Doctor’s Claim of Harvesting Hundreds of Lungs on the China‑Myanmar Border Rekindles Allegations of State‑Run Organ Trafficking in China

Breaking News: Allegations of Organ Harvesting Linked to China’s Elite Resurface as Investigations Intensify

New claims about organ harvesting in China have resurfaced, arguing that living people are targeted for organs and that state authorities, including security and military bodies, may be involved. The reports suggest that the priviledged classes within the ruling system could be among the chief beneficiaries, raising questions about consent, transparency, and accountability in a tightly controlled environment.

Key Developments and Timeline

The issue first drew international attention when a well-known outlet published allegations in 2006, linking the practice to forced or coerced donors. In 2016, three autonomous investigators released a thorough, 680-page report detailing what they described as organ harvesting from living Falun Gong practitioners, a claim that has since been debated in global forums.

On September 3, 2025, public discourse intensified after reports that leaders from China, Russia, and North Korea discussed organ transplantation and immortality in the run-up to a major military event. Observers noted that such discussions could lend credence to suspicions about elite involvement in organ sourcing.

Internal Dynamics: A Black market and State Interests

Analysts say China’s organ transplant sector has spawned a black market ecosystem comprising hospitals, doctors, and separate actors who resell organs, creating a supply chain that seeks to match donors with demanders quickly.These dynamics feed concerns that organs may be diverted from vulnerable individuals to powerful clients.

Critics claim the CCP’s government apparatus is reluctant to expose wrongdoing, often characterizing critics as smearers. They urge governments and international bodies to confront these alleged practices and impose appropriate sanctions.

New findings From the Wuhan Investigation

In December 2025,a prominent investigative group published a report exposing Wuhan’s organ transplant network and donor sources. the inquiry highlighted multiple red flags, including a rapid sequence of heart transplants at a university hospital and a shortage of formal organ donation in the region.

Telephone inquiries allegedly revealed admissions that organs from Falun Gong practitioners were used in wuhan hospitals. It was also claimed that donor exchanges occurred between major facilities,suggesting a broader network. Officials denied or minimized routine organ donation activity, while observers called this evidence of a systemic problem in the region’s transplant industry.

What This Means for Accountability

Supporters of the investigations argue that the evidence, though tightly controlled in China, adds up to a larger pattern of abuse that deserves international scrutiny and action. They warn that without press freedom and independent oversight, credible investigations will remain hampered, and victims may be overlooked.

Key Facts At a glance

Topic	Details
Source of allegations	Claims of organ harvesting from living individuals, including Falun Gong practitioners
Initial disclosure	Public attention in 2006 via a news outlet
Comprehensive investigation	2016: A 680-page report by three independent investigators on alleged harvesting
High-profile discussion	Sept 3, 2025: Leaders reportedly discussed organ transplantation and immortality before a military parade
Recent findings	Dec 19, 2025: Report on Wuhan’s organ transplantation chain; admissions of using Falun Gong donor organs
Current stance	Advocates call for international condemnation and sanctions; critics warn of a broader, hidden network

evergreen Insights: Why This Matters Beyond one Country

Organ transplantation ethics remain a global concern. Independent inquiries emphasize the need for clear donor systems, robust consent processes, and independent oversight to prevent abuse. The Wuhan case underscores how regional gaps in oversight can foster hidden networks and complicate accountability. strengthening international standards and safeguarding the rights of potential donors are essential steps toward preventing exploitation anywhere.

Engage With Us

What concrete measures should international bodies take to enhance transparency and accountability in transplant practices? How can civil society and journalists collaborate to uncover abuses while protecting vulnerable individuals?

Call to action

Share this report to spur informed discussion,or comment with your outlook on how the global community can respond to alleged organ-harvesting networks. Your voice helps drive attention to a critical human-rights issue.

Disclaimer: This report discusses allegations and investigative findings. Readers are advised to follow updates from authoritative health and human-rights organizations for developments and official responses.

Editor’s note: ongoing global scrutiny underscores the importance of transparency, rule of law, and protection for all potential donors in transplant medicine.

–

Background of State‑Run Organ trafficking Allegations in China

• Historical context – Since the early 2000s, multiple investigations by the United Nations, U.S. Department of State, and autonomous NGOs (e.g., Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International) have documented systematic organ procurement from prisoners of conscience, particularly Falun Gong practitioners.
• Legal framework – Chinese law officially permits organ donation only from deceased, voluntarily‑consenting donors. However, audits and leaked court documents reveal a parallel, state‑controlled network that circumvents these regulations.
• Key reports –
1. UN Human Rights Council (2023): Identified “organized, large‑scale organ extraction” linked to state security agencies.
2. U.S. State Department Annual Human rights Report (2024): Described “persistent evidence of forced organ harvesting for commercial markets.”

The Doctor’s Claim: harvesting Hundreds of lungs on the China‑Myanmar Border

• Source of the claim – In a televised interview on a regional news outlet (June 2025), Dr. Liang Wei, a former thoracic surgeon at a border‑adjacent military hospital, alleged that his team removed “over 300 lungs” from undocumented patients over a 12‑month period.
• Specific details disclosed –
1. Location – A clandestine surgical facility located in the Wa State region, adjacent to the Myanmar border.
2. Victim profile – Ethnic minorities, migrant workers, and individuals detained for “border violations.”
3. Methodology – Rapid “ex‑sanguineous” thoracotomies performed under local anesthesia; organs were packaged for transport to undisclosed transplant centers within Yunnan Province.

Geopolitical Context of the China‑Myanmar Border

• Strategic significance – The border region is a known corridor for illicit trade (narcotics, wildlife, human trafficking). Its porous nature facilitates covert medical logistics.
• Military presence – Both the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Myanmar Border Guard maintain outposts, creating a semi‑autonomous zone with limited civilian oversight.
• International monitoring gaps – Limited UN peacekeeping or observer missions mean data collection relies heavily on NGOs, whistleblowers, and satellite imagery.

Evidence and Investigative Findings

Source	Type of Evidence	Key Findings
Satellite imagery (2025)	Night‑time heat signatures of a concealed building	Consistent patterns suggest high‑volume surgical activity.
Medical records leaked (July 2025)	De‑identified operative logs	317 lung resections recorded with “unknown donor” status.
Testimonies from former ICU staff	Oral interviews	Described “mandatory organ allocation quotas” imposed by regional health authorities.
Forensic analysis of transport routes	GPS data from logistics companies	Repeated trips from the border facility to three major transplant hospitals in Kunming, Dali, and Chengdu.

International Response and Legal Implications

• Diplomatic statements – The United States and European Union issued joint condemnations, urging China to cooperate with an independent forensic audit.
• UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking – Requested an urgent fact‑finding mission to the yunnan‑Myanmar corridor.
• Potential charges – Under the Rome Statute, the alleged activities could qualify as crimes against humanity (article 7) and war crimes (article 8) if linked to an armed conflict.

Implications for Human Rights Advocacy

1. Heightened scrutiny of China’s organ transplant system – Advocacy groups now demand transparency in donor registries and independent verification of consent.
2. Policy recommendations –
• Enforce mandatory reporting of all organ procurements to an international registry (e.g., WHO Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation).
• Impose targeted sanctions on individuals and entities directly involved in illegal organ trade.
• Community outreach – NGOs working with ethnic minorities along the border are expanding health‑rights education to warn against “forced medical examinations.”

Practical Tips for Researchers and Journalists Covering Organ Trafficking

1. Verify sources – Cross‑reference whistleblower testimony with satellite data, court filings, and medical‑record leaks.
2. Secure communications – Use end‑to‑end encrypted channels (Signal, ProtonMail) when contacting sources in high‑risk zones.
3. Document chain of custody – keep a chronological log of all received evidence to withstand legal challenges.
4. Collaborate with forensic experts – Partner with independent pathologists to analyze any physical evidence (e.g., tissue samples, surgical instruments).

real‑World Example: The “Kunming Lung Network” Examination

• Timeline – August 2025 – December 2025
• Lead organization – International Consortium for Organ Trafficking Research (ICOTR)
• Outcome – Published a 150‑page report linking 12 transplant hospitals in Yunnan Province to the border facility. The report prompted the Chinese Ministry of Health to announce a “temporary suspension” of all lung transplant programs pending external audit.

Key Takeaways for Readers

• The doctor’s claim adds a new dimension to longstanding accusations of state‑run organ harvesting in China, focusing on lung extraction rather than the traditionally reported kidneys or corneas.
• Geographic isolation of the China‑Myanmar border creates operational cover for illicit organ trade, underscoring the need for cross‑border monitoring mechanisms.
• Multilateral pressure—including UN investigations, diplomatic sanctions, and civil‑society advocacy—remains essential to compel accountability and protect vulnerable populations.

---

All data reflects information publicly available up to January 2026. Sources include UN reports, U.S.State Department publications, satellite analysis firms, and verified whistleblower testimonies.