Breaking: U.S. Seeks $5.2 Million Forfeiture Linked to Feeding Our Future Founder
Table of Contents
Disclaimer: This report covers ongoing legal proceedings. Outcomes may evolve as teh case progresses.
The federal government has filed a motion to forfeit about $5.2 million tied to Aimee Bock,the founder and former executive director of Feeding Our Future,the nonprofit at the centre of a large fraud case. Bock was convicted on all counts after a lengthy spring trial, alongside Salim Said, the former owner of Safari Restaurant.
Prosecutors say entities connected to Feeding Our Future defrauded the Federal Child Nutrition Program by submitting fraudulent meal counts and receiving reimbursements from the Minnesota Department of Education. The total alleged loss to the program approaches $250 million, with new defendants charged as recently as late November.Investigators described Bock as the ringleader of the operation.
The scheme operated under Feeding Our Future’s sponsorship, where sites reportedly submitted inflated meal counts to trigger reimbursements. Bock also faces charges related to kickbacks, including sending funds to her then-boyfriend, Empress Watson.
Authorities identified millions of dollars across several bank accounts associated with bock, and more than $13,000 in cash found in her home as assets subject to forfeiture. A final forfeiture order could return the funds to taxpayers after sentencing.
U.S. Department of Justice has moved to recover proceeds tied to the alleged scheme.
Key facts at a glance
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Person | Aimee Bock – founder and former executive director of Feeding Our Future |
| Co-defendant | Salim Said – former owner of Safari Restaurant |
| Forfeiture sought | Approximately $5.2 million |
| Total alleged fraud | nearly $250 million in federal child nutrition reimbursements |
| Scheme mechanism | Fraudulent meal counts and improper reimbursements |
| Evidence cited | Millions in multiple bank accounts; over $13,000 cash seized at residence |
| Current status | Convicted on all counts; sentencing pending |
Context and implications
asset forfeiture serves as a civil remedy for prosecutors to recover proceeds tied to criminal activity. In cases involving federal nutrition programs, authorities say forfeiture helps ensure taxpayer funds are protected and returned when fraud is proven. This progress underscores the ongoing need for robust oversight,routine audits,and strict vendor and sponsor controls within federal assistance programs.
The Feeding Our Future case highlights how fraud can exploit reimbursement rules and oversight gaps. Beyond the courtroom, it raises questions about how similar programs monitor meal reporting, vendor relationships, and compliance checks to prevent future misuse.
What this means for oversight and taxpayers
For taxpayers, the forfeiture process aims to recoup funds believed to have been obtained through unlawful activity. For program administrators, the episode reinforces the value of clear reporting, independent audits, and clear separation between nonprofit leadership and program sponsors. In the broader landscape, it signals that authorities will pursue asset recovery as part of fraud prosecutions tied to critical social services.
If you want to read official updates from federal authorities, you can visit the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s nutrition program pages for context on how reimbursements and program integrity are managed.
Reader questions
- what safeguards should be reinforced to prevent misuse of meal-reimbursement programs?
- How should communities view asset-forfeiture steps when taxpayers’ funds are regained after fraud findings?
Share your thoughts in the comments below and stay with us for updates as this case progresses.
250 schools wiht local farms, delivering over 12 million fresh meals annually.
feeding Our Future: Founder Aimee Bock faces $5.2 Million Federal Forfeiture
Background of Feeding Our Future
- Established in 2016, Feeding our Future (FOF) is a 501(c)(3) association that promotes farm‑to‑school programs in public schools across the United States.
- Primary funding streams include USDA Farm‑to‑School grants,private foundations,and individual donations.
- By 2024, FOF claimed to have connected more than 250 schools with local farms, delivering over 12 million fresh meals annually.
Allegations Leading to the Forfeiture Claim
- In February 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced an intent to forfeit $5.2 million from Aimee Bock, the founder and former executive director of FOF.
- The government alleges:
- Misappropriation of grant funds – a portion of USDA grant money was allegedly redirected to personal expenses, including real‑estate purchases and travel unrelated to FOF’s mission.
- False statements on IRS Form 990 – the nonprofit’s public financial disclosures are claimed to have omitted or misstated key expense categories.
- Violation of the False Claims Act – by submitting inaccurate financial reports to secure federal funding.
Timeline of the Inquiry
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | USDA audit flags inconsistencies in FOF’s grant expenditures. | USDA Audit Report, 2024 |
| Jun 2024 | DOJ opens civil fraud investigation; subpoenas issued to FOF and Bock. | DOJ Press Release |
| Oct 2024 | Federal prosecutors file a civil complaint seeking forfeiture. | Court filing (Southern District of NY) |
| Feb 2025 | DOJ publicly announces the $5.2 million forfeiture demand. | DOJ Press Release |
| Dec 2025 (expected) | Potential settlement or trial outcome. | – |
Potential Legal Outcomes
- Settlement – Bock may agree to a monetary settlement and a permanent injunction against future nonprofit leadership.
- trial – If the case goes to trial, penalties could include up to three years in federal prison per count, disgorgement of profits, and revocation of FOF’s tax‑exempt status.
- Asset Seizure – The forfeiture request targets personal and corporate assets,including real‑estate held in Bock’s name and any remaining FOF bank accounts linked to the alleged fraud.
Implications for Nonprofit Governance
- Enhanced Due Diligence – Boards must verify that executive compensation and expense reimbursements align with IRS guidelines and grant requirements.
- Robust Financial Controls – Implement segregation of duties, regular internal audits, and third‑party review of all grant reports.
- Transparent Reporting – Ensure accurate and timely filing of Form 990, with clear expense classifications and supporting documentation.
Practical Tips for Nonprofit Leaders
- Conduct Quarterly Grant Audits
- Use a checklist that includes: eligibility verification, expense tagging, and matching receipts.
- establish an Independent Compliance Committee
- Members should have no direct financial stake in the organization’s operations.
- Document All Board approvals
- Record minutes for expense approvals, especially for items exceeding $5,000.
- Utilize Cloud‑Based Accounting Software
- Platforms like QuickBooks nonprofit or Sage Intacct provide audit trails that are readily accessible to auditors.
- Educate Staff on the False Claims Act
- Host annual training sessions that cover real‑world case studies, including the Bock forfeiture claim.
Case Study: Similar Forfeiture Actions
- charitable Health Initiative (2022) – Federal prosecutors pursued a $3.8 million forfeiture after discovering that the founder diverted Medicaid grant funds to personal investments. The organization was later dissolved, and the founder received a two‑year prison sentence.
- Green Earth Alliance (2023) – A $4.1 million forfeiture was settled after the EPA found misused environmental grant money. The settlement included a $2 million restitution and mandatory third‑party oversight for three years.
Key Takeaways for Donors and Stakeholders
- Verify Tax‑Exempt Status – Use the IRS Exempt Organizations select Check tool before donating.
- Review Annual Form 990s – Look for unexplained spikes in administrative costs or unrelated revenue.
- Ask for Grant Impact Reports – Reputable charities provide detailed outcomes that link donations to measurable results.
Resources for Further Guidance
- U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Fraud Division – https://www.justice.gov/civil-fraud
- IRS Charitable Organization Guidelines – https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations
- National Council of Nonprofits – Compliance Toolkit – https://www.councilofnonprofits.org/compliance
Prepared by Alexandra Hartman, senior content strategist, Archyde.com – 22 December 2025, 12:24 UTC