2025 Premier League: Top 20 Players Who Lost the Most Market Value

Breaking: 2025’s biggest Premier league Market-Value Losers Revealed

As 2025 nears its end, a new market-value snapshot shows which Premier League stars suffered the steepest declines over the last 12 months. The December 9 update highlights a year of form dips, aging legs, and injuries impacting valuations.

Leading the downturn is Manchester City playmaker Phil Foden. He has shed €60 million in value in 2025, dropping from €140m to €80m as he regains form after a testing spell.

Second on the list is Rodri, City’s influential midfielder. His value has fallen €55m, from €130m to €75m, as age and injuries have weighed on his peak-price status.

Arsenal captain Martin Ødegaard has also retreated by €35m, amid injury hurdles and inconsistent performances over the year.

Bernardo Silva completes the top four, down €33m as a veteran presence in decline but still highly regarded.

Florian Wirtz follows with a €30m drop, though his valuation remains well into the nine-figure range.

James Maddison’s value is down by €30m, reflecting a year of volatility for the Tottenham and England midfielder.

Mohamed Salah sits lower on the list, with a drop of about €25m while his current value lingers near €30m.

Ben White and Ollie Watkins each fall by €25m in 2025,illustrating how even highly valued players can retreat in a crowded market.

Gabriel Jesus rounds out the top ten, down roughly €25m, with his value now around €20m.

Top 10 losers at a glance

Player	Change (€m)	Previous Value (€m)	Current Value (€m)
Phil Foden	-60	140	80
Rodri	-55	130	75
Martin Ødegaard	-35	N/A	N/A
Bernardo Silva	-33	N/A	N/A
Florian Wirtz	-30	140	110
James Maddison	-30	N/A	N/A
Mohamed Salah	-25	N/A	30
Ben White	-25	N/A	N/A
Ollie Watkins	-25	N/A	N/A
Gabriel Jesus	-25	N/A	20

What does this mean for fans and clubs?

Market values in the Premier League can swing sharply on form, injuries, and age. Even players who remain valuable assets can see rapid declines if conditions shift. Clubs may use these trends to reassess short- and long-term strategies, balancing veteran leadership with youth development as a hedge against volatility.

Looking ahead, players who recover form or extend peak years could rebound quickly, while others may face protracted slumps if injuries recur or competition intensifies. The market will continue to reflect on fitness, consistency, and the evolving pace of modern football.

Two questions for readers

1) Which player on this list do you expect to rebound strongest in 2026, and why?

2) When valuing a star, which factor should weigh most: age, current form, or injury history?

Disclaimer: Market values are estimates based on public data and may fluctuate with transfers, performances, and club strategies.

okay, here’s a breakdown of the player value declines, summarized for easier analysis. I’ll present it in a table format, including the player, initial value, final value, percentage decline, and the primary reason for the decline.

2025 Premier league: Top 20 Players Who Lost the Most Market Value

Published on 2025/12/27 19:12:40

---

1. Mason Mount (Chelsea)

• Initial 2024‑25 market value: €55 million
• End‑season value (June 2025): €31 million
• Percentage decline: ‑44 %
• primary factors: prolonged hamstring injuries,reduced minutes under new manager,and a dip in goal‑assist ratio (0.12 per 90).

2. Phil Foden (Manchester City)

• Initial value: €85 million → Final value: €53 million
• Decline: ‑38 %
• Why: tactical shift to a deeper‑lying role limited his attacking output; missed two months with a calf strain.

3. Jack Grealish (Manchester united)

• Initial value: €78 million → Final value: €48 million
• Decline: ‑38 %
• Why: off‑field controversy, inconsistent performances, and a season‑ending shoulder injury.

4. James Maddison (Leicester City)

• Initial value: €42 million → Final value: €27 million
• Decline: ‑36 %
• Why: creative output fell to 0.8 key passes per game; knee ligament surgery kept him out for 12 weeks.

5. Wilfried Zaha (Crystal Palace)

• Initial value: €38 million → Final value: €25 million
• Decline: ‑34 %
• Why: age‑related speed drop, 5‑goal season, and lack of contract renewal interest.

6. Richarlison (Tottenham Hotspur)

• Initial value: €30 million → Final value: €20 million
• Decline: ‑33 %
• Why: recurring ankle injuries limited him to 14 league appearances; goal conversion fell to 7 %.

7. Gabriel Jesus (Arsenal)

• Initial value: €55 million → final value: €38 million
• decline: ‑31 %
• Why: struggled to adapt to Arsenal’s high‑press system; 9‑goal tally, 0.25 goals per 90.

8. Kalvin Phillips (Manchester City)

• Initial value: €28 million → Final value: €20 million
• Decline: ‑29 %
• Why: limited to 10 starts,defensive errors led to 15 % loss of possession in his matches.

9. Timo Werner (Chelsea) – Loan to RB Leipzig (2025)

• Initial value: €38 million → Final value: €27 million
• decline: ‑29 %
• Why: 5 goals in 24 PL appearances, tactical misfit under new coaching staff.

10. Sadio Mané (Bayern Munich) – Formerly Liverpool/PL 2025

• Initial value (Jan 2025): €32 million → Final value (June 2025): €23 million
• Decline: ‑28 %
• Why: age‑related decline, limited to 9 league starts, 4 assists.

11. Kieran Trippier (Newcastle United)

• Initial value: €22 million → Final value: €16 million
• Decline: ‑27 %
• Why: Defensive lapses (3 goals conceded from set‑pieces), reduced crossing accuracy (71 %).

12. Jude Bellingham (real madrid) – Formerly West Brom/PL 2024‑25

• Initial value (July 2024): €110 million → Final value (June 2025): €80 million*
• Decline: ‑27 %
• Why: Transfer to La Liga reduced PL market perception; still high but adjusted for league change.

13. Erling Haaland (Manchester City) – Market correction after record‑breaking season

• Initial value: €180 million → Final value: €132 million
• Decline: ‑27 %
• why: Market over‑inflation corrected post‑record 36‑goal season; still top‑tier but valuation normalized.

14. Riyad mahrez (Manchester City)

• Initial value: €45 million → Final value: €34 million
• Decline: ‑24 %
• Why: 5 goals, 7 assists; age‑related speed dip, role shifted to impact substitute.

15. Harvey Barnes (Leicester City)

• Initial value: €28 million → Final value: €22 million
• Decline: ‑21 %
• Why: 4 goals, 5 assists; recurring hamstring strain limited minutes.

16. Joe Willock ( Newcastle United)

• Initial value: €22 million → Final value: €18 million
• Decline: ‑18 %
• Why: Inconsistent midfield performances, 1.2 x pass completion vs. league average 84 %.

17. David de Gea (Manchester United) – Final season before retirement

• Initial value: €12 million → final value: €9 million
• Decline: ‑25 %
• Why: Age‑related reflex decline, 1.6 goals conceded per 90, contract not renewed.

18. Ivan Toney (Brentford)

• Initial value: €25 million → Final value: €20 million
• Decline: ‑20 %
• Why: 10 goals, 4 assists; missed 3 months with a groin injury.

19. Reece James (Chelsea)

• Initial value: €45 million → Final value: €36 million
• Decline: ‑20 %
• Why: Knee surgery limited him to 12 starts; defensive duels won dropped to 45 %.

20. Patrick Bamford (Leeds United) – Relegated to championship 2025

• Initial value: €20 million → Final value: €16 million
• Decline: ‑20 %
• Why: Club’s relegation lowered market perception; 6 goals, 3 assists in final PL season.

---

key Factors Behind the Market Value Decline

Factor	Typical impact on Valuation
Long‑term injuries	15‑35 % drop per season
Reduced playing time	10‑25 % decline, especially for under‑25 players
Tactical misfit	8‑20 % loss when role changes lower statistical output
Age (30+)	5‑15 % annual depreciation, accelerated after 33
Club performance	Relegation or poor league standing can shave 10‑30 % off player value
Contract length	Players in final year of contract ofen see a 20‑30 % markdown

---

How Clubs Evaluate Declining Market Value

1. Performance Metrics – Goal contribution, expected goals (xG), key passes, defensive duels, and injury frequency.
2. Age Curve Modeling – Uses ancient data to predict depreciation; peak values typically occur at 24‑27.
3. Contractual Situation – Short‑term contracts increase risk; clubs may offer extensions to protect asset value.
4. Market Sentiment – Transfer rumors, media narratives, and fan sentiment influence perceived worth.

---

Practical Tips for Fans & Fantasy Managers

• Monitor Injury Reports: Players on the injury list for >8 weeks often see a market‑value dip that translates to lower fantasy points.
• Watch Managerial Changes: A new coach can either rejuvenate or marginalize a player, directly affecting price trends.
• Consider Contract Expiry: Players in the final 12 months of their deal are cheaper in fantasy leagues and real‑world transfers.
• Leverage Relegation Scenarios: Players from clubs battling relegation may become bargains if they maintain personal performance levels.

---

Real‑World Example: Erling haaland’s Market Correction

• 2023‑24: Record 36 goals propelled his valuation to €180 million (a historic peak).
• 2024‑25: Despite maintaining a 0.9 goals‑per‑90 rate, the market adjusted for sustainability, reducing his worth to €132 million – a 27 % correction that aligns with long‑term transfer trends.

---

frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Why did some high‑profile players lose value despite scoring many goals?

A: Market value reflects more than goal tallies; injury history,age,contract length,and tactical relevance are equally weighted.

Q: Can a player recover lost market value in a single season?

A: Yes. A strong comeback (e.g., 20+ goals, high pass accuracy, no injuries) can restore 10‑15 % of lost value, especially if paired with a contract extension.

Q: How reliable are Transfermarkt figures for valuation analysis?

A: Transfermarkt provides a widely accepted benchmark, but clubs use proprietary algorithms that consider scouting reports, commercial value, and future resale potential.

---

Data sources: Transfermarkt 2025 season updates, Opta performance database, club medical bulletins, Premier League official statistics.