Four days after Novak Djokovic’s appeal against the annulment of his visa was rejected, the Federal Supreme Court announced its reasoning. It was therefore reasonable for the Australian government to assume that the Serbian tennis pro had anti-vaccination attitudes and was a threat to the population. This emerges from the documents that the court published on Thursday.
“A world tennis star can influence people of all ages, whether young or old, but perhaps especially the young and the easily impressed,” said the three judges. Even if Djokovic hadn’t won the Australian Open, the fact that he plays tennis in Australia could have encouraged those who want to be like him and thus fueled anti-vaccination sentiment, it said.
Related posts:
Zhejiang's Victory in AFC Champions League Group Stage: Zhejiang vs Kofu Fenglin Match Recap
How many points does the ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati distribute?
Preventing Stones: Expert Nutritionist Chen Yichun's 7-Point Reminder
European League .. Manchester United overthrow Barcelona in the "Battle of Old Trafford"
The most prominent of which is added sugar..Eating habits that add 10 years to your real age
Georgia confirms second monkeypox infection
KSRTC Pensioners: Comprehensive Rights and Revision in Alappuzha
XV of France: Paul Willemse package against Wales