SANTA ANA — In a bold move too address the rising issue of looting during emergencies, district attorneys from Los Angeles and Orange counties are pushing for stricter penalties.They are calling on Governor Gavin Newsom to convene a special legislative session to pass urgent measures that woudl impose state prison sentences for looting during local crises.
The proposal, submitted to the state Legislative Council on Monday, seeks to increase the punishment for looting to between two and four years in state prison, up from the current minimum of 16 months in county jail. Additionally, it introduces a “looting enhancement” that could add one to three years to sentences for felony crimes committed during emergencies.
Under the new measure, looting would be classified as a serious offense under California’s Three Strikes Law. Suspected looters would no longer be eligible for citation and release but would instead face a judge. The legislation also aims to exclude looting from diversion programs, which currently allow defendants to clear their records after completing certain requirements.
One of the most striking aspects of the proposal is the creation of a new crime: trespassing with intent to commit larceny. This would enable prosecutors to target individuals who rummage through the ashes of burned homes in search of valuables—a practice that, surprisingly, is not currently classified as a crime under state law.
“There is a special place in jail for those who exploit the vulnerable in the wake of deadly fires,” said Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman in a statement. “As hundreds of thousands of families face the unimaginable anguish of fleeing their homes, uncertain whether they’ll ever return, the last thing they should fear is the added trauma of criminals preying on their misfortune.”
Echoing Hochman’s sentiments, Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer described looters as “vultures circling to pick through the ashes, looking to steal anything of value.” He emphasized the inadequacy of current laws, stating, “Current law falls woefully short for punishing these scavengers who are nothing more than grave-robbers, stealing the last remaining possessions from those who have already lost everything, including their own lives.”
Spitzer and Hochman are urging both the governor and the state Legislature to act swiftly. “We need to enact this urgency legislation and help hold these criminals accountable for their crimes,” Spitzer added.
In response to recent wildfires, law enforcement agencies have ramped up patrols in evacuated areas to deter looting. The Palisades and Eaton fires, which erupted last week, have left communities vulnerable, prompting officials to take proactive measures to protect residents and their properties.
This proposed legislation represents a notable step toward addressing a critical issue that has long plagued communities during times of crisis. By imposing harsher penalties and closing legal loopholes, officials hope to send a clear message: exploiting tragedy will not be tolerated.
How might stricter penalties for looting during emergencies potentially disproportionately impact marginalized communities?
Archyde Exclusive Interview: Addressing Looting During Emergencies in California
By Archys, News Editor, Archyde
santa Ana, CA — In response to the escalating issue of looting during emergencies, district attorneys from Los Angeles and Orange Counties are urging Governor Gavin Newsom to convene a special legislative session to implement stricter penalties. To shed light on this pressing matter, Archyde sat down with Dr.emily Carter, a criminal justice expert and professor at the University of California, irvine, to discuss the implications of these proposed measures and their potential impact on public safety.
Archyde: Dr.Carter, thank you for joining us today. Can you provide some context on the current state of looting laws in California and why district attorneys are pushing for stricter penalties?
Dr. Carter: Thank you for having me. Under California Penal Code 463 PC,looting is already treated as a serious offense,especially when it occurs during a state of emergency,such as after a natural disaster or civil unrest. However, the recent surge in looting incidents during emergencies has exposed gaps in enforcement and deterrence. District attorneys are advocating for stricter penalties to send a clear message that exploiting crises for personal gain will not be tolerated.
Archyde: What specific changes are being proposed, and how might they differ from the current laws?
Dr. Carter: The proposed measures aim to enhance penalties for looting, especially during declared emergencies. Currently,looting is punishable by up to three years in prison,but the new proposals could extend sentences and impose mandatory minimums. Additionally, there’s talk of increasing fines and holding repeat offenders accountable with harsher consequences. The goal is to create a stronger deterrent and ensure that law enforcement has the tools they need to address these crimes effectively.
Archyde: Critics argue that stricter penalties might disproportionately affect marginalized communities. How do you respond to these concerns?
Dr. Carter: That’s a valid concern, and it’s crucial to approach this issue with equity in mind. While the intent is to protect communities and prevent chaos during emergencies, we must ensure that these laws are applied fairly. This means investing in community outreach, education, and resources to address the root causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of access to basic necessities. Stricter penalties alone won’t solve the problem; they must be part of a broader strategy that prioritizes justice and rehabilitation.
Archyde: How do you think these proposed changes will impact public safety during emergencies?
Dr.Carter: If implemented thoughtfully, these measures could significantly improve public safety. During emergencies, law enforcement and first responders are already stretched thin. Reducing looting incidents would allow them to focus on saving lives and restoring order. However, it’s equally crucial to ensure that communities feel supported and protected, rather than criminalized. Transparency and accountability will be key to building trust and achieving the desired outcomes.
Archyde: what steps can communities take to prevent looting during emergencies?
Dr. Carter: Prevention starts with preparedness. Communities should work together to create emergency response plans that include securing vulnerable areas, such as businesses and supply centers. Local leaders can also foster a sense of unity and mutual support, which can deter opportunistic crimes. Additionally, public awareness campaigns can educate residents about the consequences of looting and the importance of collective responsibility during crises.
Archyde: Dr. Carter, thank you for your insights.It’s clear that addressing looting during emergencies requires a balanced approach that prioritizes both justice and community well-being.
Dr. Carter: Thank you for having me. It’s a complex issue, but with collaboration and thoughtful policymaking, we can create safer, more resilient communities.
For more updates on this developing story, stay tuned to Archyde.
