Brett Yormark Backs 5+11 Playoff Model, Urges Fairness in college Football
Table of Contents
- 1. Brett Yormark Backs 5+11 Playoff Model, Urges Fairness in college Football
- 2. The Proposed College Football Playoff Structures
- 3. did You Know?
- 4. Coaches Weigh In On Playoff Expansion
- 5. Potential Impacts of the New Playoff Format
- 6. Pro Tip
- 7. The Evolution of the College Football Playoff
- 8. Conference Realignment and Its Impact
- 9. fan Expectations and Engagement
- 10. Frequently Asked Questions About the College football Playoff
- 11. How can the Big Ten and SEC, as dominant forces in college football, ensure that the financial benefits of the sport are distributed more equitably across all teams to prevent a widening gap between powerhouse programs and those struggling to compete?
- 12. Big Ten & SEC: the Future of College Football Demands All-Around Support
- 13. Financial stability & Fair Distribution: The Foundation
- 14. Challenges and Solutions for Financial Wellbeing
- 15. Player Welfare: Prioritizing Athlete Well-being
- 16. Concrete actions for Player Protection
- 17. Competitive Balance and the Evolution of College Football
- 18. Examples of Conference Action
Orlando, Fla. – Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark has publicly reinforced his support for the 5+11 College Football Playoff (Cfp) model. Speaking Friday, Yormark emphasized that while the Big ten and Sec conferences are at the forefront of ongoing discussions regarding cfp expansion, they bear a important responsibility to act in the best interest of the sport as a whole.
Momentum has been building recently for a revamped 16-team playoff format.This proposed structure would grant automatic bids to the top five conference champions, with the remaining 11 slots filled by at-large selections. Yormark himself presented this model during a recent meeting of the Power 4 commissioners in Charlotte, North Carolina.
The Proposed College Football Playoff Structures
An option format under consideration involves guaranteed berths for the Big Ten and Sec (four each), with the Acc and Big 12 each receiving two, and the highest-ranked Group of 5 team also securing a spot. However, both the Big 12 and Acc have expressed opposition to this particular model.
Under the terms of a new six-year agreement for the Cfp, the Big Ten and sec hold considerable sway over the playoff’s format from 2026 onward.This agreement was reached last year with the consensus of other Fbs commissioners and Notre Dame Athletic Director Pete Bevacqua.
“I Think there’s real momentum for 5-11,” Yormark stated following the conclusion of the Big 12 spring meetings.”Certainly, the public is voting yes for it, which I think is critically important.Yes, the Big Ten, the Sec are leading the discussions, but with leading those discussions, they have a great responsibility that goes with it, to do what’s right for college football and not to do anything that just benefits two conferences.”
Yormark addressed concerns about the Big 12 potentially missing out on guaranteed playoff spots under the 5+11 model. “In talking to our Ads and coaches, we want to earn it on the field,” yormark explained. “The 5-11 might not be ideal for the conference, but it’s good for college football, and it’s what’s fair. We don’t want any gimmes. We want to earn it on the field. I feel very agreeable with that, and I feel the same way, and I’ve been very outspoken about it.”
Coaches Weigh In On Playoff Expansion
Arizona State Coach Kenny Dillingham, whose team participated in the Cfp last season, voiced his support for an open platform allowing teams to prove their worth. “Every year is a new year. You never know who’s going to be good in college football,especially with the volatility with the portal. So anything that creates an open platform for teams like our guys last year to prove that they do belong, I’m in support of.”
“Our coaches and our league want just the best teams, whoever those best teams are in college football that year, let’s have those best teams go and compete for a championship,” Dillingham added.
Tcu Coach sonny Dykes echoed similar sentiments, stating that the idea of conferences receiving more than one automatic qualifier “doesn’t make any sense.” He argued that the ultimate goal should be to have the best teams competing for the national championship, regardless of conference affiliation.
“All Anybody wants is to look up at the end of the year and see the best teams competing for a national championship,” Dykes said. “I don’t think that guaranteed bids does. That’s not how it works in pro football; that’s not how it works in any other sport.. It’s just not good for the game.”
Yormark noted that Cfp leaders have until December to finalize the future format. Further discussions are scheduled for june 18 in Asheville, North Carolina, where the Fbs commissioners and Bevacqua will convene.
“We have some time now to work through the process,” Yormark stated. “It is a process, but I do anticipate something getting done sooner than later.”
This marks the second instance in a week where Yormark has emphasized prioritizing the best interests of college football. Following the commissioners’ decision to adopt a straight seeding model for the Cfp starting in 2025, Yormark expressed his hope that “what’s best for college football” remains the guiding principle moving forward. Acc Commissioner Jim Phillips has also made similar remarks regarding his “responsibility” to the game.
sec Commissioner Greg Sankey appeared to disagree,stating from Sec spring meetings earlier in the week,”I don’t need lectures from others about ‘good of the game.’ I don’t lecture others about good of the game.”
When asked to respond, Yormark quipped, “I agreed with Greg’s follow-up statement that I’d be entertained by it, and I was.We all have thick skin here. The neat thing about our relationship amongst the commissioners is we’re going to battle. That’s part of life. We’re going to agree to disagree. We’re kind of in that mode right now, but I have a lot of respect for my peers, and I know they have a lot of respect for me and Jim, and we’ll end up in the right place.”
Potential Impacts of the New Playoff Format
The debate surrounding the College Football Playoff expansion highlights the complex balancing act between conference representation and ensuring that the most deserving teams have a chance to compete for the national title. the final decision will undoubtedly shape the landscape of college football for years to come.
As College Football continues to evolve, adapting to changes such as the transfer portal and Nil deals, the structure of the Cfp must also adapt to ensure fairness and maintain the integrity of the sport. The discussions and decisions made in the coming months will be crucial in determining the future of college football.
Here’s a summary of the proposed models:
| Model | automatic Qualifiers | At-Large Bids |
|---|---|---|
| 5+11 | Top 5 Conference Champions | 11 |
| Conference-Based | Big Ten (4),Sec (4),Acc (2),Big 12 (2),Group of 5 (1) | Remaining slots filled based on rankings |
The Evolution of the College Football Playoff
The College Football playoff has undergone significant transformations since its inception. Initially designed to pit the top four teams in the nation against each other,discussions have consistently revolved around expanding the playoff to include more teams and provide greater access for various conferences.
The move towards expansion reflects a broader trend in college sports to increase revenue and fan engagement.However, it also raises important questions about competitive balance and the potential dilution of the regular season’s significance. As of 2024, conferences are exploring various models that could reshape the playoff structure, ensuring representation from different regions and conferences while maintaining a high level of competition.
Conference Realignment and Its Impact
Conference realignment has added another layer of complexity to the College football Playoff discussions. The movement of teams between conferences has altered the competitive landscape, leading to debates about fair representation and access to the playoff. For instance, teams moving into stronger conferences may face tougher competition, impacting their chances of securing an automatic bid or at-large selection.
These shifts have prompted commissioners and athletic directors to re-evaluate the criteria for playoff inclusion, considering factors such as strength of schedule, conference championships, and overall team performance. the goal is to create a system that rewards excellence while accommodating the evolving dynamics of college football.
fan Expectations and Engagement
Fan engagement plays a crucial role in shaping the College Football Playoff. Increased access to the playoffs can generate more excitement and interest in the sport, as fans from different regions and conferences rally behind their teams. Though, there are concerns that expanding the playoff too much could diminish the importance of regular-season games.
Balancing these competing interests requires careful consideration of the playoff format, ensuring that it remains competitive, engaging, and fair. Ultimately, the success of the College Football Playoff depends on its ability to capture the imagination of fans and maintain the integrity of the sport.
Frequently Asked Questions About the College football Playoff
-
What is the 5+11 College Football Playoff model?
The 5+11 College Football Playoff model proposes that the top five conference champions receive automatic bids, with the remaining 11 spots filled by at-large selections.
-
Why Does Brett Yormark support the 5+11 Cfp model?
Brett Yormark supports the 5+11 model as he believes it is indeed the fairest approach for college football, emphasizing that teams should earn their playoff spots on the field rather than through guaranteed bids.
-
What are the college Football concerns with automatic Conference bids?
Some coaches and commissioners worry that automatic conference bids could prevent the best teams from competing for a national championship if those bids are not based purely on merit.
-
When will the new College Football Playoff format be decided?
Cfp leaders have until December to determine the future format, with further discussions scheduled for June 18 in Asheville, North Carolina.
-
How do conference realignments affect the College Football Playoff?
Conference realignments can alter the competitive landscape, leading to debates about fair representation and access to the College Football Playoff, prompting re-evaluation of playoff inclusion criteria.
What are your thoughts on the proposed college Football Playoff expansion? How do you think it will impact the sport?
Share your comments below!
How can the Big Ten and SEC, as dominant forces in college football, ensure that the financial benefits of the sport are distributed more equitably across all teams to prevent a widening gap between powerhouse programs and those struggling to compete?
Big Ten & SEC: the Future of College Football Demands All-Around Support
The landscape of college football is undergoing a seismic shift. The Big Ten and the SEC, as the two most powerful conferences, wield significant influence. To ensure the continued health and growth of the sport, focusing solely on financial gains or championship aspirations is insufficient. A more holistic approach, one that supports all facets of college football, is critical. This thorough strategy, encompassing financial stability, athlete welfare, a level playing field, and sustained competitive balance, is essential for a thriving future. This article delves into the crucial areas where the Big Ten and SEC conferences must actively champion progressive change within college football, focusing on financial distribution, player safety, and the overall growth of the game.
Financial stability & Fair Distribution: The Foundation
The immense revenue generated by the NCAA football powers requires responsible management and equitable distribution. Uneven financial distributions can led to a widening gap between the “haves” and “have-nots” among teams, potentially destabilizing competitive balance and potentially impacting coach salaries, staffing, and facility upgrades within these college football conferences. Key considerations include:
- Revenue Sharing: How should revenue generated from media rights and sponsorships be divided? Should more be allocated to non-revenue-generating sports and programs to improve athlete opportunities?
- Scholarship Funding: Ensuring adequate funding for scholarships is paramount, supporting student-athletes’ education and wellbeing.
- Cost Containment: Exploring avenues to control escalating coaching salaries and operational costs.
Challenges and Solutions for Financial Wellbeing
Several challenges need to be addressed to ensure financial stability. These include navigating complex media rights deals to ensure fairness. For example, how a new media landscape like with streaming deals impacts financial flow and revenue. The following table lists challenges and potential solutions.
| challenge | Potential Solution |
|---|---|
| Varying Revenue Streams | Create a system to share revenues across various revenue-generating teams more equitably. |
| Increasing Expenses | Implement financial controls that allow schools to properly fund their other programs as well. |
| Uneven Competition | Ensure a revenue distribution method that can support all schools; large and small. |
Player Welfare: Prioritizing Athlete Well-being
The well-being of college football players should be at the forefront. This encompasses physical safety, particularly concerning concussion protocols and the long-term effects of repeated head injuries. It includes mental health support, providing resources to address the pressures inherent in elite-level athletics, and ensuring equitable compensation, including considerations for name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities. In addition, it includes appropriate medical care and access to it.
Concrete actions for Player Protection
Player safety demands sustained attention and proactive measures: Here is a list of changes required.
- Strict concussion Protocols: Mandatory self-reliant medical evaluations after head injuries and a comprehensive return-to-play protocol
- Mental Health Support: Access to counselors and psychologists, and a culture that encourages athletes to share their problems through programs set up by the university.
- NIL & Athlete Compensation: clear, transparent guidelines for financial compensation, ensuring athletes can benefit from their name, image, and likeness.
- Medical Care: providing the best medical staff possible and access to healthcare to any athlete that needs it.
Competitive Balance and the Evolution of College Football
The power dynamics between the Big ten and the SEC require attention. to preserve any semblance of a level playing field across the broader landscape of college football, the conferences must consider competitive balance and the long-term impact this has on the sport. While many are hoping for a new conference structure,competitive balance is key to keeping the game alive. Some key issues and points of concern as it comes to this vital part of the sport:
- Scheduling: Ensuring both a fair and balanced schedule to provide a more objective way to assess a team.
- Recruiting: Implementing more restrictions, while not overly impacting a school’s ability to obtain the players thay want.
- Overexpansion: The current state where teams switch conferences may impact the overall game.
Examples of Conference Action
The proactive adoption of the following items: This is an ongoing trend. Some examples:
- New NCAA rules: Rules around player compensation, as well as transfer rules.
- conference realignment adjustments Conference realignments will affect how college football is viewed by many players, and fans alike.
- Continued collaboration: The Big Ten and SEC could set an example by working together for the good of the sport with other smaller conferences.
