<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="
The beginning of the crisis came when it was announced Sherine Abdel Wahab Preparing for a new song titled "joy is gone"which will soon be released as one of the songs of the new album, to announce that her ex-husband "She stole the song and doesn’t own the rights".
confirmed Hussam Habib that "He has a waiver of the song in question from the composer and author, certified by the Society of Authors and Composers"And that the Egyptian actress "She seized a work that she did not own".
The crisis intensified when Sherine Abdel Wahab’s lawyer, Yasser Kantoush, Counselor, submitted a report to Public Prosecutor Hamada El-Sawy, stating that: "The defendant, Hossam Habib, had betrayed the trust and trust that the complainant, Sherine Abdel Wahhab, had deposited in him, as she trusted him as her husband at that time, and he had betrayed the trust and performed the assignment of songs in his name and for his benefit.".
Kantoush continued in his statement: "The defendant was responsible for negotiating on behalf of the complainant in all of her artworks, including choosing the lyrics, composing and making the procedures for waiving those songs in her favor by their authors. Money in exchange for a waiver in favor of the complainant who was issuing checks from her personal account in favor of authors and composers".
The song writer resolves the controversy
In the midst of crisis, the lyric poet wrote, Ibrahim ShetaOn his personal Facebook account: "A large number of people ask me about the songs (Ghab Al-Farah) and (I’m Extinguished), which are mentioned in Sherine’s new album.".
The lyricist emphasized that "Habib recorded the two songs, and they are supposed to be released in the coming period on his album".
Confused position and personal revenge
In this regard, the music critic commented, Mostafa Hamdyon the crisis of overlapping artistic property rights, saying: "The situation between Sherine and Hossam is very ambiguous, as the business was joint between them because of what they had done in partnership, and here the papers and the concessions that were made will be considered, and were they in the name of Hossam or in the name of the company?".
Subject to location "Sky News Arabia": "What is happening between them is a personal revenge that I see taking place in a childish way, because of the great overlap between them at work, there are songs by Sherine that Hossam sang and vice versa, and the solution will eventually be the concession of one of the parties and compromise.".
The papers are the key
Hamdi went on to explain: "The papers, the poet and the composer will be referred to to clarify who owns the rights to the song, and if the second party uses it and displays it on any of the different platforms, it will act legally".
And he added: "Sometimes the various platforms deal with the fact that the owner of the priority of publishing is the one who owns the intellectual property rights, which is considered a huge loss of rights, and by virtue of what is done in the artistic market, most songs are published without obtaining official concessions, and then the conditions and procedures are reconciled in the future".
previous incident
The music critic mentioned a previous case in which a dispute occurred because of the song (As You Are) that the artist sang Amr diabAnd then the singer came out Ramy Sabry To announce that it belongs to him, and the deciding between them was the paper that proved that the latter liked her and registered it without obtaining official concessions".
He continued his speech to the site "Sky News Arabia": "When the composer and composer found that Rami did not publish the song, besides not paying its financial value, it was given to Diab, who obtained all the concessions, then sang and published it.".
He explained: "Entering the judiciary crisis will make things go according to official documents and agreements between all parties, then look at papers to find out rights, as a large number of artists are ignorant of the law, and sometimes circumvent it.".
Intellectual property and foreign songs
On the extent to which artistic intellectual property rights are applied to foreign songs, Hamdi said: "In the West, they have a completely different industry and procedures, very much ahead of us in intellectual property rights, in addition to their work in a different system, as they have a profession (producer) which is the basis in the industry.".
He continued: "Most of the artists abroad write and compose their songs, the product is not only a music composer, but also has a great presence, and the form of their intellectual property is completely different from EgyptThey respect each other’s moral agreement".
“>
The beginning of the crisis came when it was announced Sherine Abdel Wahab Preparing for a new song called “joy is gone“, which will be released soon as one of the songs of the new album, to announce that her ex-husband “has seized the song and does not own the rights to it”.
confirmed Hussam Habib That “he has a waiver of the song in question from the composer and author, documented by the Association of Authors and Composers”, and that the Egyptian artist “stole a work that was not owned by her.”
The crisis intensified when Sherine Abdel Wahab’s lawyer, Counselor Yasser Kantoush, submitted a report to Attorney General Hamada El-Sawy, stating that “the defendant, Hossam Habib, had betrayed the trust and trust deposited in him by the complainant, Sherine Abdel Wahab, who trusted him as her husband at that time, He betrayed the trust and performed the assignment of songs in his name and for his benefit.
In his communication, Kantoush continued: “The defendant was responsible for negotiating on behalf of the complainant in all her artworks, from choosing the lyrics, composing and making the procedures for waiving those songs in her favor by their authors, and when the complainant chooses a particular song, the defendant only negotiates.” With the author of the words and the composer on his material fees in return for a waiver in favor of the complainant who was issuing checks from her personal account in favor of the authors and composers“.
The song writer resolves the controversy
In the midst of crisis, the lyric poet wrote, Ibrahim Shetaon his personal account on the social networking site Facebook: “A large number of people ask me about the songs (Ghab Al Farah) and (I’m Extinguished), which are indicated in Sherine’s new album.“.
The lyricist confirmed that “Habib recorded the two songs, and they are supposed to be released in the coming period on his album.”
Confused position and personal revenge
In this regard, the music critic commented, Mostafa Hamdyon the crisis of overlapping artistic property rights, saying: “The situation between Sherine and Hossam is very ambiguous, as the works were joint between them because of what they had done in partnership, and here the papers and the concessions that were made will be considered, and were they in the name of Hossam or in the name of the company?“.
He continued to “Sky News Arabia”: “What is happening between them is a personal revenge, which I see taking place in a childish way, because of the great overlap between them at work.“.
The papers are the key
Hamdi went on to explain: “The papers, the poet and the composer will be referred to to clarify who owns the rights to the song, and if the second party uses it and displays it on any of the different platforms, it will act legally.”
And he added: “Sometimes, the different platforms deal with the fact that the owner of the priority of publishing is the one who owns the intellectual property rights, which is considered a huge loss of rights, and by virtue of what is happening in the artistic market, most songs are published without obtaining official concessions, and then reconciliation is done. Conditions and actions in the future“.
previous incident
The music critic mentioned a previous case in which a dispute occurred because of the song (As You Are) that the artist sang Amr diabAnd then the singer came out Ramy Sabry To announce that it belongs to him, and the deciding between them was the paper that proved that the latter liked her and registered it without obtaining official concessions“.
And he continued, in his speech to “Sky News Arabia”: “When the author and composer found that Ramy did not publish the song, in addition to not paying its financial value, it was given to Diab, who obtained all the concessions, then sang and published it.”
He explained: “The entry into the judiciary crisis will make things go according to official documents and agreements between all parties, then look into the papers to find out the rights, as a large number of artists are ignorant of the law, and sometimes circumvent it.”
Intellectual property and foreign songs
On the extent to which artistic intellectual property rights are applied to foreign songs, Hamdi said: “In the West, they have a completely different industry and procedures. They are very ahead of us in intellectual property rights, in addition to their work in a different system, as they have a profession (producer) which is the basis in the industry, so they do not have A poet, composer, or distributor, rather he is the one who takes care of everything“.
He continued, “Most of the artists abroad write and compose their songs. The producer is not just a music composer, but has a great presence, and the form of their intellectual property is completely different from that of the musician.” EgyptThey respect each other’s moral agreement“.