Big Tech May Gain Control Over Health Data with Trump’s Proposed Plan, Marginalizing Startups

Tech Giants and Health data: A Potential Collision Course

A new initiative aiming to streamline healthcare thru data sharing raises concerns about privacy, innovation, and market dominance.The plan, backed by the Trump administration, could reshape how patient data is used, but not necessarily for the better.

September 7, 2025

The promise of AI-Driven Healthcare

A proposed overhaul of healthcare data sharing is generating discussion about its potential benefits and risks. the initiative seeks to dismantle longstanding data silos within the healthcare system, paving the way for faster adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. Sixty major companies, including Amazon, Apple, and Google, have already signaled their support for the plan, which could revolutionize how medical care is delivered.

Proponents believe that greater data accessibility can significantly improve healthcare outcomes.AI algorithms thrive on large datasets; centralized data could refine administrative tasks, boost clinical precision, and improve patient well-being. According to a recent report by grand View Research, the global AI in healthcare market is projected to reach $187.95 billion by 2030,demonstrating the ample potential for growth and innovation.

fragmented Systems and the Need for Interoperability

Currently,the American healthcare system is notoriously fragmented. A patient receiving care in Phoenix, Arizona, may encounter difficulties when their medical records need to be accessed by a specialist in Tucson. This lack of seamless data exchange leads to delays in treatment, inaccurate diagnoses, and potentially preventable medical errors. Improving interoperability-the ability of different systems to share and use information-is increasingly recognized as crucial for modernizing healthcare.

The Risk of a ‘Health Data Oligopoly’

However, handing control of this sensitive data to Big Tech companies raises serious concerns.Critics warn that the initiative could create a “health data oligopoly,” where a handful of corporations dominate the market, stifling competition and compromising patient privacy. History suggests this is a real possibility; Apple and Microsoft already exert considerable influence over the personal computing landscape, and Google controls nearly 90% of the global search market.

If tech giants become the primary gatekeepers of health information, smaller startups and innovative companies could be squeezed out. Companies like BetterHelp, which connects millions with mental health services, and Gabbi, using predictive analytics for breast cancer risk assessment, rely on data-sharing partnerships to develop and refine their products. Such collaborations could become significantly more arduous under the new framework.

Company Type	Potential Impact
Big Tech (Apple, Google, Amazon)	Increased data control, potential for market dominance
Healthcare Startups (BetterHelp, Gabbi)	Reduced access to data, stifled innovation
Healthcare Providers (Mayo Clinic)	Potential for improved interoperability, but increased reliance on external entities

Lessons from the UK and the Importance of Provider-Led Custodianship

A more promising model can be found in the UK’s Our Future Health project. This initiative aims to establish a large-scale biobank of health data while prioritizing patient privacy through stringent safeguards, including data “airlocking” to prevent uncontrolled data exports. Crucially, access to the data is equitable, irrespective of a company’s size or market position.

Experts argue that healthcare providers should remain the primary custodians of patient data, with anonymized data shared for research and innovation. This approach strikes a better balance between promoting progress and protecting individual privacy.

Did You Know? A 2023 data breach at Yale New Haven Health exposed the personal healthcare data of millions of Connecticut residents.

Cybersecurity Concerns and the Role of Government

While some argue that healthcare providers are vulnerable to data breaches, the solution isn’t to outsource responsibility to corporate giants. Recent incidents,including a cyberattack on the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) linked to a patient death,demonstrate the real risks of data insecurity. Governments should prioritize investments in hospital cybersecurity rather than handing over control to companies whose primary focus is profit.

The Future of Health Data and AI

the integration of AI into healthcare is certain. However,the success of this conversion hinges on establishing a robust and ethical framework for data sharing. Openness, security, and equitable access are paramount. As AI continues to evolve, ongoing dialogue and collaboration between policymakers, healthcare professionals, and technology companies will be essential to ensure that innovation benefits all stakeholders.

Frequently Asked Questions About Health Data Sharing

• What is the main concern about tech companies handling health data? The primary worry is the potential for a “health data oligopoly,” where a few large companies control access and stifle innovation.
• What is interoperability in healthcare? Interoperability refers to the ability of different healthcare systems and devices to seamlessly exchange and use patient information.
• What is the Our Future Health project? It’s a UK-based initiative to create a large biobank of health data with strict privacy safeguards.
• Why is provider-led data custodianship preferred? It’s seen as a better way to balance innovation with patient privacy and market fairness.
• How can we prevent health data breaches? Investing in robust cybersecurity measures for healthcare providers is crucial.
• What role does AI play in the future of healthcare data? AI algorithms require vast datasets to function effectively, potentially improving diagnostics and treatment.
• What are the key principles for responsible health data sharing? Transparency, security, equitable access, and privacy by design are essential.

What are your thoughts on the balance between innovation and privacy in healthcare data sharing? Share your opinions in the comments below.

How might the proposed plan’s standardization of data formats unintentionally create barriers to entry for smaller health tech startups?

The Shifting Landscape of Health Data Interoperability

donald Trump’s recently proposed healthcare plan, while aiming to overhaul aspects of the Affordable Care Act, contains provisions that are raising meaningful concerns regarding health data interoperability and the potential for Big Tech dominance in the healthcare sector. The core of the issue lies in the proposed standardization of data formats and increased emphasis on nationwide health data exchanges – laudable goals, but ones that could inadvertently favor large technology companies with the resources to navigate complex new regulations. This could stifle healthcare innovation and limit patient choice.

How the Plan Favors Big Tech

The proposed plan leans heavily on establishing a single,standardized system for electronic health records (EHRs). While interoperability is crucial for seamless patient data access and improved care coordination, the infrastructure required to implement and maintain such a system is significant.

Here’s how Big Tech stands to benefit:

infrastructure Costs: Building and maintaining a nationwide health information exchange requires massive investment in servers, data security, and ongoing technical support.Smaller health tech startups simply lack the capital to compete.

Data Aggregation & Analytics: A centralized system creates a massive pool of protected health information (PHI). Big Tech companies, already proficient in data analytics and machine learning, are uniquely positioned to leverage this data for profit – possibly through targeted advertising, pharmaceutical partnerships, or the progress of proprietary AI-driven healthcare solutions.

Vendor Lock-In: the plan could incentivize hospitals and healthcare providers to adopt EHR systems compatible with the standardized format, potentially leading to vendor lock-in with the few large companies that can offer compliant solutions. This reduces competition and innovation.

Cloud Computing Dominance: The standardized system will likely rely heavily on cloud computing. Companies like Amazon (AWS), Microsoft (Azure), and Google Cloud are already dominant players in this space, giving them a significant advantage.

The Threat to Healthcare Startups

The consequences for smaller players in the digital health space could be severe. Health tech startups are ofen the driving force behind disruptive innovations, offering niche solutions tailored to specific patient needs.

Consider these potential impacts:

Increased Regulatory Burden: Navigating the complexities of a standardized system and ensuring compliance with evolving regulations will be disproportionately challenging for startups.

Limited access to data: if Big Tech controls the flow of health data, startups may struggle to access the information they need to develop and test their products. This hinders healthcare technology development.

Reduced Funding Opportunities: Investors may be hesitant to fund startups that face an uphill battle against established tech giants.

Acquisition Pressure: Startups with promising technologies may become attractive acquisition targets for Big Tech, potentially leading to the suppression of innovative solutions.

Real-World Examples & Precedents

The concerns aren’t hypothetical.We’ve seen similar dynamics play out in other industries:

Social Media & Data Privacy: The dominance of Facebook and Google in the social media landscape has raised concerns about data privacy and the concentration of power.

Retail & Amazon: Amazon’s control over e-commerce has squeezed out smaller retailers and raised questions about anti-competitive practices.

Fintech & Big Banks: Large financial institutions have leveraged their resources to dominate the fintech space, often acquiring or stifling innovative startups.

The Role of APIs and Open Standards

A crucial element in mitigating the risks is the promotion of open APIs (Submission Programming Interfaces) and truly open standards for health data exchange.

APIs allow different software systems to communicate with each other, enabling seamless data sharing without requiring a centralized platform.

Open standards ensure that data formats are publicly available and non-proprietary, preventing vendor lock-in.

However, the current proposal lacks specific guarantees regarding open APIs and standards, raising fears that Big Tech could exert undue influence over the development and implementation of these crucial components.

Patient Data Privacy Concerns

Beyond the impact on startups, the plan also raises concerns about patient data privacy. A centralized system, even with robust security measures, is a more attractive target for cyberattacks.

Key considerations include:

Data Security Breaches: The potential for large-scale data breaches is a significant risk.

Data Usage & Consent: Ensuring that patients have control over how their data is used and shared is paramount.

HIPAA compliance: Maintaining strict compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is essential.

* De-identification Challenges: Effectively de-identifying health data to protect patient privacy while still enabling valuable research is a complex challenge.

The future of Health Data: A