Regional integration across Africa, envisioned as a pathway to resilience in a fractured global landscape, is facing significant headwinds. While the African Union agreed in 2019 to establish the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), building upon the foundations laid by eight regional economic communities – including COMESA, Ecowas, and SADC – progress has been slow. Decades of research and observation suggest that deeply rooted issues, stemming from colonial legacies to contemporary challenges in governance and economic structure, are hindering the continent’s ambitions for greater economic unity.
The promise of a larger, integrated African market, first highlighted by the World Bank 45 years ago, aimed to boost production and overcome long-term development obstacles like inadequate infrastructure, inefficient payment systems, and political instability. These obstacles persist today, and a deeper examination reveals four primary reasons why the full potential of African economic integration remains unrealized. These challenges range from the enduring impact of colonial dependencies to the complexities of informal economies and the often-unclear objectives of integration efforts.
The Lingering Shadow of Colonial Dependency
The roots of Africa’s current economic challenges are inextricably linked to its colonial past. As formalized at the Berlin West Africa Conference in February 1885, European powers asserted their right to “regulate the conditions most favourable to the development of trade and civilization … in Africa.” This historical context continues to shape contemporary economic relationships. A 1973 study on Foreign Investments in the East African Common Market found that many post-colonial regional integration arrangements were “based on pre-independence links and institutions.”
The East African Common Market, for example, evolved directly from Britain’s colonial East African Federation, a precursor to today’s East African Community. Attempts to expand beyond this original geographic scope have reportedly strained cohesion within the community. Ecowas stands out as an early attempt to transcend these colonial patterns, uniquely encompassing countries formerly colonized by France, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. However, even Ecowas, after 50 years, continues to navigate complex dynamics.
A key issue is the nature of post-colonial agreements between the European Union and African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. These agreements, critics argue, often prioritize the extraction of raw materials from Africa for processing in Europe, with African nations subsequently importing these processed goods at higher prices. This dynamic hinders the development of local industries and limits employment opportunities for African populations.
The Challenge of Informal Economies
Colonial rule often suppressed or drove underground indigenous African enterprise. This legacy has resulted in a large informal sector that continues to operate outside the formal regulatory framework. Governments across the continent have largely failed to address this historical pattern, often criminalizing informal economic activity. The United Nations Economic Commission for Africa estimated in 2023 that informal cross-border trade accounts for between 30% and 72% of formal trade between neighboring countries, effectively excluding a significant portion of African businesses from the benefits of regional integration.
Integration as an Add-on, Not a Reimagining
Many African nations approach regional integration as an addition to existing colonial arrangements rather than a fundamental reimagining of economic relationships. There are currently over 156 such arrangements in place across the continent’s 55 countries, leading to significant overlaps in membership and conflicting objectives. The African Union’s recognition of eight regional economic communities was intended to address this fragmentation, but it has not fully resolved the issue. For instance, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) both belong to the East African Community (EAC) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), while Eritrea and Sudan are members of IGAD, COMESA, and Cen-Sad. French-speaking West African countries participate in both Ecowas and the Economic and Monetary Union of West Africa (UEMOA).
Mission Creep and Unclear Objectives
Regional integration efforts in Africa have often been burdened by “mission creep,” expanding beyond purely economic objectives to encompass collective security and governance oversight. This broadening of scope has led to unconvincing outcomes and, in some cases, destabilizing effects. The recent withdrawal of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger from Ecowas in 2025, following tensions with France, exemplifies this challenge. These nations, however, remain members of UEMOA, whose currency system is backed by France, highlighting the complexities of disentangling from existing arrangements.
Addressing these challenges requires more than simply establishing rules for market access or harmonizing tax policies. A more holistic approach is needed, one that prioritizes the needs of the informal sector – where women constitute over 70% of cross-border traders – by improving frontier regimes and eliminating policies that discourage lawful enterprise.
Looking Ahead
While popular discontent with lingering colonial influences is evident, translating that sentiment into constructive action requires political vision. Rationalizing Africa’s integration arrangements is underway, with some nations, like Rwanda (withdrawing from Eccas) and Eritrea (withdrawing from IGAD), already streamlining their memberships. However, a fundamental shift in focus is needed, prioritizing a clear and shared vision for the future of African integration. The time has come for African governments to prioritize a cohesive strategy that unlocks the continent’s potential and improves the prospects for its people.
What are your thoughts on the future of African economic integration? Share your comments below.
