Tunisia Calls for Revision of Cybercrime Decree with SNJT Initiatives – APANEWS – African Press Agency

tunisian Journalists Advocate for Revision of Cybercrime Decree

Tunis, Tunisia – the National Union of Tunisian Journalists (SNJT) is escalating its demands for a thorough revision of Decree 54, a contentious law concerning cybercrimes. The SNJT asserts that the decree, originally intended to combat online offenses, has increasingly been weaponized to suppress journalistic expression and curtail press freedom in the North African nation.

Growing Concerns Over Repressive Application

For three years,Decree 54 has been a focal point of debate. Originally enacted to address the proliferation of false information and online threats, the SNJT and numerous human rights organizations now contend that its broad language and ambiguous clauses are being exploited to stifle legitimate journalistic inquiry. Recent cases have involved journalists facing legal proceedings for articles deemed critical of government policies or public figures. According to a report by Freedom House from earlier this year, Tunisia’s press freedom surroundings has significantly deteriorated.

The SNJT emphasizes that the decree’s current form creates a chilling effect on investigative journalism, as reporters fear prosecution for merely exercising their right to report on matters of public interest. They offer examples of journalists being summoned for questioning over social media posts or online articles, causing undue distress and hindering their ability to perform their duties effectively.

parliamentary Action Urged

The SNJT is actively lobbying members of Parliament to accelerate the revision process. They have submitted detailed proposals outlining specific amendments needed to safeguard press freedom while still addressing legitimate cybersecurity concerns. These proposals focus on narrowing the scope of the decree’s criminal provisions and ensuring that any restrictions on speech are proportionate and comply wiht international human rights standards. A concerning trend highlighted by the Committee to Protect Journalists is the increasing use of cybercrime laws globally to target journalists.

Several parliamentary factions have expressed support for a review, but progress has been slow. Critics point to political considerations and a lack of consensus on the extent of necesary reforms as key obstacles. The SNJT intends to increase public awareness campaigns to rally support for legislative changes.

Did You Know? Tunisia ranked 127th out of 180 countries in the 2023 World Press Freedom Index, a sharp decline from previous years.

The Impact on Tunisian media Landscape

The application of Decree 54 has created a climate of self-censorship within the Tunisian media landscape. Many journalists are now hesitant to tackle sensitive topics, fearing legal repercussions. This has resulted in a noticeable reduction in investigative reporting and critical analysis. the SNJT points to instances where news outlets have proactively removed articles or issued apologies to avoid potential legal challenges.

Pro Tip: Journalists and media organizations can utilize resources from organizations like Reporters without Borders to understand their rights and navigate legal challenges related to restrictive legislation.

Aspect	Original Decree 54	SNJT Proposed revisions
scope of Criminalization	Broad, encompassing various online offenses.	Narrowed,focusing on genuine threats and malicious activities.
Definition of “False Information”	Vague and open to interpretation.	Clearly defined, requiring proof of intent to harm.
Protection for Journalists	Limited to none.	Explicit protection for journalistic sources and activities.

Understanding Cybercrime Legislation & Press Freedom

The debate surrounding Decree 54 reflects a broader global trend: the tension between cybersecurity concerns and the protection of basic freedoms. Many countries are grappling with how to regulate online content without infringing on freedom of expression. International legal frameworks, such as Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, emphasize the importance of protecting freedom of expression, even when it involves criticism of governments or public figures. Effective cybercrime legislation should be narrowly tailored, proportionate, and subject to independent oversight to prevent abuse. Balancing these competing interests requires careful consideration and ongoing dialog between lawmakers, journalists, and civil society organizations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Decree 54

• What is Decree 54? decree 54 is a Tunisian law concerning cybercrimes, originally intended to address online offenses.
• Why is the SNJT calling for its revision? The SNJT argues the decree is used to suppress journalistic expression and curtail press freedom.
• what are the key changes the SNJT is proposing? The SNJT seeks to narrow the scope of criminal provisions and protect journalistic activities.
• How dose Decree 54 impact Tunisian journalists? It creates a climate of self-censorship and fear of legal repercussions.
• What is the current status of the revision process? The revision process is ongoing, with slow progress due to political obstacles.
• What international bodies are concerned about Decree 54? Organizations like Freedom House and the Committee to Protect Journalists have expressed concern.
• what can be done to protect press freedom in Tunisia? Legislative reforms, public awareness campaigns, and international pressure are crucial.

what are your thoughts on the balance between cybersecurity and press freedom? Do you believe Decree 54 needs to be revised, and if so, what changes would you suggest?

What specific articles within Decree 2023-22 are drawing the most criticism from the SNJT and international human rights organizations?

Tunisia calls for Revision of Cybercrime decree with SNJT Initiatives

The controversy Surrounding Decree 2023-22

Tunisia is facing mounting pressure to revise its controversial cybercrime decree, officially Decree 2023-22, enacted in July 2023. The decree, ostensibly designed to combat online offenses, has been widely criticized by journalists, human rights organizations, and international bodies for its vaguely worded provisions and potential to stifle freedom of expression.Concerns center around articles that criminalize actions like “spreading false information” and “attacking systems,” which critics argue are open to broad interpretation and misuse. This has led to a chilling affect on online journalism and public discourse in Tunisia. The decree’s implementation has been a key point of contention, with reports of selective enforcement targeting critical voices.

SNJT’s Leading Role in Advocacy & Legal Challenges

The National Union of Tunisian Journalists (SNJT – Syndicat National des Journalistes Tunisiens) has been at the forefront of the campaign to revise Decree 2023-22. Their initiatives include:

* Legal Challenges: The SNJT has filed legal challenges against the decree, arguing its incompatibility with the Tunisian constitution and international human rights standards.These challenges focus on the decree’s violation of the right to freedom of expression, as enshrined in Article 38 of the Tunisian Constitution.

* Public Awareness Campaigns: the SNJT has launched extensive public awareness campaigns to educate citizens about the dangers posed by the decree. These campaigns utilize social media, public forums, and media appearances to highlight the potential for abuse.

* documentation of cases: The union meticulously documents cases of journalists and citizens targeted under the decree,providing evidence of its detrimental impact on freedom of the press. This documentation is crucial for advocacy efforts and legal proceedings.

* International Advocacy: SNJT actively engages with international organizations like Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and the Committee to protect Journalists (CPJ) to raise awareness and garner support for the revision of the decree.

* Collaboration with Civil Society: The SNJT works closely with other civil society organizations to build a broad coalition advocating for a more democratic and rights-respecting legal framework for online expression.

Key Provisions Under Scrutiny: A Detailed breakdown

Several specific provisions within Decree 2023-22 are drawing intense scrutiny:

* Article 24: This article criminalizes the use of information and communication systems in a way that “harms individuals or society.” The vagueness of “harm” is a major concern.

* Article 25: This provision targets the “spreading of false information,” raising fears of censorship and self-censorship among journalists.Defining “false information” is subjective and susceptible to political manipulation.

* Penalties: The decree imposes harsh penalties, including imprisonment and hefty fines, for violations, further exacerbating the chilling effect on free speech. Penalties can range from several months to several years in prison, depending on the perceived severity of the offense.

* surveillance Powers: Concerns have been raised about the decree’s potential to expand government surveillance powers, allowing authorities to monitor online activity without adequate safeguards.

Impact on Tunisian Journalism & Digital rights

The implementation of Decree 2023-22 has had a demonstrable impact on the Tunisian media landscape:

* Self-Censorship: Journalists are increasingly hesitant to report on sensitive topics, fearing prosecution under the decree. This leads to a narrowing of the public discourse.

* increased Legal Threats: Journalists and activists have reported receiving legal threats and intimidation tactics aimed at silencing critical voices.

* decline in Investigative Journalism: The risk of prosecution discourages investigative journalism, hindering the ability of the media to hold power accountable.

* erosion of Public trust: The decree’s perceived bias and selective enforcement erode public trust in the media and the justice system.

* Digital Rights Concerns: The decree sets a perilous precedent for the restriction of digital rights and freedoms in Tunisia.

APANEWS Coverage & Regional Implications

The African Press Agency (APANEWS) has provided consistent coverage of the unfolding situation in Tunisia, highlighting the concerns raised by the SNJT and other stakeholders. APANEWS’ reporting has helped to amplify the voices of those advocating for a revision of the decree and has brought international attention to the issue.The situation in Tunisia has broader regional implications,as it sets a precedent for other countries in North Africa and the Middle East grappling with the balance between security concerns and freedom of expression. The outcome of the debate over Decree 2023-22 will likely influence the advancement of cybercrime legislation in neighboring countries.

Potential Revisions & Proposed Amendments

Discussions surrounding potential revisions to the decree are ongoing. Key proposals include:

* Narrowing the Scope of Criminalization: Clearly defining the types of online behavior that constitute criminal offenses, avoiding vague and overly broad language.

* **Strengthening Safeguards for