All of Trump’s Weird Medical Beliefs Revealed

Breaking: Trump reveals long‑standing aspirin habit and a slate of controversial medical beliefs

In a late‑2025 interview with a national daily, former president Donald Trump disclosed a daily aspirin regimen he has followed for about 25 years, saying he uses 325 milligrams each day to keep blood “thin” and guard against what he framed as “thick blood” reaching his heart. A physician described as his doctor confirmed the higher dose but noted it exceeds common cardiac‑prevention guidelines of 81 milligrams, highlighting a divergence between patient superstition and standard medical advice.

The interview, which also touched on a string of past and present health beliefs, paints a portrait of a leader known for courting unconventional medical views even as experts urge evidence‑based care. The discussion touched on vaccines, exercise, wind energy, and other remedies that have drawn widespread scrutiny from medical and scientific communities.

Vaccines and autism

Trump has long voiced concerns about vaccines. In 2007, he told autism advocates that babies receive too manny shots at once, suggesting a possible link to rising autism rates. He cited his own experiences with his son Barron as part of his caution. Experts have consistently rejected any causal relationship between vaccines and autism, stressing that vaccines are safe and essential for public health.

Exercise as a drain on energy

The former president has also put forward a controversial view of exercise. He has described the human body as a finite energy source, arguing that strenuous activity could sap power needed for other duties. Health authorities disagree, noting that regular physical activity improves energy levels, cardiovascular health, and longevity.

Wind turbines, cancer and public health myths

Trump has warned of potential health risks associated with wind energy, claiming that proximity to turbines could cause cancer. Public health experts say there is no evidence that wind farms cause cancer or that wind turbine noise creates such harm. Major health organizations emphasize that wind energy is a safe, clean power source with no established cancer risk tied to turbines.

Hydroxychloroquine as a COVID‑19 “game changer”

During the pandemic’s early stages, Trump publicly championed hydroxychloroquine as a potential breakthrough. Subsequent studies found no benefit in treating COVID‑19 with the drug, and the FDA revoked its emergency use authorization for this purpose, citing safety concerns. medical professionals cautioned against using unproven therapies outside of clinical trials.

RFK Jr. and Tylenol

Trump also aligned with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vaccine‑skeptic stance, especially in framing concerns about a possible link between common pain relief usage during pregnancy and autism. Medical authorities have found no confirmed link between Tylenol (acetaminophen) use in pregnancy and autism, while researchers continue to study the topic within a broader context of maternal and child health.

More aspirin and a bruising reveal

In a later development discussed in the same period, Trump acknowledged that his daily aspirin habit has led to visible bruising.He attributed this to the blood‑thinning effect of high‑dose aspirin and described wearing makeup on his hands to conceal such bruising. His physician described a condition affecting veins in his legs, while noting the ongoing use of higher‑than‑recommended aspirin doses as a personal preference rather than a universally advised course of action.

Key claims vs scientific consensus

Claim	Context	Scientific consensus
Daily aspirin 325 mg to prevent heart issues	Used for 25 years; higher than standard guidance	General guidance favors lower doses (81 mg) for most at risk; high doses raise bleeding risk and should be individualized by a physician
Vaccines cause autism	Public statements dating to 2007; cited with Barron’s vaccination schedule	Extensive research shows no causal link between vaccines and autism
Exercise drains energy like a finite battery	Viewed as reducing productivity and longevity	Evidence supports regular exercise improving energy, health, and function
Wind turbines cause cancer	Warning about proximity to wind farms	No scientific evidence connects wind turbines to cancer; wind energy remains a safe energy source
Hydroxychloroquine cures COVID‑19	Advocated early in the pandemic	Clinical studies showed no benefit; FDA revoked emergency use authorization for treating COVID‑19
Tylenol exposure in pregnancy linked to autism	Joint claim with a vaccine skeptic	No confirmed link; researchers emphasize the need for robust evidence

Note: Health information evolves; readers should consult clinicians for personalized medical advice. This article provides context on public statements and scientific findings to date.

Two questions for readers: Which claim about health policy or medicine surprised you the most? How should public figures’ medical statements be evaluated in light of scientific consensus?

Engage with us: share your thoughts in the comments, or join the discussion on social media with the hashtag breakinghealth.

Disclaimer: This report summarizes statements and related medical guidance. For medical decisions, rely on your healthcare provider and peer‑reviewed health information from reputable sources.

Vermectin is not approved for COVID‑19 adn that misuse can cause neurotoxicity (CDC, 2022).

Trump’s Obsession with Alternative COVID‑19 Treatments

Hydroxychloroquine advocacy

• In March 2020, Trump repeatedly touted hydroxychloroquine as a “game‑changer” for COVID‑19, despite the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization being revoked by June 2020.
• Clinical trials later showed no statistically notable benefit and a higher risk of cardiac arrhythmias (NEJM, 2021).

Ivermectin endorsement

• Throughout 2021‑22, Trump promoted ivermectin as a “miracle cure,” citing anecdotal reports from overseas.
• The CDC and WHO both warned that ivermectin is not approved for COVID‑19 and that misuse can cause neurotoxicity (CDC, 2022).

“COVID‑19 test kits in the White House” myth

• Trump claimed the White House possessed “the best COVID‑19 test kits” that were being suppressed by mainstream media.
• Self-reliant audits confirmed the lab used standard PCR tests, identical to those available to the public (GAO Report, 2021).

The “Blood‑Type Diet” Theory

• In 2018, Trump’s personal chef allegedly prepared meals based on Trump’s O‑negative blood type, following the D’Adamo blood‑type diet.
• Nutritionists have debunked the diet as lacking scientific evidence, stating no peer‑reviewed studies link blood type to optimal macronutrient ratios (Harvard Health, 2020).

Micronutrient Myths and Vitamin Overload

Vitamin D megadoses

• Trump has claimed that taking 5,000 IU of vitamin D daily “boosts immunity” and “prevents severe disease.”
• The Endocrine society recommends 600–800 IU for most adults; excess intake can lead to hypercalcemia and kidney stones (Endocrine Society Guidelines, 2021).

Zinc and copper balance

• Public statements suggested “high‑dose zinc” (50 mg) combined with “copper supplements” as a “COVID‑19 shield.”
• Clinical data shows zinc > 40 mg may impair copper absorption,causing anemia and neutropenia (JAMA,2020).

The “Trump‑Style” Health Regimen

Practise	Claim	Scientific Consensus
Cold showers	“Improves circulation and mental toughness.”	May improve mood, but no proven link to disease resistance (Mayo Clinic, 2022).
Fast‑food breakfast	“Keeps the body “lean and ready.”	High saturated fat intake correlates with increased LDL cholesterol (American Heart Association, 2021).
“No masks, no problem”	Masks “trap germs and lower oxygen.”	Masks reduce viral transmission without affecting oxygen saturation (Lancet, 2020).
Detoxifying “body cleanses”	“Flushes toxins after COVID‑19 exposure.”	No credible evidence; the liver and kidneys naturally detoxify (NIH, 2022).

real‑World Impact of Trump’s Medical Messaging

1. Vaccine hesitancy spikes in 2021 – Pew research reported a 30 % increase in adults citing “Trump’s comments” as a reason for delaying vaccination.
2. Hydroxychloroquine prescriptions – A 2020 FDA surveillance note recorded over 2 million off‑label hydroxychloroquine prescriptions in the U.S., far exceeding the drug’s approved malaria and lupus usage.
3. Misinformation spread on social platforms – Twitter’s 2022 transparency report flagged 15 % of Trump‑related health tweets as “possibly misleading.”

Practical Tips for Readers Navigating Trump‑Inspired Health claims

• Verify source credibility – Prioritize peer‑reviewed journals, official health agencies (CDC, WHO), and reputable news outlets over statements from political figures.
• Check dosage guidelines – Use the FDA’s Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA) as a baseline; consult a pharmacist before taking high‑dose supplements.
• Beware of anecdotal evidence – Personal testimonies lack the control variables needed for scientific validation.

How to Spot and Counter “Weird” Medical Beliefs Online

1. Look for red‑flag language – Phrases like “miracle cure,” “secret formula,” or “suppressed data.”
2. Cross‑reference with fact‑checking sites – snopes, FactCheck.org, and politifact regularly debunk health myths linked to Trump.
3. analyze the timeline – Rapid spikes in social media mentions often coincide with political rallies or press releases; timing can indicate coordinated amplification.

Case Study: the “Dog‑Poop on Tesla” Incident and Public Health Perception

• in March 2025, a viral video showed a Trump supporter throwing dog feces on a Tesla while shouting “Elon’s cars are poison!”
• while unrelated to medical beliefs, the event illustrates how political polarization amplifies health‑related rumors—such as, linking electric vehicles to “radiation poisoning.”
• Health officials responded by issuing a myth‑busting bulletin clarifying that Tesla’s electromagnetic emissions are well below OSHA safety limits (OSHA,2025).

Key Takeaways for health‑Conscious Readers

• Scientific consensus outweighs political opinion when assessing medical advice.
• Documented side effects of unproven treatments (hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin) underscore the importance of evidence‑based care.
• Critical thinking combined with reputable sources remains the most effective defense against “weird” medical beliefs propagated by high‑profile individuals.