Brazil’s Havaianas Flip‑Flops Ignite Right‑Wing Boycott Over Controversial “Right‑Foot” Ad

Breaking: Havaianas faces Political Backlash in Brazil Ahead of 2026 Election

In a sweeping clash that mixes culture, commerce, and policy, the iconic Brazilian flip-flop maker Havaianas is at the center of a fierce political dispute as the nation moves toward next year’s presidential vote. A brand video featuring a celebrated actress has sparked objections from conservative circles, turning a marketing moment into a cross‑hairs political moment.

What sparked therow

A promotional clip posted by the brand shows Fernanda Torres, a renowned Brazilian actress, urging the public not to begin 2026 with a “right foot” and not to walk into the new year with a rigid stance. The message, interpreted by critics as unfavorable to the conservative right, prompted a chorus of calls for a boycott from political allies ahead of the election season.

Brazil’s political landscape is polarized. The current presidency is held by a left-leaning leader, and the debate over the direction of the country has intensified discussions about where businesses should stand in public life. The ad’s reception has underscored how brands can become flashpoints in Brazil’s heated political climate.

Prominent figures react

One of the ex-president’s sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, posted a video from abroad showing him disposing of a pair of black Havaianas-its straps bearing a Brazilian flag-saying, in his view, that the brand has taken sides.He also suggested that the political right has endorsed a boycott. In response, other conservative voices amplified their critique, with several influencers sharing provocative demonstrations online.

On the opposite side, supporters of the brand and critics of the boycott argued that political fealty could damage consumer trust and cost jobs in the country.A left-leaning member of congress condemned what she described as “idiotic attacks” and warned that boycotts could threaten manufacturing jobs in Minas Gerais, where one of the brand’s factories is located.

Company stance

Alpargatas, the group behind Havaianas, did not comment when approached for reaction on the situation. The episode has nonetheless put the brand under intensified scrutiny as it navigates a highly charged political moment in a country where many citizens view business leaders as potential mediators or targets in public life.

Why this matters beyond the moment

Brand-politics dynamics are increasingly common in today’s markets. When a product becomes a symbol in a political debate, companies face choices about neutrality, advocacy, and the potential consequences for workers and supply chains.The Havaianas episode illustrates how quickly a marketing message can spark a national conversation about loyalty, culture, and the social responsibilities of brands.

evergreen insights for readers and brands

Brand campaigns connected to politics can elevate awareness, but they also risk alienating segments of the customer base. Businesses should weigh the potential benefits of alignment with social issues against the possibility of backlash, especially in highly polarized environments. Managing public sentiment requires clear values, consistent messaging, and readiness to engage transparently with stakeholders.

Key Aspect	Summary
Brand	Havaianas, part of alpargatas
Trigger	Promotional video featuring Fernanda torres; perceived political stance
Reactions	Conservative boycott calls; supportive and critical commentary from various figures
Company response	No public comment issued at the time
Potential impact	Possible effects on jobs in Minas Gerais; broader brand perception
Context	brazilian political climate ahead of 2026 election; Lula da Silva’s presidency

What this means for readers

As debates over political expression in advertising continue, consumers are reminded that brands operate within broader social ecosystems. the balance between social responsibility and market neutrality remains delicate, and outcomes vary based on regional dynamics and audience expectations.

Reader questions

What is your view on brands engaging in political conversations? Do you think they should remain neutral, or take a stance on social issues?

If a brand publicly supports a political position, would you continue to buy from them, or would you boycott? Why?

Share your thoughts in the comments and tell us how you weigh brand choices in a politically charged environment.

Why might a platform refuse to help with a request and say “Refuse. I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.”?

Refuse.I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.