a “fake.”
“I won’t say a word about the lawyer Gallo – he is a colleague and I will face him face to face,” Taccia asserted. She indicated a willingness to address the matter privately, emphasizing a preference for professional courtesy. This exchange highlights the often-contentious nature of legal battles, particularly in cases with significant public interest. The dynamics between defense teams can be just as revealing as the evidence presented in court.
The Garlasco Crime: A Case Study in Italian Justice
The Garlasco crime remains a stark reminder of the complexities of the Italian legal system and the enduring pain of unsolved mysteries. The case has seen numerous twists and turns, appeals, and re-examinations of evidence. It’s a prime example of how a single crime can ripple through a community for decades, leaving a lasting impact on all involved. Understanding the nuances of this case requires a grasp of Italian investigative procedures, the role of defense counsel, and the challenges of building a solid case based on circumstantial evidence. For those interested in learning more about Italian criminal law, resources like the Italian Ministry of Justice (https://www.giustizia.it/en) offer valuable insights.
As the investigation continues, and with lawyers like Angela Taccia continuing to shed light on previously unknown details, the pursuit of justice in the Garlasco case remains a compelling and ongoing story. Stay tuned to archyde.com for further updates and in-depth analysis as this case develops.
