Home » Economy » Canadian housing target falling short as construction slows

Canadian housing target falling short as construction slows

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

Canada Stumbles Towards Housing Affordability Targets

New data from teh Canada⁤ Mortgage ⁣and Housing Corporation (CMHC) paints a stark picture:​ Canada is falling significantly​ short⁤ of its ambitious housing affordability goals. While⁢ the government aims to construct 650,000 ⁣new housing units annually to keep ​pace with demand, urban housing starts fell to 227,697 last year.

Condominium Slump​ a Key Factor

A major contributing ⁤factor to this shortfall is a⁢ decline in condominium construction. “With low investor interest and more young families looking for family-friendly homes, developers will find ‍it harder to ⁢sell enough units to⁤ fund new projects,” CMHC stated in its 2025 housing Market Outlook. “The increase in unsold units will likely reduce new project launches.”

Ontario‍ and British Columbia⁣ Bear the Brunt

The affordability crisis continues ‍to ‌grip Ontario and British Columbia, where housing markets remain especially unaffordable. According to the CMHC report,‍ “Sales in thes markets are expected to remain below their 10-year ⁣averages due to ongoing affordability challenges and⁢ the more notable impact‍ of new immigration targets.”

Price Growth ‌Slows in Pricier Provinces

CMHC anticipates slower price growth in these provinces,‌ especially in⁤ the near⁣ term. Meanwhile, more affordable markets ​in Alberta and⁢ Quebec are experiencing a rebound. “Sales in these provinces are ⁤expected ⁤to ‌reach historically high levels with prices growing faster than national averages,” CMHC​ wrote.

Industry ‍Concerns and Government Stance

The construction industry has long ‌expressed concerns about ⁤the government’s housing⁤ targets, calling them⁢ unrealistic. “What we are saying is that when cranes are coming down they are not going ⁣back up,” Richard Lyall,president of the Residential ⁤Construction Council of Ontario,warned ⁣at a parliamentary committee hearing last May. When questioned ‍about⁢ the government’s⁤ pledge to ⁤build 3.87 million homes ⁢by 2031, Lyall was blunt, stating, “Not ​a chance.”

Municipal Fees a Roadblock to construction

Lyall pointed to municipal ⁢development charges as a significant obstacle to new housing construction. “How much⁣ are the taxes, fees and levies⁣ on new⁢ housing now?” he questioned. ​”It varies⁤ across Canada of course but in the ⁢Greater ‍Toronto Area it is 31% of the cost of new housing. In British Columbia they did their ‍own study, it was 30%. That is by far the highest ​in North America and it’s not ⁣sustainable. It particularly hits the first-time buyer the most. ⁣We effectively‍ tax housing‍ like alcohol and tobacco. It’s like a sin tax. It doesn’t make sense.”

Looking Ahead

Despite calls for policy adjustments and‍ a ​growing⁢ urgency to address the housing crisis, ⁢Canada faces a significant challenge in bridging the gap⁢ between its ambitious ‌housing⁤ goals and the realities⁢ of current market conditions. Swift ⁤and decisive action is needed ‍to ensure that Canadians have access to‌ affordable⁣ and sustainable housing.

Do you think ‍the government is doing enough to⁢ address ⁤the housing affordability crisis?

Canada⁣ Stumbles Towards Housing Affordability Targets

An Interview with Richard Lyall,⁣ President of the Residential Construction⁢ council ⁣of⁤ Ontario

Canada’s aspiring housing affordability goals seem ‍increasingly out of reach, according to new data from the⁢ Canada⁤ Mortgage and Housing ⁤corporation​ (CMHC). ⁣Archyde caught⁤ up with Richard Lyall, president of the ⁤Residential Construction Council of ontario, to discuss the challenges facing⁣ the industry and potential solutions to this growing​ crisis.

Falling Short: A Cause for Concern?

Archyde: Richard, CMHC’s latest report highlights a notable shortfall in housing starts, notably in condo construction. What are ⁣your thoughts on these ​findings?

lyall: It’s disheartening, to⁢ be honest. Our industry has been ⁣sounding the⁣ alarm for some time now, warning that the government’s targets were simply unrealistic.While we understand the need for more housing,⁣ building ‍650,000 ⁤units annually requires a significant⁣ shift ⁢in policy and market conditions.We’re simply ‌not seeing the necessary investment or construction activity to meet these aggressive​ goals.

A Shift in‍ Demand: Constructions Catalysts

Archyde: The‌ report attributes the decline in⁢ condo construction partly‍ to a ‍shift in ⁣demand from​ investors ‌and young families. How does this‌ evolving market⁣ dynamic impact developers and ⁢overall housing supply?

Lyall: This change in⁤ demand is creating a real dilemma ​for developers. Condos have traditionally been attractive⁤ to investors, driving construction. However, with investor interest waning and families prioritizing ⁤larger⁢ homes, building profitable condo projects is becoming increasingly difficult. this can led‌ to delays in ‍new projects‍ and, ultimately, less housing overall.

The Ontario and British Columbia Dilemma: Affordability Challenges Persist

Archyde: Ontario⁤ and British Columbia continue to grapple with housing affordability ​challenges. ‌How can policymakers ​address this issue in⁢ these key ⁢provinces?

Lyall: It’s a complex issue with no easy solutions. Policymakers need to consider a multifaceted approach, addressing factors such as excessive advancement charges, zoning restrictions, and the need for more diverse housing options. ⁢ Simply relying on market forces to address affordability is unlikely to be effective without proactive intervention.

Beyond Construction: ⁣ is the Solution Systemic?

Archyde: ⁢ You’ve highlighted the⁣ impact of municipal fees⁣ on new housing​ construction. ⁣How significant is⁢ this factor in hindering affordability?

Lyall: It’s a major roadblock. ⁢Development charges‍ and other levies‍ can add 30% ⁣or more to the cost of a new home, pushing it further out of reach for first-time buyers. We need a system that encourages, rather than discourages, building new homes. Treating housing⁢ like a sin tax is‌ simply unsustainable.

A Call⁤ to Action: Looking Towards a more ⁢affordable Future

Archyde: What actions do you believe are ⁣most ⁢crucial to bridge ⁤the gap between Canada’s ⁣ambitious housing goals and current realities?

Lyall: We need a fundamental shift in thinking.Policymakers, developers, and communities must work ‍together to find innovative solutions ⁣to this pressing issue. That ‍means simplifying the‌ approval process, reducing ​development charges, exploring alternatives to single-family​ zoning, and‌ investing in‍ infrastructure to support housing growth.The time⁢ for action ‍is now;

Do you think the government is doing enough to address the housing affordability crisis?

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.