Charles Darwin theorized that birds possessed a sense of beauty remarkably similar to our own. New research from the University of Auckland is lending weight to that 19th-century hunch, suggesting a surprising degree of overlap in aesthetic preferences between humans and other species – specifically when it comes to the sounds animals use to attract mates. The findings, published recently, indicate that human listeners often agree with the preferences of the animals themselves when evaluating mating calls, hinting at universal principles governing what sounds are considered appealing across the animal kingdom.
The study, conducted through the University of Auckland’s citizen science platform The Music Lab, involved over 4,000 participants who listened to pairs of mating calls from 16 different species – ranging from frogs and birds to insects, mice and monkeys. Participants were asked to choose which call they preferred, and researchers then compared those choices to established preferences within each species. The core question explored whether human aesthetic judgment aligns with the evolutionary pressures shaping animal communication, specifically in the context of reproduction.
On average, humans tended to favor the same calls that the animals themselves did, demonstrating a significant correlation. “This result seems wild and it is,” says Dr. Sam Mehr, of the University of Auckland and Yale University, the senior author of the new study. “The big-picture implication is of some universals across species in the appreciation of sound.” The research team found that human preferences aligned particularly well with those of the Pacific field cricket, the song sparrow, and the hourglass treefrog, while discrepancies emerged with species like the Gelada monkey and the Zebra finch.
The strength of an animal species’ preference directly influenced the likelihood of human agreement, and the speed at which a choice was made. Humans were more likely to concur with strong animal preferences and made quicker decisions in those cases. Interestingly, agreement between humans and animals was most pronounced when the calls featured lower pitches or acoustic embellishments like trills, clicks, and chucks. Participants could even produce their own choices and view the study’s data collection process through The Music Lab platform.
How the Experiment Worked
The experiment leveraged a gamified approach through The Music Lab, a platform designed to gather data on musical preferences from a broad audience. More than 110 pairs of sounds were presented to participants, building on previous research that had already identified which calls were most attractive to females within each species. For example, female túngara frogs in Panama consistently demonstrate a preference for complex calls over simpler ones – a preference that human listeners mirrored in the study.
Dr. Logan James, of McGill University in Canada, the University of Texas and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, and lead researcher on the project, suggests a possible explanation for these shared preferences. “The results are incredibly exciting,” says James. “Across nature, the smells of flowers, the colours of butterflies, and the songs of birds didn’t evolve for humans, yet we find them beautiful. And it seems there are shared preferences we are only just learning about.” He posits that humans and other animals may share fundamental aspects of perception, leading to these surprising convergences in aesthetic judgment.
“From an aesthetics perspective, you wouldn’t really expect similarities here,” Mehr added. “So, it’s quite surprising that there are some cross-cutting, universal principles of what sounds nice across species, even if those principles are a bit hard to nail down quite yet.”
This research opens up new avenues for understanding the evolution of aesthetic preferences and the underlying mechanisms of perception. While the exact reasons for these shared tastes remain unclear, the study provides compelling evidence that beauty, at least in the realm of sound, may be less subjective – and more universally appreciated – than previously thought. Further research will likely focus on identifying the specific acoustic features that drive these preferences and exploring whether similar patterns exist in other sensory modalities, such as vision and smell.
What comes next for this line of inquiry? Researchers plan to expand the study to include a wider range of species and explore the potential role of cultural influences on human preferences. The ongoing work at The Music Lab continues to gather valuable data, offering a unique window into the fascinating intersection of animal behavior and human perception.
What are your thoughts on this research? Share your comments below and let us know if you agree with the findings!
