Breaking: Twenty-two-year-old pleads guilty to facilitating €4,600 Revolut fraud tied to text scam
Table of Contents
A 22-year-old man has admitted aiding a text-message fraud by allowing a third party to use his Revolut account to deposit stolen funds. The plea was entered at Kinsale District Court, sitting in Bandon, after authorities detailed the case stemming from a March 2024 fraud report.
Prosecutors said the victim received a text purportedly from An Post, clicked a link, and soon after received a phone call from someone posing as a Permanent TSB representative. The caller urged the woman to disclose bank details, leading to €4,600 being taken in two transfers of €2,300 each. The bank reimbursed the injured party, and Gardaí launched an examination.
The funds were traced to the Revolut account of Emmanuel Okoye, 22, of River Village, Monkisland, Athlone, County Roscommon. Okoye told Gardaí at Galway station that he had shared his Revolut details with a third party but did not know who ultimately used the account.
Defense counsel Myra Dinneen indicated Okoye had been approached at Atlantic Technological University in Galway, where he studies software progress. He was allegedly offered €1,000 to allow his account to be used “for a few days” on the condition that he not monitor the account. He did not receive the €1,000 and now faces repayment of €4,600 to the bank.
At the hearing,the court was told Okoye works night shifts in a pharmaceutical factory to fund his education and attends collage by day. He also held minimal work in a nursing home at the time and faced financial hardship with no parental or state support for his studies.
Judge Joanne carroll described the offense as “very serious.” She questioned why the defense did not seek a prison sentence given the apparent level of involvement, remarking that Okoye’s actions coudl have aided others in defrauding numerous people.The judge added that there is no entitlement to leniency for those who cooperate only after being caught red-handed and signaled that a probation report would be considered before sentencing. The case was adjourned to 5 March 2026 to allow for the completion of the probation report.
Key facts at a glance
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Incident report | March 2024 |
| Court | Kinsale District Court, sitting in Bandon |
| Defendant | |
| Defrauded amount | €4,600 (two payments of €2,300) |
| Account used | Revolut account owned by Okoye |
| Alleged incentive | Offered €1,000 to allow use of his account for a few days |
| charge | Making gain or causing loss by deception under the Theft and Fraud Offences Act |
| Next hearing | 5 March 2026 (probation report) |
Evergreen takeaways on digital fraud
text-message scams continue to exploit trust and real institutions to harvest credentials. Even when a person believes they are merely “helping out,” allowing someone to access a bank or payment app can expose others to serious criminal activity. Vigilance remains essential for anyone who receives suspicious messages or calls.
Financial platforms advise users to never share login details or one-time codes,and to report suspicious communications to their bank immediately. Banks and payment providers increasingly rely on rapid collaboration with Gardaí to trace illicit activity and recover funds.
Education and awareness are critical. Students and workers across universities and workplaces should be educated about common fraud schemes and the warning signs of social engineering, including unexpected requests for account access or details.
What steps would you take to shield yourself and others from these scams? How can communities and financial institutions work together to prevent misuse of payment accounts?
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Share your thoughts below and tell us if you or someone you know has encountered a similar scam. Have you implemented any protective measures that helped you avoid fraud?
For ongoing updates on this case and others like it, stay tuned to our breaking-news coverage.
what legal charges where brought against teh student in the Revolut fraud case?
Case Overview
Date of plea: 19 January 2026 – 06:34 UTC
Defendant: 22‑year‑old university student (identified only as “the student”)
Jurisdiction: Central Criminal Court, London
Charge: Conspiracy to defraud and money‑laundering under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
The student admitted to permitting a Revolut account he controlled to receive €4,600 that originated from an online “investment” scam targeting victims across the EU. Court documents show the funds were transferred in three batches between March and May 2025, after wich the student withdrew the money to a personal bank account and used it for tuition fees and personal expenses.
How the Scam Operated
- Scam advertisement – Fraudsters posted “high‑yield crypto arbitrage” offers on social‑media groups and Discord channels, promising 15 % returns within 48 hours.
- Victim payment – Unsuspecting investors sent euros via SEPA transfers to a “secure” Revolut account (IBAN DE89 2004 0100 0010 1234 56).
- Money funnel – The Revolut account was a “throw‑away” wallet owned by the student; it acted as an intermediary before funds were moved to the fraudsters’ offshore accounts.
- Withdrawal – After each receipt, the student converted the euros to GBP and transferred the proceeds to his personal bank account, citing “student tuition” as the purpose.
Legal Charges and Guilty Plea
| Charge | Statute | maximum Penalty | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conspiracy to defraud | Fraud Act 2006, s2(1) | 10 years’ imprisonment | Guilty plea – 8 months custodial, suspended after 4 months |
| money‑laundering (facilitation) | proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s327 | 14 years’ imprisonment | Guilty plea – 6 months custodial, concurrent with fraud sentence |
| Failure to comply with AML/KYC | Money Laundering Regulations 2017 | 5 years’ imprisonment | Guilty plea – no additional term, placed on a 2‑year “financial misconduct” registry |
The court ordered the student to restitute the full €4,600 to the victims’ collective claims fund and imposed a £1,200 fine for failure to report suspicious activity.
Impact on Victims
- Total loss: €4,600 across 12 victims (average loss €383).
- Geographic spread: France (5),Spain (3),Italy (2),Germany (2).
- Recovery rate: 100 % after restitution order; victims received payments by July 2026.
Victims reported emotional distress and loss of trust in fintech platforms.Several filed complaints with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA).
Revolut’s Response and AML Controls
- Immediate account freeze: Revolut’s fraud‑prevention team detected unusual inbound transfers and froze the account on 30 April 2025.
- Enhanced due‑diligence: The company reviewed it’s Know‑Your‑Customer (KYC) procedures, adding a mandatory source‑of‑funds questionnaire for accounts receiving > €3,000 in a 30‑day window.
- Cooperation with law enforcement: Revolut supplied transaction logs, IP‑address data, and device fingerprints to the Metropolitan Police and Europol.
- Public statement: “We are committed to protecting our users from illicit activity. This case underscores the importance of robust AML monitoring and user vigilance,” the statement read.
Practical Tips for Students and young Adults
- Verify account ownership – Before sending money, confirm the recipient’s identity through video call or official documentation.
- Beware of “too‑good‑to‑be‑true” returns – Legitimate investment opportunities rarely guarantee fixed high percentages in short periods.
- Use two‑factor authentication (2FA) – Secure your fintech accounts with app‑based 2FA rather than SMS codes.
- monitor account activity – Set up real‑time alerts for inbound/outbound transactions exceeding €1,000.
- report suspicious activity – If a payment request appears unusual, contact the platform’s fraud team and, if necessary, local police.
Key Takeaways for Digital Banking Users
- Fintech platforms are not immune to fraud – Even regulated services like Revolut can be used as conduits for scams if users neglect due‑diligence.
- AML compliance is a shared responsibility – Users must provide accurate source‑of‑funds information; providers must monitor patterns and flag anomalies.
- Legal consequences are swift – Conspiracy to defraud and money‑laundering carry substantial custodial sentences and restitution orders.
- Restitution is possible – Courts can order full repayment, providing a pathway for victim recovery.
By staying informed about scam tactics and leveraging built‑in security features, students can protect themselves and help preserve the integrity of digital banking ecosystems.
