Hamas Endorses Part of Trump’s Peace Plan, Advocating for Cessation of Israeli Attacks in the Middle East

October 3, 2025

Hamas Partially Accepts Gaza Peace Plan, Hostage release Proposed

Gaza City – In a meaningful development, Hamas has announced a partial acceptance of a peace proposal presented by the Trump Administration, contingent on further negotiations. The proclamation included a commitment to release all remaining israeli hostages held in Gaza, both those still alive and those deceased.

Hostage Release and Negotiation points

The Palestinian movement indicated its willingness to engage in immediate discussions to finalize the terms of a prisoner exchange, with the release of Israeli hostages linked to the release of Palestinian prisoners currently detained in Israel. Estimates suggest approximately 48 hostages remain in Gaza, with fewer than 20 believed to be still living.

Hamas also stipulated that the administration of the Gaza enclave would be transferred to a “Palestinian organ of autonomous technocrats,” chosen through a Palestinian national consensus and with support from Arab and Islamic nations. This differs from the US proposal, which initially suggested an international body oversee the administration.

Trump’s response and Ultimatum

President Donald Trump reacted positively to Hamas’s statement, expressing his belief that the group is “prepared for lasting peace.” He urgently called for an immediate cessation of Israeli military operations in gaza to facilitate the hostage release. Trump communicated this via his social media platform, following the initial announcement from Hamas.

The Trump Administration had previously presented a 20-point plan aimed at resolving the conflict. A deadline of 6 PM on Sunday (Washington D.C. time) was imposed for hamas’s acceptance, with a warning of dire consequences should the ultimatum be ignored. The proposed plan has been met with mixed reactions, particularly from hardliners within Israel.

Concerns and Opposition

Sources indicate that elements within Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet view the US plan as a setback. Concerns center on the proposed amnesty for Hamas members and the lack of guarantees regarding the annexation of territories or the expulsion of Palestinians.

The current conflict, which began after Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, has resulted in a devastating toll. Over 60,000 Palestinians have tragically lost their lives due to the ensuing Israeli military response, drawing increasing international condemnation. A recent United Nations inquiry has characterized Israeli actions in Gaza as a potential genocide.

Key facts at a Glance

Aspect	Details
Hostages Held	Approximately 48
Hostages Believed Alive	Less than 20
US Peace Plan Points	20
Deadline for Acceptance	Sunday 6 PM (Washington D.C. time)
Palestinian Deaths (as of Oct 3, 2025)	Over 60,000

The Complexities of Hostage negotiations

Hostage negotiations are inherently fraught with difficulty, often involving delicate compromises and a high degree of uncertainty. The Council on Foreign Relations provides in-depth analysis on the dynamics of hostage situations, outlining the challenges faced by negotiators and the factors influencing outcomes.

Did you know? The psychological impact of prolonged captivity on hostages can be severe, leading to long-term trauma and adjustment difficulties.

Pro Tip: Successful hostage negotiations often rely on establishing clear communication channels and building trust between all parties involved.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Gaza Peace Plan

• What is Hamas’s primary demand in the negotiations?

  Hamas seeks guarantees regarding the future administration of Gaza and the rights of Palestinians.

• What is the US stance on Hamas’s governance role in Gaza?

  The US initially proposed an international body oversee the administration, which Hamas rejects.

• What are the potential consequences if Hamas rejects the peace plan?

  President Trump has warned of “a hell like never before” if the ultimatum is ignored.

• How many Palestinian lives have been lost in the current conflict?

  Over 60,000 Palestinian deaths have been reported as of October 3,2025.

• What role is the United Nations playing in the crisis?

  A UN inquiry committee has qualified Israeli actions in Gaza as a potential genocide.

What are your thoughts on the proposed peace plan? Do you believe a lasting resolution is achievable given the current circumstances?

Share your perspectives in the comments below and join the conversation.

How might Hamas’s partial endorsement of the trump plan impact intra-Palestinian relations between Hamas and the Palestinian authority?

A Shift in Hamas’s Stance: Analyzing the Unexpected Endorsement

Recent developments have sent ripples through the international community: Hamas, the Palestinian militant group governing the gaza Strip, has publicly expressed conditional endorsement of elements within former U.S. President Donald Trump’s peace plan, specifically focusing on the immediate cessation of Israeli military attacks. This marks a significant departure from the group’s historically staunch rejection of the plan and signals a potential, albeit cautious, shift in strategy amidst ongoing regional instability and internal pressures.The core of this endorsement centers around securing an end to the escalating violence and protecting Palestinian civilians. This unexpected move requires a deep dive into the motivations, implications, and potential future ramifications.

The Trump Plan: A Recap of Key Provisions

The “Deal of the Century,” as Trump’s plan was dubbed, proposed a two-state solution with significant concessions from the Palestinian side. Key aspects included:

* Recognizing Israeli Sovereignty: Full U.S. recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over Jerusalem and the Golan heights.

* Border Adjustments: Proposals for land swaps that would see Israel retain control of approximately 30% of the West Bank.

* Gaza Development: Plans for infrastructure projects and economic development in Gaza,contingent on demilitarization.

* Palestinian Statehood: A future Palestinian state with limited sovereignty, lacking full control over its borders and airspace.

Previously, Hamas categorically rejected the plan, deeming it biased in favor of Israel and a betrayal of Palestinian rights. The current partial endorsement focuses solely on the demand for an immediate halt to Israeli attacks,a universally shared goal even amongst staunch critics of the broader plan.

Why Now? Understanding Hamas’s Motivations

Several factors likely contribute to Hamas’s altered position. The recent unrest in Gaza, highlighted by reports of growing discontent amongst the population – as evidenced by the “Revolt of the Gazaouis” (JForum, 2023) – has placed immense pressure on the group’s leadership. This internal challenge, coupled with the external pressure of continued Israeli military operations, may have prompted a reassessment of strategy.

* Internal Gaza dynamics: The increasing frustration within Gaza, stemming from economic hardship and the cycle of violence, presents a significant threat to hamas’s authority.

* Regional Realignment: Shifting alliances and geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East might potentially be influencing Hamas’s calculations.

* Humanitarian Crisis: The worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza, with limited access to essential resources, necessitates a focus on immediate relief and protection of civilians.

* Public Image: Attempting to portray themselves as pragmatic actors concerned with the well-being of Palestinians could improve Hamas’s international standing.

Specific Endorsements and Conditions

Hamas’s endorsement isn’t blanket. It’s highly conditional and specifically targets the cessation of Israeli attacks. Senior Hamas officials have stated they will consider any proposal that guarantees:

1. Immediate Ceasefire: A complete and verifiable halt to all Israeli military operations in Gaza and the west Bank.
2. Lifting of the Blockade: An end to the Israeli blockade of Gaza, allowing for the free flow of goods and people.
3. Protection of Palestinian Civilians: Guarantees for the safety and security of Palestinian civilians.
4. Release of Prisoners: The release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails.

These conditions represent a clear attempt to leverage the current situation to achieve tangible gains for Palestinians, even if it means engaging with aspects of a plan they previously condemned.

Implications for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

This development has far-reaching implications for the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

* Potential for Negotiations: While unlikely in the short term, the endorsement opens a narrow window for potential negotiations, albeit indirect, mediated by international actors.

* Fracturing of Palestinian Unity: The move could further exacerbate divisions within the Palestinian political landscape, particularly between hamas and the Palestinian Authority.

* Impact on Regional Stability: A cessation of hostilities could contribute to a temporary stabilization of the region, but underlying tensions remain.

* U.S. Role: The Biden administration’s response will be crucial. Whether the U.S. will engage with Hamas, even on a limited basis, remains to be seen.

The Role of International Mediation

Effective international mediation will be essential to capitalize on this potential shift. Key players, including the United States, Egypt, qatar, and the United Nations, must work together to:

* Facilitate Dialog: Create channels for communication between Hamas and Israel, even if initially through intermediaries.

* Monitor the Ceasefire: Ensure compliance with any agreed-upon ceasefire terms.

* Address humanitarian Needs: Provide urgent humanitarian assistance