Radio host Andy Kusnetzoff addressed workplace mistreatment allegations made by Ronnie Arias regarding their time together on the Urbana Play program Perros de la Calle. Speaking to the press at the Buenos Aires airport upon returning from a trip, Kusnetzoff defended his track record as a team leader while acknowledging Arias’s reported discomfort.
The Bottom Line
- The Core Conflict: Ronnie Arias accused Andy Kusnetzoff of workplace mistreatment, marginalization, and financial withholding during their time on Perros de la Calle on Urbana Play.
- The Direct Response: Kusnetzoff dismissed the claims of abuse while expressing genuine puzzlement, stating that he tried to ensure everyone felt comfortable and valued on the show.
- The Wider Ecosystem: The clash highlights the cultural shift toward streaming video platforms—such as Ángel De Brito’s Ángel Responde on Bondi—as preferred venues for unfiltered industry post-mortems.
Inside the Clash at Perros de la Calle
The controversy ignited when Ronnie Arias appeared on the Bondi streaming program Ángel Responde, hosted by Ángel De Brito. During his appearance, Arias unpacked a difficult tenure working on the radio program Perros de la Calle. According to Arias, Kusnetzoff curated an exclusionary environment where he allegedly told him, “You shouldn’t talk because you’re not a journalist.” Arias further claimed that behind-the-scenes friction overshadowed the on-air chemistry, noting, “They caressed me on the air and screwed me over outside.” He also alleged administrative grievances, claiming he went unpaid for his final four months before resigning.
When Primicias Ya cameras intercepted Kusnetzoff at the Buenos Aires airport, the conductor offered a measured counter-narrative. “I love Ronnie a lot. He came to PH and I loved the vibe we had, I told him: ‘Come work with us,'” Kusnetzoff stated. While admitting that Arias evidently felt uncomfortable, Kusnetzoff rejected the characterization of abuse, emphasizing, “I tried to integrate him, I tried to keep him in the photo, I tried to keep him happy, like everyone else who is there.”
Collateral Damage and Network Dynamics
The fallout extended beyond the main hosts. Arias also criticized fellow cast member Evelyn Botto, suggesting she was positioned on the show merely to fulfill a demographic requirement. Botto fired back in an interview with América TV’s SQP, defending her stance by admitting that the working environment was far from harmonious for anyone involved. “I have the feeling that none of the two had a good time and I think it has to do with the fact that we were in two different timings,” Botto explained, adding that she can be visceral when reactions clash.
| Participant | Primary Role | Platform / Show | Stance on the Dispute |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Kusnetzoff | Host | Urbana Play (Perros de la Calle) | Denies mistreatment; expresses affection and surprise at Arias’s discomfort. |
| Ronnie Arias | Contributor | Bondi (Ángel Responde) | Alleges exclusion, undervaluation, and administrative neglect during his tenure. |
| Evelyn Botto | Columnist | Urbana Play (Perros de la Calle) | Acknowledges mutual discomfort and points to timing and personality clashes. |
The Evolution of Industry Accountability
Despite the severity of the public back-and-forth, Kusnetzoff left the door open for a private reconciliation. “If I take two minutes for a coffee, we’ll catch up,” he noted to reporters at the airport. What are your thoughts on how modern streaming platforms handle legacy radio disputes? Sound off in the comments below.
