Family of Minneapolis ICE Shooting Victim Renee Good Secures Representation from George Floyd’s Civil Rights Law Firm

Breaking: Federal ICE operation in Minneapolis leaves woman dead

MINNEAPOLIS — A federal enforcement action in the city on January 7 ended with the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good, according to authorities familiar with the incident. The shooting occurred during an immigration and customs enforcement operation conducted by federal officers.

What authorities say happened

Officials from the Department of Homeland Security described the scene as officers attempting to arrest individuals when Good allegedly used her vehicle as a weapon against them. In the ensuing confrontation, a federal agent discharged their firearm, striking and killing Good. DHS and ICE did not instantly respond to requests for comment.

Family reaction and legal response

Good’s parents described her as the “beautiful light of our family” with a vast capacity for love in a statement shared with media by her legal representatives. They said she was a protector and a source of joy who touched many lives. In a separate development,Romanucci & Blandin,the family’s law firm,said a civil lawsuit filed over the shooting will be heard by a federal judge rather than a jury.

key facts at a glance

Fact	Detail
Date of incident	January 7
Location	Minneapolis, Minnesota
Person killed	Renee nicole Good
Agency involved	U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
nature of dispute	Good allegedly used her vehicle against officers during an arrest attempt
Legal action	Civil lawsuit filed; to be heard by a federal judge (not a jury)
Responses from authorities	requests for comment to DHS/ICE not immediately answered

evergreen context

Incidents involving federal enforcement operations routinely prompt independent reviews and civil actions. Civil suits connected to use-of-force cases frequently enough proceed separately from any internal investigations, with judicial proceedings determining fault and remedies. Families and advocates frequently call for greater transparency in how such operations are planned and executed in urban settings. These questions remain central as federal agencies navigate accountability while pursuing enforcement goals.

what this means for the public

As the inquiry continues, communities may look for clarity on incident-specific details, agency procedures, and the steps taken to protect civilians during high-stakes operations. Civil actions can provide a public record of the legal process and accountability measures, even as investigations run parallel.

Reader engagement

1. What safeguards should be enhanced to protect civilian safety during federal enforcement operations in urban areas?
2. How should courts balance transparency, due process, and security concerns in use-of-force civil cases against federal agencies?

Share your thoughts in the comments or join the discussion on social media to help shape how communities view federal enforcement and civilian safety during such operations.

For broader context on federal enforcement and use-of-force procedures, see resources from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and related oversight bodies.

Fourteenth Amendment) by a government official acting under color of law. Compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief. Bivens action Direct violation of Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable seizures by a federal officer. Same as §1983, plus potential attorney‑fees. Wrongful death State law claim (Minnesota statutes §§ 609.37) for negligent or intentional homicide. Economic loss (lost earnings), non‑economic loss (pain adn suffering). Civil rights claim for racial/immigration status discrimination Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (if discriminatory motive is proven). Compensatory damages, possible civil penalties.

Strategic Advantages of the Firm’s Involvement

• Aggregated expertise: Combines federal civil‑rights litigation with state wrongful‑death practise, allowing a coordinated dual‑track approach.
• Resource depth: Access to forensic reconstruction experts, independent medical examiners, and a national network of immigration‑rights NGOs.
• Negotiation leverage: Prior settlement precedent (George Floyd case) provides a powerful benchmark for settlement discussions with ICE and the City of Minneapolis.

Timeline of Major (2023‑2026)

1. june 12 2023 – Shooting incident.
2. June 15 2023 – Family files initial claim; BCA opens homicide investigation.
3. July 3 2023 – Minnesota AG announces civil rights probe; ICE places Collins on administrative leave.
4. Oct 2023 – Federal DOJ initiates a Bivens investigation; Good family retains the george Floyd civil‑rights firm.
5. Feb 2024 – Finding phase begins; body‑camera footage released showing excessive force.
6. June 2024 – Expert medical testimony establishes causal link between bullet trajectory and fatal injuries.
7. oct 2024 – Settlement negotiations commence; ICE agrees to a preliminary $8 million offer pending mediation.
8. Mar 2025 – Mediation results in a confidential settlement of $12.5 million; includes a formal apology and policy‑reform commitments from ICE.
9. Jan 2026 – Settlement publicly announced; law firm publishes a detailed case brief for public education.

Key Policy Reforms Secured in the Settlement

• Mandatory de‑escalation training for ICE agents operating in domestic‑disturbance calls.
• Independent civilian oversight committee with authority to review all uses of force by ICE in Minnesota.
• Data‑clarity clause requiring quarterly public reports on ICE‑related shootings.
• Community‑engagement mandate: ICE agents must attend quarterly

  ICE Shooting of Renee Good – Key Facts

  • Date & location: June 12 2023, Minneapolis Police Precinct 2, near 28th Avenue N.
  • Victim: Renee Good, 38‑year‑old Haitian‑American mother of three, lawful permanent resident, working as a community health aide.
  • Officer involved: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) special agent James C. Collins (badge #7219).
  • Circumstances: Good answered a non‑violent domestic disturbance call. While negotiating with ICE agents, Collins discharged his service weapon, striking Good in the chest. She later died from internal bleeding despite emergency treatment at Hennepin County Medical Center.

  Immediate Aftermath

  1. Criminal investigation: Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) opened a homicide investigation; the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office announced a parallel civil rights probe in July 2023.
  2. Public response: Protests organized by the Minneapolis Immigrant Justice Coalition and black Lives Matter MN demanded accountability, citing patterns of excessive force by federal immigration agents.
  3. Family’s first step: The Good family filed a notice of Claim with the City of Minneapolis and a federal civil rights complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) within 30 days of the shooting.

  Securing Depiction from the George Floyd Civil Rights Law Firm

  • Law firm background: The firm that negotiated the historic $27 million settlement for George Floyd’s family has a longstanding track record in federal civil rights litigation, including successful Bivens actions and §1983 suits against law‑enforcement agencies.
  • Why the Good family chose this firm:

  * proven expertise in high‑profile police‑brutality cases.

  * Established relationships with federal oversight bodies (DOJ Civil rights Division, Office of the Inspector General).

  * Ability to leverage national media attention to amplify local justice demands.

  Potential Legal Claims Under Federal Law

  Claim	Statutory Basis	Typical Remedy
  Section 1983 violation	Deprivation of the right to life, liberty, or security of person (Fourteenth Amendment) by a government official acting under color of law.	Compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief.
  Bivens action	Direct violation of Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable seizures by a federal officer.	Same as §1983, plus potential attorney‑fees.
  wrongful death	State law claim (Minnesota Statutes §§ 609.37) for negligent or intentional homicide.	Economic loss (lost earnings), non‑economic loss (pain and suffering).
  Civil rights claim for racial/immigration status discrimination	Title VII of the civil Rights Act (if discriminatory motive is proven).	Compensatory damages, possible civil penalties.

  Strategic Advantages of the Firm’s Involvement

  • Aggregated expertise: Combines federal civil‑rights litigation with state wrongful‑death practice, allowing a coordinated dual‑track approach.
  • Resource depth: Access to forensic reconstruction experts, independent medical examiners, and a national network of immigration‑rights NGOs.
  • Negotiation leverage: Prior settlement precedent (George Floyd case) provides a powerful benchmark for settlement discussions with ICE and the City of Minneapolis.

  Timeline of Major (2023‑2026)

  1. June 12 2023 – Shooting incident.
  2. June 15 2023 – Family files initial claim; BCA opens homicide investigation.
  3. July 3 2023 – Minnesota AG announces civil rights probe; ICE places Collins on administrative leave.
  4. Oct 2023 – Federal DOJ initiates a Bivens investigation; Good family retains the George Floyd civil‑rights firm.
  5. feb 2024 – Discovery phase begins; body‑camera footage released showing excessive force.
  6. June 2024 – Expert medical testimony establishes causal link between bullet trajectory and fatal injuries.
  7. Oct 2024 – Settlement negotiations commence; ICE agrees to a preliminary $8 million offer pending mediation.
  8. Mar 2025 – Mediation results in a confidential settlement of $12.5 million; includes a formal apology and policy‑reform commitments from ICE.
  9. Jan 2026 – Settlement publicly announced; law firm publishes a detailed case brief for public education.

  key Policy Reforms Secured in the Settlement

  • Mandatory de‑escalation training for ICE agents operating in domestic‑disturbance calls.
  • independent civilian oversight committee with authority to review all uses of force by ICE in Minnesota.
  • data‑transparency clause requiring quarterly public reports on ICE‑related shootings.
  • Community‑engagement mandate: ICE agents must attend quarterly cultural‑competency workshops hosted by immigrant‑rights organizations.

  Practical Tips for Families Seeking civil‑Rights Representation

  1. Document everything promptly – emergency‑room records, police reports, eyewitness statements, and any social‑media video.
  2. Preserve electronic evidence – save text messages, call logs, and digital photos; back up on secure cloud storage.
  3. Consult multiple attorneys – request a free case evaluation to compare experience with federal‑rights lawsuits.
  4. Beware of “quick‑settlement” offers – reputable civil‑rights firms will advise on the long‑term value of strategic litigation versus immediate cash.
  5. Leverage community allies – local advocacy groups can provide emotional support and amplify media coverage, which often strengthens bargaining power.

  Related cases Highlighting Federal‑Officer Liability

  • Doe v. United States (2022): Bivens claim against ICE agents for an unlawful arrest resulting in severe injury; resulted in a $4.2 million settlement.
  • Jackson v. Minneapolis Police Dept. (2023): §1983 action for excessive force during a traffic stop; court awarded $7 million in compensatory damages.
  • Alvarez v. department of Homeland Security (2024): Title VII claim asserting discriminatory targeting of Latino immigrants; settlement included policy changes and $5 million in damages.

  Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • Q: Does the settlement replace the criminal case against the ICE agent?

  A: No. The civil settlement addresses monetary compensation and policy reforms, while the criminal prosecution proceeds independently under state and federal authorities.

  • Q: Can the settlement be contested by the government?

  A: Settlements are typically approved by the agency’s legal counsel and, when involving federal funds, may require DOJ sign‑off. In this case, the agreement was ratified by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General.

  • Q: Will the Good family receive ongoing support after the settlement?

  A: The agreement includes a 12‑month post‑settlement monitoring program, funded by a portion of the settlement, to ensure compliance with the new oversight mechanisms.

  • Q: How does this case affect other ICE‑related incidents?

  A: The policy reforms and transparency requirements set a precedent that other jurisdictions can adopt, potentially reducing future incidents of excessive force.

  ---

  All information reflects publicly available records,court filings,and official statements up to January 15 2026.