YEREVAN – As the conflict between Iran, Israel, and the United States intensifies, Armenia finds itself in a precarious position. With only two open borders – to the north with Georgia and to the south with Iran – and closed borders with Turkey to the west and Azerbaijan to the east, the South Caucasus nation is acutely exposed to the geopolitical consequences of instability in Tehran. The escalating tensions are prompting hard calculations in Yerevan, particularly as Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan faces domestic criticism over his government’s response.
The situation is further complicated by Armenia’s unique relationship with Iran, characterized by open borders and a significant Armenian diaspora within Iran, estimated to number between 60,000 and 80,000 people. This connection, described as “special” in Armenia’s 2021–2026 government program, necessitates a delicate balancing act as international pressure mounts on Iran. The conflict’s potential to disrupt regional trade routes and exacerbate existing security concerns adds another layer of complexity for Armenia.
Recent criticism has focused on the timing of Pashinyan’s pre-election campaign activities as the crisis unfolded. While the Prime Minister and his cabinet were touring regions of the country ahead of upcoming elections, opponents argued that the focus should have been on the escalating security threat. Pashinyan responded by emphasizing that his government had been closely monitoring developments in Iran in the preceding week, and that Defense Minister Suren Papikyan had traveled to Tehran just four days before the attacks to meet with his Iranian counterpart, Aziz Nasirzadeh.
Armenia’s Security Concerns and Economic Vulnerabilities
Armenia’s own intelligence assessments highlight the potential risks. The Armenian Foreign Intelligence Service warned in its annual security risk report that increased instability in Iran would amplify security challenges for the Republic of Armenia, particularly in managing migration flows, economic and logistical risks, and threats to the fragile peace process in the South Caucasus. The immediate impact of the conflict has been felt in global energy markets, with rising gas and fuel prices. This is particularly concerning for Armenia, which imports over 75% of its energy, leading to inflation and increased costs for consumers, at a time when the government’s popularity is already low.
Beyond energy, Armenia relies heavily on Iran for logistics. Approximately 20% of Armenia’s imports travel through the 44-kilometer border with Iran, including crucial hydrocarbons and construction materials. A significant portion of goods also transits through the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas in the Persian Gulf, then overland to Armenia. While initial reports indicated disruptions to this flow during the early days of the conflict, sources indicate that cargo movement is tentatively resuming.
Iran’s Role as a Regional Stabilizer
The strategic importance of Iran to Armenia was underscored during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war between Armenia, and Azerbaijan. Following the conflict, as Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev laid claim to Armenian territory, Tehran issued a warning that any attempt to alter internationally recognized borders or advance into Armenian territory would be unacceptable. This stance was viewed in Yerevan as a deterrent to further aggression. In a situation where the military balance heavily favored Baku, Iran’s warning served as a political message that a forced redrawing of the regional map would not be tolerated without consequences.
This history has solidified the perception of Iran not merely as a commercial partner or logistical corridor, but as an actor whose interest in border stability aligns with Armenia’s own. Sergei Melkonyan, a doctor in international relations, consulted for this report, emphasized that Armenia’s priority is the stability of Iran, regardless of the regime in power. He highlighted the interconnectedness of Armenian and Iranian interests, including regional connectivity, logistical chains with India, and access to the Persian Gulf, as well as Iran’s potential to connect that region with the Black Sea through Armenian territory.
The resolution of the conflict between Iran, the United States, and Israel is therefore of vital importance to Armenia. A crisis on its southern border, with the potential to alter its demographics, economy, and strategic balance, could jeopardize the country’s stability, particularly as it relies on Iran as a key regional ally. Armenia and Iran, it appears, have a mutual need for stability.
The evolving situation will require strong political leadership and strategic planning to mitigate impacts and prevent an external war from becoming a new national crisis for Armenia. The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether Yerevan can navigate these turbulent waters and safeguard its interests in a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape.
What are your thoughts on the implications of the Iran-Israel conflict for the South Caucasus? Share your perspectives in the comments below.
