European creators are cautiously optimistic following the European Parliament’s approval of a resolution aimed at establishing a clear legal framework for generative artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on copyright. The non-binding resolution, adopted on Tuesday, seeks to ensure fair remuneration for artists and content creators whose work is used to train AI models, a growing concern as AI technology rapidly advances.
The resolution, spearheaded by centrist Christian Democrat Union MEP Axel Voss, calls for greater transparency from AI developers regarding the copyrighted material used in their systems. It proposes a system where creators receive compensation for both past and future uses of their work by generative AI tools, addressing a significant gap in current copyright law. This move comes as the EU prepares for a broader review of its 2021 Digital Single Market directive, slated to begin in June.
At the heart of the debate is the question of how to balance innovation in AI with the protection of intellectual property rights. The approved resolution suggests enshrining in EU law the full disclosure of all copyrighted works used to train AI models, with potential copyright infringement proceedings for those who fail to comply. It also advocates for a licensing framework, facilitated by collective management organizations, to ensure creators are fairly compensated.
Industry groups representing screenwriters, directors, and audiovisual authors have welcomed the Parliament’s decision. The Society of Audiovisual Authors (SAA) chair, Barbara Hayes, stated, “Today’s vote confirms what Europe’s screenwriters and directors have been saying for years: the current framework is failing them. GenAI companies have built billion-euro businesses on the works of audiovisual authors without asking, paying or disclosure. The Parliament has now spoken with a clear majority. We call on the European Commission to swiftly introduce enforceable obligations that level the playing field.”
Concerns Over Impact on Creative Professions
The Federation of European Screen Directors (FERA) echoed these sentiments, with chair Bill Anderson warning that the profession of directing is under threat without updated copyright legislation. “Directors have always been early adopters of new technologies and many already work with AI. Though, they are now seeing AI systems replicate their work,” Anderson said. “The Parliament acknowledges this threat to their livelihoods and gives it political weight. Now, we need the Commission to enforce rules so that European directors can continue to tell original stories that engage audiences worldwide.”
The Federation of Screenwriters in Europe (FSE) President Jacob Groll framed the issue as a matter of theft, stating, “Every film, every series, every episode of television has a screenwriter behind it who spend months, most often years, bringing it to life. These words are taken unlawfully, without consent and without remuneration – stolen by generative AI systems to be used as basis of their own product. This is not an abstract policy debate, it is the fight for creatives to earn a living and for the diversity of stories offered to European audiences.”
GESAC, representing over one million creators across Europe, also voiced its support, with Director General Adriana Moscoso del Prado calling the vote a “strong and timely political message” that recognizes the “ongoing massive unfairness in the generative AI market.”
Industry Pushback and Concerns About Competitiveness
However, the resolution hasn’t been universally embraced. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) expressed concerns that the proposed measures could hinder Europe’s access to cutting-edge AI technologies. The CCIA argued that the EU’s existing Copyright Directive already provides adequate provisions for text-and-data-mining (TDM), allowing developers to train models on publicly available material with an opt-out mechanism for rights holders. Axel Voss led the charge for the resolution.
The industry group criticized the call for prior authorization or broad licensing regimes, suggesting they would create unnecessary complexity, legal uncertainty, and a “compliance tax” for EU companies, potentially pricing startups out of the market. Boniface de Champris, AI Policy Lead at CCIA Europe, stated, “Today’s non-binding report sends the wrong signal to innovators, and risks holding back Europe’s digital competitiveness on the global stage. The EU already has strong, future-proof rules that carefully balance the interests of rightsholders with AI innovation.” He added, “The last thing the EU needs right now is more complexity. It just needs to enforce the ones it already has. Let the Copyright Directive and AI Act do their job.”
What’s Next for AI and Copyright in Europe
The European Parliament’s resolution is a significant step towards addressing the complex relationship between AI and copyright, but it is not legally binding. The European Commission will now consider the recommendations and determine whether to propose new legislation. The upcoming review of the 2021 Digital Single Market directive will provide a crucial opportunity to further refine the EU’s approach to copyright in the age of AI.
The debate is far from over, and the coming months will be critical in shaping the future of AI and creative industries in Europe. The resolution signals a clear intent to protect the rights of creators and ensure they benefit from the value generated by their work in the age of artificial intelligence.
What are your thoughts on the European Parliament’s resolution? Share your opinions in the comments below.
